UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended: March 31, 2002 | ||
OR | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number: 1-13759
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
Maryland (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
68-0329422 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
591 Redwood Highway, Suite 3100
Mill Valley, California (Address of principal executive offices) |
94941 (Zip Code) |
(415) 389-7373
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of stock, as of the last practicable date.
Class B Preferred Stock ($.01 par value)
|
902,068 as of May 10, 2002 | |
Common Stock ($.01 par value)
|
15,334,537 as of May 10, 2002 |
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
INDEX
Page | ||||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | ||||||||
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements Redwood Trust, Inc. | ||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 | 2 | |||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and March 31, 2001 | 3 | |||||||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2002 | 4 | |||||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and March 31, 2001 | 5 | |||||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 6 | |||||||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 22 | |||||||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 50 | |||||||
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | 51 | |||||||
Item 2. Changes in Securities | 51 | |||||||
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 51 | |||||||
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 51 | |||||||
Item 5. Other Information | 51 | |||||||
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 51 | |||||||
SIGNATURES | 52 |
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||
Residential mortgage loans
|
$ | 1,794,260 | $ | 1,474,862 | ||||||
Residential credit-enhancement securities
|
249,832 | 190,813 | ||||||||
Commercial mortgage loans
|
49,380 | 51,084 | ||||||||
Securities portfolio
|
609,432 | 683,482 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
9,960 | 9,030 | ||||||||
Total Earning Assets
|
2,712,864 | 2,409,271 | ||||||||
Restricted cash
|
2,334 | 3,399 | ||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
13,101 | 13,729 | ||||||||
Principal receivable
|
9,257 | 7,823 | ||||||||
Other assets
|
2,282 | 1,422 | ||||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 2,739,838 | $ | 2,435,644 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
||||||||||
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||||
Short-term debt
|
$ | 1,122,513 | $ | 796,811 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net
|
1,234,459 | 1,313,715 | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
2,224 | 2,569 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
6,450 | 6,498 | ||||||||
Dividends payable
|
9,748 | 8,278 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities
|
2,375,394 | 2,127,871 | ||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
||||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share;
Class B 9.74% Cumulative Convertible 902,068 shares
authorized, issued and outstanding ($28,645 aggregate
liquidation preference)
|
26,517 | 26,517 | ||||||||
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share;
49,097,932 shares authorized; 14,624,647 and 12,661,749 issued
and outstanding
|
146 | 127 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
374,854 | 328,668 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
11,015 | 2,701 | ||||||||
Cumulative earnings
|
71,861 | 59,961 | ||||||||
Cumulative distributions to stockholders
|
(119,949 | ) | (110,201 | ) | ||||||
Total Stockholders Equity
|
364,444 | 307,773 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders
Equity
|
$ | 2,739,838 | $ | 2,435,644 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
Interest Income
|
|||||||||
Residential mortgage loans
|
$ | 14,125 | $ | 19,702 | |||||
Residential credit-enhancement securities
|
6,695 | 2,642 | |||||||
Commercial mortgage loans
|
1,274 | 1,933 | |||||||
Securities portfolio
|
8,514 | 17,048 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
108 | 312 | |||||||
Total interest income
|
30,716 | 41,637 | |||||||
Interest Expense
|
|||||||||
Short-term debt
|
(4,941 | ) | (13,575 | ) | |||||
Long-term debt
|
(10,661 | ) | (17,838 | ) | |||||
Total interest expense
|
(15,602 | ) | (31,413 | ) | |||||
Net Interest Income
|
15,114 | 10,224 | |||||||
Operating expenses
|
(3,546 | ) | (2,980 | ) | |||||
Other income (expense)
|
(543 | ) | (156 | ) | |||||
Net unrealized and realized market value gains
(losses)
|
875 | 2,641 | |||||||
Net income before preferred dividend and change
in accounting principle
|
11,900 | 9,729 | |||||||
Dividends on Class B preferred stock
|
(681 | ) | (681 | ) | |||||
Net income before change in accounting principle
|
11,219 | 9,048 | |||||||
Cumulative effect of adopting EITF 99-20 (See
Note 2)
|
| (2,368 | ) | ||||||
Net Income Available to Common
Stockholders
|
$ | 11,219 | $ | 6,680 | |||||
Earnings per Share:
|
|||||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
|||||||||
Net income before change in accounting principle
|
$ | 0.82 | $ | 1.02 | |||||
Cumulative effect of adopting EITF 99-20
|
$ | | $ | (0.26 | ) | ||||
Net income
|
$ | 0.82 | $ | 0.76 | |||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|||||||||
Net income before change in accounting principle
|
$ | 0.80 | $ | 1.00 | |||||
Cumulative effect of adopting EITF 99-20
|
$ | | $ | (0.26 | ) | ||||
Net income
|
$ | 0.80 | $ | 0.74 | |||||
Weighted average shares of common stock and
common stock equivalents:
|
|||||||||
Basic
|
13,658,443 | 8,838,964 | |||||||
Diluted
|
14,077,405 | 9,065,221 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Class B | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Additional | Other | Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paid-In | Comprehensive | Cumulative | Distributions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Income | Earnings | to Stockholders | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2001
|
902,068 | $ | 26,517 | 12,661,749 | $ | 127 | $ | 328,668 | $ | 2,701 | $ | 59,961 | $ | (110,201 | ) | $ | 307,773 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income before preferred dividend
|
| | | | | | 11,900 | | 11,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized income on assets available-for-sale
|
| | | | | 8,314 | | | 8,314 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income
|
| | | | | | | | 20,214 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
| | 1,962,898 | 19 | 46,186 | | | | 46,205 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
|
| | | | | | | (681 | ) | (681 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
| | | | | | | (9,067 | ) | (9,067 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2001
|
902,068 | $ | 26,517 | 14,624,647 | $ | 146 | $ | 374,854 | $ | 11,015 | $ | 71,861 | $ | (119,949 | ) | $ | 364,444 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Three Months Ended | |||||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Cash Flows From Operating
Activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders
before preferred dividend
|
$ | 11,900 | $ | 7,361 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
used in operating activities:
|
|||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
3,331 | 1,291 | |||||||||
Provision for credit losses
|
282 | 184 | |||||||||
Non-cash stock compensation
|
42 | 143 | |||||||||
Net unrealized and realized market value
(gains) losses
|
(875 | ) | (2,641 | ) | |||||||
Cumulative effect of adopting EITF 99-20
|
| 2,368 | |||||||||
Purchases of mortgage loans held-for-sale
|
(417,251 | ) | | ||||||||
Principal payments on mortgage loans held-for-sale
|
8,658 | 2,172 | |||||||||
Net (purchases) sales of mortgage securities
trading
|
(9,904 | ) | (288,944 | ) | |||||||
Principal payments on mortgage securities trading
|
53,149 | 65,726 | |||||||||
Net sales (purchases) of interest rate
agreements
|
| (658 | ) | ||||||||
Net change in:
|
|||||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
628 | 534 | |||||||||
Principal receivable
|
(1,434 | ) | 2,549 | ||||||||
Other assets
|
(991 | ) | 892 | ||||||||
Accrued interest payable
|
(345 | ) | (914 | ) | |||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
(48 | ) | 1,375 | ||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities
|
(352,858 | ) | (208,562 | ) | |||||||
Cash Flows From Investing
Activities:
|
|||||||||||
Purchases of mortgage loans held-for-investment
|
(165 | ) | | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans
held-for-investment
|
| 1,660 | |||||||||
Principal payments on mortgage loans
held-for-investment
|
89,140 | 60,779 | |||||||||
Purchases of mortgage securities
available-for-sale
|
(92,052 | ) | (33,814 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sales of mortgage securities
available-for-sale
|
60,531 | 3,034 | |||||||||
Principal payments on mortgage securities
available-for-sale
|
11,160 | 1,022 | |||||||||
Net decrease in restricted cash
|
1,065 | 79 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
69,679 | 32,760 | |||||||||
Cash Flows From Financing
Activities:
|
|||||||||||
Net borrowings (repayments) on short-term
debt
|
325,702 | 218,175 | |||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
8,354 | 16,948 | |||||||||
Repayments on long-term debt
|
(87,831 | ) | (56,756 | ) | |||||||
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
46,162 | 986 | |||||||||
Dividends paid
|
(8,278 | ) | (4,557 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
284,109 | 174,796 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
|
930 | (1,006 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
9,030 | 15,483 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 9,960 | $ | 14,477 | |||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow
information:
|
|||||||||||
Cash paid for interest
|
$ | 15,947 | $ | 32,330 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTE 1. THE COMPANY
Redwood Trust, Inc. (Redwood Trust) together with its subsidiaries, is a real estate finance company. Redwood Trusts primary business is owning, financing, and credit enhancing high-quality jumbo residential mortgage loans nationwide. Redwood Trust also finances real estate through its securities portfolio and its commercial loan portfolio. Redwood Trusts primary source of revenue is monthly payments made by homeowners on their mortgages, and its primary expense is the cost of borrowed funds. Redwood Trust is structured as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) and, therefore, the majority of net earnings are distributed to shareholders as dividends.
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The March 31, 2002 and the December 31, 2001 consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Redwood Trust and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sequoia Mortgage Funding Corporation (Sequoia) and RWT Holdings, Inc. (Holdings). For financial reporting purposes, references to the Company mean Redwood Trust, Sequoia, and Holdings.
Substantially all of the assets of Sequoia, consisting primarily of residential whole loans shown as part of Residential Mortgage Loans, are subordinated to support long-term debt in the form of collateralized mortgage bonds (Long-Term Debt) and are not available for the satisfaction of general claims of the Company. The Companys exposure to loss on the assets which are collateral for Long-Term Debt is limited to its net equity investment in Sequoia and its net equity investment in three commercial mortgage loans, as the Long-Term Debt is non-recourse to the Company. All significant intercompany balances and transactions with Sequoia and Holdings have been eliminated in the consolidation of the Company at March 31, 2002. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the March 31, 2002 presentation.
On January 1, 2001, the Company acquired 100% of the voting common stock of Holdings for $300,000 in cash consideration from two officers of Holdings, and Holdings became a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of the Company. This transaction did not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Company.
Use of Estimates
Fair Value. Management estimates the fair value of its financial instruments using available market information and other appropriate valuation methodologies. The fair value of a financial instrument, as defined
6
Reserve for Credit Losses. A reserve for credit losses is maintained at a level deemed appropriate by management to provide for known credit losses, as well as losses inherent in Redwoods earning assets. The reserve is based upon managements assessment of various factors affecting its assets, including current and projected economic conditions, delinquency status, and credit protection. These estimates are reviewed periodically and adjusted as deemed necessary. The credit reserve on mortgage loans is increased by provisions, which are charged to income from operations. Summary information regarding the Reserve for Credit Losses on mortgage loans is presented in Note 4. The credit reserve on securities is established at acquisition and adjustments are made as further discussed below under EITF 99-20 and in Note 3. The Companys actual credit losses may differ from those estimates used to establish the reserve.
Individual mortgage loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When a loan is impaired, impairment is measured based upon the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the loans observable market price, or the fair value of the underlying collateral. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company had no impaired mortgage loans.
EITF 99-20. During 1999, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issued EITF 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets. EITF 99-20 established new income and impairment recognition standards for interests in certain securitized assets. Under the provisions of EITF 99-20, the holder of beneficial interests should recognize the excess of all estimated cash flows attributable to the beneficial interest estimated at the acquisition date over the initial investment (the accretable yield) as interest income over the life of the beneficial interest using the effective yield method. If the estimated cash flows change, then the holder of the beneficial interest should recalculate the accretable yield and adjust the periodic accretion recognized as income prospectively. If the fair value of a beneficial interest has declined below its carrying amount, an other-than-temporary decline is considered to exist if there has been a decline in estimated future cash flows. The difference between the carrying value and fair value of the beneficial interest is recorded as a mark-to-market impairment loss through the income statement. Any impairment adjustments under the provisions of EITF 99-20 are recognized as mark-to-market adjustments under Net Unrealized and Realized Market Value Gains (Losses) on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The Company adopted the provisions of EITF 99-20 effective January 1, 2001. At that date, the Company held certain beneficial interests where the current projections of cash flows were less than the cash flows anticipated at acquisition and the fair value had declined below the carrying value. Accordingly, the Company recorded a $2.4 million charge through the Statement of Operations during the quarter ended March 31, 2001 as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The mark-to-market adjustments on these beneficial interests had previously been recorded as unrealized losses through Accumulative Other Comprehensive Income as a component of Stockholders Equity. Since this was a reclassification of declines in market values that had already been recognized in the Companys balance sheet and stockholders equity accounts, there was no change in net carrying value of these interests upon adoption of EITF 99-20.
Risks and Uncertainties
7
Earning Assets
Mortgage Loans: Held-for-Investment
Mortgage Loans: Held-for-Sale
Securities: Trading
Securities: Available-for-Sale
Interest income on loans and securities is calculated using the effective yield method based on projected cash flows over the life of the asset. Yields on each asset vary as a function of credit results, prepayment rates, and interest rates. For Residential Credit-Enhancement Securities purchased at a discount, a portion of the discount for each security is designated as a credit reserve, with the remaining portion of the discount designated to be amortized into income over the life of the security using the effective yield method. If future credit losses exceed the Companys original expectations, or credit losses occur more quickly than expected, or prepayment rates occur more slowly than expected, the yield over the remaining life of the security may be adjusted downwards or the Company may take a mark-to-market earnings charge to write down the basis in the security to current market value. If future credit losses are less than the Companys original estimate, or credit losses occur later than expected, or prepayment rates are faster than expected, the yield over the remaining life of the security may be adjusted upwards.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
8
Restricted Cash
Other Assets
Interest Rate Agreements
The Company has elected not to seek hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 for any of its Interest Rate Agreements through March 31, 2002. Accordingly, such instruments are designated as trading and are recorded at their estimated fair market value with changes in their fair value reported in current-period earnings in Net Unrealized and Realized Market Value Gains (Losses) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company may elect to seek hedge accounting based on the provisions of SFAS No. 133 in the future.
Net premiums on Interest Rate Agreements are amortized as a component of net interest income over the effective period of the Interest Rate Agreement using the effective interest method. The income or expense related to Interest Rate Agreements is recognized on an accrual basis and is included in interest expense on short-term debt in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Debt
Income Taxes
Under the Code, a dividend declared by a REIT in October, November, or December of a calendar year and payable to shareholders of record as of a specified date in such year, will be deemed to have been paid by the
9
Taxable earnings of Holdings are subject to state and Federal income taxes at the applicable statutory rates. Holdings provides for deferred income taxes, if any, to reflect the estimated future tax effects under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Under this pronouncement, deferred income taxes, if any, reflect the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and such amounts as measured by tax laws and regulations.
Net Income Per Share
10
The following tables provide reconciliations of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share computations.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | |||||||||
Numerator:
|
|||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per
share
|
|||||||||
Net income before preferred dividend and change
in accounting principle
|
$ | 11,900 | $ | 9,729 | |||||
Cash dividends on Class B preferred stock
|
(681 | ) | (681 | ) | |||||
Net income before change in accounting principle
|
11,219 | 9,048 | |||||||
Cumulative effect of adopting EITF 99-20
|
| (2,368 | ) | ||||||
Basic and Diluted EPS Net income available
to common stockholders
|
$ | 11,219 | $ | 6,680 | |||||
Denominator:
|
|||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per
share
|
|||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period
|
13,658,443 | 8,838,964 | |||||||
Net effect of dilutive stock options
|
418,962 | 226,257 | |||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share
|
14,077,405 | 9,065,221 | |||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
|||||||||
Net income before change in accounting principle
|
$ | 0.82 | $ | 1.02 | |||||
Cumulative effect of adopting EITF 99-20
|
| (.26 | ) | ||||||
Net income per share
|
$ | 0.82 | $ | 0.76 | |||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|||||||||
Net income before change in accounting principle
|
$ | 0.80 | $ | 1.00 | |||||
Cumulative effect of adopting EITF 99-20
|
| (.26 | ) | ||||||
Net income per share
|
$ | 0.80 | $ | 0.74 | |||||
The number of common equivalent shares issued by the Company that were anti-dilutive during the three months ended March 31, 2002 totaled 390,662.
Comprehensive Income
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
11
NOTE 3. EARNING ASSETS
At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, investments in Earning Assets generally consisted of interests in adjustable-rate, hybrid, or fixed-rate residential and commercial real estate mortgage loans and securities. Hybrid mortgages have an initial fixed coupon rate for three to ten years followed by annual adjustments. The original maturity of the majority of our residential mortgage assets is twenty-five to thirty years. The actual amount of principal outstanding is subject to change based on the prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans. The original maturity of the majority of our commercial mortgage assets is three years.
At March 31, 2002 and 2001, the annualized effective yield after taking into account the amortization income or expense due to discounts and premiums and associated credit expenses on the Earning Assets was 4.92% and 7.72%, respectively, based on the reported carrying value of the assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the average balance of Earning Assets was $2.5 billion and $2.2 billion, respectively.
At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, Earning Assets consisted of the following:
Residential Mortgage Loans
March 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-for- | Held-for- | Held-for- | Held-for- | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Sale | Investment | Total | Sale | Investment | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Current Face
|
$ | 562,261 | $ | 1,227,978 | $ | 1,790,239 | $ | 153,125 | $ | 1,317,343 | $ | 1,470,468 | ||||||||||||
Unamortized Discount
|
(308 | ) | | (308 | ) | (364 | ) | (132 | ) | (496 | ) | |||||||||||||
Unamortized Premium
|
1,503 | 8,307 | 9,810 | 34 | 10,055 | 10,089 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost
|
563,456 | 1,236,285 | 1,799,741 | 152,795 | 1,327,266 | 1,480,061 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reserve for Credit Losses
|
| (5,481 | ) | (5,481 | ) | | (5,199 | ) | (5,199 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Carrying Value
|
$ | 563,456 | $ | 1,230,804 | $ | 1,794,260 | $ | 152,795 | $ | 1,322,067 | $ | 1,474,862 | ||||||||||||
At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, residential mortgage loans with a net carrying value of $563 million and $148 million were pledged as collateral under short-term borrowing arrangements to third parties.
Residential Credit-Enhancement Securities
March 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||
Mortgage Securities | Mortgage Securities | |||||||
Available-for-Sale | Available-for-Sale | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Current Face
|
$ | 460,035 | $ | 353,435 | ||||
Unamortized Discount
|
(28,058 | ) | (25,863 | ) | ||||
Portion Of Discount Designated As A Credit Reserve
|
(194,556 | ) | (140,411 | ) | ||||
Amortized Cost
|
237,421 | 187,161 | ||||||
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
16,204 | 7,174 | ||||||
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
(3,793 | ) | (3,522 | ) | ||||
Carrying Value
|
$ | 249,832 | $ | 190,813 | ||||
The Company credit enhances pools of high-quality jumbo residential mortgage loans by acquiring subordinated securities in third-party securitizations. The subordinated interests in a securitization transaction bear the majority of the credit risk for the securitized pool of mortgages, thus allowing the more senior securitized interests to qualify for investment-grade ratings and to be sold in the capital markets. The Company therefore commits capital that effectively forms a guarantee or insurance on the securitized pool of mortgages.
The Companys Residential Credit-Enhancement Securities are first-loss, second-loss, and third-loss securities. First-loss securities are generally allocated actual credit losses on the entire underlying pool of loans up to a maximum of the principal amount of the first loss security. First-loss securities provide credit-enhancement
12
When the Company purchases residential credit enhancement interests, a portion of the discount for each security is designated as a credit reserve, with the remaining portion of the discount designated to be amortized into income over the life of the security using the effective yield method. If future credit losses exceed the Companys original expectations, and the fair value of the security is less than its carrying value, the Company will record a charge on the Statement of Operations to write down the basis in the security. If future credit losses exceed the Companys original expectations, and the fair value of the security is greater than its carrying value, the yield over the remaining life of the security may be adjusted downward. If future credit losses are less than the Companys original estimate, the yield over the remaining life of the security may be adjusted upward. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company designated $195 million and $140 million as a credit reserve on its residential credit-enhancement interests, respectively.
At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, Residential Credit-Enhancement Securities with a net carrying value of $66 million and $89 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral under borrowing arrangements to third parties.
Commercial Mortgage Loans
March 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-for- | Held-for- | Held-for- | Held-for- | |||||||||||||||||||||
Sale | Investment | Total | Sale | Investment | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current Face
|
$ | 19,271 | $ | 30,786 | $ | 50,057 | $ | 30,931 | $ | 20,860 | $ | 51,791 | ||||||||||||
Unamortized Discount
|
(533 | ) | (144 | ) | (677 | ) | (683 | ) | (24 | ) | (707 | ) | ||||||||||||
Carrying Value
|
$ | 18,738 | $ | 30,642 | $ | 49,380 | $ | 30,248 | $ | 20,836 | $ | 51,084 | ||||||||||||
At March 31, 2002, there were no commercial mortgage loans pledged as collateral under short-term borrowing arrangements to third parties. At December 31, 2001, commercial mortgage loans with a net carrying value of $19 million were pledged as collateral under short-term borrowing arrangements to third parties. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, commercial mortgage loans held-for-investment with a net carrying value of $31 million and $21 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral under long-term borrowing arrangements to third parties.
13
Securities Portfolio
March 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | Securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities | Portfolio | Securities | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||
Portfolio | Available- | Portfolio | Available- | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Trading | for-Sale | Total | Trading | for-Sale | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Current Face
|
$ | 459,536 | $ | 142,390 | $ | 601,926 | $ | 501,078 | $ | 171,877 | $ | 672,955 | ||||||||||||
Unamortized Discount
|
(604 | ) | (567 | ) | (1,171 | ) | (139 | ) | (1,320 | ) | (1,459 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unamortized Premium
|
4,456 | 5,616 | 10,072 | 6,634 | 6,303 | 12,937 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost
|
463,388 | 147,439 | 610,827 | 507,573 | 176,860 | 684,433 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
| 402 | 402 | | 516 | 516 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
| (1,797 | ) | (1,797 | ) | | (1,467 | ) | (1,467 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Carrying Value
|
$ | 463,388 | $ | 146,044 | $ | 609,432 | $ | 507,573 | $ | 175,909 | $ | 683,482 | ||||||||||||
Agency
|
$ | 285,174 | $ | 0 | $ | 285,174 | $ | 353,523 | $ | 20,223 | $ | 373,746 | ||||||||||||
Non-Agency
|
178,214 | 146,044 | 324,258 | 154,050 | 155,686 | 309,736 | ||||||||||||||||||
Carrying Value
|
$ | 463,388 | $ | 146,044 | $ | 609,432 | $ | 507,573 | $ | 175,909 | $ | 683,482 | ||||||||||||
For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company recognized net market value gains through the Consolidated Statement of Operations of $0.9 million and $3.0 million on its securities portfolio, respectively.
At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, securities portfolio assets with a net carrying value of $539 million and $592 million, respectively, were pledged as collateral under borrowing arrangements to third parties.
NOTE 4. RESERVE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
The Reserve for Credit Losses is for Residential Mortgage Loans held-for-investment and is reflected as a component of Earning Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes the activity in the Reserve for Credit Losses:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Balance at beginning of period
|
$ | 5,199 | $ | 4,814 | ||||
Provision for credit losses
|
282 | 184 | ||||||
Charge-offs
|
| (30 | ) | |||||
Balance at end of period
|
$ | 5,481 | $ | 4,968 | ||||
NOTE 5. INTEREST RATE AGREEMENTS
Through March 31, 2002, the Company reports its Interest Rate Agreements at fair value, and has not elected to obtain hedge accounting treatment under SFAS No. 133 on any of its Interest Rate Agreements. At both March 31, 2002 and December 31 2001, the fair value of the Companys Interest Rate Agreements was $0. Interest Rate Agreements are included in Other Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
During the three months ended March 31, 2002, the Company did not recognize any gains or losses on Interest Rate Agreements. During the three months ended March 31, 2001, the Company recognized net market value losses of $0.5 million on Interest Rate Agreements. The market value gains and losses are included in Net Unrealized and Realized Market Value Gains (Losses) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company generally attempts to structure its balance sheet to address many of the interest rate risks inherent in financial institutions. The Company may enter into certain Interest Rate Agreements from time to
14
In the future, the Company may enter into Interest Rate Agreements consisting of interest rate caps, interest rate floors, interest rate futures, options on interest rate futures, interest rate swaps, and other types of hedging instruments.
The following table summarizes the aggregate notional amounts of all of the Companys Interest Rate Agreements as well as the credit exposure related to these instruments as of March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001. The credit exposure reflects the fair market value of any cash and collateral of the Company held by counterparties. The cash and collateral held by counterparties are included in Restricted Cash or the Securities Portfolio on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Notional Amounts | Credit Exposure | |||||||||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2002 | 2001 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Options Purchased
|
$ | 8,000 | $ | 313,000 | | | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Swaps
|
423,787 | 445,107 | $ | 7,050 | $ | 6,645 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 431,787 | $ | 758,107 | $ | 7,050 | $ | 6,645 | ||||||||
In general, the Company incurs credit risk to the extent that the counterparties to the Interest Rate Agreements do not perform their obligations under the Interest Rate Agreements. If one of the counterparties does not perform, the Company would not receive the cash to which it would otherwise be entitled under the Interest Rate Agreement. In order to mitigate this risk, the Company has only entered into Interest Rate Agreements that are either a) transacted on a national exchange or b) transacted with counterparties that are either i) designated by the U.S. Department of the Treasury as a primary government dealer, ii) affiliates of primary government dealers, or iii) rated BBB or higher. Furthermore, the Company has entered into Interest Rate Agreements with several different counterparties in order to diversify the credit risk exposure.
NOTE 6. SHORT-TERM DEBT
The Company has entered into repurchase agreements, bank borrowings, and other forms of collateralized short-term borrowings (collectively, Short-Term Debt) to finance of a portion of its Earning Assets.
At March 31, 2002, the Company had $1.1 billion of Short-Term Debt outstanding with a weighted-average borrowing rate of 2.25% and a weighted-average remaining maturity of 78 days. This debt was collateralized with $1.2 billion of Earning Assets. At December 31, 2001, the Company had $0.8 billion of Short-Term Debt outstanding with a weighted-average borrowing rate of 2.19% and a weighted-average remaining maturity of 82 days. This debt was collateralized with $0.8 billion of Earning Assets.
At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Short-Term Debt had the following remaining maturities:
March 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Within 30 days
|
$ | 455,140 | $ | 270,855 | ||||
31 to 90 days
|
431,655 | 226,407 | ||||||
Over 90 days
|
235,718 | 299,549 | ||||||
Total Short-Term Debt
|
$ | 1,122,513 | $ | 796,811 | ||||
15
For both the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the average balance of Short-Term Debt was $0.9 billion, with a weighted-average interest cost of 2.12% and 5.91%, respectively. The maximum balance outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, was $1.1 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively. The Company continues to meet all of its debt covenants for its short-term borrowing arrangements and credit facilities.
At March 31, 2002, the Company had uncommitted facilities with credit lines in excess of $4 billion for financing AAA and AA-rated residential mortgage securities. It is the intention of the Companys management to renew committed and uncommitted facilities as needed.
At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company had short-term facilities with two Wall Street Firms totaling $1.0 billion to fund Residential Mortgage Loans. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company had borrowings under these facilities of $551 million and $146 million, respectively. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest based on a specified margin over the one-month LIBOR interest rate. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the weighted average borrowing rate under these facilities was 2.49% and 2.56%, respectively. These facilities expire in June and December 2002.
At March 31, 2002, the Company had two committed revolving mortgage warehousing credit facilities totaling $57 million to finance commercial mortgage loans. At March 31, 2002, the Company had no borrowings under these facilities. At December 31, 2001, the Company had borrowings under these facilities of $17 million. One of the facilities allows for loans to be financed to the maturity of the loan, up to three years. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest based on a specified margin over the one-month LIBOR interest rate. At March 31, 2002, the weighted average borrowing rate under these facilities was 3.88%. These facilities expire in May and September 2002.
At March 31, 2002, the Company had four master repurchase agreements with two banks and two Wall Street Firms totaling $170 million. At December 31, 2001, the Company had three master repurchase agreements with a bank and two Wall Street Firms totaling $140 million. These facilities are intended to finance securities with lower than investment grade ratings. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the Company had borrowings under these facilities of $40 million and $66 million, respectively. Borrowings under these facilities bear interest based on a specified margin over the one-month LIBOR interest rate. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the weighted average borrowing rate under these facilities was 2.98% and 2.92%, respectively. The Company does not intend to renew a facility expiring in May 2002. Two other facilities expire in September 2002 and February 2003. The fourth facility has a six-month term that is extended monthly. Unless notice is provided by either party the expiration on this fourth facility will remain at six months.
NOTE 7. LONG-TERM DEBT
Through securitization, the Company issues Residential Long-Term Debt in the form of collateralized mortgage bonds secured by Residential Mortgage Loans (Residential Bond Collateral). The Residential Bond Collateral consists primarily of adjustable-rate and hybrid, conventional, 30-year residential mortgage loans secured by first liens on one- to four-family residential properties. All Residential Bond Collateral is pledged to secure repayment of the related Residential Long-Term Debt obligation. As required by the indentures relating to the Residential Long-Term Debt, the Residential Bond Collateral is held in the custody of trustees. The trustees collect principal and interest payments (less servicing and related fees) on the Residential Bond Collateral and make corresponding principal and interest payments on the Residential Long-Term Debt. The obligations under the Residential Long-Term Debt are payable solely from the Residential Bond Collateral and are otherwise non-recourse to the Company.
Each series of Residential Long-Term Debt consists of various classes of bonds at variable rates of interest. The maturity of each class is directly affected by the rate of principal prepayments on the related Residential Bond Collateral. Each series is also subject to redemption according to the specific terms of the respective indentures. As a result, the actual maturity of any class of a Residential Long-Term Debt series is likely to occur earlier than its stated maturity.
16
The Commercial Long-Term Debt is secured by three adjustable-rate Commercial Mortgage Loans with maturity dates in 2002 or 2003, which are secured by first liens on the related commercial mortgage properties (Commercial Loan Collateral).
The Companys exposure to loss on the Residential Bond Collateral and the Commercial Loan Collateral is limited to its net investment, as the Residential and Commercial Long-Term Debt are non-recourse to the Company.
The components of the collateral for the Companys Long-Term Debt are summarized as follows:
March 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||
Residential Mortgage Loans:
|
||||||||||
Residential Mortgage Loans held-for-sale
|
$ | 1,060 | $ | 848 | ||||||
Residential Mortgage Loans held-for-investment
|
1,230,804 | 1,322,067 | ||||||||
Restricted cash
|
2,334 | 2,534 | ||||||||
Accrued interest receivable
|
4,115 | 5,340 | ||||||||
Total Residential Collateral
|
$ | 1,238,313 | $ | 1,330,789 | ||||||
Commercial Mortgage Loans held-for-investment
|
$ | 30,642 | $ | 20,836 | ||||||
Total Long-Term Debt Collateral
|
$ | 1,268,955 | $ | 1,351,625 | ||||||
The components of the Long-Term Debt at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 along with selected other information are summarized below:
March 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | ||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||
Residential Long-Term Debt
|
$ | 1,210,126 | $ | 1,297,958 | |||||
Commercial Long-Term Debt
|
25,648 | 17,211 | |||||||
Unamortized premium on Long-Term Debt
|
1,839 | 2,038 | |||||||
Deferred bond issuance costs
|
(3,154 | ) | (3,492 | ) | |||||
Total Long-Term Debt
|
$ | 1,234,459 | $ | 1,313,715 | |||||
Range of weighted-average interest rates, by
series residential
|
2.24% to 6.78 | % | 2.28% to 6.35 | % | |||||
Stated residential maturities
|
2017 - 2029 | 2017 - 2029 | |||||||
Number of residential series
|
5 | 5 | |||||||
Weighted-average interest rates
commercial
|
6.07 | % | 5.09 | % | |||||
Stated commercial maturities
|
2002 - 2003 | 2002 - 2003 | |||||||
Number of commercial series
|
3 | 2 |
For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the average effective interest cost for Residential Long-Term Debt, as adjusted for the amortization of bond premium, deferred bond issuance costs, and other related expenses, was 3.30% and 6.65%, respectively. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, accrued interest payable on Residential Long-Term Debt was $1.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively, and is reflected as a component of Accrued Interest Payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the average balance of Residential Long-Term Debt was $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the weighted average interest rate for Commercial Long-Term Debt was 6.07% and 5.09%, and the balance of Commercial Long-Term Debt was $25.6 million and $17.2 million, respectively.
17
NOTE 8. INCOME TAXES
As a REIT, Redwood Trust can exclude dividends for taxable income and thus, effectively, may not be subject to income taxes. Holdings, the Companys taxable REIT subsidiary, is subject to income taxes.
The current provision for income taxes for Holdings for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 was $3,200 and was a component of Operating Expenses on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. These amounts represent the minimum California franchise taxes. No additional tax provision has been recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001 as taxable income reported for these periods was offset by Federal and state net operating loss carryforwards from prior years. In addition, due to the uncertainty of realization of net operating losses, no deferred tax benefit has been recorded. A valuation allowance has been provided to offset the deferred tax assets related to net operating loss carryforwards and other future temporary deductions at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, the deferred tax assets and associated valuation allowances were approximately $9.2 million and $9.3 million, respectively. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, Holdings had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $24.2 million and $24.4 million for Federal tax purposes, and $10.1 million and $10.4 million for state tax purposes, respectively. The Federal loss carryforwards and a portion of the state loss carryforwards expire between 2018 and 2021, while the largest portion of the state loss carryforwards expire between 2003 and 2006.
NOTE 9. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments at March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001.
March 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Loans
|
||||||||||||||||||
Residential: held-for-sale
|
$ | 563,456 | $ | 563,456 | $ | 152,795 | $ | 152,795 | ||||||||||
Residential: held-for-investment
|
1,230,804 | 1,233,651 | 1,322,067 | 1,318,673 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial: held-for-sale
|
18,738 | 18,738 | 30,248 | 30,248 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial: held-for-investment
|
30,642 | 30,786 | 20,836 | 20,860 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage Securities
|
||||||||||||||||||
Residential: trading
|
463,388 | 463,388 | 507,573 | 507,573 | ||||||||||||||
Residential: available-for-sale
|
395,876 | 395,876 | 366,722 | 366,722 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||
Short-Term Debt
|
1,122,513 | 1,122,513 | 796,811 | 796,811 | ||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt
|
1,234,459 | 1,229,561 | 1,313,715 | 1,295,323 |
The carrying values of all other balance sheet accounts as reflected in the financial statements approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these accounts.
NOTE 10. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Class B 9.74% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
18
In March 1999, the Companys Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to 150,000 shares of the Companys Preferred Stock. The Company did not repurchase any shares of Preferred Stock during the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001. At March 31, 2002, there remained 142,550 shares available under the authorization for repurchase.
Stock Option Plan
The number of shares of Common Stock available under the Plan for options and Awards, subject to certain anti-dilution provisions, is 15% of the Companys total outstanding shares of Common Stock. The total outstanding shares are determined as the highest number of shares outstanding prior to any stock repurchases. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, 305,404 and 299,064 shares of Common Stock, respectively, were available for grant.
Of shares of Common Stock available for grant, no more than 500,000 shares of Common Stock shall be cumulatively available for grant as ISOs. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, 459,137 and 458,537 ISOs had been granted, respectively. The exercise price for ISOs granted under the Plan may not be less than the fair market value of shares of Common Stock at the time the ISO is granted. At both March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, 28,000 shares of restricted stock had been granted to two officers of the Company. The restrictions on 7,000 of these shares expired on January 1, 2002. The restrictions on 6.25% of the total restricted shares expire on the first day of each calendar quarter starting April 1, 2002, and continuing through January 1, 2005.
The Company has granted stock options that accrue and pay stock and cash DERs. This feature results in current expenses being incurred that relate to long-term incentive grants made in the past. To the extent the Company increases its common dividends or the market price of the Common Stock increases, stock and cash DER expenses may increase. For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company accrued cash and stock DER expenses of $1.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively, which was included in Operating Expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Stock DERs represent shares of stock which are issuable when the holders exercise the underlying stock options and are considered to be variable stock awards under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25. For the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company recognized variable stock option expense of $0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, which was included in Other Income (Expense) on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The number of stock DER shares accrued was based on the level of the Companys common stock dividends and on the price of the common stock on the related dividend payment dates. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, there were 185,166 and 181,010 unexercised options with stock DERs under the Plan, respectively. Cash DERs were accrued and paid based on the level of the Companys common stock dividend. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, there were 1,283,984 and 1,284,222 unexercised options with cash DERs under the Plan, respectively. At March 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, there were 151,456 and 153,269 outstanding stock options that did not have DERs, respectively.
19
A summary of the status of the Plan at March 31, 2002 and changes during the quarter ending on that date is presented below.
March 31, 2002 | |||||||||
Weighted | |||||||||
Average | |||||||||
Exercise | |||||||||
(in thousands, except share data) | Shares | Price | |||||||
Outstanding options at beginning of period
|
1,618,501 | $ | 22.33 | ||||||
Options granted
|
600 | $ | 26.58 | ||||||
Options exercised
|
(1,625 | ) | $ | 17.63 | |||||
Options canceled
|
(1,026 | ) | $ | 14.38 | |||||
Dividend equivalent rights earned
|
4,156 | | |||||||
Outstanding options at end of period
|
1,620,606 | $ | 22.29 | ||||||
In March 2002, the Companys Board of Directors approved, subject to shareholder approval, the 2002 Redwood Trust, Inc. Incentive Stock Plan (Incentive Stock Plan). The Incentive Stock Plan is intended to replace the Plan discussed above (Prior Plan) with respect to all future grants of stock-related awards.
Subject to anti-dilution provisions for stock splits, stock dividends and similar events, the Incentive Stock Plan authorizes the grant of awards with respect to a maximum number of shares equal to the sum of: (i) 400,000 shares of common stock; (ii) 299,064 shares of common stock available for future awards under the Prior Plan as of March 1, 2002; (iii) any shares of common stock that are represented by awards granted under the Prior Plan which are (A) forfeited, expire or are canceled without delivery of shares of common stock or (B) settled in cash; and (iv) any shares of common stock that are represented by awards granted under the Prior Plan which are tendered to the Company to satisfy the exercise price of options or the applicable tax withholding obligation.
In May 2002, the shareholders approved the Incentive Stock Plan.
Common Stock Repurchases
Common Stock Issuances
NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At March 31, 2002, the Company had entered into commitments to purchase $2 million of securities and $162 million of residential mortgage loans for settlement in April 2002. At March 31, 2002, the Company had entered into commitments to sell $30 million of securities.
At March 31, 2002, the Company is obligated under non-cancelable operating leases with expiration dates through 2006. The total future minimum lease payments under these non-cancelable leases are $2.4 million and are expected to be expensed as follows: 2002 $0.5 million; 2003 $0.6 million; 2004 $0.6 million; 2005 $0.5 million; 2006 $0.2 million.
20
NOTE 12. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In April 2002, the Company completed a secondary offering of 575,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $14.9 million to fund the continued expansion of its real estate finance business.
In April 2002, the Company issued $502 million in face value of Long-Term Debt through Sequoia Mortgage Trust 6, a trust established by Sequoia. This debt is collateralized by a pool of adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans. The proceeds received from this issuance were used to pay down a portion of the Companys Short-Term Debt.
In April 2002, the Company issued $81 million in face value of Long-Term Debt through Sequoia Mortgage Funding Company 2002-A, a trust established by Sequoia. This debt is collateralized by a pool of adjustable-rate residential mortgage securities. The proceeds received from this issuance were used to pay down a portion of the Companys Short-Term Debt.
In May 2002, the Companys Board of Directors declared a regular and special cash dividend for common shareholders of $0.63 per share and $0.125 per share, respectively, for the second quarter of 2002. The Board of Directors also declared a preferred cash dividend of $0.755 per share for the second quarter of 2002. The common and preferred cash dividends are payable on July 22, 2002 to shareholders of record on June 28, 2002.
In May 2002, the Companys common shareholders approved the Incentive Stock Plan and the 2002 Redwood Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). The ESPP will allow eligible employees to purchase, through payroll deductions, shares of the Companys common stock on a quarterly basis at a discount rate from the fair market value of the shares as determined under the ESPP.
21
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes.
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Certain matters discussed in this Form 10-Q may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that inherently include certain risks and uncertainties. Throughout this Form 10-Q and other Company documents, the words believe, expect, anticipate, intend, aim, will, and similar words identify forward-looking statements. Actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those projected in, or contemplated by, the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, among other things, changes in interest rates and market values on our earning assets and borrowings, changes in prepayment rates on our mortgage assets, general economic conditions, particularly as they affect the price of earning assets and the credit status of borrowers, and the level of liquidity in the capital markets as it affects our ability to finance our mortgage asset portfolio, and other risk factors outlined in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001. Other factors not presently identified may also cause actual results to differ. Future results and changes in expectations of future results could lead to adverse changes in our dividend rate. We continuously update and revise our estimates based on actual conditions experienced. We generally do not intend to publish such revisions. No one should assume that results projected in or contemplated by the forward-looking statements included herein will prove to be accurate in the future.
This Form 10-Q contains statistics and other data that in some cases have been obtained from, or compiled from, information made available by servicing entities and information service providers. In addition, some of the historical presentations contained herein have been restated to conform to current formats.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings and Dividend Summary and Outlook
In the first quarter of 2002, we increased our equity base through a common stock offering, improved our operating efficiencies, and further strengthened our balance sheet. As in 2001, our credit results remained excellent and we continued to increase our market share, gain new customers, and strengthen our competitive position. This growth in our high-quality residential business continued to drive our profitability.
Core earnings were $0.77 per share for the first quarter of 2002, an increase of 5% over first quarter 2001 core earnings of $0.73 per share. Core earnings were $0.76 per share in the fourth quarter 2001. Core earnings equal GAAP earnings excluding mark-to-market adjustments and non-recurring items. GAAP earnings for the first quarter of 2002 were $0.80 per share. See Table 1 for a reconciliation of GAAP earnings and core earnings.
After falling during most of 2001, short-term interest rates stabilized in the first quarter of 2002. The yield on our assets continued to fall during this period as the coupons reset to lower levels than existed at the prior resets. Our cost of funds also decreased for similar reasons. Our asset yield fell 0.49% (from 5.41% to 4.92%) from the previous quarter while our cost of funds decreased 0.74% (from 3.56% to 2.82%) and our interest rate spread increased to 2.10% from 1.85%.
Our spread increased as we continued to replace lower-yielding AAA-rated mortgage securities with higher-yielding mortgage loans and credit-enhancement securities. We believe this change in portfolio mix will continue in 2002 and will provide long-term benefits.
Our core net income for the first quarter of 2002 was $10.9 million, an increase of 66% from the $6.6 million we earned in the first quarter of 2001. Our annualized core return on common equity was 13.8% in the first quarter of 2002 and 13.8% in the first quarter of 2001. Our reported GAAP net income for the first quarter of 2002 was $11.2 million, an increase of 67% from the $6.7 million we earned in the first quarter of 2001.
22
As a result of an increase in our estimate of the reasonably sustainable rate of cash flow generation per share we expect in the future, we increased our regular quarterly cash dividend rate to $0.62 per common share in the first quarter of 2002 and to $0.63 per common share in the second quarter of 2002.
We believe we will continue to have a strong operating performance year in 2002; we currently expect to benefit from healthy origination volume by our customers, asset growth, improvements in asset mix, improved operational efficiencies, and favorable credit results.
Many market participants expect short-term interest rates to rise later in 2002. Relative to our earnings potential during a period of stable interest rates, rising interest rates may have both positive and negative effects on our earnings trends. A rapid or unexpected increase would be a negative factor for several quarters. Over longer periods of time, we believe higher interest rates are generally favorable for our business.
Our first goal in managing Redwood Trusts operations is to do our best to make sure that our regular dividend rate for common shareholders remains sustainable in the long run from the cash flows generated by our assets. We believe the current regular quarterly dividend rate of $0.63 per common share is a sustainable rate, even in most circumstances if some business trends become less favorable or interest rates increase.
In the event we earn taxable REIT income in excess of the dividends we distribute at our regular dividend rate we may declare one or more special dividends during 2002. We declared a special dividend of $0.125 per common share in the second quarter of 2002.
We believe the longer-term trends that really matter are the strength of our credit results and the strength of our competitive market position. If these stay strong, we may be able to increase our cash flows and increase our regular dividend rate over time.
Reconciliation of GAAP Income and Core Income
The table below reconciles core earnings to reported GAAP earnings. RWT Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) was an unconsolidated subsidiary through January 1, 2001. The table below shows Holdings on an as-if-consolidated basis for 2000.
Table 1
Variable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset | Option | Core | GAAP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mark-to- | Mark-to- | Closed | Reported | Average | Earnings | Earnings | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Core | Market | Market | Business | GAAP | Diluted | Per | Per | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings | Adjustments | Adjustments | Units | Earnings | Shares | Share | Share | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 6,563 | $ | 273 | $ | (156 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | 6,680 | 9,065,221 | $ | 0.73 | $ | 0.74 | ||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
7,384 | (413 | ) | (508 | ) | 0 | 6,463 | 9,184,195 | 0.80 | 0.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
8,188 | 104 | (227 | ) | 0 | 8,065 | 10,752,062 | 0.76 | 0.75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
9,775 | (800 | ) | (20 | ) | 0 | 8,955 | 12,888,420 | 0.76 | 0.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
10,887 | 875 | (543 | ) | 0 | 11,219 | 14,077,405 | 0.77 | 0.80 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 18,585 | $ | (2,329 | ) | $ | 0 | $ | (46 | ) | $ | 16,210 | 8,902,069 | $ | 2.08 | $ | 1.82 | |||||||||||||||
2001
|
31,910 | (836 | ) | (911 | ) | 0 | 30,163 | 10,474,764 | 3.05 | 2.88 |
Core earnings is not a measure of earnings in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). It is calculated as GAAP earnings from ongoing operations less mark-to-market adjustments (on certain assets, hedges, and variable stock options) and non-recurring items. Management believes that core earnings provide relevant and useful information regarding our results of operations in addition to GAAP measures of performance. This is, in part, because market valuation adjustments on only a portion of our assets and stock options and none of our liabilities are recognized through our income statement under GAAP and
23
Net Interest Income
Net interest income after credit expenses rose to $15.1 million in the first quarter of 2002 from $13.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2001 and $10.2 million in the first quarter of 2001. We benefited from our continuing strategy of growth in our high-quality jumbo residential mortgage loan business, a business where we believe we have a solid competitive position and favorable long-term market trends. We also benefited from a change in asset mix as we added higher yielding assets.
Table 2
Net | Interest | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Rate | Rate | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Income | Spread | Margin | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | After | Earning | Cost | After | After | Income/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After Credit | Interest | Credit | Asset | Of | Credit | Credit | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses | Expense | Expenses | Yield | Funds | Expenses | Expenses | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 41,637 | $ | (31,413 | ) | $ | 10,224 | 7.72 | % | 6.34 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.85 | % | 18.83 | % | |||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
38,453 | (27,010 | ) | 11,443 | 7.18 | % | 5.45 | % | 1.73 | % | 2.06 | % | 20.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
33,172 | (21,555 | ) | 11,617 | 6.63 | % | 4.83 | % | 1.80 | % | 2.24 | % | 18.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
31,277 | (18,091 | ) | 13,186 | 5.41 | % | 3.56 | % | 1.85 | % | 2.22 | % | 17.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
30,716 | (15,602 | ) | 15,114 | 4.92 | % | 2.82 | % | 2.10 | % | 2.36 | % | 17.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 169,261 | $ | (138,603 | ) | $ | 30,658 | 7.56 | % | 6.69 | % | 0.87 | % | 1.33 | % | 14.33 | % | |||||||||||||||
2001
|
144,539 | (98,069 | ) | 46,470 | 6.71 | % | 5.04 | % | 1.67 | % | 2.09 | % | 18.66 | % |
Redwoods primary source of debt funding is the issuance of non-recourse long-term collateralized debt through securitization transactions. Collateral assets are transferred to a special-purpose bankruptcy-remote financing trust and non-recourse securities are issued from the trust. These transactions are accounted for as financings. Thus, the securitized assets remain on our reported balance sheet (residential mortgage loans) and the securities issued remain on our balance sheet as liabilities (long-term debt).
If our securitizations had qualified as sales, our reported balance sheet (both assets and liabilities) would be substantially smaller. As a result, many of the ratios one might use to analyze our business would be different. For instance, our interest rate spread would be wider and our debt-to-equity ratio lower. Ratios calculated on this basis may be more comparable to those reported by some other financial institutions. The table below presents our interest income and interest expense on an at-risk basis for assets and on a recourse basis for liabilities (generally, conforming to the income statement items we would report if we accounted for our securitizations as sales rather than financings). Please also see the discussion under Balance Sheet Leverage below for further information.
24
Table 3
Net | Interest | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Rate | Rate | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Interest | Income | Spread | Margin | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | After | Earning | Cost | After | After | Income/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After Credit | Interest | Credit | Asset | Of | Credit | Credit | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses | Expenses | Expenses | Yield | Funds | Expenses | Expenses | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 23,799 | $ | (13,575 | ) | $ | 10,224 | 8.51 | % | 5.96 | % | 2.55 | % | 3.60 | % | 18.83 | % | |||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
23,286 | (11,843 | ) | 11,443 | 7.99 | % | 4.91 | % | 3.08 | % | 3.83 | % | 20.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
20,458 | (8,841 | ) | 11,617 | 7.43 | % | 4.15 | % | 3.28 | % | 4.11 | % | 18.25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
19,328 | (6,142 | ) | 13,186 | 6.70 | % | 2.93 | % | 3.77 | % | 4.49 | % | 17.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
20,055 | (4,941 | ) | 15,114 | 6.30 | % | 2.12 | % | 4.18 | % | 4.75 | % | 17.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 92,967 | $ | (62,309 | ) | $ | 30,658 | 8.63 | % | 6.67 | % | 1.96 | % | 2.76 | % | 14.33 | % | |||||||||||||||
2001
|
86,871 | (40,401 | ) | 46,470 | 7.66 | % | 4.53 | % | 3.13 | % | 4.01 | % | 18.66 | % |
Interest Income After Credit Expenses
Our interest income continued to decrease due to a significant decline in asset yields caused by rapidly falling short-term interest rates during 2001. The decrease in our interest income and asset yields has not resulted in a material reduction of our operating margins, however, as this decline in asset yield has been fully offset by a similar rapid decrease in our cost of borrowed funds.
The yield on our earning assets, the majority of which are adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans, fell from 7.72% in the first quarter of 2001 to 5.41% in the fourth quarter of 2001 and to 4.92% in the first quarter of 2002.
Table 4
Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Premium | Credit | Total | Earning | ||||||||||||||||||||
Earning | Interest | Amortization | Provision | Interest | Asset | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Income | Expense | Expense | Income | Yield | |||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 2,156,741 | $ | 42,690 | $ | (869 | ) | $ | (184 | ) | $ | 41,637 | 7.72 | % | ||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
2,142,496 | 40,502 | (1,885 | ) | (164 | ) | 38,453 | 7.18 | % | |||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
2,001,687 | 35,300 | (1,977 | ) | (151 | ) | 33,172 | 6.63 | % | |||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
2,310,906 | 36,399 | (4,854 | ) | (268 | ) | 31,277 | 5.41 | % | |||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
2,498,565 | 33,977 | (2,979 | ) | (282 | ) | 30,716 | 4.92 | % | |||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 2,237,956 | $ | 172,327 | $ | (2,335 | ) | $ | (731 | ) | $ | 169,261 | 7.56 | % | ||||||||||
2001
|
2,152,965 | 154,891 | (9,585 | ) | (767 | ) | 144,539 | 6.71 | % |
To provide a greater level of detail on our interest income trends, we review interest income by product line below. Each of our product lines is a component of our single business segment of real estate finance.
Residential Mortgage Loans
Our residential mortgage loan portfolio increased 22% in the first quarter of 2002 to $1.8 billion. We acquired $417 million residential mortgage loans during the first quarter of 2002. These acquisitions were all adjustable
25
Table 5
Mar. 2002 | Dec. 2001 | Sep. 2001 | Jun. 2001 | Mar. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Start of Period Balances
|
$ | 1,474,862 | $ | 1,354,606 | $ | 1,060,470 | $ | 1,071,819 | $ | 1,130,997 | ||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
417,276 | 207,170 | 391,328 | 76,314 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Sales
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Principal Payments
|
(95,924 | ) | (82,676 | ) | (96,172 | ) | (86,511 | ) | (58,539 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization
|
(1,672 | ) | (3,991 | ) | (1,180 | ) | (1,065 | ) | (485 | ) | ||||||||||
Credit Provisions
|
(282 | ) | (268 | ) | (151 | ) | (164 | ) | (184 | ) | ||||||||||
Net Charge-Offs
|
0 | 29 | 311 | 12 | 30 | |||||||||||||||
Mark-To-Market (Balance Sheet)
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Mark-To-Market (Income Statement)
|
0 | (8 | ) | 0 | 65 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
End of Period Balances
|
$ | 1,794,260 | $ | 1,474,862 | $ | 1,354,606 | $ | 1,060,470 | $ | 1,071,819 |
Most of our residential loans have coupon rates that adjust each month or each six months as a function of the one or six month LIBOR interest rate. Due to the rapid decline in these interest rates during 2001, the yield on our residential loan portfolio fell from 7.21% in the first quarter of 2001 and to 4.00% in the fourth quarter of 2001 to 3.66% in the first quarter of 2002.
Table 6
Annual | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Mortgage | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Net | Average | Prepay | Premium | Credit | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Premium | Credit | Rate | Interest | Amortization | Provision | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Balance | Reserve | (CPR) | Income | Expense | Expense | Income | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 1,083,943 | $ | 13,519 | $ | (4,895 | ) | 21 | % | $ | 20,371 | $ | (485 | ) | $ | (184 | ) | $ | 19,702 | 7.21 | % | |||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
1,007,227 | 12,747 | (5,051 | ) | 24 | % | 17,492 | (1,065 | ) | (164 | ) | 16,263 | 6.41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
1,087,593 | 12,138 | (4,950 | ) | 25 | % | 16,583 | (1,180 | ) | (151 | ) | 15,252 | 5.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
1,372,552 | 12,023 | (5,065 | ) | 19 | % | 18,053 | (3,990 | ) | (268 | ) | 13,795 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
1,541,136 | 9,130 | (5,342 | ) | 18 | % | 16,079 | (1,672 | ) | (282 | ) | 14,125 | 3.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 1,238,993 | $ | 15,080 | $ | (4,408 | ) | 17 | % | $ | 93,460 | $ | (2,595 | ) | $ | (731 | ) | $ | 90,134 | 7.21 | % | |||||||||||||||
2001
|
1,138,482 | 12,646 | (4,991 | ) | 22 | % | 72,499 | (6,720 | ) | (767 | ) | 65,012 | 5.67 | % |
Credit results remain excellent for our residential mortgage loan portfolio. We had no credit losses in the first quarter of 2002. At March 31, 2002, our residential mortgage loan credit reserve was $5.5 million, equal to 0.31% of the current balance of this portfolio. Credit provision expense has increased in recent quarters due to the significant acquisitions of residential mortgage loans.
Our residential loan delinquencies declined from $5.1 million at the beginning of the year to $4.9 million at the end of the first quarter of 2002. Delinquencies include loans delinquent more than 90 days, in bankruptcy, in foreclosure, and real estate owned. As a percentage of our loan portfolio, delinquencies declined from 0.34% to 0.27% during this period. This decline in delinquency percentage is primarily due to the significant amount of recently originated whole loans acquired in the first quarter. Delinquencies and credit losses may rise in the near future as a result of a weak economy and seasoning of the loans in our portfolio.
26
Table 7
Loss Severity | Realized | Annualized | Ending | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending | Delinquent | Delinquent | On Liquidated | Credit | Credit Losses | Credit | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Loans | Loan % | Loans | Losses | As % of Loans | Reserve | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 1,071,819 | $ | 6,371 | 0.59 | % | 13 | % | (30 | ) | 0.01 | % | $ | 4,968 | ||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
1,060,470 | 4,913 | 0.46 | % | 14 | % | (12 | ) | 0.01 | % | 5,120 | |||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
1,354,606 | 4,823 | 0.36 | % | 60 | % | (311 | ) | 0.09 | % | 4,960 | |||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
1,474,862 | 5,069 | 0.34 | % | 39 | % | (29 | ) | 0.01 | % | 5,199 | |||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
1,794,260 | 4,926 | 0.27 | % | 0 | % | 0 | 0.00 | % | 5,481 | ||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 1,130,997 | $ | 5,667 | 0.50 | % | 9 | % | (42 | ) | 0.01 | % | $ | 4,814 | ||||||||||||||
2001
|
1,474,862 | 5,069 | 0.34 | % | 42 | % | (382 | ) | 0.03 | % | 5,199 |
The characteristics of our loans continue to show the high-quality nature of our residential mortgage loan portfolio. At March 31, 2002, we owned 4,914 residential loans with a total value of $1.8 billion. These were all A quality loans at origination. All these loans were adjustable rate loans. Our average loan size was $364,360. Northern California loans were 12% of the total and Southern California loans were 11% of the total. Loans originated in 1999 or earlier were 41% of the total. On average, our residential mortgage loans had 25 months of seasoning. Loans where the original loan balance exceeded 80% loan-to-value (LTV) made up 28% of loan balances; we benefit from mortgage insurance or additional pledged collateral on all of these loans, serving to substantially lower the effective LTV on these loans. The average effective LTV at origination for our mortgage loans (including the effect of mortgage insurance, pledged collateral, and other credit enhancements) was 67%. Given housing appreciation and loan amortization, we estimated the current effective LTV of our residential mortgage loans was roughly 61%.
27
Table 8
Mar. 2002 | Dec. 2001 | Sep. 2001 | Jun. 2001 | Mar. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Principal Value (Face Value)
|
$ | 1,790,239 | $ | 1,470,467 | $ | 1,346,346 | $ | 1,053,158 | $ | 1,063,633 | ||||||||||
Internal Credit Reserves
|
(5,481 | ) | (5,199 | ) | (4,960 | ) | (5,120 | ) | (4,968 | ) | ||||||||||
Premium (Discount) to be
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized
|
9,502 | 9,594 | 13,220 | 12,432 | 13,154 | |||||||||||||||
Retained Residential Loans
|
$ | 1,794,260 | $ | 1,474,862 | $ | 1,354,606 | $ | 1,060,470 | $ | 1,071,819 | ||||||||||
Number of loans
|
4,914 | 4,177 | 3,909 | 3,306 | 3,433 | |||||||||||||||
Average loan size
|
$ | 364 | $ | 353 | $ | 347 | $ | 321 | $ | 312 | ||||||||||
Adjustable %
|
100 | % | 100 | % | 81 | % | 73 | % | 71 | % | ||||||||||
Hybrid %
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 19 | % | 27 | % | 29 | % | ||||||||||
Fixed %
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||
Northern California
|
12 | % | 10 | % | 10 | % | 13 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Southern California
|
11 | % | 12 | % | 12 | % | 10 | % | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Florida
|
12 | % | 11 | % | 11 | % | 9 | % | 9 | % | ||||||||||
New York
|
7 | % | 8 | % | 8 | % | 9 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||||
Georgia
|
7 | % | 8 | % | 7 | % | 4 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||
New Jersey
|
5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||
Texas
|
4 | % | 4 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||
Other states
|
42 | % | 42 | % | 42 | % | 44 | % | 44 | % | ||||||||||
Year 2002 origination
|
17 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||
Year 2001 origination
|
42 | % | 45 | % | 34 | % | 7 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||
Year 2000 origination
|
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||
Year 1999 origination
|
9 | % | 11 | % | 12 | % | 17 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||||
Year 1998 origination or earlier
|
32 | % | 44 | % | 54 | % | 76 | % | 82 | % | ||||||||||
% balance in loans>
|
||||||||||||||||||||
$1mm per loan
|
16 | % | 15 | % | 14 | % | 11 | % | 11 | % |
We intend to fund our mortgage loans through the issuance of long-term debt through our special purpose subsidiary, Sequoia Mortgage Funding Corporation (Sequoia). This type of financing is non-recourse to Redwood Trust. Our exposure to our $1.2 billion of long-term financed loans is limited to our investment in Sequoia, which at March 31, 2002 was $28.4 million or 2.3% of the Sequoia loan balances. Short-term funded residential mortgage loans at March 31, 2002 were $0.6 billion. We intend to permanently fund all of our residential loans with the non-recourse long-term Sequoia debt that we issue from time to time. In April 2002, we issued $502 million of long-term debt to replace the short-term debt related to $514 million of residential mortgage loans.
Residential Credit-Enhancement Securities
At March 31 2002, we owned $250 million of residential credit-enhancement securities, an increase of 31% over the $191 million we owned at December 31, 2001. These securities had below-investment-grade credit ratings and represented subordinated interests in pools of high-quality jumbo residential mortgage loans. We continue to increase our capacity to evaluate and acquire these assets and to strengthen our relationships with the sellers and servicers of these assets. At the same time, the volume of newly originated and seasoned loans
28
Table 9
Mar. 2002 | Dec. 2001 | Sep. 2001 | Jun. 2001 | Mar. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Start of Period Balances
|
$ | 190,813 | $ | 188,283 | $ | 158,704 | $ | 100,849 | $ | 80,764 | ||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
59,157 | 17,132 | 27,172 | 61,195 | 20,695 | |||||||||||||||
Sales
|
(5,037 | ) | (7,786 | ) | 0 | (1,780 | ) | 0 | ||||||||||||
Principal Payments
|
(4,270 | ) | (3,857 | ) | (1,895 | ) | (1,952 | ) | (1,022 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization
|
366 | (92 | ) | 86 | 161 | 126 | ||||||||||||||
Mark-To-Market (Balance Sheet)
|
8,758 | (3,258 | ) | 4,216 | 223 | 2,654 | ||||||||||||||
Mark-To-Market (Income Statement)
|
45 | 391 | 0 | 8 | (2,368 | ) | ||||||||||||||
End of Period Balances
|
$ | 249,832 | $ | 190,813 | $ | 188,283 | $ | 158,704 | $ | 100,849 |
Our residential credit-enhancement securities are first-loss, second-loss, or third loss interests. First loss interests are generally allocated actual credit losses on the entire underlying pool of loans up to a maximum of the principal amount of the first loss interest. Our ownership of first loss interests provides credit-enhancement principal protection from the initial losses in the underlying pool for the second loss, third loss, and more senior interests. Any first loss interests that are owned by others and that are junior to our second and third loss interests provide our interests with some principal protection from losses (they serve as external credit-enhancement).
At March 31, 2002, we owned $460 million principal (face) value of residential credit-enhancement securities at a cost basis of $237 million. After mark-to-market adjustments, our net investment in these assets, as reflected on our balance sheet, was $250 million. Over the life of the underlying mortgage loans, we expect to receive principal payments from these securities of $460 million less credit losses. We receive interest payments each month on the outstanding principal amount. Of the $210 million difference between principal value and reported value, $195 million was designated as an internal credit reserve (reflecting our estimate of future credit losses over the life of the underlying mortgages), $28 million was designated as purchase discount to be amortized into income over time, and $13 million represented positive balance sheet market valuation adjustments.
29
Table 10
Mar. 2002 | Dec. 2001 | Sep. 2001 | Jun. 2001 | Mar. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Total principal value (face value)
|
$ | 460,035 | $ | 353,435 | $ | 323,870 | $ | 266,004 | $ | 155,233 | ||||||||||
Internal credit reserves
|
(194,556 | ) | (140,411 | ) | (112,133 | ) | (78,170 | ) | (35,722 | ) | ||||||||||
Discount to be amortized
|
(28,058 | ) | (25,863 | ) | (30,365 | ) | (31,824 | ) | (21,137 | ) | ||||||||||
Net investment
|
237,421 | 187,161 | 181,372 | 156,010 | 98,374 | |||||||||||||||
Market valuation adjustments
|
12,411 | 3,652 | 6,911 | 2,694 | 2,475 | |||||||||||||||
Net book value
|
$ | 249,832 | $ | 190,813 | $ | 188,283 | $ | 158,704 | $ | 100,849 | ||||||||||
First loss position, principal value
|
$ | 173,990 | $ | 129,019 | $ | 105,830 | $ | 76,386 | $ | 41,156 | ||||||||||
Second loss position, principal
value
|
127,930 | 96,567 | 84,876 | 67,700 | 37,197 | |||||||||||||||
Third loss position, principal value
|
158,115 | 127,849 | 133,164 | 121,918 | 76,880 | |||||||||||||||
Total principal value
|
$ | 460,035 | $ | 353,435 | $ | 323,870 | $ | 266,004 | $ | 155,233 | ||||||||||
First loss position, net book value
|
$ | 42,760 | $ | 29,648 | $ | 25,886 | $ | 18,956 | $ | 13,191 | ||||||||||
Second loss position, net book value
|
79,969 | 60,074 | 53,925 | 43,733 | 25,106 | |||||||||||||||
Third loss position, net book value
|
127,103 | 101,091 | 108,472 | 96,015 | 62,552 | |||||||||||||||
Total net book value
|
$ | 249,832 | $ | 190,813 | $ | 188,283 | $ | 158,704 | $ | 100,849 |
Total interest income from our residential credit-enhancement securities increased to $6.7 million in the first quarter of 2002 from $5.4 million in the fourth quarter of 2001 and $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2001. An increase in our net investment in these securities was the principal reason for the increases in interest income.
Our credit-enhancement portfolio yield was 13.29% during the first quarter of 2002, an increase from 12.01% in the fourth quarter 2001 and 12.32% in the first quarter of 2001. Yields have been increasing over the past several quarters due to the acquisition of an increased proportion of first and second loss interests which have higher yields than third loss interests due to their higher risk levels. In addition, some of our securities have improved yields as a result of faster than anticipated prepayment speeds and/or better than expected credit performance.
Under the effective yield method, credit losses lower than (or later than) anticipated by our designated credit reserve and/or faster than anticipated long-term prepayment rates could result in increasing yields being recognized from our current portfolio. Credit losses higher than (or earlier than) anticipated by our designated credit reserve and/or slower than anticipated long-term prepayment rates could result in lower yields being recognized under the effective yield method and/or market value adjustments through our income statement under EITF 99-20. Yield and EITF 99-20 adjustments are on an asset-specific basis.
30
Table 11
Average | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Net | Discount | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Credit | Discount | Average | Coupon | Amortization | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value | Reserve | Balance | Basis | Income | Income | Income | Yield | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 135,471 | $ | (31,415 | ) | $ | (18,260 | ) | $ | 85,796 | $ | 2,516 | $ | 126 | $ | 2,642 | 12.32 | % | ||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
184,472 | (48,845 | ) | (21,920 | ) | 113,707 | 3,242 | 161 | 3,403 | 11.97 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
296,417 | (96,364 | ) | (31,378 | ) | 168,675 | 5,160 | 86 | 5,246 | 12.44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
328,652 | (121,183 | ) | (27,914 | ) | 179,555 | 5,484 | (92 | ) | 5,392 | 12.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
389,798 | (164,995 | ) | (23,263 | ) | 201,540 | 6,329 | 366 | 6,695 | 13.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 87,070 | $ | (18,527 | ) | $ | (9,734 | ) | $ | 58,809 | $ | 6,532 | $ | 1,992 | $ | 8,524 | 14.49 | % | ||||||||||||||
2001
|
236,947 | (74,763 | ) | (24,907 | ) | 137,276 | 16,402 | 281 | 16,683 | 12.15 | % |
Credit losses for the $65 billion portfolio that we credit enhanced at March 31, 2002 totaled $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2002. The annualized rate of credit loss was less than 1 basis point (0.01%) of the portfolio. Of this loss, $0.6 million was borne by the external credit enhancements to our positions and we had net recoveries of $0.1 million on our interests.
Delinquencies (over 90 days, foreclosure, bankruptcy, and REO) in our credit-enhancement portfolio decreased from 0.24% of the current balances at the end of 2001 to 0.20% at the end of the first quarter of 2002. We expect delinquency and loss rates for our existing residential credit-enhancement securities to increase from their current modest levels, given a weaker economy and the natural seasoning pattern of these loans. However, in periods where we have significant increases in the size of our portfolio, total delinquencies as a percent of the pool balance may decline (as occurred in the first quarter of 2002).
Table 12
Redwoods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of | Losses To | Total Credit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying | Delinquencies | Net | External | Total | Losses as | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage | Credit | Credit | Credit | % of Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | $ | % | Losses | Enhancement | Losses | (annualized) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 27,081,361 | $ | 63,893 | 0.24 | % | $ | (55 | ) | $ | (550 | ) | $ | (605 | ) | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
38,278,631 | 98,287 | 0.26 | % | (196 | ) | (824 | ) | (1,020 | ) | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
49,977,641 | 107,821 | 0.22 | % | (192 | ) | (407 | ) | (599 | ) | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
51,720,856 | 124,812 | 0.24 | % | (321 | ) | (571 | ) | (892 | ) | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
64,826,605 | 129,849 | 0.20 | % | 166 | (618 | ) | (452 | ) | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 22,633,860 | $ | 51,709 | 0.23 | % | $ | (758 | ) | $ | (3,750 | ) | $ | (4,508 | ) | 0.02 | % | |||||||||||
2001
|
51,720,856 | 124,812 | 0.24 | % | (764 | ) | (2,352 | ) | (3,116 | ) | 0.01 | % |
At March 2002, we had $80 million of external credit enhancements and $195 million of internal credit reserves for this portfolio. External credit reserves serve to protect us from credit losses on a specific asset basis and represent the principal value of interests that are junior to us and are owned by others. Total reserves of $275 million represented 42 basis points (0.42%) of our credit-enhancement portfolio of $65 billion. Reserves, credit protection, and risks are specific to each credit-enhancement interest.
31
Table 13
Mar. 2002 | Dec. 2001 | Sep. 2001 | Jun. 2001 | Mar. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Internal Credit Reserves
|
$ | 194,556 | $ | 140,411 | $ | 112,133 | $ | 78,170 | $ | 35,722 | ||||||||||
External Credit Enhancement
|
79,924 | 90,224 | 94,745 | 91,004 | 86,600 | |||||||||||||||
Total Credit Protection
|
$ | 274,480 | $ | 230,635 | $ | 206,878 | $ | 169,174 | $ | 122,322 | ||||||||||
As % of Total Portfolio
|
0.42 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.44 | % | 0.45 | % |
The characteristics of the loans that we credit-enhance continue to show their high-quality nature. At March 31, 2002, we credit enhanced 162,502 loans in our total credit-enhancement portfolio. Of the $65 billion loan balances, 67% were fixed-rate loans, 14% were hybrid loans (loans that become adjustable 3 to 10 years after origination), and 19% were adjustable-rate loans. The average size of the loans that we credit-enhanced was $398,900. We credit-enhanced 1,992 loans with principal balances in excess of $1 million; these loans had an average size of $1.4 million and a total loan balance of $2.8 billion. Loans over $1 million were 1% of the total number of loans and 4% of the total balance of loans that we credit-enhanced at quarter-end.
The average FICO score of borrowers on residential mortgage loans underlying our residential credit-enhancement securities where FICO was obtained was 728. Borrowers with FICO scores over 720 comprised 60% of the portfolio, those with scores between 680 and 720 comprised 23%, those with scores between 620 and 680 comprised 15% and those with scores below 620 comprised 2%. In general, loans with lower FICO scores have strong compensating factors.
Many of the loans that we credit enhance are seasoned. On average, our credit-enhanced loans had 23 months of seasoning. Generally, the credit risk for seasoned loans is reduced as property values appreciate and the loan balances amortize. The current LTV ratio for seasoned loans is often much reduced from the LTV ratio at origination.
Loans with LTVs at origination in excess of 80% made up 7% of loan balances. We benefit from mortgage insurance or additional pledged collateral on 99% of these loans, serving to substantially reduce the effective LTV on these loans. The average effective LTV at origination for all the loans we credit enhance (including the effect of mortgage insurance, pledged collateral, and other credit enhancements) was 70%. Given housing appreciation and loan amortization, we estimated the average current effective LTV for these loans was roughly 63%.
32
Table 14
Mar. 2002 | Dec. 2001 | Sep. 2001 | Jun. 2001 | Mar. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Credit-enhancement securities
|
$ | 64,826,605 | $ | 51,720,856 | $ | 49,977,641 | $ | 38,278,631 | $ | 27,081,361 | ||||||||||
Number of credit-enhanced loans
|
162,502 | 133,634 | 132,555 | 105,721 | 77,011 | |||||||||||||||
Average loan size
|
$ | 398 | $ | 387 | $ | 377 | $ | 362 | $ | 352 | ||||||||||
Adjustable %
|
19 | % | 15 | % | 11 | % | 19 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||||
Hybrid %
|
14 | % | 17 | % | 19 | % | 20 | % | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Fixed %
|
67 | % | 68 | % | 70 | % | 61 | % | 61 | % | ||||||||||
Northern California
|
25 | % | 27 | % | 25 | % | 26 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||
Southern California
|
25 | % | 26 | % | 26 | % | 28 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||||
New York
|
5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||||
Texas
|
4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | 3 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||
New Jersey
|
3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||
Virginia
|
3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||
Other states
|
35 | % | 32 | % | 34 | % | 32 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||
Year 2002 origination
|
1 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||
Year 2001 origination
|
55 | % | 43 | % | 32 | % | 21 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||
Year 2000 origination
|
8 | % | 10 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||||
Year 1999 origination
|
17 | % | 22 | % | 31 | % | 36 | % | 29 | % | ||||||||||
Year 1998 or earlier origination
|
19 | % | 25 | % | 23 | % | 29 | % | 43 | % | ||||||||||
% balance in loans> $1mm per
loan
|
4 | % | 4 | % | 3 | % | 4 | % | 6 | % |
The geographic dispersion of our credit-enhancement portfolio generally mirrors that of the jumbo residential market as a whole with approximately half of our loans concentrated in California.
For the loans that we credit enhanced where the home was located in Northern California (25% of the total portfolio), at March 31, 2002 the average loan balance was $421,400, the average FICO score was 730, and the average LTV at origination was 68%. On average, these Northern California loans had 24 months of seasoning, with 1% originated in year 2002, 57% in year 2001, 5% in year 2000, and 37% in years 1999 or earlier. At March 31, 2002, 628 of these loans had principal balances in excess of $1 million; these larger loans had an average size of $1.4 million and a total loan balance of $879 million. They represented 1% of the total number of Northern California loans and 5% of the total balance of Northern California loans. Delinquencies in our Northern California residential credit-enhancement portfolio at March 31, 2002 were 0.14% of current loan balances.
For the loans that we credit enhanced where the home was located in Southern California (25% of the total portfolio), at March 31, 2002 the average loan balance was $410,800, the average FICO score was 725, and the average LTV at origination was 71%. On average, these Southern California loans had 32 months of seasoning, with 1% originated in year 2002, 46% in year 2001, 5% in year 2000, and 48% in years 1999 or earlier. At March 31, 2002, 643 of these loans had principal balances in excess of $1 million; these larger loans had an average size of $1.4 million and a total loan balance of $923 million. They represented 2% of the total number of Southern California loans and 6% of the total balance of Southern California loans. Delinquencies
33
Combined Residential Loan Portfolios
The table below summarizes the credit protection of our residential mortgage loans and our residential credit-enhancement securities on a combined basis.
Table 15
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Redwoods | Credit | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | Residential | External | Total | Protection | ||||||||||||||||
Residential | Credit | Credit | Credit | As % of | ||||||||||||||||
Loans | Reserve | Enhancement | Protection | Loans | ||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 28,153,180 | $ | 40,690 | $ | 86,600 | $ | 127,290 | 0.45% | |||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
39,339,101 | 83,290 | 91,004 | 174,294 | 0.44% | |||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
51,332,247 | 117,093 | 94,745 | 211,838 | 0.41% | |||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
53,195,718 | 145,610 | 90,224 | 235,834 | 0.44% | |||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
66,620,865 | 200,037 | 79,924 | 279,961 | 0.42% | |||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 23,764,857 | $ | 31,866 | $ | 86,840 | $ | 118,706 | 0.50% | |||||||||||
2001
|
53,195,718 | 145,610 | 90,224 | 235,834 | 0.44% |
The table below summarizes the credit performance of our residential mortgage loans and our residential credit-enhancement securities on a combined basis.
Table 16
Delinquencies | Redwoods | Losses | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
As % of | Share of | To | Credit | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Net Credit | External | Total | Losses as | ||||||||||||||||||||
Residential | (Losses) | Credit | Credit | % of Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
Delinquencies | Loans | Recoveries | Enhancement | Losses | (annualized) | |||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 70,264 | 0.25 | % | $ | (85 | ) | $ | (550 | ) | $ | (635 | ) | 0.01% | ||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
103,200 | 0.26 | % | (208 | ) | (824 | ) | (1,032 | ) | 0.01% | ||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
112,644 | 0.22 | % | (503 | ) | (407 | ) | (910 | ) | 0.01% | ||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
129,881 | 0.24 | % | (352 | ) | (571 | ) | (923 | ) | 0.01% | ||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
134,775 | 0.20 | % | 166 | (618 | ) | (452 | ) | 0.01% | |||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 57,376 | 0.24 | % | $ | (799 | ) | $ | (3,751 | ) | $ | (4,550 | ) | 0.02% | ||||||||||
2001
|
129,881 | 0.24 | % | (1,148 | ) | (2,352 | ) | (3,500 | ) | 0.01% |
Commercial Mortgage Loans
Our commercial real estate loan portfolio decreased to $49 million at March 31, 2002 due to loan payoffs and sales over the past several quarters. We plan to acquire commercial loans and commercial loan participations later in 2002.
34
Table 17
Mar. 2002 | Dec. 2001 | Sep. 2001 | Jun. 2001 | Mar. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Start of Period Balances
|
$ | 51,084 | $ | 64,362 | $ | 67,043 | $ | 70,077 | $ | 76,082 | ||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
140 | 210 | 0 | 1,500 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Sales
|
0 | 0 | (2,645 | ) | (3,573 | ) | (1,513 | ) | ||||||||||||
Principal Payments
|
(1,873 | ) | (13,403 | ) | (44 | ) | (897 | ) | (4,572 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization
|
28 | 29 | 15 | 104 | 76 | |||||||||||||||
Mark-To-Market (Balance Sheet)
|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Mark-To-Market (Income Statement)
|
1 | (114 | ) | (7 | ) | (168 | ) | 4 | ||||||||||||
End of Period Balances
|
$ | 49,380 | $ | 51,084 | $ | 64,362 | $ | 67,043 | $ | 70,077 |
The yield on our commercial mortgage loans decreased in the first quarter of 2002 due to a reduction in fees recognized at the time of loan payoff. Early payoffs resulted in the acceleration of the recognition of deferred origination fees, prepayment penalty, and exit fees. All commercial mortgage loans in our portfolio had interest rate floors, so the decline in short-term interest rates over the past year did not have a material impact on the yields on these loans.
Table 18
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Net | Discount | Credit | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | Discount | Coupon | Amortization | Provision | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Value | Balance | Income | Income | Expense | Income | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 73,836 | $ | (1,208 | ) | $ | 1,857 | $ | 76 | $ | 0 | $ | 1,933 | 10.65% | ||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
70,279 | (878 | ) | 1,857 | 104 | 0 | 1,961 | 11.30% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
66,024 | (724 | ) | 1,680 | 15 | 0 | 1,695 | 10.38% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
64,851 | (601 | ) | 1,862 | 29 | 0 | 1,891 | 11.77% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
50,872 | (702 | ) | 1,247 | 27 | 0 | 1,274 | 10.15% | ||||||||||||||||||||
2000*
|
$ | 53,127 | $ | (1,116 | ) | $ | 5,260 | $ | 822 | $ | 0 | $ | 6,082 | 11.69% | ||||||||||||||
2001
|
68,715 | (851 | ) | 7,256 | 224 | 0 | 7,480 | 11.02% |
*Includes loans held at RWT Holdings, Inc., which was consolidated with our financials as of January 1, 2001.
To date, we have not experienced delinquencies or credit losses in our commercial mortgage loans nor have we established a credit reserve for our commercial loans. A slowing economy, and factors particular to each loan, could cause credit concerns and issues in the future. If this occurs, we may need to provide for future losses or reduce the reported market value for commercial mortgage loans held for sale. Other factors may also affect the market value of these loans.
35
Table 19
Mar. 2002 | Dec. 2001 | Sep. 2001 | Jun. 2001 | Mar. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage Loans
|
$ | 49,380 | $ | 51,084 | $ | 64,362 | $ | 67,043 | $ | 70,077 | ||||||||||
Number of Loans
|
7 | 8 | 14 | 16 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
Average Loan Size
|
$ | 7,054 | $ | 6,386 | $ | 4,597 | $ | 4,190 | $ | 3,893 | ||||||||||
Serious Delinquency $
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
Realized Credit losses
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||||||
California %
|
61 | % | 59 | % | 67 | % | 68 | % | 71 | % |
Our goal is to secure long-term non-recourse debt for our commercial mortgage loans. In March 2002, we issued $8 million of long-term debt collateralized debt for our commercial real estate loans. At March 31, 2002, three of our commercial loans, totaling over $30 million of principal, were financed through long-term debt in the form of commercial loan participations. Our remaining commercial mortgage loans were financed with a combination of equity and short- and medium-term credit facilities.
Securities Portfolio
Our securities portfolio consisted of all the securities we owned with the exception of residential credit-enhancement securities (discussed separately above). At March 31, 2002, our securities portfolio consisted primarily of investment-grade residential mortgage securities held to generate interest income. We will likely acquire lower-rated and more diverse securities in the future. During the first quarter of 2002, this portfolio decreased from $683 million to $609 million. As a part of our long-term strategy, we plan to reduce short-term debt utilized to fund our securities portfolio; we expect to either reduce the size of our securities and/or to fund these securities with long-term debt. In April 2002, we issued $81 million in face value of Long-Term Debt through Sequoia Mortgage Funding Company 2002-A, a trust established by Sequoia. This debt is collateralized by a pool of adjustable-rate residential mortgage securities. The proceeds received from this issuance were used to pay down a portion of the Companys Short-Term Debt.
Table 20
Mar. 2002 | Dec. 2001 | Sep. 2001 | Jun. 2001 | Mar. 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Start of Period Balances
|
$ | 683,482 | $ | 608,793 | $ | 739,187 | $ | 1,000,612 | $ | 764,775 | ||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
76,701 | 147,251 | 47,323 | 16,051 | 310,026 | |||||||||||||||
Sales
|
(89,395 | ) | (15,260 | ) | (106,297 | ) | (162,753 | ) | (11,000 | ) | ||||||||||
Principal Payments
|
(60,040 | ) | (53,400 | ) | (71,692 | ) | (113,165 | ) | (65,726 | ) | ||||||||||
Premium Amortization
|
(1,701 | ) | (799 | ) | (898 | ) | (1,086 | ) | (586 | ) | ||||||||||
Mark-To-Market (Balance Sheet)
|
(444 | ) | (2,034 | ) | 1,087 | (94 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||||||
Mark-To-Market (Income Statement)
|
829 | (1,069 | ) | 83 | (378 | ) | 3,129 | |||||||||||||
End of Period Balances
|
$ | 609,432 | $ | 683,482 | $ | 608,793 | $ | 739,187 | $ | 1,000,612 |
Total interest income from this portfolio was $8.5 million in the first quarter of 2002, a decrease from $9.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2001 and from $17.0 million in the first quarter of 2001. This decrease was the result of lower average balances and lower yields.
The yields on this portfolio have fallen over the past several quarters due to declining short-term interest rates, as the majority of these securities represent interests in pools of adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans. We expect adjustable coupon rates to continue to decrease for the next several months, even if interest rates
36
Table 21
Average | Mortgage | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Net | Prepayment | Premium | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earning | Premium | Rates | Interest | Amortization | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Balance | (CPR) | Income | Expense | Income | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 874,307 | $ | 10,164 | 19 | % | $ | 17,634 | $ | (586 | ) | $ | 17,048 | 7.71 | % | |||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
910,793 | 14,013 | 31 | % | 17,648 | (1,086 | ) | 16,562 | 7.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
626,246 | 12,332 | 32 | % | 11,642 | (898 | ) | 10,744 | 6.73 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
628,193 | 11,838 | 31 | % | 10,702 | (799 | ) | 9,903 | 6.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
666,570 | 10,122 | 31 | % | 10,215 | (1,701 | ) | 8,514 | 5.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 884,081 | $ | 8,475 | 20 | % | $ | 68,982 | $ | (1,776 | ) | $ | 67,206 | 7.53 | % | |||||||||||||
2001
|
758,844 | 12,092 | 28 | % | 57,626 | (3,369 | ) | 54,257 | 7.04 | % |
The table below presents our securities portfolio by asset type.
Table 22
Credit | Mar. | Dec. | Sep. | Jun. | Mar. | |||||||||||||||||||
Rating | 2002 | 2001 | 2001 | 2001 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||
FNMA & FHLMC
Adjustable
|
AAA | $ | 285,174 | $ | 353,523 | $ | 389,400 | $ | 434,732 | $ | 485,639 | |||||||||||||
FNMA & FHLMC Hybrid
|
AAA | 0 | 20,223 | 0 | 2,828 | 3,096 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jumbo Prime Adjustable
|
AAA or AA | 157,279 | 144,813 | 138,261 | 243,078 | 451,950 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jumbo Prime Hybrid
|
AAA or AA | 133,456 | 137,926 | 43,775 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Jumbo Prime Fixed
|
AAA or AA | 4,961 | 5,018 | 15,732 | 24,815 | 23,997 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subprime Floaters
|
AAA or AA | 20,935 | 14,600 | 14,600 | 14,600 | 19,277 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subprime Fixed
|
AAA to BBB | 0 | 600 | 1,050 | 13,026 | 13,062 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-Only
Residential
|
AAA | 0 | 13 | 53 | 60 | 71 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-Only Commercial
|
AAA | 4,768 | 4,874 | 5,008 | 5,082 | 2,534 | ||||||||||||||||||
CBO Equity Mixed Real
Estate
|
B or NR | 2,859 | 1,892 | 914 | 966 | 986 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Securities Portfolio
|
$ | 609,432 | $ | 683,482 | $ | 608,793 | $ | 739,187 | $ | 1,000,612 | ||||||||||||||
Realized Credit Losses During
Quarter
|
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
We owned fixed rate securities in our securities portfolio and our residential credit-enhancement securities portfolio, but not in amounts that materially exceed our equity capital base (see Table 30). We have generally avoided funding fixed rate assets with floating rate liabilities.
37
Interest Expense
Our cost of borrowed funds has continued to fall over the past several quarters. During the first quarter of 2002, our cost of borrowed funds was 2.82%, a decrease from 3.56% in the fourth quarter of 2001 and 6.34% in the first quarter of 2001. This decline in interest expense of our adjustable-rate debt was due to the decrease in short-term interest rates in 2001 and the stabilization of short-term interest rates thus far in 2002. Our average debt levels rose slightly from $2.0 billion in the first quarter of 2001 to $2.2 billion in the first quarter of 2002. Due to the decline in borrowing costs, our interest expenses declined from $31.4 million in the first quarter of 2001 to $15.6 million in the first quarter of 2002.
Table 23
Long | Long | Short | Short | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Term | Term | Average | Term | Term | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long | Debt | Debt | Short | Debt | Debt | Total | Cost | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Term | Interest | Cost of | Term | Interest | Cost of | Interest | Of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt | Expense | Funds | Debt | Expense | Funds | Expense | Funds | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 1,072,172 | $ | 17,838 | 6.65 | % | $ | 910,515 | $ | 13,575 | 5.96 | % | $ | 31,413 | 6.34 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
1,018,646 | 15,167 | 5.96 | % | 964,543 | 11,843 | 4.91 | % | 27,010 | 5.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
933,340 | 12,714 | 5.45 | % | 852,341 | 8,841 | 4.15 | % | 21,555 | 4.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
1,193,050 | 11,949 | 4.01 | % | 839,879 | 6,142 | 2.93 | % | 18,091 | 3.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
1,280,503 | 10,661 | 3.33 | % | 931,424 | 4,941 | 2.12 | % | 15,602 | 2.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 1,137,324 | $ | 76,294 | 6.71 | % | $ | 933,619 | $ | 62,309 | 6.67 | % | $ | 138,603 | 6.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2001
|
1,054,135 | 57,668 | 5.47 | % | 891,251 | 40,401 | 4.53 | % | 98,069 | 5.04 | % |
38
The table below lists our long-term debt issuance.
Table 24
Principal | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original | Estimated | Outstanding | Rate At | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt | Issue | Issue | Stated | Callable | At Mar. 31, | Mar. 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Term Debt Issue | Rating | Date | Amount | Index | Maturity | Date | 2002 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 1 A1
|
AAA | 7/29/97 | $ | 334,347 | 1m LIBOR | 2/15/28 | Called | $ | 0 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 1 A2
|
AAA | 7/29/97 | 200,000 | Fed Funds | 2/15/28 | Called | 0 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2 A1
|
AAA | 11/6/97 | 592,560 | 1y Treasury | 3/30/29 | 2003 | 211,894 | 4.17 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2 A2
|
AAA | 11/6/97 | 156,600 | 1m LIBOR | 3/30/29 | 2003 | 55,999 | 2.24 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 A1
|
AAA | 6/26/98 | 225,459 | Fixed to 12/02 | 5/31/28 | Retired | 0 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 A2
|
AAA | 6/26/98 | 95,000 | Fixed to 12/02 | 5/31/28 | Retired | 0 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 A3
|
AAA | 6/26/98 | 164,200 | Fixed to 12/02 | 5/31/28 | 2002 | 6,844 | 6.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 A4
|
AAA | 6/26/98 | 121,923 | Fixed to 12/02 | 5/31/28 | 2002 | 121,923 | 6.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 M1
|
AA/AAA | 6/26/98 | 16,127 | Fixed to 12/02 | 5/31/28 | 2002 | 16,127 | 6.79 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 M2
|
A/AA | 6/26/98 | 7,741 | Fixed to 12/02 | 5/31/28 | 2002 | 7,741 | 6.79 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 M3
|
BBB/A | 6/26/98 | 4,838 | Fixed to 12/02 | 5/31/28 | 2002 | 4,838 | 6.79 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 1A A1
|
AAA | 5/4/99 | 157,266 | 1m LIBOR | 2/15/28 | 2002 | 50,123 | 2.27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 4 A
|
AAA | 3/21/00 | 377,119 | 1m LIBOR | 8/31/24 | 2005 | 239,279 | 2.26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial 1
|
N/A | 3/30/01 | 8,891 | 1m LIBOR | 11/1/02 | N/A | 9,010 | 4.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial 2
|
N/A | 3/30/01 | 8,320 | 1m LIBOR | 10/1/03 | N/A | 8,320 | 4.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 5 A
|
AAA | 10/29/01 | 496,667 | 1m LIBOR | 10/29/26 | 2006 | 481,979 | 2.25 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 5 B1
|
AA | 10/29/01 | 5,918 | 1m LIBOR | 10/29/26 | 2006 | 5,918 | 2.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 5 B2
|
A | 10/29/01 | 5,146 | 1m LIBOR | 10/29/26 | 2006 | 5,146 | 2.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 5 B3
|
BBB | 10/29/01 | 2,316 | 1m LIBOR | 10/29/26 | 2006 | 2,316 | 2.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial 3
|
N/A | 3/1/02 | 8,318 | 1m LIBOR | 7/1/03 | N/A | 8,318 | 8.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Long-Term Debt
|
$ | 2,988,756 | $ | 1,235,775 | 3.19 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In 2001, Fitch Ratings, a credit rating agency, upgraded the credit ratings on three of our debt issues (Sequoia 3 M1 to M3). In April 2002 we issued $502 million of long-term debt through Sequoia 6.
Operating Expenses
Our ratio of operating expenses to equity decreased to 4.15% in the first quarter of 2002, from 5.49% in the first quarter of 2001. Our efficiency ratio (operating expenses divided by net interest income after credit expenses) decreased to 23% in the first quarter of 2002 from 30% in the first quarter of 2001. We expect our total operating expenses to be higher in 2002 (from the $12 million in 2001) as a result of improved performance (as a significant portion of our compensation expenses are performance based) and increased staffing due to the increase in capital and assets. Operating expenses increased 19% from the first quarter of 2001 as compared to the first quarter of 2002. However, our average total equity increased by 56% from the first quarter of 2001 as compared to the first quarter of 2002. If we continue to increase the scale of our business, we expect to continue to benefit from operating leverage, as we would expect growth in our operating expenses would be restrained relative to growth in equity and net interest income.
We report Holdings on a consolidated basis. In years prior to 2001, we accounted for our interest in Holdings as an equity investment; our losses from Holdings in these years were reported as other income and expense. The costs of business units that were closed are the primary expenses associated with Holdings in 2000.
39
Table 25
Operating | Efficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses | Operating | Ratio: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Of | Expenses | Operating | Operating | |||||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Unconsolidated | Closed | From | Expenses/ | Expenses/ | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating | Holdings | Business | Ongoing | Average | Net Interest | |||||||||||||||||||
Expenses | Expenses | Units | Operations | Equity | Income | |||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 2,980 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 2,980 | 5.49 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
3,378 | 0 | 0 | 3,378 | 6.13 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
2,748 | 0 | 0 | 2,748 | 4.32 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
2,730 | 0 | 0 | 2,730 | 3.60 | % | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
3,546 | 0 | 0 | 3,546 | 4.15 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 7,850 | $ | 2,391 | $ | (221 | ) | $ | 10,020 | 4.68 | % | 33 | % | |||||||||||
2001
|
11,836 | 0 | 0 | 11,836 | 4.75 | % | 26 | % |
Other Income (Expense)
In the first quarter of 2002, other income and expense primarily consisted of variable stock option expense associated with certain stock options. This expense, a type of mark-to-market expense, occurred as our stock price rose above the underlying strike price on a small portion of our outstanding stock options.
Mark-to-Market Adjustments
Changes in the market value of certain of our mortgage assets and interest rate agreements affect our GAAP earnings each quarter. For the first quarter of 2002, income statement mark-to-market adjustments totaled a positive $0.9 million. We also mark-to-market certain assets through our balance sheet; these adjustments affect our reported book value but not our earnings. Net balance sheet and income statement mark-to-market adjustments were positive $9.2 million in the first quarter of 2002. This increase in market values was due in part to favorable prepayment and credit performance on some of our residential credit-enhancement securities.
Shareholder Wealth
In the 7.5 years since the commencement of Redwoods operations, cumulative shareholder wealth has grown at a compound rate of 18% per year. We define shareholder wealth as growth in tangible book value per share, plus dividends paid, plus reinvestment of dividends. In calculating shareholder wealth, we assumed that dividends were reinvested through the purchase of additional shares at the prevailing book value per share. With this assumption, the shareholder wealth we have created can be compared to book value per share growth at a non-REIT company that has retained its earnings and compounds book value within the company. This is a measure of management value-added, not a measure of actual shareholder returns.
Book value per share was $11.67 in September 1994 when we commenced operations. We increased book value to $23.11 per share at March 31, 2002 through the retention of cash by keeping dividends lower than cash flow, net positive changes in market values of assets, issuance of stock at prices above book value, and repurchases of stock below book value. Since we mark-to-market many of our assets through our balance sheet, reported book value is a good approximation of tangible value in the company. Cumulative dividends paid during this period were $10.49 per share, and reinvestment earnings on those dividends were $7.11 per share. Thus, cumulatively, shareholder wealth has increased from $11.67 per share to $40.71 per share during this 7.5 year period. A company that earned an 18% after-tax return on equity and retained all its earnings would have shown a similar amount of shareholder wealth growth during this period.
40
Table 26
Book | Dividends | Cumulative | ||||||||||||||||||
Value | Declared | Reinvestment | Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||
Per | During | Cumulative | Earnings on | Shareholder | ||||||||||||||||
Share | Period | Dividends | Dividends | Wealth | ||||||||||||||||
Sep. 1994
|
$ | 11.67 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 11.67 | ||||||||||
Dec. 1994
|
10.82 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 11.07 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1995
|
12.38 | 0.96 | 1.21 | 0.09 | 13.68 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1996
|
16.50 | 1.67 | 2.88 | 1.07 | 20.45 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1997
|
21.55 | 2.15 | 5.03 | 3.07 | 29.65 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1998
|
20.27 | 0.28 | 5.31 | 2.67 | 28.25 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1999
|
20.88 | 0.40 | 5.71 | 3.07 | 29.66 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 2000
|
21.47 | 1.61 | 7.32 | 4.11 | 32.90 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 2001
|
22.21 | 2.55 | 9.87 | 6.03 | 38.11 | |||||||||||||||
Mar. 2002
|
23.11 | 0.62 | 10.49 | 7.11 | 40.71 |
Taxable Income and Dividends
We generally intend to distribute over time as preferred and common stock dividends 100% of our REIT taxable income earned at our parent company, Redwood Trust, which has elected REIT status. Our REIT taxable income may differ materially from our core earnings or reported GAAP income.
Our common stock dividend policy and distributions are set by our Board of Directors. Generally, distributions depend on our REIT taxable income, GAAP earnings, cash flows, overall financial condition, maintenance of REIT status, and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant. The Board of Directors may reduce our regular dividend rate when it believes it may be in the long-term interest of Redwood Trust and its shareholders to do so. No dividends will be paid or set apart for payment on shares of our common stock unless full cumulative dividends have been paid on our Class B 9.74% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. As of March 31, 2002, full cumulative dividends have been paid on the Class B Preferred Stock.
Under current policy, the Board sets our regular dividend at a rate that it believes is more likely than not to be sustainable, given current expectations for cash flow generation and other factors. In years when our dividend distribution requirements exceed what we believe to be our sustainable dividend rate, the Board may declare one or more special quarterly cash dividends.
Distributions to our shareholders will generally be subject to tax as ordinary income, although a portion of such distributions may be designated by us as capital gain or may constitute a tax-free return of capital. All dividends declared and paid in the last three years have been ordinary income. Our Board of Directors may elect to maintain a steady dividend rate during periods of fluctuating REIT taxable income. In such event, the Board may choose to declare dividends that include a return of capital. We will generally attempt to avoid acquiring assets or structuring financings or sales at the REIT corporate level that may generate unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) or excess inclusion income for our shareholders; there can be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so. We annually furnish to each shareholder a statement setting forth distributions paid during the preceding year and their characterization as ordinary income, capital gains or return of capital. For a discussion of the Federal income tax treatment of our distributions, see Federal Income Tax Considerations Taxation of Holders of Redwood Trusts Common Stock in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
41
We estimate the fair value of our assets and hedges using available market information and other appropriate valuation methodologies. We believe the estimates we use accurately reflect the values we may be able to receive should we choose to sell them. Our estimates are inherently subjective in nature and involve matters of uncertainty and judgment to interpret relevant market and other data. Many factors are necessary to estimate market values, including, but not limited to interest rates, prepayment rates, and amount and timing of credit losses.
In addition to our valuation processes, we are active acquirers, and occasional sellers, of the assets we own and we are users of hedges. Thus, we have the ability to understand and determine changes in assumptions that are taking place in the market place, and make appropriate changes in our assumptions for valuing assets in our portfolio. In addition, we use third party sources to assist in developing our estimates. Furthermore, for many of the assets we pledge to obtain collateralized short-term borrowings, we obtain market valuations from our counter-parties on our assets in order to establish the maximum amount of borrowings.
Changes in the perceptions regarding future events can have a material impact on the value of such assets. Should such changes, or other factors, result in significant changes in the market values, our income and/or book value could be adversely affected.
We recognize revenue on our assets using the effective yield method. The use of this method requires us to project the cash flow over the remaining life of each asset. Such projections include assumptions about interest rates, prepayment rates, timing and amount of credit losses, when certain tests will be met that may allow for changes in payments made under the structure of securities, and other factors. There can be no assurance that our assumptions used to generate future cash flows, or the current periods yield for each asset, will prove to be accurate. Our current period earnings may not accurately reflect the yield to be earned on that asset for the remaining life.
We review our cash flow projections on an ongoing basis. We monitor the critical performance factors for each loan and security. Our expectations of future asset cash flow performance are shaped by input and analysis received from external sources, internal models, and our own judgment and experience.
One significant assumption used in projecting cash flows on many of our assets, and thus our current yield, is the level and timing of credit losses that we expect to incur over the lives of these assets. We establish the level of future estimated credit losses as a credit reserve. The reserve is based upon our assessment of various factors affecting our assets, including current and projected economic conditions, characteristics of the underlying loans, delinquency status, and external credit protection. Our actual credit losses, and the timing of these losses, may differ from those estimates used to establish the reserve. Such differences will result in different yields over the life of the asset than we may be currently reporting under GAAP. If such differences are adverse, and the market value of our assets decline below our carrying value, we may need to take current period mark-to-market charges through our income statement.
We continually review and update, as appropriate, all of our assumptions. Despite this continual review, there can be no assurance that our assumptions used to estimate cash flows, fair values, and effective yields will prove to be correct as interest rates, economic conditions, real estate conditions, and the markets perception of the future constantly change.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flow
Cash flow from operations equals earnings adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization, provisions, and mark-to-market adjustments. Free cash flow equals cash flow from operations less capital expenditures and increases in working capital. Generally, free cash flow plus principal receipts from assets are available to pay dividends, pay down debt, repurchase stock, or acquire new portfolio assets. Funds retained to
42
Over the past several quarters, our cash flow from operations has exceeded our earnings and our dividend distributions. In the first quarter of 2002, cash flow from operations was $14 million, consisting of earnings of $11 million plus non-cash depreciation, amortization, compensation, and mark-to-market adjustments of $3 million. Our free cash flow, which is our cash flow from operations plus changes in working capital, property, plant, equipment, and other non-earning assets, was $13 million. In addition, we issued $46 million in common stock during the quarter through a common stock offering and our direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment plan. We used the available cash from these sources to fund our common stock dividend of $8 million and to increase our net investment in our real estate activities by $51 million.
The presentation of free cash flow and funds available for portfolio investing is intended to supplement the presentation of cash provided by operating activities in accordance with GAAP. Since all companies do not calculate these alternative measures of cash flow in the same fashion, free cash flow and funds retained for portfolio investing may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Table 27
Changes In | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | Working | Funds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | Flow | Capital | Free | Common | (Purchase)/ | Available for | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP | Cash | From | And Other | Cash | Dividends | Sale | Portfolio | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings | Items | Operations | Assets | Flow | Paid | Of Stock | Investing | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 6,680 | $ | 1,345 | $ | 8,025 | $ | 4,515 | $ | 12,540 | $ | (3,876 | ) | $ | 986 | $ | 9,650 | |||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
6,463 | 3,004 | 9,467 | (1,096 | ) | 8,371 | (4,448 | ) | 548 | 4,471 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
8,065 | 2,386 | 10,451 | 366 | 10,817 | (6,715 | ) | 50,586 | 54,688 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
8,955 | 6,496 | 15,451 | 562 | 16,013 | (8,268 | ) | 33,665 | 41,410 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
11,219 | 2,780 | 13,999 | (1,125 | ) | 12,874 | (7,597 | ) | 46,162 | 51,439 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 16,210 | $ | 8,873 | $ | 25,083 | $ | 2,368 | $ | 27,451 | $ | (12,488 | ) | $ | 428 | $ | 15,391 | |||||||||||||||
2001
|
30,163 | 13,231 | 43,394 | 4,347 | 47,741 | (23,307 | ) | 85,785 | 110,219 |
Our ability to retain significant amounts of the free cash flow that we generate may be diminished in the future should our minimum dividend distribution requirements increase relative to our free cash flow (see the discussion on Taxable Income and Dividends above).
Short-Term Borrowings and Liquidity
A substantial majority of our short-term borrowings have maturities of one year or earlier and generally have interest rates that change monthly to a margin over or under the one month LIBOR interest rate.
Some of our short-term borrowing facilities are committed (for which we pay fees) but most are uncommitted. Our facilities are generally for a term of up to one year, although certain assets maybe funded for periods up to three years. These facilities have restrictions on pledged asset types and debt covenant tests; we continue to meet these requirements.
At March 31, 2002, we had over a dozen uncommitted facilities for short-term collateralized debt, with credit approval for $4 billion of borrowings. We have had no difficulty securing short-term borrowings on favorable terms. Outstanding borrowings under these agreements were $526 million at March 31, 2002, a decrease from $568 million at year-end 2001 due to a reduction in our securities portfolio.
We also had two short-term facilities available to fund our residential mortgage loan portfolio at March 31, 2002. These facilities totaled over $1 billion; we had $551 million outstanding borrowings at March 31, 2002, and $146 million outstanding borrowings at December 31, 2001. We anticipate using these and other new facilities as we continue to acquire whole loans in anticipation of a securitization.
43
We had four borrowing facilities for residential credit-enhancement securities totaling $170 million and two borrowing facilities for commercial mortgage loans totaling $57 million outstanding at March 31, 2002. Outstanding borrowings under these agreements were $40 million at March 31, 2002, a decrease from the $83 million at December 31, 2001.
At this time, we see no material negative trends that we believe would affect our access to short-term borrowings or bank credit lines sufficient to maintain safe operations, that would suggest that our liquidity reserves would be called upon, or that would likely cause us to be in danger of a covenant default. However, many factors, including ones external to us, may affect our liquidity in the future.
In the first quarter of 2002, we added borrowing facilities for our residential credit-enhancement securities and our residential mortgage loans. We intend to add other borrowing facilities throughout the year. There can be no assurance that we will be able to find or retain sufficient borrowing agreements to fund our current operations or our potential acquisition opportunities.
Under our internal risk-adjusted capital system, we maintain liquidity reserves in the form of cash and unpledged liquid assets. These liquidity reserves may be needed for a variety of reasons, including a decline in the market value, or a change in the acceptability to lenders, of the collateral we pledge to secure short-term borrowings. We continue to maintain liquidity reserves at or in excess of our policy levels. At March 31, 2002, we had $64 million of unrestricted cash and highly liquid (unpledged) assets available to meet potential liquidity needs. Total available liquidity equaled 6% of our short-term debt balances. At December 31, 2001, we had $74 million of liquid assets, equaling 9% of our short-term debt balances.
Long-Term Debt
The $1.2 billion of long-term debt on our March 31, 2002 consolidated balance sheet was non-recourse debt. Substantially all this debt was issued through our special purpose financing subsidiary, Sequoia, and was collateralized by residential mortgage loans. The holders of our long-term debt can look only to the cash flow from the mortgages specifically collateralizing the debt for repayment. By using this source of financing, our liquidity risks are limited. Our special purpose financing subsidiaries that issue debt have no call on Redwoods general liquidity reserves, and there is no debt rollover risk as the loans are financed to maturity. The market for AAA-rated long-term debt of the type that we issue to fund residential loans through Sequoia is a large, global market that has been relatively stable for many years. At this time, we believe we could issue more of this debt on reasonable terms if we should choose to do so. In April 2002, we issued $502 million of long-term debt through Sequoia 6.
The remaining $26 million of our long-term debt was backed by commercial loans and was created through the sale of senior loan participations. In March 2002, we sold a senior participation on a commercial loan for $8 million. The market for senior participations on commercial loans of the types in our portfolio is limited and there can be no assurance that we will be able to sell future participations.
Equity Capital and Risk-Adjusted Capital Guidelines
Excluding short- and long-term collateralized debt, we are capitalized entirely by common and preferred equity capital. Our equity base increased from $308 million to $364 million in the first quarter of 2002 as a result of an equity offering totaling $40 million, $8 million in asset appreciation, $3 million in retention of cash flow, and $6 million in stock issuance through our direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment program. We raised another $21 million of new capital through an equity offering and our direct stock purchase and dividend reinvestment program in April 2002. We will seek to raise additional equity capital in the future when opportunities to expand our business are attractive and when we believe such issuance is likely to benefit long-term earnings and dividends per share.
The amount of assets that can be supported with a given capital base is limited by our internal risk-adjusted capital policies. Our risk-adjusted capital policy guideline amounts are expressed in terms of an equity-to-assets ratio and vary with market conditions and asset characteristics. Our risk-adjusted capital guideline is further discussed under Capital Risks. At March 31, 2002, our aggregate equity capital guidelines
44
Our total risk-adjusted capital guideline amount for assets on our balance sheet was $342 million (12% of asset balances) at March 31, 2002. Capital required for outstanding commitments at March 31, 2002 for asset purchases settling in the second quarter of 2002 was $14 million. Thus, at March 31, 2002, our total capital committed at quarter end was $356 million, our total capital available was $364 million, and our excess capital to support growth in the second quarter of 2002 was $8 million.
Balance Sheet Leverage
As reported on our balance sheet of March 31, 2002, our equity-to-reported-assets ratio was 13% and our reported debt-to-equity ratio was 6.5 times. We believe our balance sheet is generally less leveraged than many banks, savings and loans, and other financial institutions such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that are in similar real estate finance businesses.
A majority of our debt is non-recourse debt. Holders of non-recourse debt can look only to the pledged assets and not to Redwood Trust for repayment. Therefore, another useful measure of the leverage we employ is to compute leverage ratios comparing our equity base to our recourse debt levels and to our at-risk assets (our assets excluding those assets pledged to non-recourse debt). These adjustments generally conform our balance sheet to what would be reported if we accounted for our securitizations as sales rather than as financings. Total reported assets at March 31, 2002 were $2.7 billion; of these, $1.2 billion were pledged to non-recourse debt and $1.5 billion were at-risk. Total reported liabilities at March 31, 2002 were $2.4 billion; non-recourse debt was $1.2 billion and recourse debt was $1.1 billion. Our ratio of equity-to-at-risk-assets was 24% and our ratio of recourse-debt-to-equity was 3.1 times. Please also see Net Interest Income above for a discussion of our income statement as reformatted to a recourse basis.
Our long-term plan is to reduce short-term recourse debt levels, in part by replacing this debt with long-term non-recourse debt. If we are successful in this funding strategy, and we continue to grow, our reported leverage levels may increase at the same time that our recourse leverage levels may decrease.
Table 28
Recourse | Equity | Recourse | Equity | Reported | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
At | Debt | To | Debt and | To | Debt | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Risk | And Other | At-Risk | Liabilities | Reported | To | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Liabilities | Equity | Assets | To Equity | Assets | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 1,226,951 | $ | 1,005,280 | $ | 221,671 | 18 | % | 4.5 | 10 | % | 9.3 | ||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2001
|
1,099,885 | 875,871 | 224,014 | 20 | % | 3.9 | 11 | % | 8.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
1,387,409 | 1,107,557 | 279,852 | 20 | % | 4.0 | 12 | % | 7.1 | |||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
1,120,061 | 812,288 | 307,773 | 28 | % | 2.6 | 13 | % | 6.9 | |||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
1,503,744 | 1,139,300 | 364,444 | 24 | % | 3.1 | 13 | % | 6.5 | |||||||||||||||||||
2000
|
$ | 983,097 | $ | 767,433 | $ | 215,664 | 22 | % | 3.6 | 10 | % | 8.7 | ||||||||||||||||
2001
|
1,120,061 | 812,288 | 307,773 | 28 | % | 2.6 | 13 | % | 6.9 |
RISK MANAGEMENT
We seek to manage the risks inherent in all financial institutions including credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, prepayment risk, market value risks, and capital risks in a prudent manner designed to insure Redwoods longevity. At the same time we endeavor to provide our shareholders an opportunity to realize a steady, and rising dividend and an attractive total rate of return through stock ownership in our company. In general, we seek, to the best of our ability, to assume risks that can be quantified from historical experience, to
45
Credit Risk
The majority of our credit risk comes from high-quality residential mortgage loans. This includes residential mortgage loans we own and loans we effectively guarantee or insure through acquisitions of credit-enhancement securities. We also are exposed to credit risks in our commercial mortgage loan portfolio. A small amount of our securities portfolio is currently exposed to credit risk; the bulk of this portfolio has very high credit ratings and would not normally be expected to incur credit losses. We also have credit risk with counter-parties with whom we do business.
It should be noted that the establishment of a credit reserve for GAAP or a designated credit reserve under the effective yield method does not reduce our taxable income or our dividend payment obligations as a REIT. For taxable income, many of our credit expenses will be recognized only as incurred. Thus, the timing and recognition amount of credit losses for GAAP and tax, and for our earnings and our dividends, may differ. A material increase in actual credit losses may not affect our GAAP income due to our credit reserves but could materially reduce our dividend payment obligations.
The method that we use to account for future credit losses depends upon the type of asset that we own. For our credit-enhancement securities, we establish a credit reserve upon the acquisition of such assets under the effective yield method of accounting. In addition, first loss and other credit-enhancement interests that are junior to our positions that we do not own act as a form of external credit reserve for us on a specific asset basis; these interests junior to ours will absorb credit losses in the pool of underlying mortgage loans before the principal of our interest in that pool of loans will be affected. For our residential and commercial mortgage loans, we establish a credit reserve based on anticipation of losses by taking credit provisions through our income statement. Most of the assets in our securities portfolio do not have material credit risk, and, thus, no credit reserves have been established to date for these assets. When we acquire assets for this portfolio where credit risk exists, we will establish the appropriate reserve as necessary in our estimation.
Liquidity Risk
Our primary form of financing is the issuance of long-term non-recourse securitized debt that very closely matches the interest rate, prepayment rate, and maturities of our assets that we pledge to secure this debt. Once we issue this debt, our recourse exposure to the underlying assets is limited to our net investment after debt issuance. We believe this is a secure and robust form of financing that effectively eliminates liquidity risk for this portion of our balance sheet and eliminates a variety of other potential risks as well. As a part of our long-term planning, we generally intend to reduce our short-term debt levels. We expect, under our current plan, that our primary use of short-term debt will be to fund assets under accumulation for securitization.
Our primary liquidity risk arises from financing long-maturity mortgage assets with short-term debt. Even if the interest rate adjustments of these assets and liabilities are well matched, maturities may not be matched. Trends in the liquidity of the capital markets in general may affect our ability to rollover short-term debt. At March 31, 2002, we had $1.1 billion of short-term debt collateralized by assets. Of this debt, $526 million was collateralized by investment-grade securities, $46 million by residential credit-enhancement securities, and $551 million by high-quality residential mortgage loans under accumulation for a future securitization. If our short-term debt was called, or we could not renew lines, we may need to sell assets in a potentially unfavorable environment. There can be no assurance that such sales would satisfy our liabilities. The events of September 11, 2001 did not impact our liquidity. We have and continue to develop business continuity plans which may help preserve access to liquidity and help mitigate the effect of any disruptions to our operations in the event of certain disasters.
46
The table below presents our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2002. The debt appears on our balance sheet. The operating leases are commitments which are expensed as paid per terms of the contracts. Additional information on these obligations is presented in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Table 29
Stated | ||||||||||
Total | Maturities | Comments | ||||||||
Short-term debt
|
$ | 1,122,513 | 2002 | Weighted average maturity is 78 days | ||||||
Long-term debt, residential
|
$ | 1,208,889 | 2017 - 2029 | Non-recourse debt amortizes as residential collateral pays down | ||||||
Long-term debt, commercial
|
$ | 25,570 | 2002 - 2003 | Non-recourse debt amortizes as commercial collateral pays down | ||||||
Asset purchase commitments
|
$ | 163,860 | 2002 | Most acquisitions were completed in April 2002 | ||||||
Operating leases
|
$ | 2,452 | 2002 - 2005 | Office rent and software licenses |
Interest Rate Risk
Our strategy is to maintain an asset/liability posture that is effectively match-funded so that the achievement of our long-term goals is unlikely to be affected by changes in interest rates, yield curves, or mortgage prepayment rates. At March 31, 2002, the interest rate characteristics of our debt closely matched the interest rate characteristics of our assets that were funded with debt. We had $2.3 billion of adjustable-rate debt matched with $2.3 billion of adjustable-rate assets. We had $364 million of equity invested primarily in fixed rate assets and working capital.
As a part of our current asset/liability strategy, we have been maintaining a slight mismatch between the interest rate adjustment periods of our adjustable-rate debt and our adjustable-rate assets. In effect, we own six-month LIBOR assets (and, to a lesser degree, one-year Treasury index assets) funded with one-month LIBOR debt. The interest rate on this debt adjusts each month to the current one-month LIBOR interest rate plus a margin. The interest rate on the six-month LIBOR assets adjusts more slowly to market conditions; each month the coupon rate on approximately one-sixth of these assets adjusts to the current six-month LIBOR interest rate plus a margin. Any single change in short-term interest rates could thus have some short-term effect on our earnings (generally, for the next two quarters). We would expect that the spread between our asset yields and our cost of borrowed funds would be more favorable in a falling short-term interest rate environment than in a rising short-term interest rate environment. This trend may be partially or fully offset over time by the equity-funded portion of our balance sheet, which would generally have increasing net interest earnings (and perhaps better credit results) in a rising rate environment. Short-term interest rates fell throughout 2001, and our earnings benefited from this pricing adjustment mismatch. We would expect our spread to narrow over the next few quarters assuming interest rates stabilize or rise.
We have achieved our desired asset/liability mix on-balance sheet. As the table below shows our variable-rate assets are generally funded with variable-rate debt and our fixed-rate assets are generally funded with equity. As a result, we have generally ceased our hedging activities. We intend to use interest rate agreements as part of our asset/liability strategy in the future to achieve our asset/liability management goals.
47
Table 30
One Month | One Year | Non-Interest | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset | LIBOR | Treasury | Hybrid | Bearing | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Type | Amount | Liabilities | Liabilities | Liabilities | Liabilities | Equity | And Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash (unrestricted)
|
$ | 9,960 | $ | 9,960 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 9,960 | ||||||||||||||
One Month LIBOR
|
955,767 | 955,767 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 955,767 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Six Month LIBOR
|
847,829 | 847,829 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 847,829 | |||||||||||||||||||||
COFI/Other ARM
|
84,526 | 84,526 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84,526 | |||||||||||||||||||||
One Year Treasury
|
443,825 | 231,931 | 211,894 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 443,825 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed / Hybrid<1 Yr*
|
41,000 | 15,065 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25,935 | 41,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Hybrid
|
195,633 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 195,633 | 195,633 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed
|
134,324 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 134,324 | 134,324 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Earning Assets
|
26,974 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18,422 | 8,552 | 26,974 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,739,838 | $ | 2,145,078 | $ | 211,894 | $ | 0 | $ | 18,422 | $ | 364,444 | $ | 2,739,838 |
* | :Projected principal receipts on fixed-rate and hybrid assets over the next twelve months. |
Changes in interest rates can have many effects on our business aside from those discussed in this section, including effects on our liquidity, market values, and mortgage prepayment rates.
Prepayment Risk
We seek to maintain an asset/liability posture that mitigates the effects that mortgage prepayment trends may have on our ability to achieve our long-term objectives. For the development of our business, there are positive and negative aspects to both slow prepayment rate environments and fast prepayment rate environments. In general, it would be difficult to say which scenario would be preferred over the longer term.
Prepayments affect short-term earnings primarily through amortization of purchase premium and discount. Although we have roughly equal amounts of premium and discount, variations in a specific assets current and long-term estimated prepayment rates and differing accounting methods for various types of assets can cause earnings fluctuations as individual asset prepayment rates change.
Table 31
Net | Net | |||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Premium/ | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Premium | Discount | (Discount) | (Expense) | |||||||||||||
Q1: 2001
|
$ | 29,598 | $ | (25,809 | ) | $ | 3,789 | $ | (869 | ) | ||||||
Q2: 2001
|
29,046 | (36,230 | ) | (7,184 | ) | (1,885 | ) | |||||||||
Q3: 2001
|
27,921 | (34,308 | ) | (6,387 | ) | (1,977 | ) | |||||||||
Q4: 2001
|
26,518 | (30,562 | ) | (4,044 | ) | (4,852 | ) | |||||||||
Q1: 2002
|
23,036 | (32,053 | ) | (9,017 | ) | (3,201 | ) | |||||||||
2000
|
$ | 25,437 | $ | (21,400 | ) | $ | 4,037 | $ | (2,335 | ) | ||||||
2001
|
26,518 | (30,562 | ) | (4,044 | ) | (9,583 | ) |
We could have material net premium amortization expenses even if we do not have a high net premium balance. This could occur because our premium mortgage assets generally prepay at a faster rate than do our discount mortgage assets, and because the yields of our premium assets are generally more sensitive to
48
Market Value Risk
At March 31, 2002, we owned mortgage securities and loans totaling $1.1 billion that we account for on a mark-to-market basis (in the case of mortgage loans, on a lower-of-cost-or-market basis) for purposes of determining reported earnings. Of these assets, 100% had adjustable-rate coupons. At March 31, 2002, we owned $393 million of assets that were marked-to-market through our balance sheet but not our income statement. Market value fluctuations of these assets can affect the reported value of our stockholders equity base. Market value fluctuations for our assets not only affect our reported earnings and book value, but also can affect our liquidity, especially to the extent these assets are funded with short-term borrowings.
We currently do not have a significant number of interest rate agreements. Our interest rate agreements are reported at market value with any periodic changes reported either through the income statement or our balance sheet. To the extent we seek hedge accounting under SFAS 133, certain assets whose market value changes would not generally be reported through our income statement may have such market value changes reported through the income statement in the future.
Capital Risk
Our capital levels, and thus our access to borrowings and liquidity, may be tested, particularly if the market value of our assets securing our short-term borrowings declines or the market for short-term borrowings changes in an adverse manner.
Through our risk-adjusted capital policy, we assign a guideline capital adequacy amount, expressed as a guideline equity-to-assets ratio, to each of our mortgage assets. For short-term funded assets, this ratio may fluctuate over time, based on changes in that assets credit quality, liquidity characteristics, potential for market value fluctuation, interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and the over-collateralization requirements for that asset set by our collateralized short-term lenders. Capital requirements for securities rated below AA, residential credit-enhancement interests, retained interests from our Sequoia securitizations of our residential retained portfolio assets, commercial mortgage whole loans, and retained commercial mortgage junior participants are generally higher than for higher-rated securities and residential whole loans. Capital requirements for less-liquid assets depend chiefly on our access to secure funding for these assets, the number of sources of such funding, the funding terms, and the amount of extra capital we decide to hold on hand to protect against possible liquidity events with these assets. Capital requirements for our retained interests in Sequoia generally equal our net investment. The sum of the capital adequacy amounts for all of our mortgage assets is our aggregate capital adequacy guideline amount.
We do not expect that our actual capital levels will always exceed the guideline amount. If interest rates were to rise in a significant manner, our capital guideline amount may rise, as the potential interest rate risk of our assets would increase, at least on a temporary basis, due to periodic and life caps and slowing prepayment rates for mortgage assets. We measure all of our assets funded with short-term debt at estimated market value for the purpose of making risk-adjusted capital calculations. Our actual capital levels, as determined for our risk-adjusted capital policy, would likely fall as rates increase and as the market values of our assets, net of mark-to-market gains on hedges, decrease. Such market value declines may be temporary, as future coupon adjustments on adjustable-rate mortgage loans may help to restore some of the lost market value.
In this circumstance, or any other circumstance in which our actual capital levels decreased below our capital adequacy guideline amount, we would generally cease the acquisition of new assets until capital balance was restored through prepayments, interest rate changes, or other means. In certain cases prior to a planned equity offering or other circumstances, the Board of Directors may authorize management to acquire assets in a limited amount beyond the usual constraints of our risk-adjusted capital policy.
49
Inflation Risk
Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are financial in nature. As a result, interest rates, changes in interest rates, and other factors drive our performance far more than does inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates.
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and, as a REIT, our dividends must equal at least 90% of our net REIT income as calculated for tax purposes. In each case, our activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost or fair market value without considering inflation.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For a discussion on the quantitative disclosures about market risk, please refer to our Risk Management presentation in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations above. We believe our quantitative risk has not materially changed from our disclosures under Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.
50
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
At March 31, 2002, there were no pending material legal proceedings to which the Company was a party or of which any of its property was subject. |
Item 2. Changes in Securities
Not applicable |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable |
Item 5. Other Information
None |
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit 10.14.5 Amended and Restated Executive and Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, amended January 24, 2002 | |
Exhibit 11.1 to Part I Computation of Earnings Per Share for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2002 and March 31, 2001. |
(b) Reports
None
51
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. |
Dated: May 10, 2002
By: | /s/ DOUGLAS B. HANSEN |
|
|
Douglas B. Hansen | |
President | |
(authorized officer of registrant) |
Dated: May 10, 2002
By: | /s/ HAROLD F. ZAGUNIS |
|
|
Harold F. Zagunis | |
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | |
Secretary, Treasurer and Controller | |
(principal financial and accounting officer) |
52