EXHIBIT 99.1
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 |
Financial Results
Table 1
Earnings
($ in thousands, except per share data)
GAAP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings / | Core | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Earnings / | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | GAAP | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted | Common | Common | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP | Core | Shares | GAAP | Core | Equity | Core Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings | Earnings | Outstanding | EPS | EPS | (Annualized) | (Annualized) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 11,219 | $ | 10,887 | 14,077,405 | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.77 | 14.2 | % | 14.2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
13,802 | 12,546 | 15,747,048 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 15.4 | % | 14.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
14,306 | 12,831 | 16,240,194 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 14.1 | % | 14.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
14,566 | 13,183 | 16,529,075 | 0.88 | 0.80 | 13.7 | % | 14.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
53,893 | 49,447 | 15,658,623 | 3.44 | 3.16 | 14.3 | % | 14.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
14,932 | 14,962 | 16,983,513 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 12.9 | % | 15.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
22,212 | 20,761 | 18,433,165 | 1.21 | 1.13 | 17.6 | % | 19.4 | % |
See Tables 5 & 6 for a description of core earnings and core equity and a related reconciliation of GAAP earnings to core earnings and GAAP equity to core equity.
Table 2
Net Interest Income
($ in thousands)
Net | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income/ | Income/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Total | Net | Earning | Cost | Interest | Interest | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Interest | Interest | Asset | of | Rate | Rate | GAAP | Core | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | Expense | Income | Yield | Funds | Spread | Margin | Equity | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 30,716 | $ | 15,602 | $ | 15,114 | 4.92 | % | 2.82 | % | 2.10 | % | 2.36 | % | 17.69 | % | 18.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
36,252 | 18,489 | 17,763 | 4.71 | % | 2.69 | % | 2.02 | % | 2.25 | % | 18.41 | % | 19.12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
42,093 | 24,291 | 17,802 | 4.07 | % | 2.57 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.68 | % | 16.47 | % | 18.51 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
54,155 | 33,323 | 20,832 | 3.59 | % | 2.35 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.35 | % | 18.50 | % | 20.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
163,216 | 91,705 | 71,511 | 4.13 | % | 2.54 | % | 1.59 | % | 1.77 | % | 17.75 | % | 19.21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
61,125 | 36,933 | 24,192 | 3.31 | % | 2.10 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.28 | % | 19.79 | % | 23.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
71,426 | 41,802 | 29,624 | 3.35 | % | 2.05 | % | 1.30 | % | 1.36 | % | 23.45 | % | 27.63 | % |
Table 3
Interest Expense
($ in thousands)
Average | Debt | Average | Long Term | Long Term | Average | Short Term | Short Term | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Interest | Cost of | Long Term | Interest | Debt Cost | Short Term | Interest | Debt Cost | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt | Expense | Funds | Debt | Expense | Of Funds | Debt | Expense | Of Funds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 2,211,927 | $ | 15,602 | 2.82 | % | $ | 1,280,503 | $ | 10,661 | 3.33 | % | $ | 931,424 | $ | 4,941 | 2.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
2,752,215 | 18,489 | 2.69 | % | 1,806,884 | 12,894 | 2.85 | % | 945,331 | 5,595 | 2.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
3,781,717 | 24,291 | 2.57 | % | 2,893,682 | 18,893 | 2.61 | % | 888,035 | 5,398 | 2.43 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
5,680,238 | 33,323 | 2.35 | % | 5,018,353 | 28,945 | 2.31 | % | 661,885 | 4,378 | 2.65 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
3,616,506 | 91,705 | 2.54 | % | 2,760,490 | 71,393 | 2.59 | % | 856,016 | 20,312 | 2.37 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
7,036,183 | 36,933 | 2.10 | % | 6,637,053 | 34,993 | 2.11 | % | 399,130 | 1,940 | 1.94 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
8,160,393 | 41,802 | 2.05 | % | 7,861,252 | 40,163 | 2.04 | % | 299,141 | 1,639 | 2.19 | % |
Table 4
Net Interest Income on an At Risk Assets and Recourse Debt Basis
($ in thousands)
Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Interest | Net | "At Risk" | "At Risk" | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | Expense | Interest | Recourse | Asset | Asset | Income/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
On | On | Income on | "At Risk" | Cost | Interest | Interest | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
"At Risk" | Recourse | "At Risk" | Asset | of | Rate | Rate | Core | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Debt | Basis | Yield | Funds | Spread | Margin | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 20,055 | $ | 4,941 | $ | 15,114 | 6.30 | % | 2.12 | % | 4.18 | % | 4.75 | % | 18.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
23,358 | 5,595 | 17,763 | 7.02 | % | 2.37 | % | 4.65 | % | 5.34 | % | 19.12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
23,200 | 5,398 | 17,802 | 7.03 | % | 2.43 | % | 4.60 | % | 5.39 | % | 18.51 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
25,210 | 4,378 | 20,832 | 9.07 | % | 2.65 | % | 6.42 | % | 7.49 | % | 20.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
91,823 | 20,312 | 71,511 | 7.29 | % | 2.37 | % | 4.92 | % | 5.68 | % | 19.21 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
26,132 | 1,940 | 24,192 | 11.77 | % | 1.94 | % | 9.83 | % | 10.89 | % | 23.33 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
31,263 | 1,639 | 29,624 | 15.54 | % | 2.19 | % | 13.35 | % | 14.73 | % | 27.63 | % |
See Table 7 for a reconciliation of GAAP interest income to net interest income on an at risk basis and GAAP interest expense to recourse cost of funds. See Table 8 for a description of recourse assets and recourse debt and a related reconciliation to reported GAAP assets and reported GAAP debt.
Financial Results (continued)
Table 5
Core Earnings (1)
($ in thousands)
Less: Net | ||||||||||||||||
Realized & | Less: | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Variable | |||||||||||||||
Market | Stock | |||||||||||||||
Value | Option | |||||||||||||||
GAAP | Gains/ | Valuation | Core | |||||||||||||
Earnings | (Losses) | Adjustments | Earnings | |||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 11,219 | $ | 875 | $ | (543 | ) | $ | 10,887 | |||||||
Q2: 2002 |
13,802 | 2,045 | (789 | ) | 12,546 | |||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
14,306 | 730 | 745 | 12,831 | ||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
14,566 | 1,461 | (78 | ) | 13,183 | |||||||||||
2002 |
53,893 | 5,111 | (665 | ) | 49,447 | |||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
14,932 | 918 | (948 | ) | 14,962 | |||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
22,212 | 2,941 | (1,490 | ) | 20,761 |
(1) | Core earnings is not a measure of earnings in accordance with GAAP. Core earnings is calculated as GAAP earnings from ongoing operations less mark-to-market adjustments (which include realized and unrealized gains and losses on certain assets, interest rate agreements, and variable stock options). We believe that core earnings provides relevant and useful information regarding our results of operations in addition to GAAP measures of performance. This is, in part, because market valuation adjustments on only a portion of our assets and stock options and none of our liabilities are recognized through our Consolidated Statements of Income under GAAP, and thus GAAP valuation adjustments may not be fully indicative of changes in market values on our balance sheet as a whole or a reliable guide to our current operating performance. Furthermore, gains or losses realized upon sales of assets vary based on portfolio management decisions; a sale of an asset for a gain or a loss may or may not affect our ongoing earnings from operations. Because all companies and analysts do not calculate non-GAAP measures such as core earnings in the same fashion, core earnings as calculated by us may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. |
Table 6
Core Equity (2)
($ in thousands)
Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Balance | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Sheet | Average | Sheet | Average | Average | Average | Common | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP | Mark-to-Mkt | Core | GAAP | Mark-to-Mkt | Core | Preferred | Common | Core | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity | Adjustments | Equity | Equity | Adjustments | Equity | Equity | Equity | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 364,444 | $ | 11,015 | $ | 353,429 | $ | 341,766 | $ | 8,360 | $ | 333,406 | $ | 26,517 | $ | 315,249 | $ | 306,889 | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
417,930 | 35,826 | 382,104 | 385,887 | 14,213 | 371,674 | 26,517 | 359,370 | 345,157 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
445,728 | 54,148 | 391,580 | 432,310 | 47,705 | 384,605 | 26,517 | 405,793 | 358,088 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
473,033 | 69,146 | 403,887 | 450,464 | 52,200 | 398,264 | 26,517 | 423,947 | 371,747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
473,033 | 69,146 | 403,887 | 402,986 | 30,786 | 372,200 | 26,517 | 376,469 | 345,683 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
485,402 | 68,077 | 417,325 | 489,086 | 74,231 | 414,855 | 26,517 | 462,569 | 388,338 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
547,176 | 108,409 | 438,767 | 505,373 | 76,477 | 428,896 | | 505,373 | 428,896 |
(2) | Core equity is calculated as GAAP equity less unrealized gains and losses on certain assets and interest rate agreements. We believe measurements based on core equity provide relevant useful information regarding our results of operations in addition to GAAP measures of performance. This is, in part, because market valuation adjustments reflected in GAAP equity represent unrealized gains and losses on a portion of the balance sheet only and may not be reflective of the equity available to invest in operations. Because all companies and analysts do not calculate non-GAAP measures in the same fashion, core equity and ratios using core equity as calculated by the us may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. Average Common Equity measures are calculated by excluding Average Preferred Equity. |
Table 7
Reconciliation of GAAP Interest Income and Interest Expense to Interest Income
on an At Risk Assets and Interest Expense on Recourse Debt
($ in thousands)
Interest | Interest | Interest | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income | Income | Expense | Expense | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | On Non- | On | Total | On Non- | On | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Recourse | At Risk | Interest | Recourse | Recourse | |||||||||||||||||||
Income | Assets | Assets | Expense | Debt | Debt | |||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 30,716 | $ | 10,661 | $ | 20,055 | $ | 15,602 | $ | 10,661 | $ | 4,941 | ||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
36,252 | 12,894 | 23,358 | 18,489 | 12,894 | 5,595 | ||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
42,093 | 18,893 | 23,200 | 24,291 | 18,893 | 5,398 | ||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
54,155 | 28,945 | 25,210 | 33,323 | 28,945 | 4,378 | ||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
163,216 | 71,393 | 91,823 | 91,705 | 71,393 | 20,312 | ||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
61,125 | 34,993 | 26,132 | 36,933 | 34,993 | 1,940 | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
71,426 | 40,163 | 31,263 | 41,802 | 40,163 | 1,639 |
Financial Results (continued)
Table 8
Leverage Ratios
Equity to Assets and Debt to Equity
($ in thousands)
GAAP | GAAP | Reported | Recourse | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non- | (3) | Equity to | Equity to | Non- | (3) | Debt to | Debt to | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Recourse | Recourse | Reported | Recourse | Reported | Recourse | Recourse | GAAP | GAAP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Assets | Assets | Assets | Assets | Debt | Debt | Debt | Equity | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 2,739,838 | $ | 1,252,881 | $ | 1,486,957 | 13 | % | 25 | % | $ | 2,356,972 | $ | 1,234,459 | $ | 1,122,513 | 6.5 | 3.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
3,689,782 | 2,266,849 | 1,422,933 | 11 | % | 29 | % | 3,246,603 | 2,241,600 | 1,005,003 | 7.8 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
5,674,302 | 4,394,493 | 1,279,809 | 8 | % | 35 | % | 5,199,362 | 4,365,281 | 834,081 | 11.7 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
7,007,772 | 6,435,025 | 572,747 | 7 | % | 83 | % | 6,496,734 | 6,397,020 | 99,714 | 13.7 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
7,007,772 | 6,435,025 | 572,747 | 7 | % | 83 | % | 6,496,734 | 6,397,020 | 99,714 | 13.7 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
8,172,063 | 7,210,944 | 961,119 | 6 | % | 51 | % | 7,646,408 | 7,170,691 | 475,717 | 15.8 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
10,356,052 | 9,591,192 | 764,860 | 5 | % | 72 | % | 9,760,315 | 9,542,631 | 217,684 | 17.8 | 0.4 |
(3) | Assets that have been sold to non-recourse securitization trusts and long-term debt that is non-recourse to Redwood are reported on our balance sheet. Only our net investments in the equity of these trusts constitute at-risk assets to us. If we had used different terms or forms of securitization these transactions may have been accounted for as sales. With sales accounting, our reported balance sheet (both assets and liabilities) would be substantially smaller (although the economics of the transaction and our exposure to risks would be unchanged). If we structured the securitizations differently and therefore accounted for them as sales rather than financings, our asset-based margins would have been different and, in some respects, reported on a basis that is more comparable to some other financial institutions. Our interest rate spread and our interest rate margin would have been higher and would show a positive trend in recent quarters. Our reported debt-to-equity ratio would have been substantially lower. Table 4 above presents our interest income and interest expense as if we had structured our securitizations to obtain sales accounting treatment rather than financing accounting treatment; effectively, on an at-risk basis for assets and on a recourse basis for liabilities. |
Table 9
Reconciliation of Average Reported Assets to Average At Risk Assets and
Average Reported Debt to Average Recourse Debt
($ in thousands)
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Non- | Average | Average | Non- | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Reported | Recourse | "At Risk" | Reported | Recourse | Recourse | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets | Assets | Assets | Debt | Debt | Debt | |||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 2,564,847 | $ | 1,291,657 | $ | 1,273,190 | $ | 2,211,927 | $ | 1,280,503 | $ | 931,424 | ||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
3,158,751 | 1,827,533 | 1,331,218 | 2,752,215 | 1,806,884 | 945,331 | ||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
4,234,477 | 2,914,133 | 1,320,344 | 3,781,717 | 2,893,682 | 888,035 | ||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
6,158,898 | 5,046,549 | 1,112,349 | 5,680,238 | 5,018,353 | 661,885 | ||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
4,039,652 | 2,780,650 | 1,259,002 | 3,616,506 | 2,760,490 | 856,016 | ||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
7,553,727 | 6,665,511 | 888,216 | 7,036,183 | 6,637,053 | 399,130 | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
8,687,371 | 7,882,857 | 804,514 | 8,160,393 | 7,861,252 | 299,141 |
Portfolios
Table 10
Balances & Yields
($ in thousands)
At period end | For period ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unamortized | Unrealized | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Premium/ | Credit | Gain/ | Book | Average | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Face | (Discount) | Reserve | (loss) | Value | Balance* | Income | Yield | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Earning Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 2,912,217 | $ | (10,332 | ) | $ | (200,037 | ) | $ | 11,016 | 2,712,864 | $ | 2,498,565 | 30,716 | 4.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
3,854,545 | (14,318 | ) | (212,296 | ) | 35,827 | 3,663,758 | 3,080,165 | 36,252 | 4.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
5,829,188 | (6,941 | ) | (227,346 | ) | 54,148 | 5,649,049 | 4,131,870 | 42,093 | 4.07 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
7,158,374 | (25,644 | ) | (233,162 | ) | 72,226 | 6,971,794 | 6,042,042 | 54,155 | 3.59 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
7,158,374 | (25,644 | ) | (233,162 | ) | 72,226 | 6,971,794 | 3,948,399 | 163,216 | 4.13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
8,356,918 | (50,540 | ) | (244,056 | ) | 72,282 | 8,134,604 | 7,393,566 | 61,125 | 3.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
10,471,190 | (62,790 | ) | (216,834 | ) | 115,903 | 10,307,469 | 8,523,925 | 71,426 | 3.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 1,790,239 | $ | 9,502 | $ | (5,481 | ) | $ | | 1,794,260 | $ | 1,544,924 | 14,125 | 3.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
2,795,628 | 13,881 | (5,953 | ) | | 2,803,556 | 2,201,384 | 19,601 | 3.56 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
4,736,645 | 31,859 | (6,611 | ) | | 4,761,893 | 3,262,462 | 24,447 | 3.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
6,190,674 | 32,776 | (8,271 | ) | | 6,215,179 | 5,318,910 | 37,264 | 2.80 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
6,190,674 | 32,776 | (8,271 | ) | | 6,215,179 | 3,092,755 | 95,437 | 3.09 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
7,297,515 | 33,520 | (9,996 | ) | | 7,321,039 | 6,625,539 | 42,314 | 2.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
9,206,987 | 52,592 | (12,159 | ) | | 9,247,420 | 7,670,484 | 47,299 | 2.47 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 460,035 | $ | (28,058 | ) | $ | (194,556 | ) | $ | 12,411 | 249,832 | $ | 201,540 | 6,695 | 13.29 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
492,642 | (35,745 | ) | (206,343 | ) | 34,205 | 284,759 | 238,282 | 9,006 | 15.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
542,669 | (49,360 | ) | (220,735 | ) | 51,556 | 324,130 | 257,844 | 10,443 | 16.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
559,186 | (58,578 | ) | (224,891 | ) | 76,762 | 352,479 | 271,016 | 11,283 | 16.65 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
559,186 | (58,578 | ) | (224,891 | ) | 76,762 | 352,479 | 242,404 | 37,427 | 15.44 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
614,111 | (84,648 | ) | (234,060 | ) | 77,759 | 373,162 | 278,339 | 13,693 | 19.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
598,134 | (113,358 | ) | (204,675 | ) | 113,310 | 393,411 | 279,010 | 17,977 | 25.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 50,057 | $ | (677 | ) | $ | | $ | | 49,380 | $ | 50,170 | 1,274 | 10.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
50,436 | (638 | ) | | | 49,798 | 49,369 | 1,233 | 9.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
51,318 | (654 | ) | | | 50,664 | 50,102 | 1,280 | 10.22 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
30,250 | (980 | ) | | | 29,270 | 47,935 | 1,213 | 10.12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
30,250 | (980 | ) | | | 29,270 | 49,390 | 5,000 | 10.12 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
32,223 | (1,009 | ) | | | 31,214 | 30,888 | 816 | 10.57 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
42,492 | (7,970 | ) | | | 34,522 | 33,138 | 960 | 11.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 601,926 | $ | 8,901 | $ | | $ | (1,395 | ) | 609,432 | $ | 676,692 | 8,514 | 5.03 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
502,684 | 8,184 | | 1,622 | 512,490 | 529,843 | 6,222 | 4.70 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
477,950 | 11,214 | | 2,592 | 491,756 | 493,997 | 5,719 | 4.63 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
339,095 | 1,138 | | (4,536 | ) | 335,697 | 320,154 | 3,949 | 4.93 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
339,095 | 1,138 | | (4,536 | ) | 335,697 | 504,401 | 24,404 | 4.84 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
370,187 | 1,597 | | (5,477 | ) | 366,307 | 360,084 | 4,192 | 4.66 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
587,038 | 5,946 | | 2,593 | 595,577 | 453,546 | 5,057 | 4.46 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash & Cash Equivalents |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 9,960 | $ | | $ | | $ | | 9,960 | 108 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
13,155 | | | | 13,155 | 190 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
20,606 | | | | 20,606 | 204 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
39,169 | | | | 39,169 | 446 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
39,169 | | | | 39,169 | 948 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
42,882 | | | | 42,882 | 110 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
36,539 | 36,539 | 133 |
* | Average excludes unrealized gains (losses) from mark-to-market adjustments. |
Portfolios (continued)
Table 11
Portfolio Activity
($ in thousands)
Discount/ | Net | Net | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal | (Premium) | Credit | Charge-offs/ | Mark-to-Mkt | Increase/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions | Sales | Payments | Amortization | Provision | (Recoveries) | Adjustment | (Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 417,276 | $ | | $ | (95,924 | ) | $ | (1,672 | ) | $ | (282 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 319,398 | ||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
1,146,621 | (46,683 | ) | (89,582 | ) | (1,060 | ) | (472 | ) | | 472 | 1,009,296 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
2,075,296 | (2,960 | ) | (109,896 | ) | (3,502 | ) | (894 | ) | 236 | 57 | 1,958,337 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
1,616,400 | | (155,915 | ) | (5,754 | ) | (1,660 | ) | | 215 | 1,453,286 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
5,255,593 | (49,643 | ) | (451,317 | ) | (11,988 | ) | (3,308 | ) | 236 | 744 | 4,740,317 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
1,338,920 | (73,137 | ) | (152,768 | ) | (6,156 | ) | (1,756 | ) | 31 | 726 | 1,105,860 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
2,168,181 | | (234,582 | ) | (5,055 | ) | (2,163 | ) | | | 1,926,381 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 59,157 | $ | (5,037 | ) | $ | (4,270 | ) | $ | 366 | $ | | $ | | $ | 8,803 | $ | 59,019 | |||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
25,849 | (898 | ) | (15,801 | ) | 1,767 | | | 24,010 | 34,927 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
28,983 | | (9,437 | ) | 2,722 | | | 17,103 | 39,371 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
13,442 | (13,573 | ) | 3,275 | | | 25,205 | 28,349 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
127,431 | (5,935 | ) | (43,081 | ) | 8,130 | | | 75,121 | 161,666 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
37,077 | | (23,212 | ) | 5,545 | | | 1,273 | 20,683 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
11,265 | (1,248 | ) | (38,773 | ) | 10,024 | | | 38,981 | 20,249 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 140 | $ | | $ | (1,873 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | (1,704 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
470 | | (53 | ) | | | | 1 | 418 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
919 | | (54 | ) | | | | 1 | 866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
| | (21,068 | ) | 24 | | | (350 | ) | (21,394 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
1,529 | | (23,048 | ) | 52 | | | (347 | ) | (21,814 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
2,011 | | (68 | ) | | | | 1 | 1,944 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
3,408 | | (34 | ) | (67 | ) | | | 1 | 3,308 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 76,701 | $ | (89,395 | ) | $ | (60,040 | ) | $ | (1,701 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | 385 | $ | (74,050 | ) | |||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
23,026 | (56,802 | ) | (65,617 | ) | (1,249 | ) | | | 3,700 | (96,942 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
6,811 | | (31,830 | ) | (1,052 | ) | | | 5,337 | (20,734 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
196,279 | (315,308 | ) | (31,009 | ) | (24 | ) | | | (5,997 | ) | (156,059 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
302,817 | (461,505 | ) | (188,496 | ) | (4,026 | ) | | | 3,425 | (347,785 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
42,955 | | (11,329 | ) | 3 | | | (1,019 | ) | 30,610 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
237,516 | (4,051 | ) | (12,126 | ) | (111 | ) | | | 8,042 | 229,270 |
Table 12
Residential Credit Results
($ in thousands)
Total | Losses To | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Internally | (4) | Credit | Securities | Redwood's | Total Credit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Face Value | Designated | External | Total | Protection | Total | Junior to | Share of Net | Losses As % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying | Credit | Credit | Credit | As % of | Delinquent | Delinquent | Credit | Redwood's | Charge Offs | of Loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | Reserves | Enhancement | Protection | Loans | Loans | Loan % | Losses | Interest | (Recoveries) | (Annualized) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Residential Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 66,616,844 | $ | 200,037 | $ | 79,924 | $ | 279,961 | 0.42 | % | $ | 134,775 | 0.20 | % | $ | 452 | $ | 618 | $ | (166 | ) | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
68,856,787 | 212,296 | 65,102 | 277,398 | 0.40 | % | 153,217 | 0.22 | % | 115 | 189 | (74 | ) | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
73,220,004 | 227,346 | 64,147 | 291,493 | 0.40 | % | 152,894 | 0.21 | % | 386 | 103 | 283 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
64,849,784 | 233,162 | 63,179 | 296,341 | 0.46 | % | 150,353 | 0.23 | % | 377 | 163 | 214 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
64,849,784 | 233,162 | 63,179 | 296,341 | 0.46 | % | 150,353 | 0.23 | % | 1,330 | 1,073 | 257 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
68,045,731 | 244,056 | 61,814 | 305,870 | 0.45 | % | 162,657 | 0.24 | % | 1,171 | 456 | 715 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
61,031,486 | 216,834 | 58,296 | 275,130 | 0.45 | % | 163,894 | 0.27 | % | 384 | 152 | 232 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Real Estate Loans |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 1,790,239 | $ | 5,481 | $ | | $ | 5,481 | 0.31 | % | $ | 4,926 | 0.28 | % | $ | | $ | | $ | | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
2,795,628 | 5,953 | | 5,953 | 0.21 | % | 3,257 | 0.12 | % | | | | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
4,736,645 | 6,611 | | 6,611 | 0.14 | % | 1,387 | 0.03 | % | 236 | | 236 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
6,190,674 | 8,271 | | 8,271 | 0.13 | % | 4,127 | 0.07 | % | | | | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
6,190,674 | 8,271 | | 8,271 | 0.13 | % | 4,127 | 0.07 | % | 236 | | 236 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
7,297,515 | 9,996 | | 9,996 | 0.14 | % | 1,159 | 0.02 | % | 31 | | 31 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
9,206,987 | 12,159 | | 12,159 | 0.13 | % | 3,895 | 0.04 | % | | | | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 64,826,605 | $ | 194,556 | $ | 79,924 | $ | 274,480 | 0.42 | % | $ | 129,849 | 0.20 | % | $ | 452 | $ | 618 | $ | (166 | ) | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
66,061,159 | 206,343 | 65,102 | 271,445 | 0.41 | % | 149,960 | 0.23 | % | 115 | 189 | (74 | ) | 0.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
68,483,359 | 220,735 | 64,147 | 284,882 | 0.42 | % | 151,507 | 0.22 | % | 150 | 103 | 47 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
58,659,110 | 224,891 | 63,179 | 288,070 | 0.49 | % | 146,226 | 0.25 | % | 377 | 163 | 214 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
58,659,110 | 224,891 | 63,179 | 288,070 | 0.49 | % | 146,226 | 0.25 | % | 1,094 | 1,073 | 21 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
60,748,216 | 234,060 | 61,814 | 295,874 | 0.49 | % | 161,498 | 0.27 | % | 1,140 | 456 | 684 | 0.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
51,824,499 | 204,675 | 58,296 | 262,971 | 0.51 | % | 159,999 | 0.31 | % | 384 | 152 | 232 | 0.01 | % |
(4) The credit reserve on residential real estate loans owned is only available to absorb losses on the residential real estate loan portfolio. The internally-designated credit reserves on loans credit enhanced and the external credit enhancement on loans credit enhanced are only available to absorb losses on the residential loan credit-enhancement portfolio.
Loan Characteristics
Table 13
Residential Real Estate Loan Characteristics
(at period end, all dollars in thousands)
Jun. 2003 | Mar. 2003 | Dec. 2002 | Sep. 2002 | Jun. 2002 | Mar. 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||
Retained Residential Loans |
$ | 9,247,420 | $ | 7,321,039 | $ | 6,215,179 | $ | 4,761,893 | $ | 2,803,556 | $ | 1,794,260 | ||||||||||||
Number of loans |
24,988 | 19,805 | 16,669 | 12,580 | 7,394 | 4,914 | ||||||||||||||||||
Average loan size |
$ | 370 | $ | 370 | $ | 373 | $ | 379 | $ | 379 | $ | 365 | ||||||||||||
Adjustable % |
99 | % | 99 | % | 99 | % | 98 | % | 96 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Hybrid % |
1 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | 2 | % | 4 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Fixed % |
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Northern California |
13 | % | 13 | % | 12 | % | 12 | % | 13 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
Southern California |
12 | % | 12 | % | 12 | % | 12 | % | 12 | % | 11 | % | ||||||||||||
Florida |
12 | % | 12 | % | 12 | % | 11 | % | 13 | % | 12 | % | ||||||||||||
Georgia |
6 | % | 7 | % | 8 | % | 8 | % | 9 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
New York |
5 | % | 5 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
New Jersey |
4 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
Illinois |
4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
Texas |
3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
Arizona |
3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 2 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
Colorado |
3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
North Carolina |
3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
Other states (none greater than 3%) |
32 | % | 30 | % | 29 | % | 30 | % | 28 | % | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 2003 origination |
40 | % | 11 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 2002 origination |
49 | % | 72 | % | 78 | % | 70 | % | 47 | % | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 2001 origination |
6 | % | 11 | % | 13 | % | 18 | % | 31 | % | 42 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 2000 origination |
0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 1999 origination |
1 | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | 3 | % | 5 | % | 9 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 1998 origination or earlier |
4 | % | 4 | % | 7 | % | 9 | % | 17 | % | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
% balance in loans > $1mm per loan |
15 | % | 14 | % | 14 | % | 15 | % | 15 | % | 16 | % |
Table 14
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities Underlying Collateral Characteristics
($ in thousands)
Jun. 2003 | Mar. 2003 | Dec. 2002 | Sep. 2002 | Jun. 2002 | Mar. 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||
First loss position, principal value |
$ | 233,787 | $ | 236,122 | $ | 215,046 | $ | 206,062 | $ | 181,179 | $ | 173,990 | ||||||||||||
Second loss position, principal value |
168,524 | 176,864 | 163,428 | 152,433 | 139,290 | 127,930 | ||||||||||||||||||
Third loss position, principal value |
195,823 | 201,125 | 180,712 | 184,174 | 172,173 | 158,115 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total principal value |
$ | 598,134 | $ | 614,111 | $ | 559,186 | $ | 542,669 | $ | 492,642 | $ | 460,035 | ||||||||||||
First loss position, reported value |
$ | 74,470 | $ | 63,675 | $ | 65,292 | $ | 52,595 | $ | 46,979 | $ | 42,760 | ||||||||||||
Second loss position, reported value |
139,788 | 130,415 | 121,491 | 104,928 | 90,878 | 79,969 | ||||||||||||||||||
Third loss position, reported value |
179,153 | 179,072 | 165,696 | 166,607 | 146,902 | 127,103 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total reported value |
$ | 393,411 | $ | 373,162 | $ | 352,479 | $ | 324,130 | $ | 284,759 | $ | 249,832 | ||||||||||||
Internal Designated Credit Reserves |
$ | 204,675 | $ | 234,060 | $ | 224,891 | $ | 220,735 | $ | 206,343 | $ | 194,556 | ||||||||||||
External Credit Enhancemen |
58,296 | 61,814 | 63,179 | 64,147 | 65,102 | 79,924 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Credit Protection |
$ | 262,971 | $ | 295,874 | $ | 288,070 | $ | 284,882 | $ | 271,445 | $ | 274,480 | ||||||||||||
As % of Total Portfolio |
0.51 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.41 | % | 0.42 | % | ||||||||||||
Underlying Residential Real Estate Loans |
$ | 51,824,499 | $ | 60,748,216 | $ | 58,659,110 | $ | 68,483,359 | $ | 66,061,159 | $ | 64,826,605 | ||||||||||||
Number of credit-enhanced loans |
7 | 138,327 | 135,196 | 160,695 | 165,515 | 162,502 | ||||||||||||||||||
Average loan size |
$ | 7,403,500 | $ | 439 | $ | 434 | $ | 426 | $ | 399 | $ | 398 | ||||||||||||
Adjustable % |
36 | % | 27 | % | 20 | % | 20 | % | 19 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Hybrid % |
36 | % | 39 | % | 37 | % | 28 | % | 20 | % | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
Fixed % |
28 | % | 34 | % | 43 | % | 52 | % | 61 | % | 67 | % | ||||||||||||
Northern California |
26 | % | 26 | % | 27 | % | 27 | % | 25 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||||||
Southern California |
24 | % | 24 | % | 25 | % | 24 | % | 24 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||||||
New York |
6 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 4 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
Florida |
4 | % | 4 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
Texas |
3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 4 | % | 4 | % | ||||||||||||
Massachusetts |
3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
New Jersey |
3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
Other states (none greater than 3%) |
31 | % | 32 | % | 31 | % | 33 | % | 33 | % | 32 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 2003 origination |
12 | % | 2 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | 0 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 2002 origination |
42 | % | 41 | % | 28 | % | 25 | % | 11 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 2001 origination |
24 | % | 31 | % | 40 | % | 43 | % | 49 | % | 55 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 2000 origination |
4 | % | 4 | % | 5 | % | 5 | % | 6 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 1999 origination |
7 | % | 9 | % | 11 | % | 11 | % | 16 | % | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
Year 1998 or earlier origination |
11 | % | 13 | % | 16 | % | 16 | % | 18 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
% balance in loans > $1mm per loan |
10 | % | 10 | % | 8 | % | 6 | % | 5 | % | 4 | % |
Loan Characteristics (continued)
Table 15
Commercial Real Estate Loans Characteristics
(at period end, all dollars in thousands)
Jun. 2003 | Mar. 2003 | Dec. 2002 | Sep. 2002 | Jun. 2002 | Mar. 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage Loans |
$ | 34,522 | $ | 31,214 | $ | 29,270 | $ | 50,664 | $ | 49,978 | $ | 49,380 | ||||||||||||
Number of Loans |
12 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Average Loan Size |
$ | 2,877 | $ | 3,121 | $ | 4,181 | $ | 5,629 | $ | 6,247 | $ | 7,054 | ||||||||||||
Serious Delinquency |
$ | 650 | $ | 650 | $ | 650 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Realized Credit losses |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
California % |
46 | % | 40 | % | 36 | % | 62 | % | 61 | % | 61 | % |
Table 16
Securities Portfolio Characteristics at June 30, 2003
($ in thousands)
Rating: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | AAA | AA | A | BBB | BB | B | Unrated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate |
$ | 93,072 | $ | 7,832 | $ | | $ | 21,141 | $ | 54,045 | $ | 5,978 | $ | 4,076 | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
Residential Prime |
158,912 | 34,511 | 72,369 | 19,984 | 32,048 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Subprime |
153,165 | | 17,321 | 100,802 | 35,042 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Second Lien |
70,580 | | 43,340 | 22,976 | 4,264 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Manufactured Housing |
15,338 | 2,990 | 5,620 | 6,728 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate REIT Debt |
58,277 | | | 7,522 | 50,755 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real Estate CDOs |
46,233 | 4,940 | 9,619 | 13,573 | 13,438 | | | 4,663 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Securities Portfolio |
$ | 595,577 | $ | 50,273 | $ | 148,269 | $ | 192,726 | $ | 189,592 | $ | 5,978 | $ | 4,076 | $ | 4,663 |
Table 17
Asset / Liability Matching at June 30, 2003
($ in thousands)
One- | Six- | One- | Non | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Month | Month | Year | Fixed/ | Interest | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset | Asset | LIBOR | LIBOR | Treasury | Hybrid | Bearing | And | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type | Amount | Liabilities | Liabilities | Liabilities | Liabilities | Liabilities | Equity | Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash (unrestricted) |
$ | 36,539 | $ | 36,539 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 36,539 | ||||||||||||||||
One Month LIBOR |
2,707,635 | 2,707,635 | | | | | | 2,707,635 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Month LIBOR |
6,849,546 | 4,249,407 | 2,264,658 | 126,598 | | | 208,883 | 6,849,546 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other ARM |
17,541 | | | 17,541 | | | | 17,541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year Treasury |
35,260 | | | 35,260 | | | | 35,260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed / Hybrid < 1yr* |
79,847 | | | | | | 79,847 | 79,847 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed > 1yr |
387,890 | | | | 221,191 | | 166,699 | 387,890 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hybrid > 1yr |
193,211 | | | | 101,486 | | 91,725 | 193,211 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Earning Assets |
48,583 | | | | | 48,561 | 22 | 48,583 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,356,052 | $ | 6,993,581 | $ | 2,264,658 | $ | 179,399 | $ | 322,677 | $ | 48,561 | $ | 547,176 | $ | 10,356,052 |
Long-Term Debt Characteristics
Table 18
Long-Term Debt Characteristics Residential Mortgage Loans (Sequoia)
($ in thousands)
Principal | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original | Estimated | Outstanding | Rate At | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt | Issue | Issue | Stated | Callable | At June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia Long Term Debt Issue | Rating | Date | Amount | Index | Maturity | Date | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 1 A1 |
AAA | 07/29/97 | $ | 334,347 | 1m LIBOR | 02/15/28 | Called | $ | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 1 A2 |
AAA | 07/29/97 | 200,000 | Fed Funds | 02/15/28 | Called | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2 A1 |
AAA | 11/06/97 | 592,560 | 1y Treasury | 03/30/29 | 6/26/05 | 179,399 | 2.67 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2 A2 |
AAA | 11/06/97 | 156,600 | 1m LIBOR | 03/30/29 | 6/26/05 | 47,411 | 1.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 A1 |
AAA | 06/26/98 | 225,459 | Fixed to 12/02 | 05/31/28 | Retired | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 A2 |
AAA | 06/26/98 | 95,000 | Fixed to 12/02 | 05/31/28 | Retired | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 A3 |
AAA | 06/26/98 | 164,200 | Fixed to 12/02 | 05/31/28 | Retired | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 A4 |
AAA | 06/26/98 | 121,923 | 1m LIBOR | 05/31/28 | Called | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 M1 |
AA/AAA | 06/26/98 | 16,127 | 1m LIBOR | 05/31/28 | Called | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 M2 |
A/AA | 06/26/98 | 7,741 | 1m LIBOR | 05/31/28 | Called | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 3 M3 |
BBB/A | 06/26/98 | 4,838 | 1m LIBOR | 05/31/28 | Called | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 1A A1 |
AAA | 05/04/99 | 157,266 | 1m LIBOR | 02/15/28 | Called | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 4 A |
AAA | 03/21/00 | 377,119 | 1m LIBOR | 08/31/24 | 6/28/05 | 186,187 | 1.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 5 A |
AAA | 10/29/01 | 496,667 | 1m LIBOR | 10/29/26 | 6/30/05 | 408,068 | 1.44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 5 B1 |
AA | 10/29/01 | 5,918 | 1m LIBOR | 10/29/26 | 6/30/05 | 5,918 | 1.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 5 B2 |
A | 10/29/01 | 5,146 | 1m LIBOR | 10/29/26 | 6/30/05 | 5,146 | 1.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 5 B3 |
BBB | 10/29/01 | 2,316 | 1m LIBOR | 10/29/26 | 6/30/05 | 2,316 | 1.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 6A |
AAA | 04/26/02 | 496,378 | 1m LIBOR | 04/26/27 | 6/30/05 | 433,037 | 1.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 6B1 |
AA | 04/26/02 | 5,915 | 1m LIBOR | 04/26/27 | 6/30/05 | 5,915 | 1.76 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 7A |
AAA | 05/29/02 | 554,686 | 1m LIBOR | 05/29/32 | 6/30/05 | 485,545 | 1.44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 7B1 |
AA | 05/29/02 | 8,080 | 1m LIBOR | 05/29/32 | 6/30/05 | 8,080 | 1.85 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 8 1A-1 |
AAA | 07/30/02 | 50,000 | 1m LIBOR | 08/20/32 | 6/30/05 | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 8 1A-2 |
AAA | 07/30/02 | 61,468 | Fixed to 12/04 | 08/20/32 | 6/30/05 | 59,460 | 3.46 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 8 2A |
AAA | 07/30/02 | 463,097 | 1m LIBOR | 08/20/32 | 6/30/05 | 420,931 | 1.40 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 8 3A |
AAA | 07/30/02 | 49,973 | 6m LIBOR | 08/20/32 | 6/30/05 | 43,892 | 3.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 8 B1 |
AA | 07/30/02 | 9,069 | 1m LIBOR | 08/20/32 | 6/30/05 | 9,069 | 1.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 9 1A |
AAA | 08/28/02 | 381,689 | 1m LIBOR | 09/20/32 | 7/2/05 | 361,541 | 1.45 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 9 2A |
AAA | 08/28/02 | 168,875 | 1m LIBOR | 09/20/32 | 7/2/05 | 139,106 | 2.99 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 9 B1 |
AA | 08/28/02 | 7,702 | 1m LIBOR | 09/20/32 | 7/2/05 | 7,701 | 1.85 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 10 1A |
AAA | 09/26/02 | 822,375 | 1m LIBOR | 10/20/27 | 7/2/05 | 772,130 | 1.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 10 2A-1 |
AAA | 09/26/02 | 190,000 | 1m LIBOR | 10/20/27 | 7/2/05 | 180,912 | 1.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 10 2A-2 |
AAA | 09/26/02 | 3,500 | 1m LIBOR | 10/20/27 | 7/2/05 | 3,500 | 1.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 10 B1 |
AA | 09/26/02 | 12,600 | 1m LIBOR | 10/20/27 | 7/2/05 | 12,600 | 1.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 10 B2 |
A | 09/26/02 | 8,400 | 1m LIBOR | 10/20/27 | 7/2/05 | 8,400 | 1.90 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 10 B3 |
BBB | 09/26/02 | 4,725 | 1m LIBOR | 10/20/27 | 7/2/05 | 4,725 | 2.50 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 11 A |
AAA | 10/30/02 | 695,210 | 1m LIBOR | 12/21/32 | 7/3/05 | 656,560 | 1.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 11 B1 |
AA | 10/30/02 | 9,726 | 1m LIBOR | 12/21/32 | 7/3/05 | 9,726 | 2.07 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 12 A |
AAA | 12/19/02 | 1,080,076 | 1m LIBOR | 01/21/33 | 7/3/05 | 1,037,855 | 1.55 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 12 B1 |
AA | 12/19/02 | 16,815 | 1m LIBOR | 01/21/33 | 7/3/05 | 16,815 | 1.95 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-1 1A |
AAA | 02/27/03 | 798,206 | 1m LIBOR | 04/20/33 | 7/1/05 | 775,613 | 1.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-1 2A |
AAA | 02/27/03 | 190,000 | 6m LIBOR | 04/20/33 | 7/1/05 | 184,819 | 1.74 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-1 B-1 |
AA | 02/27/03 | 15,905 | 1m LIBOR | 04/20/33 | 7/1/05 | 15,905 | 1.98 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-1 B-2 |
A | 02/27/03 | 8,210 | Pass Through | 04/20/33 | 7/1/05 | 8,210 | 2.79 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-2 A-1 |
AAA | 04/29/03 | 500,000 | 1m LIBOR | 06/01/33 | 7/1/05 | 494,603 | 1.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-2 A-2 |
AAA | 04/29/03 | 303,600 | 6m LIBOR | 06/01/33 | 7/1/05 | 298,351 | 1.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-2 M-1 |
AA | 04/29/03 | 11,480 | 1m LIBOR | 06/01/33 | 7/1/05 | 11,480 | 1.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-3 A-1 |
AAA | 06/26/03 | 379,455 | 1m LIBOR | 07/01/33 | 7/1/05 | 379,455 | 1.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-3 A-2 |
AAA | 06/26/03 | 149,922 | 6m LIBOR | 07/01/33 | 7/1/05 | 149,922 | 1.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sequoia 2003-3 B-1 |
AA | 06/26/03 | 9,075 | 1m LIBOR | 07/01/33 | 7/1/05 | 9,075 | 1.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
MLCC 2003-C A-1 |
AAA | 06/26/03 | 773,795 | 1m LIBOR | 06/01/28 | 7/3/05 | 773,795 | 1.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
MLCC 2003-C A-2 |
AAA | 06/26/03 | 200,002 | 6m LIBOR | 06/01/28 | 7/3/05 | 200,002 | 1.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
MLCC 2003-C B-1 |
AA | 06/26/03 | 10,553 | 1m LIBOR | 06/01/28 | 7/3/05 | 10,553 | 1.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Sequoia Issuance |
$ | 11,413,788 | $ | 8,823,728 | 1.54 | % |
Table 19
Long-Term Debt Characteristics Commercial Real Estate Loans
($ in thousands)
Principal | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | Original | Estimated | Outstanding | Rate At | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Term Debt | Debt | Issue | Issue | Stated | Callable | At June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issue | Rating | Date | Amount | Index | Maturity | Date | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial 1 |
NR | 03/30/01 | $ | 9,010 | 1m LIBOR | 11/01/02 | Paid Off | $ | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial 2 |
NR | 03/30/01 | 8,320 | 1m LIBOR | 10/01/03 | Paid Off | | NM | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial 3 |
NR | 03/01/02 | 8,318 | 1m LIBOR | 07/01/03 | NC | 8,255 | 8.63 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Commercial
Issuance |
$ | 25,648 | $ | 8,255 | 8.63 | % |
Long-Term Debt Characteristics (continued)
Table 20
Long-Term Debt Characteristics
Collateralized Debt Obligations and Other Resecuritizations Acacia and SMFC
($ in thousands)
Principal | Interest | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resecuritizations | Original | Estimated | Outstanding | Rate At | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long Term Debt | Debt | Issue | Issue | Stated | Callable | At June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Resecuritizations Issue | Rating | Date | Amount | Index | Maturity | Date | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002A A1 |
AAA | 04/30/02 | 64,761 | 1m LIBOR | 04/30/30 | 6/30/05 | $ | 36,446 | 1.17 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002A A2 |
AAA | 04/30/02 | 15,861 | 1m LIBOR | 08/30/29 | 6/30/05 | 11,846 | 1.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acacia CDO 1 A |
AAA | 12/10/02 | 224,250 | 3m LIBOR | 12/04/18 | 7/2/05 | 224,006 | 1.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acacia CDO 1 B |
AA | 12/10/02 | 45,000 | 3m LIBOR | 12/04/37 | 7/2/05 | 45,000 | 2.58 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acacia CDO 1 C |
BBB | 12/10/02 | 15,750 | 3m LIBOR | 12/04/37 | 7/2/05 | 15,750 | 3.98 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002B I A1 |
AA | 12/19/02 | 16,855 | Fixed | 08/28/31 | 6/28/05 | 16,084 | 5.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002B I A2 |
A | 12/19/02 | 18,274 | Fixed | 08/28/31 | 6/28/05 | 17,438 | 5.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002B I A3 |
BBB | 12/19/02 | 17,221 | Fixed | 08/28/31 | 6/28/05 | 16,433 | 6.38 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002B I A4 |
BB | 12/19/02 | 25,133 | Fixed | 08/28/31 | 6/28/05 | 23,983 | 6.75 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002B II A1 |
AA | 12/19/02 | 15,517 | Fixed | 12/29/39 | 6/28/05 | 8,667 | 4.82 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002B II A2 |
A | 12/19/02 | 18,345 | Fixed | 12/29/39 | 6/28/05 | 10,247 | 4.92 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002B II A3 |
BBB | 12/19/02 | 14,989 | Fixed | 12/29/39 | 6/28/05 | 8,372 | 5.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
SMFC 2002B II A4 |
BB | 12/19/02 | 8,347 | Fixed | 12/29/39 | 6/28/05 | 4,662 | 6.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acacia CDO 2 A |
AAA | 05/13/03 | 222,000 | 3m LIBOR | 06/08/23 | 7/3/05 | 222,000 | 1.94 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acacia CDO 2 B |
AA | 05/13/03 | 45,375 | 3m LIBOR | 06/08/38 | 7/3/05 | 45,375 | 2.59 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Acacia CDO 2 C |
BBB | 05/13/03 | 16,500 | 3m LIBOR | 06/08/38 | 7/3/05 | 16,500 | 4.54 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Resecuritizations |
$ | 784,178 | $ | 722,808 | 2.63 | % |
Other Supplemental Financial Data
Table 21
Shareholder Wealth (5)
(dollars per share)
GAAP | ||||||||||||||||||||
Book | Dividends | Cumulative | Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||
Value | Declared | Reinvestment | Shareholder | |||||||||||||||||
Per | During | Cumulative | Earnings on | Wealth | ||||||||||||||||
Share | Period | Dividends | Dividends | Per Share | ||||||||||||||||
Sep. 1994 |
$ | 11.67 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 11.67 | ||||||||||
Dec. 1994 |
10.82 | 0.25 | 0.250 | | 11.07 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1995 |
12.38 | 0.96 | 1.210 | 0.09 | 13.68 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1996 |
16.50 | 1.67 | 2.880 | 1.07 | 20.45 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1997 |
21.55 | 2.15 | 5.030 | 3.07 | 29.65 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1998 |
20.27 | 0.28 | 5.310 | 2.67 | 28.25 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 1999 |
20.88 | 0.40 | 5.710 | 3.07 | 29.66 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 2000 |
21.47 | 1.61 | 7.320 | 4.11 | 32.90 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 2001 |
22.21 | 2.55 | 9.870 | 6.03 | 38.11 | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 2002 |
27.43 | 2.89 | 12.755 | 12.43 | 52.62 | |||||||||||||||
Jun. 2003 |
30.70 | 1.30 | 14.055 | 16.79 | 61.55 |
(5) | In the nearly 9 years since the commencement of Redwoods operations, cumulative shareholder wealth has grown at a compound rate of 20% per year. We define shareholder wealth as growth in tangible book value per share, plus dividends paid, plus reinvestment of dividends. In calculating shareholder wealth, we assume that dividends were reinvested through the purchase of additional shares at the prevailing book value per share. With this assumption, the shareholder wealth we created can be compared to book value per share growth at a non-REIT company that has retained its earnings and compounded book value within the company. This is a measure of management value-added, not a measure of actual shareholder returns. | |
Book value per share was $11.67 in September 1994 when we commenced operations. We increased reported book value to $30.70 per share at June 30, 2003 through the retention of cash by keeping dividends lower than cash flow, net positive changes in market values of assets, issuance of stock at prices above book value, and repurchases of stock at prices below book value. Since we mark-to-market many of our assets through our balance sheet, reported book value is a good approximation of tangible value in the company. Cumulative dividends paid during this period were $14.055 per share, and reinvestment earnings on those dividends were $16.79 per share. Thus, cumulatively, shareholder wealth has increased from $11.67 per share to $61.55 per share during this nearly nine-year period. A company that earned a 20% after-tax return on equity and retained all its earnings would have shown a similar amount of shareholder wealth growth during this period. |
Table 22
Operating Expenses
($ in thousands)
Efficiency | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: | Fixed and | Fixed and | Ratio: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable | Variable | Variable | Fixed | Fixed and | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Total | Variable | Operating | Operating | Operating | Variable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Option | Fixed and | (Performance | Expenses/ | Expenses/ | Expenses/ | Operating | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | Valuation | Variable | Fixed | Based) | Average | Average | Average | Expenses/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating | Adjustments | Operating | Operating | Operating | GAAP | Core | Core | Net Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses | & Excise Tax | Expenses | Expenses | Expenses | Equity | Equity | Equity | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 4,089 | $ | 543 | $ | 3,546 | $ | 1,758 | $ | 1,788 | 4.2 | % | 4.3 | % | 2.1 | % | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
5,325 | 789 | 4,536 | 2,081 | 2,455 | 4.7 | % | 4.9 | % | 2.2 | % | 26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
3,545 | (745 | ) | 4,290 | 2,101 | 2,189 | 4.0 | % | 4.5 | % | 2.2 | % | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
7,046 | 1,037 | 6,009 | 2,230 | 3,779 | 5.3 | % | 6.0 | % | 2.2 | % | 29 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 |
20,005 | 1,624 | 18,381 | 8,170 | 10,211 | 4.6 | % | 4.9 | % | 2.2 | % | 26 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
8,282 | 1,810 | 6,472 | 2,663 | 3,809 | 5.3 | % | 6.2 | % | 2.6 | % | 27 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
8,793 | 1,490 | 7,303 | 2,645 | 4,658 | 5.8 | % | 6.8 | % | 2.5 | % | 25 | % |
Table 23
Unamortized Premium and Discount Balances*
($ in thousands)
Net | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization | ||||||||||||||||
Unamortized | (Expense) | |||||||||||||||
Unamortized | Unamortized | Net | Income | |||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Premium/ | During | |||||||||||||
Premium | Discount | (Discount) | Period | |||||||||||||
Q1: 2002 |
$ | 23,036 | ($32,053 | ) | ($9,017 | ) | ($3,201 | ) | ||||||||
Q2: 2002 |
31,155 | (40,301 | ) | (9,146 | ) | (793 | ) | |||||||||
Q3: 2002 |
57,951 | (58,397 | ) | (446 | ) | (2,148 | ) | |||||||||
Q4: 2002 |
60,478 | (70,140 | ) | (9,662 | ) | (3,083 | ) | |||||||||
2002 |
60,478 | (70,140 | ) | (9,662 | ) | (3,083 | ) | |||||||||
Q1: 2003 |
62,812 | (96,131 | ) | (33,319 | ) | (2,098 | ) | |||||||||
Q2: 2003 |
95,644 | (139,297 | ) | (43,653 | ) | 3,269 |
* | Includes deferred bond issuance costs and net premium on long-term debt. |
Other Supplemental Financial Data (continued)
Table 24
Differences Between GAAP Income and Estimated REIT Taxable Income
($ in thousands)
For the Six | ||||||||
Months | For the | |||||||
Ended | Year Ended | |||||||
6/30/2003 | 12/31/2002 | |||||||
GAAP
Income |
$ | 37,144 | $ | 53,893 | ||||
(Earnings)/losses from taxable subsidiaries |
(2,230 | ) | 37 | |||||
Amortization and credit expenses |
12,912 | 21,740 | ||||||
Operating
expenses |
8,381 | 5,232 | ||||||
Provision
for excise tax |
862 | 959 | ||||||
Mark-to-market
Adjustments |
1,774 | (4,942 | ) | |||||
Estimated REIT taxable income
for common shareholders |
$ | 58,843 | $ | 76,919 |
End