UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2005
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-13759
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
68-0329422 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
One Belvedere Place, Suite 300
|
|
|
Mill Valley, California
|
|
94941 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(415) 389-7373
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all documents and reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes þ No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of stock, as of the
last practicable date.
|
|
|
Common Stock ($0.01 par value per share)
|
|
24,721,164 as of August 4, 2005 |
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
$ |
19,383,193 |
|
|
$ |
22,208,417 |
|
Residential home equity lines of credit |
|
|
247,372 |
|
|
|
296,348 |
|
Residential loan credit-enhancement securities |
|
|
706,195 |
|
|
|
561,658 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
41,794 |
|
|
|
54,479 |
|
Securities portfolio |
|
|
1,678,234 |
|
|
|
1,394,575 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
72,193 |
|
|
|
57,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Earning Assets |
|
|
22,128,981 |
|
|
|
24,572,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
47,460 |
|
|
|
36,038 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
85,358 |
|
|
|
72,459 |
|
Interest rate agreements |
|
|
12,467 |
|
|
|
16,144 |
|
Principal receivable |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
2,653 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
6,821 |
|
|
|
10,572 |
|
Deferred asset-backed security issuance costs |
|
|
58,522 |
|
|
|
60,993 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
5,862 |
|
|
|
6,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
22,345,755 |
|
|
$ |
24,778,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood debt |
|
$ |
452,829 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
Asset-backed securities issued |
|
|
20,814,551 |
|
|
|
23,630,162 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
42,799 |
|
|
|
35,064 |
|
Interest rate agreements |
|
|
2,897 |
|
|
|
1,124 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
23,669 |
|
|
|
28,095 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
17,253 |
|
|
|
16,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
21,353,998 |
|
|
|
23,913,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 50,000,000
shares authorized; 24,646,963 and 24,153,576 issued and
outstanding |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
801,917 |
|
|
|
773,222 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
137,380 |
|
|
|
105,357 |
|
Cumulative earnings |
|
|
583,084 |
|
|
|
481,607 |
|
Cumulative distributions to stockholders |
|
|
(530,870 |
) |
|
|
(496,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
991,757 |
|
|
|
864,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
22,345,755 |
|
|
$ |
24,778,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
$ |
202,249 |
|
|
$ |
111,113 |
|
|
$ |
398,433 |
|
|
$ |
212,450 |
|
Residential home equity lines of credit |
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
Residential loan credit-enhancement securities |
|
|
19,439 |
|
|
|
16,077 |
|
|
|
39,063 |
|
|
|
31,610 |
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
Securities portfolio |
|
|
20,727 |
|
|
|
10,545 |
|
|
|
38,667 |
|
|
|
20,156 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income before provision for credit losses |
|
|
246,861 |
|
|
|
139,479 |
|
|
|
485,052 |
|
|
|
266,827 |
|
Reversal of (provision for) credit losses |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
(4,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
248,388 |
|
|
|
137,979 |
|
|
|
485,554 |
|
|
|
262,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood debt |
|
|
(1,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,490 |
) |
|
|
(4,553 |
) |
|
|
(5,061 |
) |
Asset-backed securities issued |
|
|
(193,355 |
) |
|
|
(87,869 |
) |
|
|
(366,594 |
) |
|
|
(164,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
(195,180 |
) |
|
|
(90,359 |
) |
|
|
(371,147 |
) |
|
|
(169,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Interest Income |
|
|
53,208 |
|
|
|
47,620 |
|
|
|
114,407 |
|
|
|
92,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(11,284 |
) |
|
|
(8,461 |
) |
|
|
(22,256 |
) |
|
|
(18,487 |
) |
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
12,258 |
|
|
|
18,057 |
|
|
|
29,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
44,969 |
|
|
|
51,417 |
|
|
|
110,208 |
|
|
|
104,088 |
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(4,054 |
) |
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
|
(8,731 |
) |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
40,915 |
|
|
$ |
55,088 |
|
|
$ |
101,477 |
|
|
$ |
105,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share: |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.67 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
$ |
5.29 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share: |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
2.58 |
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
Special dividends declared per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
24,591,223 |
|
|
|
20,630,186 |
|
|
|
24,474,134 |
|
|
|
20,028,267 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
25,196,286 |
|
|
|
21,325,075 |
|
|
|
25,109,390 |
|
|
|
20,855,647 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income |
|
|
$40,915 |
|
|
$ |
55,088 |
|
|
$ |
101,477 |
|
|
$ |
105,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
securities (AFS) |
|
|
33,420 |
|
|
|
12,669 |
|
|
|
50,778 |
|
|
|
29,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
adjustment for net
(gains) included in net
income |
|
|
(2,921 |
) |
|
|
(9,089 |
) |
|
|
(12,963 |
) |
|
|
(20,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains
(losses) on cash flow
hedges |
|
|
(17,984 |
) |
|
|
28,863 |
|
|
|
(5,990 |
) |
|
|
19,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of net
realized cash flow hedge
losses to interest
expense on asset-backed
securities issued |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income |
|
|
12,596 |
|
|
|
32,704 |
|
|
|
32,023 |
|
|
|
29,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
$53,511 |
|
|
$ |
87,792 |
|
|
$ |
133,500 |
|
|
$ |
134,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Distributions to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Total |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
24,153,576 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
773,222 |
|
|
$ |
105,357 |
|
|
$ |
481,607 |
|
|
|
$(496,272 |
) |
|
$ |
864,156 |
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,477 |
|
Net unrealized gain on assets AFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,815 |
|
Net unrealized (loss) on interest rate
agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,792 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Offerings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment & Stock Purchase
Plans |
|
|
469,556 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
25,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,568 |
|
Employee Option & Stock Plans |
|
|
14,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
Restricted Stock & Stock DERs |
|
|
8,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,598 |
) |
|
|
(34,598 |
) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
24,646,963 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
801,917 |
|
|
$ |
137,380 |
|
|
$ |
583,084 |
|
|
|
$(530,870 |
) |
|
$ |
991,757 |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Distributions to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Total |
|
|
December 31, 2003 |
|
|
19,062,983 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
517,826 |
|
|
$ |
82,179 |
|
|
$ |
248,972 |
|
|
|
$(295,840 |
) |
|
$ |
553,328 |
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,879 |
|
Net unrealized gain on assets AFS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,854 |
|
Net unrealized gain on
interest rate agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Offerings |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
51,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,071 |
|
Dividend Reinvestment &
Stock Purchase Plans |
|
|
944,135 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
47,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,812 |
|
Employee Option & Stock Plans |
|
|
287,681 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,994 |
|
Restricted Stock & Stock DERs |
|
|
16,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,658 |
) |
|
|
(37,658 |
) |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
21,510,801 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
625,151 |
|
|
$ |
111,221 |
|
|
$ |
354,851 |
|
|
|
$(333,498 |
) |
|
$ |
757,940 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
6
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
101,477 |
|
|
$ |
105,879 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of premiums, discounts, and debt issuance costs |
|
|
(44,169 |
) |
|
|
(31,772 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization of non-financial assets |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
4,011 |
|
Non-cash stock compensation |
|
|
1,884 |
|
|
|
2,597 |
|
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments |
|
|
(18,057 |
) |
|
|
(29,695 |
) |
Principal payments on real estate loans held-for-sale |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Net sales of real estate loans held-for-sale |
|
|
14,570 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(12,900 |
) |
|
|
(9,573 |
) |
Principal receivable |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
1,506 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
3,751 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
(6,929 |
) |
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
7,735 |
|
|
|
4,956 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(4,426 |
) |
|
|
5,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
53,990 |
|
|
|
49,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of real estate loans held-for-investment |
|
|
(1,266,047 |
) |
|
|
(5,377,250 |
) |
Principal payments on real estate loans held-for-investment |
|
|
4,120,751 |
|
|
|
1,330,443 |
|
Purchases of real estate securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(493,047 |
) |
|
|
(391,613 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of real estate securities available-for-sale |
|
|
42,667 |
|
|
|
30,890 |
|
Principal payments on real estate securities available-for-sale |
|
|
93,735 |
|
|
|
101,513 |
|
Net (increase) decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
(11,422 |
) |
|
|
2,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
2,486,637 |
|
|
|
(4,303,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings on Redwood debt |
|
|
249,548 |
|
|
|
33,447 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of asset-backed securities |
|
|
1,418,299 |
|
|
|
5,489,808 |
|
Deferred asset-backed security issuance costs |
|
|
(8,189 |
) |
|
|
(17,055 |
) |
Repayments on asset-backed securities |
|
|
(4,177,321 |
) |
|
|
(1,342,669 |
) |
Net (proceeds) purchases of interest rate agreements |
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
|
|
2,093 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
26,815 |
|
|
|
104,752 |
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(33,528 |
) |
|
|
(35,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(2,525,680 |
) |
|
|
4,234,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
14,947 |
|
|
|
(20,006 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
57,246 |
|
|
|
58,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
72,193 |
|
|
$ |
38,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
363,412 |
|
|
$ |
164,980 |
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
6,580 |
|
|
$ |
3,945 |
|
Non-cash financing activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared but not paid |
|
$ |
17,253 |
|
|
$ |
14,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
7
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. REDWOOD TRUST
Redwood Trust, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (Redwood), invests in, credit-enhances, and
securitizes residential and commercial real estate loans and securities. Our primary business is
credit-enhancing high-quality jumbo residential real estate loans nationwide. We also invest in
securities that represent interests in pools of diverse types of real estate loans, including
commercial real estate loans, home equity line of credit loans (HELOCs), real estate collateralized
debt obligations (CDOs), and other real estate assets. We have elected to have Redwood Trust, Inc.
taxed as a Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT).
Redwood acquires credit enhancement securities (CES) from residential real estate loan
securitizations and, to a lesser extent, from commercial real estate loan securitizations.
Typically, our residential CES portfolio, as currently presented represents the non-rated, B-rated,
and BB-rated securities in a residential real estate loan securitization, while commercial CES
represent the non-rated security in a commercial real estate loan securitization. Redwood acquires
its residential CES from securitizations sponsored by others as well as from the Sequoia
securitizations, which are special purpose entities sponsored by Redwood sponsors. Redwood acquires
its commercial CES from securitizations sponsored by others.
Sequoia Residential Mortgage Loan Securitizations
We acquire residential real estate loans from third party originators for our Sequoia residential
loan securitization programs. We then sell these loans to Sequoia entities that finance their
purchases through the issuance of asset-backed securities (ABS). All but certain CES and a portion
of the interest-only securities are sold to unrelated third parties through Sequoia entities.
Redwood typically acquires these securities from these Sequoia entities. However, many of these
CES are sold to the Acacia CDO resecuritization program that Redwood sponsors (see
below). Redwood also acquires other ABS issued by Sequoia for the Acacia CDO program.
All other Sequoia ABS are sold to third parties other than Acacia. Redwoods investment in Sequoia
securitizations is small relative to the size of each Sequoia entity, and Redwoods maximum loss is
limited to its investment in these securitizations.
Acacia Securitizations
We acquire various investment grade and non-investment grade residential and commercial real estate
securities from third parties and Sequoia for our Acacia CDO securitization programs. We sell these
and other securities to Acacia securitization entities, which are special purpose entities sponsored by
Redwood and these Acacia entities issue ABS. As with the Sequoia transactions, these
securitizations are treated as financings and the assets owned by the Acacia entities are
consolidated on our GAAP balance sheets. Redwood typically acquires for its own portfolio the
securities issued from Acacia entities that bear the first-loss and second-loss credit risk of the
Acacia assets. Similar to the Sequoia transactions, Redwoods investment in these securitizations
is small relative to the size of each Acacia entity, and Redwoods maximum loss is limited to that
investment.
Residential and Commercial Securitizations Sponsored by Others
Residential CES acquired from securitizations sponsored by others are reported as residential loan
credit-enhancement securities. Similarly, commercial CES acquired from securitizations sponsored by
others are included in securities portfolio.
8
NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are unaudited. The unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated
financial statements and, in our opinion, reflect all adjustments (which include only normal
recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of our financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows. These consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be
read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements included in the Redwoods
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The results for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the expected results for the year
ending December 31, 2005. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to
the June 30, 2005 presentation.
The June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Redwood and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sequoia Mortgage Funding Corporation, Acacia CDO 1, LTD,
Acacia CDO 2, LTD, Acacia CDO 3, LTD, Acacia CDO 4, LTD, Acacia CDO 5, LTD, Acacia CDO 6, LTD,
Acacia CDO 7, LTD, and RWT Holdings, Inc. (Holdings), and Holdings wholly-owned subsidiaries,
including Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc. For financial reporting purposes, references to
Sequoia mean Sequoia Mortgage Funding Corporation and Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc. References
to Acacia mean all of the aforementioned Acacia CDO entities. References to the REIT mean Redwood
exclusive of its taxable subsidiaries. The taxable subsidiaries of Redwood are Holdings and
Holdings wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company balances and transactions have
been eliminated.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States of America (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These
include fair value of certain assets, amount and timing of credit losses, prepayment assumptions,
and other items that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities and disclosure
of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and
the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reported period. Our estimates
are inherently subjective in nature and actual results could differ from those estimates.
Securitizations
Redwood treats the securitizations it sponsors as financings under the provisions of Financial
Accounting Statement No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishments of Liabilities (FAS 140), as according to FAS 140 we have retained effective
control over these loans and securities. Control is maintained through our active management of the
assets in the securitization entity, our retained asset transfer discretion, our ability to direct
certain servicing decisions, or a combination of the foregoing. Accordingly, the underlying loans
owned by the Sequoia entities and the Sequoia ABS issued to third parties are shown on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets under residential real estate loans and ABS issued. Assets owned by the
Acacia entities are shown on our Consolidated Balance Sheets either in our securities portfolio,
(residential real estate backed securities rated BBB and above, commercial real estate securities,
CDO, and most corporate REIT debt) or our residential loan credit-enhancement securities (lower
rated residential real estate securities). In our Consolidated Statements of Income, we record
interest income on the loans and securities and interest expense on the ABS issued. Any Sequoia ABS
(CES, investment grade, or interest-only) acquired by Redwood or Acacia from Sequoia
entities and any Acacia ABS acquired by Redwood for its own portfolio are eliminated in
consolidation and thus are not shown on our consolidated GAAP balance sheets.
Earning Assets
Earning assets (as consolidated for GAAP purposes) consist primarily of residential and commercial
real estate loans and securities. Coupon interest is recognized as revenue when earned according
to the terms of the loans and securities and when, in our opinion, it is collectible. Purchase
discounts and premiums related to earning assets are amortized into interest income over their
estimated lives, considering the actual and future estimated prepayments of the earning assets
using the interest method (i.e., using an effective yield method). Gains or losses on the sale of
earning assets are based on the specific identification method.
Residential and Commercial Real Estate Loans: Held-for-Investment
Real estate loans held-for-investment are carried at their unpaid principal balances adjusted for
net unamortized premiums or discounts and net of any allowance for credit losses. The majority of
consolidated residential real estate loans are classified as held-for-investment because the
consolidated securitization entities that own these assets have the ability and intent to hold
these loans to maturity. We
9
may sell real estate loans from time to time to third-parties other than the securitization
entities we sponsor.
Pursuant to Financial Accounting Statement No. 91, Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs
Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Cost of Leases (FAS 91), we use
the interest method to determine an effective yield and amortize the premium on loans. For loans
acquired prior to July 1, 2004, we use coupon interest rates as they change over time and
anticipated principal prepayments. For loans acquired after July 1, 2004, we calculate an
effective yield to amortize the premium using the initial coupon interest rate of the loans
(without regard to future changes in the underlying indices) and anticipated prepayments.
Commercial real estate loans for which we have the ability and intent to hold to maturity are
classified as held-for-investment and are carried at their unpaid balances adjusted for unamortized
discount and net of any allowance for credit losses.
Residential and Commercial Real Estate Loans: Held-for-Sale
Residential and commercial real estate loans that we are marketing for sale are classified as real
estate loans held-for-sale. These are carried at the lower of original cost or market value on a
loan-by-loan basis. Any market valuation adjustments on these loans are recognized in net
recognized gains and valuation adjustments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement and Securities Portfolio Securities: Available-for-Sale
These securities are classified as available-for-sale (AFS) and are carried at their estimated fair
values. Cumulative unrealized gains and losses are reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income in our Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity.
When recognizing revenue on AFS securities, we employ the interest method to account for purchase
premiums, discounts, and fees associated with these securities. For securities rated AAA or AA,
we use the interest method as prescribed under FAS 91, while for securities rated A or lower we use
the interest method as prescribed under the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained
Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets (EITF 99-20). The use of these methods
requires us to project cash flows over the remaining life of each asset. These projections include
assumptions about interest rates, prepayment rates, the timing and amount of credit losses, and
other factors. We review and make adjustments to our cash flow projections on an ongoing basis and
monitor these projections based on input and analyses received from external sources, internal
models, and our own judgment and experience. There can be no assurance that our assumptions used
to estimate future cash flows or the current periods yield for each asset would not change in the
near term.
Redwood monitors its available-for-sale securities for other-than-temporary impairment. We use the
guidelines prescribed under EITF 99-20, Financial Accounting Statement No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (FAS 115), and Staff Accounting Bulletin No.
5(m), Other-Than-Temporary Impairment for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SAB
5(m)). Any other-than-temporary impairments are reported under net recognized gains and losses and
valuation adjustments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Credit Reserves
For consolidated residential loans, HELOC loans, and commercial real estate loans
held-for-investment, we establish and maintain credit reserves based on estimates of credit losses
inherent in these loan portfolios as of the balance sheet date. To calculate the credit reserve, we
assess inherent losses by determining loss factors (defaults, the timing of defaults, and loss
severities upon defaults) that can be specifically applied to each of the consolidated loans, loan
pools or individual loans. We follow the guidelines of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102, Selected
Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation (SAB 102), and Financial Accounting Statement No.
5, Accounting for Contingencies (FAS 5), in setting credit reserves for our residential and
commercial loans.
The following factors are considered and applied in such determination:
|
|
|
On-going analysis of the pool of loans including, but not limited to, the age of
loans, underwriting standards, business climate, economic conditions, geographical
considerations, and other observable data |
|
|
|
|
Historical loss rates and past performance of similar loans |
|
|
|
|
Relevant environmental factors |
|
|
|
|
Relevant market research and publicly available third-party reference loss rates |
|
|
|
|
Trends in delinquencies and charge-offs |
10
|
|
|
Effects in changes in credit concentrations |
|
|
|
|
Prepayment assumptions |
Once we determine applicable default amounts, the timing of the defaults, and severities of losses
upon the defaults, we estimate expected losses for each pool of loans over its expected life. We
then estimate the timing of these losses and the losses probable to occur over an effective loss
confirmation period. This period is defined as the range of time between the probable occurrence
of a credit loss (such as the initial deterioration of the borrowers financial condition) and the
confirmation of that loss (the actual impairment or charge-off of the loan). The losses expected
to occur within the effective loss confirmation period are the basis of our credit reserves because
we believe those losses exist as of the reported date of the financial statements. We re-evaluate
the level of our credit reserves on at least a quarterly basis, and we record provision,
charge-offs, and recoveries monthly.
Additionally, if a loan becomes real estate owned (REO) or is reclassified as held-for-sale,
valuations specific to that loan also include analysis of the underlying collateral.
The credit reserve for credit losses for the commercial real estate loan portfolio includes a
detailed analysis of each loan and the underlying property. The following factors are considered
and applied in such determination.
|
|
|
On-going analysis of each individual loan |
|
|
|
|
On-going evaluation of fair values of collateral using current appraisals and other valuations |
|
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow analysis |
|
|
|
|
Perfection of security interest |
|
|
|
|
Borrowers ability to meet obligations |
We follow the guidelines of Financial Accounting Statement No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for
Impairment of a Loan (FAS 114), in determining impairment on commercial real estate loans. We had
no impaired loans as of June 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less.
Other Assets
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes principal and interest payments from real estate loans and securities
owned by consolidated securitization entities that are collateral for or payable to ABS issued by
those entities, cash pledged as collateral on interest rate agreements, and cash held back from
borrowers until certain loan agreement requirements are been met. Corresponding liabilities for
cash held back from borrowers are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Deferred Tax Assets
Net deferred tax assets represent the net benefit of net operating loss carry forwards, real estate
asset basis differences, and recognized tax gains on whole loan securitizations that will be
recognized under GAAP through the financial statements in future periods.
11
Deferred Asset-Backed Security Issuance Costs
Deferred ABS issuance costs are costs associated with the issuance of ABS from securitization
entities we sponsor. These costs typically include underwriting, rating agency, legal, accounting,
and other fees. Deferred ABS issuance costs are reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as
deferred charges and are amortized as an adjustment to consolidated interest expense using the
interest method based on the actual and estimated repayment schedules of the related ABS issued.
Other Assets
Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets include REO, fixed assets, prepaid interest, and
other prepaid expenses. REO is reported at the lower of cost or market.
Interest Rate Agreements
We maintain an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the use of
derivative interest rate agreements for a variety of reasons, including minimizing significant
fluctuations in earnings or market values on certain assets or liabilities that may be caused by
interest rate volatility. Interest rate agreements we use as part of our interest rate risk
management strategy may include interest rate options, swaps, options on swaps, futures contracts,
options on futures contracts, and options on forward purchases (collectively referred to as
interest rate agreements).
On the date an interest rate agreement is entered into, we designate the interest rate agreement as
(1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm
commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of
cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash flow hedge), or
(3) held for trading (trading instrument). We currently have elected cash flow hedging treatment
for certain interest rate agreements and treat other interest rate agreements as trading
investments.
In a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the fair value of the hedging
derivative is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified
into earnings when the hedging relationship is terminated. The change in fair value of any
ineffective portion of the hedging derivative is recognized immediately in earnings.
If we do not elect hedge accounting treatment (i.e., we designate the interest rate agreement as a
trading instrument) changes in the market value of the interest rate agreement are reported
through earnings.
We discontinue hedge accounting when (1) we determine that the derivative is no longer expected to
be effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of cash flows of the designated hedged item;
(2) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (3) the derivative is
de-designated as a fair value or cash flow hedge; or (4) it is probable that the forecasted
transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period.
See Note 5 for a further discussion on interest rate agreements.
Risks and Uncertainties
We take certain risks inherent in financial institutions, including, but not limited to, credit
risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk, prepayment risk, market value risk, reinvestment risk,
and capital risk. In addition, there are several other risks and uncertainties specific to our
business. We seek to actively manage these risks and uncertainties while also providing our
stockholders with an appropriate rate of return in light of these risks and uncertainties. There
can be no assurance that risks and uncertainties are adequately provided for in our financial
statements.
Debt and Asset-Backed Securities Issued
Redwood debt is short-term debt collateralized by loans and securities held temporarily for future
sale to securitization entities. We carry this debt on our balance sheet at its unpaid principal
balance. Redwood currently does not have any long-term debt.
The majority of our consolidated liabilities reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets represent
ABS issued by bankruptcy-remote securitization entities sponsored by Redwood. These ABS issued are
carried at their unpaid principal balances net of any unamortized discount or premium. Our exposure
to loss from consolidated securitization entities (such as Sequoia and Acacia) is limited (except,
in some circumstances, for limited loan repurchase obligations) to our net investment in securities
we have acquired from these entities. As required by the governing documents related to each series
of ABS, Sequoia and Acacia assets are held in the custody of trustees. Trustees collect principal
and interest payments (less servicing and related fees) from the assets and make corresponding
principal and interest
12
payments to the issued ABS. ABS obligations are payable solely from the assets of these entities
and are otherwise non-recourse to Redwood.
Taxes
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and the corresponding
provisions of state law. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our
annual REIT taxable income (this does not include taxable income retained in our taxable
subsidiaries) to stockholders within the time frame set forth in the tax rules, and we must meet
certain other requirements. If these requirements are met, we generally will not be subject to
Federal or state income taxation at the corporate level with respect to the REIT taxable income we
distribute to our stockholders. We may retain up to 10% of our REIT taxable income and pay
corporate income taxes on this retained income while continuing to maintain our REIT status.
The taxable income of Holdings and its subsidiaries is not included in REIT taxable income, and is
subject to state and Federal income taxes at the applicable statutory rates. Deferred income taxes,
to the extent they exist, reflect estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the
amounts of taxes recorded for financial reporting purposes and amounts actually payable currently
as measured by tax laws and regulations. Holdings provides for deferred income taxes to reflect
estimated future tax effects.
We have recorded a provision for income taxes in our Consolidated Statements of Income based upon
our estimated liability for Federal and state income tax purposes. These tax liabilities arise
from estimated taxable earnings in taxable subsidiaries and from the planned retention of a portion
of our estimated REIT taxable income. See Note 8 for further discussion on income taxes.
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding
during the period. Potential common shares outstanding are calculated using the treasury stock
method, which assumes that all dilutive common stock equivalents are exercised and the funds
generated by the exercise are used to buy back outstanding common stock at the average market price
of the common stock during the reporting period.
Pursuant to EITF 03-6, Participating Securities and the Two-Class Method under FASB No. 128 (EITF
03-6), it was determined that there was no allocation of income for our outstanding stock options,
which accrue dividend equivalent rights, as they were antidilutive during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. There were no other participating securities during these periods.
13
The following table provides reconciliation of denominators of the basic and diluted net income per
share computations.
Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Share
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period |
|
|
24,591,223 |
|
|
|
20,630,186 |
|
|
|
24,474,134 |
|
|
|
20,028,267 |
|
Net effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
605,063 |
|
|
|
694,889 |
|
|
|
635,256 |
|
|
|
827,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share |
|
|
25,196,286 |
|
|
|
21,325,075 |
|
|
|
25,109,390 |
|
|
|
20,855,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.67 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
$ |
5.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
2.58 |
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the number of common shares that were
anti-dilutive totaled 370,805 and 235,840 respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004, the number of common shares that were anti-dilutive totaled 168,636 and 16,214, respectively.
Comprehensive Income
Current period net unrealized gains and losses on residential loan CES, securities portfolio
available-for-sale, and interest rate agreements classified as cash flow hedges are reported as a
component of comprehensive income on our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity. See Note 10 for further discussion of accumulated
other comprehensive income.
Stock-Based Compensation
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had one stock-based employee compensation plan and
one employee stock purchase plan. These plans are described more fully in Note 10. In accordance
with the guidance of Financial Accounting Statement No. 148, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosure, an amendment for FASB Statement No. 123, (FAS 148) we elected to
prospectively apply the fair value method of accounting for stock-based awards issued subsequent to
December 31, 2002.
We continue to account for all stock-based compensation awards issued prior to December 31, 2002
under the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees (APB 25), and related interpretations. Under these provisions, when we granted
stock-based compensation awards we did not include any stock-based employee compensation cost in
net income, as all awards granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the market value of
the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
Had Redwood applied Financial Accounting Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(FAS 123) to options granted prior to 2003, net income and net income per share would have been the
pro-forma amounts indicated below:
14
Pro-Forma Net Income Under FAS 123
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
40,915 |
|
|
$ |
55,088 |
|
|
$ |
101,477 |
|
|
$ |
105,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Dividend equivalent right
operating expenses under APB 25 |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
|
|
5,594 |
|
Add: Stock option operating
(income) expenses under APB 25 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: Stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method
for awards granted prior to
January 1, 2003 |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
42,477 |
|
|
$ |
57,179 |
|
|
$ |
104,484 |
|
|
$ |
111,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basicas reported |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
2.67 |
|
|
$ |
4.15 |
|
|
$ |
5.29 |
|
Basicpro forma |
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
$ |
2.77 |
|
|
$ |
4.27 |
|
|
$ |
5.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutedas reported |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
2.58 |
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
Dilutedpro forma |
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
|
$ |
4.16 |
|
|
$ |
5.36 |
|
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used in determining fair values of option grants
accounted for under FAS 123. The model requires the use of assumptions such as strike price,
expected life, risk free rate of return, and stock price volatility. These options are generally
granted over the course of the calendar year. Some of the options granted in the first three and
six months of 2005 and 2004 had dividend equivalent rights, and accordingly, the assumed dividend
yield was zero. Other options granted during these periods had no DERs and assumed dividend
yields of 10%. See Note 10 for a description of options granted during prior periods. The
following table describes the weighted average of assumptions used for calculating the value of
options granted in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Assumptions used
for Valuation of Options under FAS 123 Granted during period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Stock Price Volatility |
|
|
26.41 |
% |
|
|
22.00 |
% |
|
|
26.41 |
% |
|
|
22.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk free
rate of return (5 yr Treasury Rate) |
|
|
3.93 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.07 |
% |
|
|
3.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Yield Assumptions |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
4.45 |
% |
|
|
5.18 |
% |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The EITF released EITF 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to
Certain Investments (EITF 03-1). For investments that meet the scope of this pronouncement, EITF
03-1 provides application guidance to determine when an investment is considered impaired, whether
that impairment is other-than-temporary, and the measurement of impairment. The guidance also
includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than-temporary
impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized
as other-than-temporary impairments. In general, EITF 03-1 states that if the fair value of an
applicable investment is lower than its book value, it is considered impaired. This impairment is
considered other-than-temporary unless the investor has the ability and intent to hold the
investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for a forecasted recovery of the value of the
asset. Certain disclosure requirements of this pronouncement are currently in effect and are
presented in Note 3. The recognition and measurement
15
guidance of this pronouncement will become effective at a later date to be determined.
Accordingly, we continue to evaluate other than temporary impairments as prescribed under EITF
99-20, FAS 115, and SAB 5(m).
In December 2004, a revised version of the original FAS 123 was issued. Financial Accounting
Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R), supersedes Accounting Principles Board No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25). This Statement requires that the cost resulting
from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements. This
Statement establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment
arrangements and all transactions with employees, except for equity instruments held by employee
stock ownership plans. Effective January 1, 2003 and in accordance with the transitional guidance
of FAS 148, we elected to prospectively apply the fair value method of accounting for stock-based
awards granted subsequent to December 31, 2002. In accordance with the implementation time frame
established by the Securities and Exchange Commission in April 2005, we plan to adopt FAS 123R as
of January 1, 2006. We are still in the process of evaluating the impact of FAS 123R.
NOTE 3. EARNING ASSETS
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our reported earning assets (owned by us or by
consolidated securitization entities) consisted of investments in adjustable-rate, hybrid, and
fixed-rate residential and commercial real estate loans and securities and home equity lines of
credit. Hybrid loans have an initial fixed coupon rate for three to ten years followed by periodic
(usually annual or semi-annual) adjustments. The original maturity of the majority of our
residential real estate loans and residential real estate securities is usually twenty-five to
thirty years. The original maturity of our commercial real estate loans and commercial real estate
securities is generally up to ten years. The original maturity of our home equity lines of credit
is ten years. The actual amount of principal outstanding is subject to change based on the
prepayments of the underlying loans.
For the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the average consolidated balance of earning
assets was $22.6 billion and $20.3 billion, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004, the average consolidated balance of earning assets was $23.3 billion and $19.2 billion,
respectively.
Residential Real Estate Loans
We acquire residential real estate loans from third party originators for sale to securitization
entities sponsored by us under our Sequoia program. We sell these loans to Sequoia securitization
entities, which, in turn, issue ABS (that are shown as liabilities on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets). The following table presents the carrying value of consolidated real estate loans as June
30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
Residential
Real Estate Loans Carrying Value
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Held-for-Sale |
|
|
Held-for-Investment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Held-for-Sale |
|
|
Held-for-Investment |
|
|
Total |
|
Current face |
|
$ |
59,830 |
|
|
$ |
19,142,279 |
|
|
$ |
19,202,109 |
|
|
$ |
2,365 |
|
|
$ |
22,021,523 |
|
|
$ |
22,023,888 |
|
Unamortized Premium |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
202,959 |
|
|
|
203,480 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
207,575 |
|
|
|
207,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost |
|
|
60,351 |
|
|
|
19,345,238 |
|
|
|
19,405,589 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
22,229,098 |
|
|
|
22,231,495 |
|
Lower of cost-or-market
adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
Reserve for Credit Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,396 |
) |
|
|
(22,396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,703 |
) |
|
|
(22,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
$ |
60,351 |
|
|
$ |
19,322,842 |
|
|
$ |
19,383,193 |
|
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
$ |
22,206,395 |
|
|
$ |
22,208,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment are primarily residential real estate loans sold to securitization
entities and are consolidated on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Loans acquired for future sale
to sponsored securitization entities are also classified as held-for-investment. Loans
held-for-sale are those we anticipate selling to third parties other than Redwood-sponsored
securitization entities and are reported at the lower of cost or market.
We may exercise our right to call ABS issued by entities sponsored by us and subsequently sell the
loans to third parties. If these transactions are not completed within a reporting period, we
reclassify held-for-investment loans to held-for-sale loans once we determine which loans will be
sold to third parties. To the
16
extent these transactions are completed within a reporting period, the sale of loans is reported as
a sale of loans held-for-investment in our Statements of Cash Flows.
The following table provides detail of the activity of our residential real estate loan
held-for-sale and held-for-investment portfolios for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans Activity |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Residential Real Estate Loans at beginning of
period |
|
$ |
21,493,224 |
|
|
$ |
18,086,505 |
|
|
$ |
22,208,417 |
|
|
$ |
16,239,160 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
426,806 |
|
|
|
2,703,443 |
|
|
|
1,259,189 |
|
|
|
5,025,149 |
|
Sales (other than to consolidated ABS trusts) |
|
|
(3,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,378 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments |
|
|
(2,525,628 |
) |
|
|
(859,148 |
) |
|
|
(4,064,294 |
) |
|
|
(1,319,482 |
) |
Transfers to REO |
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Premium amortization |
|
|
(8,937 |
) |
|
|
(13,992 |
) |
|
|
(15,973 |
) |
|
|
(25,508 |
) |
Credit provision |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(3,744 |
) |
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans at end of period |
|
$ |
19,383,193 |
|
|
$ |
19,915,575 |
|
|
$ |
19,383,193 |
|
|
$ |
19,915,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our goal is to sell all of the residential real estate loans we acquire to securitization entities
that finance their purchases of loans from us through the issuance of ABS. During the period we
accumulate loans for securitization, we fund these loans with equity and with short-term borrowings
sourced through various whole loan-financing facilities available to us.
The table below presents information regarding residential real estate loans pledged under our
borrowing agreements.
Residential Real Estate Loans as Collateral
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Face Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Face Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
Unpledged |
|
$ |
89,030 |
|
|
$ |
89,850 |
|
|
$ |
3,618 |
|
|
$ |
3,288 |
|
Pledged for Redwood debt |
|
|
208,591 |
|
|
|
209,919 |
|
|
|
188,707 |
|
|
|
190,207 |
|
Owned by securitization
entities, financed
through the issuance of
ABS |
|
|
18,904,488 |
|
|
|
19,083,424 |
|
|
|
21,831,563 |
|
|
|
22,014,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value |
|
$ |
19,202,109 |
|
|
$ |
19,383,193 |
|
|
$ |
22,023,888 |
|
|
$ |
22,208,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs)
There were $0.1 million HELOC purchases during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005. We
acquired $335 million HELOCs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004. There were no
sales during these periods to unrelated third parties. These HELOCs are indexed to the prime rate
and were sold (or we intend to sell) to a securitization entity that, in turn, issued (or will
issue) ABS. The table below represents the carrying value of consolidated HELOCs.
HELOCs Carrying Value
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Held-for-Investment |
|
|
Held-for-Investment |
|
Current face |
|
$ |
241,278 |
|
|
$ |
288,954 |
|
Unamortized premium |
|
|
6,657 |
|
|
|
8,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
247,935 |
|
|
|
297,041 |
|
Reserve for credit losses |
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
(693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
$ |
247,372 |
|
|
$ |
296,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our goal is to sell the HELOCs we accumulate to securitization entities that raise the proceeds
necessary through the issuance of ABS. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, substantially
all consolidated HELOCs were owned by our securitization entities.
17
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities
The residential loan credit-enhancement securities shown on our Consolidated Balance Sheets include
non-rated, B-rated, and BB-rated securities acquired from securitizations sponsored by others. Our
residential loan CES provided some level of credit enhancement on $164 billion and $126 billion
high-quality residential real estate loans securitized by entities not sponsored by us as of June
30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Residential Loan CES Carrying Value
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Securities Available- |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
for-Sale |
|
|
Available-for-Sale |
|
Current face |
|
$ |
1,103,737 |
|
|
$ |
933,772 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(96,488 |
) |
|
|
(108,141 |
) |
Portion of discount designated as credit protection |
|
|
(404,180 |
) |
|
|
(342,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
603,069 |
|
|
|
482,925 |
|
Gross unrealized gains |
|
|
109,026 |
|
|
|
84,390 |
|
Gross unrealized losses |
|
|
(5,900 |
) |
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
$ |
706,195 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the concentrated credit risk associated with CES, we are generally able to acquire
these securities at a discount to their face (principal) value. A portion of this discount is
designed as credit protection and the remainder is accreted into income over the remaining life of
the security.
The amount of designated credit protection equals the amount of credit losses within the underlying
loan pool that we expect to incur over the life of the loans. This estimate is determined based
upon various factors affecting these assets, including economic conditions, characteristics of the
underlying loans, delinquency status, past performance of similar loans, and external credit
protection. We use a variety of internal and external credit risk cash flow modeling and portfolio
analytical tools to assist in our assessments. Quarterly, we complete our assessments on each
individual underlying loan pool and determine the appropriate level of credit protection required
for each security we own. The designated credit protection is specific to each residential loan
CES.
The following table presents the changes in our unamortized discount and the portion of the
discount designated as credit protection for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
18
Residential
Loan CES Unamortized Discount and Designated Credit Protection
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Beginning balance of unamortized discount |
|
$ |
89,405 |
|
|
$ |
110,994 |
|
|
$ |
108,141 |
|
|
$ |
123,329 |
|
Amortization of discount |
|
|
(7,775 |
) |
|
|
(8,847 |
) |
|
|
(16,502 |
) |
|
|
(17,485 |
) |
Calls, sales, and other |
|
|
(2,634 |
) |
|
|
(8,505 |
) |
|
|
(15,542 |
) |
|
|
(23,417 |
) |
Re-designation of credit protection to discount |
|
|
23,518 |
|
|
|
18,888 |
|
|
|
24,773 |
|
|
|
28,430 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
(6,026 |
) |
|
|
9,278 |
|
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
10,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of unamortized discount |
|
$ |
96,488 |
|
|
$ |
121,808 |
|
|
$ |
96,488 |
|
|
$ |
121,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance of designated credit
protection |
|
$ |
365,998 |
|
|
$ |
216,924 |
|
|
$ |
342,706 |
|
|
$ |
200,970 |
|
Realized credit losses |
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
(1,706 |
) |
|
|
(1,801 |
) |
|
|
(1,809 |
) |
Calls, sales and other |
|
|
(1,736 |
) |
|
|
(3,991 |
) |
|
|
(11,348 |
) |
|
|
(6,600 |
) |
Re-designation of credit protection to discount |
|
|
(23,518 |
) |
|
|
(18,888 |
) |
|
|
(24,773 |
) |
|
|
(28,430 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
|
64,014 |
|
|
|
43,196 |
|
|
|
99,396 |
|
|
|
71,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of designated credit protection |
|
$ |
404,180 |
|
|
$ |
235,535 |
|
|
$ |
404,180 |
|
|
$ |
235,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields recognized for GAAP for each security vary as a function of credit results, prepayment
rates, and (for our variable rate securities) interest rates. If estimated future credit losses
exceed our prior expectations, credit losses occur more quickly than expected, or prepayments occur
more slowly than expected, the yield over the remaining life of the security may be adjusted
downward. If estimated future credit losses are less than our prior estimate, credit losses occur
later than expected, or prepayment rates are faster than expected, the yield over the remaining
life of the security may be adjusted upwards over time.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we recognized losses due to other-than-temporary
impairment of $0.1 million. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, we recognized losses
due to other-than-temporary impairments of $2.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively. These
losses are included in net recognized gains and valuation adjustments in our Consolidated
Statements of Income.
Gross unrealized gains and losses represent the difference between the net amortized cost and the
fair value of individual securities. Gross unrealized losses represent a decline in market value
for securities not deemed impaired for GAAP. The following table shows the gross unrealized
losses, fair value, and length of time that securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position of all consolidated residential loan CES as of June 30, 2005. These unrealized losses are
not considered to be other-than-temporary impairments because these losses are not due to adverse
changes in credit or prepayment speeds and we have the intent and ability to hold these securities
for a period sufficient for these securities to potentially recover their value.
Residential
Loan CES with Unrealized Losses as of June 30, 2005
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Value |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan
credit-enhancement
securities |
|
$ |
129,684 |
|
|
$ |
(5,742 |
) |
|
$ |
4,449 |
|
|
$ |
(158 |
) |
|
$ |
134,133 |
|
|
$ |
(5,900 |
) |
19
The following table provides detail of the activity in our residential CES portfolio for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Loan CES Activity |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Residential CES at beginning of period |
|
$ |
611,394 |
|
|
$ |
374,616 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
$ |
378,727 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
87,849 |
|
|
|
75,027 |
|
|
|
155,658 |
|
|
|
112,635 |
|
Sales (other than to consolidated ABS trusts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,293 |
) |
|
|
(22,416 |
) |
Principal repayments (including calls) |
|
|
(20,400 |
) |
|
|
(46,997 |
) |
|
|
(44,332 |
) |
|
|
(81,637 |
) |
Discount amortization |
|
|
7,775 |
|
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
16,502 |
|
|
|
17,484 |
|
Net unrealized balance sheet gains (losses) |
|
|
15,207 |
|
|
|
18,141 |
|
|
|
24,393 |
|
|
|
7,341 |
|
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments |
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
|
12,605 |
|
|
|
19,609 |
|
|
|
30,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Loan CES at end of period |
|
$ |
706,195 |
|
|
$ |
442,239 |
|
|
$ |
706,195 |
|
|
$ |
442,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $20 million and $44 million of principal pay downs in the three and six months ended June
30, 2005, $9 million and $23 million, respectively, represented calls of the securities in
accordance with the original issue provisions of individual securitization entities. Of the $47
million and $82 million of principal pay downs in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, $31
million and $56 million, respectively, represented calls of securities.
We generally fund the first-loss interests of residential CES with equity capital. We generally
sell the third-loss interests (and some of the second-loss interests) of the residential loan CES
we acquire to securitization entities (Acacia) that re-securitize these assets by issuing ABS.
Prior to sale to Acacia, we may fund some of the securities acquired on a temporary basis with
short-term borrowings through various financing facilities available to us (see Note 6).
The table below presents information regarding our residential CES pledged under borrowing
agreements and securitizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Loan CES as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Unpledged |
|
$ |
381,477 |
|
|
$ |
350,756 |
|
Pledged for Redwood debt |
|
|
87,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
Owned by securitization entities,
financed through issuance of ABS |
|
|
237,136 |
|
|
|
210,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying Value |
|
$ |
706,195 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans
Commercial real estate loans represent first or second lien interests in multifamily, office,
retail, and industrial properties. Commercial real estate loans held-for-investment may represent
junior participations in first lien interests where we provide credit enhancement to a senior
interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans Carrying Value |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Held- |
|
|
Held-for- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held- |
|
|
Held-for- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
for-Sale |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
for-Sale |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current face |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,778 |
|
|
$ |
51,778 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,598 |
|
|
$ |
65,598 |
|
Unamortized (discount)
premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,843 |
) |
|
|
(1,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,478 |
) |
|
|
(2,478 |
) |
Portion of discount
designated as credit
protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,141 |
) |
|
|
(8,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,141 |
) |
|
|
(8,141 |
) |
Lower of cost-or-market
adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,794 |
|
|
$ |
41,794 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
The following table provides detail of the activity of our commercial real estate loan portfolio
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans Activity |
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Commercial real estate loans at beginning of
period |
|
$ |
56,604 |
|
|
$ |
22,177 |
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
$ |
22,419 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
|
|
6,732 |
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
Principal payments |
|
|
(3,769 |
) |
|
|
(3,233 |
) |
|
|
(9,036 |
) |
|
|
(3,278 |
) |
Net premium amortization |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(224 |
) |
Reversal of provisions for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales (other than to consolidated ABS trusts) |
|
|
(11,192 |
) |
|
|
(2,339 |
) |
|
|
(11,192 |
) |
|
|
(2,339 |
) |
Net recognized gains and valuation
adjustments |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans at end of period |
|
$ |
41,794 |
|
|
$ |
33,546 |
|
|
$ |
41,794 |
|
|
$ |
33,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our goal is to finance our commercial real estate loans with equity or to sell them to
securitization entities sponsored by us. During the accumulation of these loans prior to sale to
Acacia, we may fund some of the loans with short-term borrowings through various financing
facilities available to us. The table below presents information regarding our commercial real
estate loans pledged under borrowing agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Face Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Face Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpledged |
|
$ |
15,381 |
|
|
$ |
7,114 |
|
|
$ |
40,868 |
|
|
$ |
32,119 |
|
Pledged for Redwood debt |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
8,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned by securitization
entities, financed
through issuance of ABS |
|
|
27,397 |
|
|
|
25,970 |
|
|
|
24,730 |
|
|
|
22,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying value |
|
$ |
51,778 |
|
|
$ |
41,794 |
|
|
$ |
65,598 |
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio
Securities portfolio assets represent investment-grade security interests in prime residential
loans, sub-prime residential loans, commercial real estate loans, second lien residential loans,
CDOs, and corporate REIT debt securities. Also included in this portfolio are commercial loan CES
and non-rated interests in CDOs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Securities Portfolio Carrying Value |
|
Securities |
|
|
Securities |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Available-for-Sale |
|
|
Available-for-Sale |
|
Current face |
|
$ |
1,743,387 |
|
|
$ |
1,424,563 |
|
Unamortized discount |
|
|
(118,751 |
) |
|
|
(73,881 |
) |
Unamortized premium |
|
|
5,104 |
|
|
|
5,548 |
|
Unamortized premium interest-only certificates |
|
|
18,410 |
|
|
|
21,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost |
|
|
1,648,150 |
|
|
|
1,377,912 |
|
Gross unrealized gains |
|
|
35,027 |
|
|
|
21,774 |
|
Gross unrealized losses |
|
|
(4,943 |
) |
|
|
(5,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
$ |
1,678,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 totaled $1.7
million and $2.0 million, respectively. These impairments totaled $1.2 million for both the three
and six months ended June 30, 2004. These are included as part of net recognized gains and
valuation adjustments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
21
Gross unrealized gains and losses represent the difference between the net amortized cost and the
fair value of individual securities. Gross unrealized losses represent a temporary decline in
market values.
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses, fair value, and length of time that
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position of all securities portfolio
securities as of June 30, 2005. These unrealized losses are not considered to be
other-than-temporary impairments because these losses are not due to adverse changes in credit or
prepayment speeds, and we have the intent and ability to hold these securities for a period
sufficient for these securities to potentially recover their values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
Portfolio with Unrealized Losses as of June 30, 2005 |
(in thousands) |
|
Less than 12 Months |
|
|
12 Months or More |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
Securities portfolio |
|
$ |
249,378 |
|
|
$ |
(2,537 |
) |
|
$ |
126,757 |
|
|
$ |
(2,406 |
) |
|
$ |
376,135 |
|
|
$ |
(4,943 |
) |
The table below provides detail of the activity in our securities portfolio for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio Activity |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Securities Portfolio at beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,533,947 |
|
|
$ |
936,646 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,575 |
|
|
$ |
844,714 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
156,182 |
|
|
|
192,700 |
|
|
|
337,389 |
|
|
|
278,978 |
|
Sales (other than to consolidated ABS
trusts) |
|
|
(3,012 |
) |
|
|
(8,333 |
) |
|
|
(15,374 |
) |
|
|
(8,475 |
) |
Principal repayments |
|
|
(22,333 |
) |
|
|
(10,069 |
) |
|
|
(49,403 |
) |
|
|
(19,876 |
) |
Net premium amortization |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
Net unrealized balance sheet gains (losses) |
|
|
15,292 |
|
|
|
(14,560 |
) |
|
|
13,423 |
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
Net recognized gains (losses) and
valuation adjustments |
|
|
(1,647 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(1,887 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio at end of period |
|
$ |
1,678,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,095,468 |
|
|
$ |
1,678,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,095,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents information on the types of securities consolidated on our balance
sheets as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio Asset Types |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
299,421 |
|
|
$ |
243,141 |
|
Residential prime |
|
|
545,504 |
|
|
|
400,047 |
|
Residential sub prime |
|
|
486,176 |
|
|
|
428,610 |
|
Residential second lien |
|
|
124,450 |
|
|
|
131,197 |
|
Manufactured housing |
|
|
14,779 |
|
|
|
14,016 |
|
Corporate REIT debt |
|
|
64,496 |
|
|
|
64,479 |
|
Real estate CDOs |
|
|
143,408 |
|
|
|
113,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities portfolio |
|
$ |
1,678,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2005, non-investment grade securities totalled $152 million, including commercial real
estate securities ($140 million, of which $23 million were non-rated and $6 million was an interest
in a re-REMIC), manufactured housing securities ($6 million), and real estate CDOs ($6 million).
At December 31, 2004, non-investment grade securities in this portfolio totalled $101 million,
including commercial real estate securities ($84 million, of which $8 million were non-rated and $6
million was an interest in a re-REMIC) and corporate REIT debt ($8 million), manufactured housing
securities ($6 million), and real estate CDOs ($3 million).
22
The bulk of the securities we acquire are subsequently sold to securitization entities (Acacia)
that finance their purchases through resecuritization (the issuance of ABS). While we are
accumulating securities prior to resecuritization, we may finance some of these securities with
short-term borrowings through various financing facilities. The table below presents information
regarding our consolidated securities portfolio securities pledged under borrowing agreements and
securitizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Unpledged |
|
$ |
98,065 |
|
|
$ |
107,970 |
|
Pledged for Redwood debt |
|
|
139,055 |
|
|
|
21,283 |
|
Owned by securitization entities,
financed through the issuance of ABS |
|
|
1,441,114 |
|
|
|
1,265,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying Value |
|
$ |
1,678,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Recognized Gains and Valuation Adjustments
Fluctuations in the market value of certain of our real estate loan and security assets and
interest rate agreements may also affect our net income. The table below describes the various
components of our net recognized gains and valuation adjustments reported in income during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Recognized Gains and Valuation Adjustments |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Realized gains on calls: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan CES |
|
$ |
4,391 |
|
|
$ |
15,246 |
|
|
$ |
11,939 |
|
|
$ |
27,062 |
|
Securities portfolio |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains on sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Residential loans CES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,725 |
|
|
|
6,242 |
|
Securities portfolio |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
Valuation adjustments Impairment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loans CES |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(2,641 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(3,199 |
) |
Securities portfolio |
|
|
(1,689 |
) |
|
|
(1,205 |
) |
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
(1,205 |
) |
Lower-of-cost-or-market (LOCOM) valuation
adjustments on real estate loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Gains (losses) on interest rate agreements |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
(674 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net recognized gains and valuation
adjustments |
|
$ |
3,045 |
|
|
$ |
12,258 |
|
|
$ |
18,057 |
|
|
$ |
29,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 4. RESERVES FOR CREDIT LOSSES
We establish and maintain credit reserves that we believe represent probable credit losses in our
consolidated residential and commercial real estate loans held for investment as of the date of the
financial statements. The reserves for credit losses are reflected as a component of residential
and commercial real estate loans on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table
summarizes the activity in reserves for credit losses for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004.
Delinquencies in our consolidated residential real estate loan portfolio were $17 million and $13
million, respectively, as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. Delinquencies include loans
delinquent more than 90 days, in bankruptcy, in foreclosure, and REO. As a percentage of our
residential real estate loan portfolio, delinquencies remained at low levels relative to
residential real estate loans in the U.S., and stood at 0.09% and 0.06% of our current loan
balances as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Our residential loan servicers
advance payment on delinquent loans to the extent they deem
23
them recoverable. The following table summarizes the activity in reserves for credit losses for our consolidated residential real estate
loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
23,856 |
|
|
$ |
18,847 |
|
|
$ |
22,703 |
|
|
$ |
16,336 |
|
Reversal of (provision for)
credit losses |
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
3,744 |
|
Net recoveries (charge-offs) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
22,396 |
|
|
$ |
20,080 |
|
|
$ |
22,396 |
|
|
$ |
20,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquencies in our HELOC portfolio totaled $0.4 million, or 0.15% of the outstanding balance as
of June 30, 2005, and totaled $0.3 million, or 0.10% of the outstanding balance as of December 31,
2004. The following table summarizes the activity in reserves for credit losses for our HELOCs for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HELOCs |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
596 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Reversal of (provision for)
credit losses |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
267 |
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had no delinquent or impaired commercial real estate loans as of June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004. The following table summarizes the activity in reserves for credit losses for our commercial
real estate loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
Reversal of (provision for)
credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5. INTEREST RATE AGREEMENTS
We report our interest rate agreements at fair value as determined using third-party models and
confirmed by Wall Street dealers. As of June 30, 2005, the net fair value of our interest rate
agreements was $9.6 million. As of December 31, 2004, the net fair value of interest rate
agreements was $15.0 million. Our total unrealized gain included in accumulated other
comprehensive income on interest rate agreements was $4.2 million at June 30, 2005 and $10.0
million at December 31, 2004.
24
The following table shows the aggregate fair value of our interest rate agreements as of June 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Agreements |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps
purchased |
|
$ |
1,254 |
|
|
$ |
113,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,861 |
|
|
$ |
105,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps sold |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate corridors
purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,213,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1,340,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
8,536 |
|
|
|
8,139,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,536 |
|
|
|
11,081,719 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Rate
Agreements |
|
$ |
9,569 |
|
|
$ |
9,401,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,020 |
|
|
$ |
12,462,450 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
We incur credit risk to the extent that the counterparties to the interest rate agreements do not
perform their obligations under the interest rate agreements. If one of the counterparties does
not perform, we may not receive the cash to which we would otherwise be entitled under the interest
rate agreement. In order to mitigate this risk, we only enter into interest rate agreements that
are either a) transacted on a national exchange or b) transacted with counterparties that are
either i) designated by the U.S. Department of Treasury as a primary government dealer, ii)
affiliates of primary government dealers, or iii) rated BBB or higher. Furthermore, we generally
enter into interest rate agreements with several different counterparties in order to diversify our
credit risk exposure.
Certain of our interest rate agreements accounted for as cash flow hedges were terminated prior to
the completion of the forecasted transactions. In these cases, if the forecasted transaction is
still likely to occur, we realize any gain or loss of the closed transactions initially through
accumulated other comprehensive income. During the period the forecasted transaction does occur,
we reclassify amounts from accumulated other comprehensive income to our Consolidated Statements of
Income. Of the $4.2 million in accumulated other comprehensive income at June 30, 2005, $0.6
million was associated with closed transactions and $0.2 million of this amount will be recognized
as interest expense on our Consolidated Statements of Income in the next twelve months. In the
case when the hedge is terminated and the forecasted transaction is not expected to occur, we
immediately recognize the gain or loss through our Consolidated Statements of Income. There were no
such instances in the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
The net ineffective portion of hedges represents amounts recorded in interest expense to the extent
our interest rate agreements accounted as cash flow hedges are ineffective related to the hedged
transaction. We use the dollar-offset method to determine the amount of ineffectiveness recorded
in the Consolidated Statements of Income. We anticipate having some ineffectiveness in our hedging
program, as not all terms of our hedges and not all terms of our hedged items match perfectly. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the amount of ineffectiveness was $0.4 million and
$0.1 million of expense, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, the
amount of such ineffectiveness was $0.2 million and $0.4 million of expense, respectively.
25
The following table depicts the interest income (expense) and net recognized gains (losses) and
valuation adjustments activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 for our
interest rate agreements.
Interest Rate Agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Realized net
loss reclassified
from other
comprehensive
income |
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
(261 |
) |
|
$ |
(198 |
) |
|
$ |
(648 |
) |
Realized net
gains (losses) due
to net ineffective
portion of hedges |
|
|
(441 |
) |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(364 |
) |
Net cash
payment (receipt)
on Interest Rate
Swaps |
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
(5,566 |
) |
|
|
2,587 |
|
|
|
(9,929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
875 |
|
|
$ |
(5,981 |
) |
|
$ |
2,344 |
|
|
$ |
(10,941 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Recognized Gains (Losses) and Valuation Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized net
gains (losses) on
trading instruments |
|
$ |
(182 |
) |
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
(674 |
) |
|
$ |
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6. SHORT-TERM DEBT
Redwood debt is currently all short-term debt. We generally enter into repurchase agreements, bank
borrowings, and other forms of collateralized short-term borrowings (short-term debt) to finance
assets under accumulation for future sale to securitization entities. The table below summarizes
Redwood debt by collateral type as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood
Debt
(in thousands) |
|
June 30 , 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Days Until |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Days Until |
|
|
|
Borrowed |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Borrowed |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Residential real
estate loan
collateral |
|
$ |
205,046 |
|
|
|
3.81 |
% |
|
|
173 |
|
|
$ |
181,999 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
126 |
|
Commercial real
estate loan
collateral |
|
|
8,840 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
% |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan
credit-enhancement
securities
collateral |
|
|
98,833 |
|
|
|
4.46 |
% |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
portfolio
collateral |
|
|
140,110 |
|
|
|
4.33 |
% |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
21,282 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
% |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Redwood debt |
|
$ |
452,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the average balance of Redwood debt was $0.2
billion with a weighted-average interest cost of 3.37% and 3.69%, respectively. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2004, the average balance of Redwood debt was $0.5 billion with a
weighted average cost of 1.85% and 2.05%, respectively. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
accrued interest payable on Redwood debt was $1.5 million and $0.1 million,
respectively.
26
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Redwoods debt had the following remaining maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 30 days |
|
$ |
247,783 |
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
31 to 90 days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,841 |
|
Over 90 days |
|
|
205,046 |
|
|
|
86,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Redwood debt |
|
$ |
452,829 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have uncommitted facilities available with several banks and major investment banking firms for
financing residential and commercial real estate securities and loans. The table below summarizes
the outstanding balances as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 by collateral type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood Debt |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities by Collateral |
|
Facilities |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Limit |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Real Estate Loans |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
213,886 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
8/05-3/06 |
|
Real Estate Securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
238,943 |
|
|
|
410,000 |
|
|
|
7/05-8/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Facilities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
452,829 |
|
|
$ |
2,010,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facilities by Collateral |
|
Facilities |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Limit |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Real Estate Loans |
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
181,999 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
3/05-10/05 |
|
Real Estate Securities |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
21,282 |
|
|
|
410,000 |
|
|
|
3/05-8/05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Facilities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,010,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under these facilities generally bear interest based on a specified margin over the
one-month LIBOR interest rate. We continue to be in compliance with all of our debt covenants for
all of our borrowing arrangements and credit facilities. Covenants associated with our debt
generally relate to our tangible net worth, liquidity reserves, and leverage requirements. We have
not had, nor do we currently anticipate having, any problems in meeting these covenants. It is our
intention to renew committed and uncommitted facilities as needed, as well as pursue additional
facilities and other types of financing.
In March 2005, we formed Madrona Residential Funding, LLC (Madrona) a special purpose entity and
wholly owned subsidiary of RWT Holdings. Madrona gives us the flexibility to access the capital
markets and issue short-term debt instruments to finance the accumulation of loans prior to sale to
sponsored securitization entities. Madrona is designed to fund residential loans accumulated for
eventual sale to our Sequoia securitization program by issuing A1+/P1 rated commercial paper.
Madrona is authorized to accumulate up to $1.5 billion of loans at any time and can warehouse each
loan up to 270 days. There are specific eligibility requirements for financing loans in this
facility that are similar to our existing financing facilities with several banks and large
investment banking firms. There will be a credit reserve account for approximately 70 basis points
that will serve as credit-enhancement to the commercial paper investors. This facility has a
three-year term. There has been no activity in Madrona to date; we anticipate issuing our first
series of commercial paper later this year.
NOTE 7. ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES ISSUED
Securitization entities sponsored by us issue ABS to raise the funds required to acquire assets
from us. Each series of asset ABS consists of various classes at variable and fixed rates of
interest. The maturity of each class is directly affected by the rate of principal prepayments on
the assets of the issuing entity. Each series is also subject to redemption (call) according to
the specific terms of the respective governing documents. As a result, the actual maturity of any
class of ABS is likely to occur earlier than its stated maturity.
The components of ABS issued by consolidated securitization entities as of June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, along with other selected information, are summarized in the table below. The
bulk of the ABS is indexed to one or six-month LIBOR. A lesser amount of the ABS are fixed for a
term and then will
27
adjust to a LIBOR rate (hybrid ABS) or are fixed for their entire term. Some of
the ABS Interest-Only (IO) securities issued have a fixed spread, while others earn a coupon based on the spread between
collateral owned by and the ABS issued by a securitized entity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-Backed Securities Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Sequoia ABS issued certificates with principal value |
|
$ |
18,673,277 |
|
|
$ |
21,681,229 |
|
Sequoia ABS issued interest-only certificates |
|
|
186,018 |
|
|
|
210,385 |
|
Acacia ABS issued |
|
|
1,920,481 |
|
|
|
1,691,592 |
|
Commercial ABS issued |
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
9,523 |
|
Unamortized premium on ABS |
|
|
30,525 |
|
|
|
37,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated ABS issued |
|
$ |
20,814,551 |
|
|
$ |
23,630,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of weighted average interest rates, by series Sequoia |
|
3.23% to 5.66% |
|
2.22% to 5.54% |
Stated Sequoia maturities |
|
|
2007-2035 |
|
|
|
2007-2035 |
|
Number of Sequoia series |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Range of weighted average interest rates, by series Acacia |
|
|
3.51%-4.29 |
% |
|
2.69% to 3.35% |
Stated Acacia maturities |
|
|
2018-2045 |
|
|
|
2018-2040 |
|
Number of Acacia series |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Weighted average interest rates Commercial |
|
|
12.00 |
% |
|
|
9.08 |
% |
Stated commercial maturities |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2005 and 2009 |
Number of commercial series |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
The following table summarizes the accrued interest payable on ABS issued as of June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable on
Asset-Backed Securities Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Sequoia |
|
$ |
30,567 |
|
|
$ |
28,879 |
|
Acacia |
|
|
10,680 |
|
|
|
6,025 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued interest payable on ABS issued |
|
$ |
41,290 |
|
|
$ |
34,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ABS issued by securitization entities sponsored by us are collateralized by residential and
commercial real estate loans and securities. The ABS collateralized by residential real estate
loans (and some residential securities) are typically securitized through entities with the brand
name Sequoia. The residential real estate loan collateral consists primarily of adjustable-rate and
hybrid, conventional, 25- or 30-year residential real estate loans secured by first liens on one-
to four-family residential properties. The residential home equity line of credit collateral
consists of adjustable-rate first and second lien residential loans with a ten-year revolving
period and a maturity from origination of ten years. The ABS issued that are collateralized by
residential and commercial real estate securities and commercial real estate loans are typically
issued through entities with the brand name Acacia. Other ABS collateralized by commercial loans
are issued on an individual basis. For financial reporting purposes the assets and liabilities of
these entities are consolidated on our balance sheets.
During the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005, Sequoia entities issued $0.4 billion and $1.1
billion, respectively, of Sequoia ABS to fund Sequoias acquisitions of residential real estate
loans from us. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, Sequoia entities issued $2.6
billion and $4.8 billion, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005,
Sequoia did not issue any ABS secured by interest-only certificates that we had retained from prior
Sequoia securitizations. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, Sequoia entities
issued $0 and $0.2 billion of ABS secured by interest-only securities, respectively.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, an Acacia entity issued $0 and $300 million of
Acacia ABS, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, Acacia issued $300
million of Acacia ABS.
28
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we issued $0 and $4.3 million of commercial
ABS, respectively and paid off commercial ABS in full of $5.5 million and $9.5 million,
respectively. No commercial ABS issuances or payoffs occurred during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2004.
The carrying value components of the collateral for ABS issued are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral for Asset-Backed Securities Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June
30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Residential real estate loans held-for-investment |
|
$ |
19,083,424 |
|
|
$ |
22,014,922 |
|
Residential home equity lines of credit held-for-investment |
|
|
247,245 |
|
|
|
296,348 |
|
Residential loan CES available-for-sale |
|
|
237,136 |
|
|
|
210,902 |
|
Securities portfolio securities available-for-sale |
|
|
1,441,114 |
|
|
|
1,265,322 |
|
Real estate owned (REO) |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash owned by consolidated securitization entities |
|
|
44,149 |
|
|
|
35,740 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
80,184 |
|
|
|
65,951 |
|
Commercial real estate loans held-for-investment |
|
|
25,970 |
|
|
|
22,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total collateral for ABS issued |
|
$ |
21,159,779 |
|
|
$ |
23,911,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8. TAXES
As a REIT, Redwood can deduct dividends paid from REIT taxable income, and thus effectively reduce
or eliminate corporate-level income taxes. However, a REIT can retain up to 10% of its REIT
taxable income and still maintain its REIT status. We currently plan to retain up to 10% of our
2005 REIT ordinary taxable income and will be subject to corporate level income taxes on this
retained income for the 2005 calendar tax year.
Our provision for corporate income taxes for the REIT for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005 was $1.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The provision was $1.2 million and $3.0
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. This provision is estimated
based on a combined Federal and state corporate tax rate of 41% on the amount of anticipated REIT
ordinary income to be permanently retained for each year.
Holdings, Redwoods taxable subsidiary, is subject to corporate income taxes on its taxable income.
Our current Federal tax provision for corporate income tax for Holdings for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2005, was $0.6 million and $1.0 million, respectively. No current Federal tax
provision for Holdings was recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 the federal
tax provisions for these periods were reduced to zero through the utilization of Federal net
operating loss carry-forwards (NOLs). Federal NOLs were fully utilized during the year ended
December 31, 2004. The state provision for corporate income taxes for Holdings for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005 was $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The state tax
provision for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was $0.3 million and $0.4 million,
respectively. Holdings has state NOLs and these reduced the tax provisions for both the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. At June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, state NOLs were
$9.6 million and $10.0 million, respectively.
Holdings recorded a net deferred tax provision for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 of
$1.4 million and $3.8 million, respectively, as a result of the build up of deferred tax assets
attributable to GAAP/tax securitization gain temporary differences and the utilization of prior
period deferred tax assets. For both the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, a $5.2 million
deferred tax benefit was recorded as we recognized on a one time basis the value of our remaining
net operating losses.
As a result of current and deferred tax provisions, we recognized a total net tax provision of $4.1
million and $8.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. We
recognized a total net tax benefit of $3.7 million and $1.8 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2004, respectively. The following table summarizes the tax provisions for Redwood
and Holdings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Tax Provision |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Current Tax Provision: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT |
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
Holdings |
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current tax provision |
|
$ |
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,509 |
|
|
$ |
4,980 |
|
|
$ |
3,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax
provision/(benefit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in
deferred tax assets |
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
(5,180 |
) |
|
|
3,751 |
|
|
|
(5,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax provision |
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
(5,180 |
) |
|
|
3,751 |
|
|
|
(5,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax provision |
|
$ |
4,054 |
|
|
$ |
(3,671 |
) |
|
$ |
8,731 |
|
|
$ |
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, Holdings had the following deferred tax asset and
liability balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets/(Liabilities) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating loss carry forward Federal |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net
operating loss carry forward State |
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
Real estate assets |
|
|
369 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Gains from Sequoia securitizations |
|
|
5,763 |
|
|
|
9,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
6,821 |
|
|
|
10,572 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefited deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
6,821 |
|
|
$ |
10,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
$ |
6,821 |
|
|
$ |
10,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Internal Revenue Code, a dividend declared by a REIT in October, November, or December of
a calendar year and payable to stockholders of record as of a specified date in such year will be
deemed to have been paid by the REIT and received by the stockholders on the last day of that
calendar year, provided the dividend is actually paid before February 1st of the following calendar
year, and provided that the REIT has any remaining undistributed REIT taxable income on the record
date. Therefore, the regular dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2004 that were paid in
January 2005 are considered taxable income to stockholders in 2004 (the year declared).
Similar to 2004, our 2005 dividend distributions declared before December 31, 2005 and distributed
on or before January 31, 2006, are expected to be less than 85% of our estimated 2005 REIT taxable
income. This will result in a 4% excise tax provision on the shortfall. Thus, for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005, we provided for excise tax of $0.3 million and $0.6 million,
respectively, which is reflected as a component of operating expenses on our Consolidated
Statements of Income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, excise tax totaled $0.2
million and $0.5 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, accrued excise
tax payable was $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and was reflected as a component of
accrued expenses and other liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTE 9. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We estimate the fair value of our financial instruments using available market information and
other appropriate valuation methodologies. These fair value estimates generally incorporate
discounted future cash flows at current market discount rates for comparable investments. We
validate many of our fair value estimates on a quarterly basis by obtaining fair value estimates
from dealers who make a market in these financial instruments. We believe the estimates we use
reasonably reflect the values we may be
30
able to
receive should we choose to sell them. Many factors must be
considered in order to estimate market values, including, but not
limited to interest rates, prepayment rates, amount and timing of credit losses, supply and
demand, liquidity, and other market factors. Accordingly, our estimates are inherently subjective
in nature and involve uncertainty and judgment to interpret relevant market and other data.
Amounts realized in actual sales may differ from the fair values presented.
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial
instruments as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
(in thousands) |
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential: held-for-investment |
|
$ |
19,322,842 |
|
|
$ |
19,324,449 |
|
|
$ |
22,206,395 |
|
|
$ |
22,395,296 |
|
Residential: held-for-sale |
|
$ |
60,351 |
|
|
$ |
60,480 |
|
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
HELOC: held-for-investment |
|
$ |
247,372 |
|
|
$ |
249,117 |
|
|
$ |
296,348 |
|
|
$ |
297,623 |
|
Commercial: held-for-investment |
|
$ |
41,794 |
|
|
$ |
43,108 |
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
$ |
55,258 |
|
Real Estate Loan Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan credit-enhancement
portfolio: available-for-sale |
|
$ |
706,195 |
|
|
$ |
706,195 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
Securities Portfolio: available-for-sale |
|
$ |
1,678,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,678,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,575 |
|
|
$ |
1,394,575 |
|
Interest Rate Agreements |
|
$ |
9,570 |
|
|
$ |
9,570 |
|
|
$ |
15,020 |
|
|
$ |
15,020 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
72,193 |
|
|
$ |
72,193 |
|
|
$ |
57,246 |
|
|
$ |
57,246 |
|
Restricted Cash |
|
$ |
47,460 |
|
|
$ |
47,460 |
|
|
$ |
36,038 |
|
|
$ |
36,038 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood debt |
|
$ |
452,829 |
|
|
$ |
452,829 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
ABS issued |
|
$ |
20,814,551 |
|
|
$ |
20,848,116 |
|
|
$ |
23,630,162 |
|
|
$ |
23,701,977 |
|
We estimate fair value of certain assets, liabilities, and interest rate agreements using available
market information and other appropriate valuation methodologies. The methodologies include
available market quotes, present value of discounted expected future cash flows, third-party bid
indications and market data, and current fair value appraisals of the underlying collateral. These
methodologies are described below.
|
|
|
Residential and HELOC loans fair values are determined by available
market quotes from third party broker/dealers and discounted cash flow analyses. |
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans fair values are determined by appraisals on underlying
collateral and discounted cash flow analyses. |
|
|
|
Residential credit enhancement portfolio and securities portfolio fair
values are determined by discounted cash flow analyses confirmed by third party
dealer pricing indications and other valuation techniques using market pricing
assumptions. |
|
|
|
Interest rate agreements |
|
|
|
Fair values are determined by third party vendor modeling software and
information from dealers active in the derivatives markets. |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
Includes cash on hand and highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less. Fair value equals carrying value. |
|
|
|
Includes interest earning cash balances in ABS entities for the purpose
of distribution to bondholders and reinvestment. Due to the short-term nature of
the restrictions, fair value equals carrying value. |
31
|
|
|
All Redwood debt is adjustable and matures within one year; fair values equal face values. |
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities issued |
|
|
|
Fair values are determined by discounted cash flow analyses confirmed
by third party dealer pricing indications and other valuations techniques. |
NOTE 10. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Stock Option Plan
In March 2004, we amended the previously approved 2002 Redwood Trust, Inc. Incentive Stock Plan
(the Plan) for executive officers, employees, and non-employee directors. This amendment was
approved by our stockholders in May 2004. The Plan authorizes our Board of Directors (or a
committee appointed by our Board of Directors) to grant incentive stock options as defined under
Section 422 of the Code (ISOs), options not so qualified (NQSOs), deferred stock, restricted stock,
performance shares, stock appreciation rights, limited stock appreciation rights (awards), and
dividend equivalent rights (DERs) to eligible recipients other than non-employee directors. ISOs
and NQSOs awarded to employees have a maximum term of ten-years and generally vest ratably over a
four-year period. NQSOs awarded to non-employee directors have a maximum term of ten years and
generally vest immediately or ratably over a three- or four-year period. Non-employee directors
are automatically provided annual awards under the Plan. The Plan has been designed to permit the
Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors to grant and certify awards that qualify as
performance-based and otherwise satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code; however,
not all awards may so qualify. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, 583,069 and 614,608
shares of common stock, respectively, were available for grant.
ISOs
Of the total shares of common stock available for grant, no more than 963,637 shares of common
stock are cumulatively available for grant as ISOs. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
551,697 ISOs had been granted. The exercise price for ISOs granted under the Plan may not be less
than the fair market value of shares of common stock at the time the ISO is granted.
DERs
Redwood has granted certain stock options that accrue and pay stock or cash DERs. Stock DERs
represent shares of stock that are issuable when the holders exercise the underlying stock options,
the amount of which is based on prior dividends paid per share on common stock and the market value
of the stock on the various dividend payable dates. All stock options with stock DERs issued
before January 1, 2003 are considered variable stock awards under the provisions of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. As of June 30, 2005,
5,340 options remained that are considered variable stock awards. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005, we recognized variable stock option expense of $2,000 and income of $0.1
million, respectively, on these stock options. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004,
we recognized variable stock option income of $0.6 million and variable stock option expense of
$0.8 million, respectively. Cash DERs per applicable option are cash payments made that are equal
to the dividends paid in common stock per share. These expenses are included in operating expenses
in our Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we
accrued cash and stock DER expenses of $1.8 million and $3.6 million, respectively. For the three
and six months ended June 30, 2004, we accrued cash and stock DER expenses of $3.0 million and $5.6
million, respectively.
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were 384,726 and 387,404 unexercised options with
stock DERs, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were 1,158,940 and
1,176,010 unexercised options with cash DERs, respectively. Options with cash DERs are
participating securities under EITF 03-6 and were determined to be antidilutive in all reported
periods. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were 58,374 and 61,050 unexercised
options with no DERs, respectively.
32
A summary of the status of the Plan and changes during the three and six months ended June 30,
2005 and 2004 are presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Stock Options Outstanding |
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at beginning
of period |
|
|
1,612,435 |
|
|
$ |
31.88 |
|
|
|
1,648,843 |
|
|
$ |
28.56 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
$ |
52.20 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
49.14 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(6,905 |
) |
|
$ |
28.67 |
|
|
|
(13,752 |
) |
|
$ |
23.46 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(10,392 |
) |
|
$ |
47.13 |
|
|
|
(5,512 |
) |
|
$ |
32.01 |
|
Stock dividend equivalent
rights earned |
|
|
5,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at end of
period |
|
|
1,602,040 |
|
|
$ |
31.71 |
|
|
|
1,656,998 |
|
|
$ |
28.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at period-end |
|
|
1,160,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
options granted during the
period |
|
$ |
52.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Stock Options Activity |
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at beginning
of period |
|
|
1,624,465 |
|
|
$ |
31.77 |
|
|
|
1,935,598 |
|
|
$ |
26.48 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
$ |
51.70 |
|
|
|
46,698 |
|
|
$ |
55.01 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(22,545 |
) |
|
$ |
18.91 |
|
|
|
(327,083 |
) |
|
$ |
18.17 |
|
Options forfeited |
|
|
(13,359 |
) |
|
$ |
43.64 |
|
|
|
(9,683 |
) |
|
$ |
31.50 |
|
Stock dividend equivalent
rights earned |
|
|
9,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at end of
period |
|
|
1,602,040 |
|
|
$ |
31.71 |
|
|
|
1,656,998 |
|
|
$ |
28.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at period-end |
|
|
1,160,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of
options granted during the
period |
|
$ |
51.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
33
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at June 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
Exercise Prices |
|
Number Outstanding |
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Number Exercisable |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
$0 to $10 |
|
|
44,119 |
|
|
|
8.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
$10 to $20 |
|
|
356,046 |
|
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
|
12.74 |
|
|
|
356,046 |
|
|
|
12.74 |
|
$20 to $30 |
|
|
462,706 |
|
|
|
5.39 |
|
|
|
24.29 |
|
|
|
341,093 |
|
|
|
23.46 |
|
$30 to $40 |
|
|
269,247 |
|
|
|
1.96 |
|
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
261,552 |
|
|
|
37.49 |
|
$40 to $50 |
|
|
99,399 |
|
|
|
3.27 |
|
|
|
45.47 |
|
|
|
97,974 |
|
|
|
45.51 |
|
$50 to $60 |
|
|
369,722 |
|
|
|
8.65 |
|
|
|
55.08 |
|
|
|
87,254 |
|
|
|
54.09 |
|
$60 to $63 |
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
7.12 |
|
|
|
62.54 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
62.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0 to $63 |
|
|
1,602,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,160,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock
As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, 3,616 and 5,912 shares, respectively, of restricted
stock were outstanding. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, we did not
grant any shares of restricted stock to employees. No restrictions lapsed during the three months
ended June 30, 2005. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, restrictions on 1,750 of these
shares lapsed. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, restrictions on 1,750 and 3,500
of these shares lapsed, respectively. Restrictions on the remaining shares of restricted stock
lapse through January 1, 2009.
Restricted Stock Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
outstanding at the
beginning of period |
|
|
3,831 |
|
|
|
8,167 |
|
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
10,003 |
|
Restricted stock granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock for
which restrictions lapsed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(3,500 |
) |
Restricted stock forfeited |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(546 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
outstanding at end of
period |
|
|
3,616 |
|
|
|
6,324 |
|
|
|
3,616 |
|
|
|
6,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Stock Units
The Incentive Stock Plan allows for the granting of Deferred Stock Units (DSUs). These are
discussed below in Executive Deferred Compensation Plan.
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
In May 2002, our Board of Directors approved the 2002 Redwood Trust, Inc. Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan (EDCP). The EDCP allows eligible employees and directors to defer portions of
current salary and certain other forms of compensation. We may match some deferrals up to certain
levels. Compensation deferred under the EDCP are assets of Redwood and subject to the claims of the
general creditors of Redwood. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, deferrals of $0.4
million and $0.7 million, respectively, were made under the EDCP. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2004, deferrals of $0.4 million and $0.7 million were made, respectively. The EDCP
allows for the investment of deferrals in either an interest crediting account or deferred stock
units. The rate of accrual in the interest crediting account is set forth in the EDCP. For
deferrals prior to July 1, 2004, the accrual rate is based on a calculation of the marginal rate of
return on our portfolio. This accrual rate will continue through July 1, 2007 and then be based on
references to publicly traded mutual funds or the applicable federal rate (AFR). For deferrals
after July 1, 2004, the accrual rate is based on references to publicly traded mutual funds on the
AFR. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, accrued interest of $0.4 million and $0.7
million was credited to participants under the Plan, respectively. For the three and six months
ended June 30, 2004, accrued interest credited totaled $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively.
34
The following table provides detail on changes in participants accounts in the EDCP for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDCP Activity |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash Accounts Transfer in of
participants payroll deductions
from the EDCP |
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
396 |
|
|
$ |
703 |
|
|
$ |
674 |
|
Accrued interest earned in EDCP |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Participant withdrawals |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in participants equity |
|
$ |
522 |
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
$ |
1,172 |
|
|
$ |
1,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
5,578 |
|
|
$ |
3,224 |
|
|
$ |
4,928 |
|
|
$ |
2,634 |
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
6,100 |
|
|
$ |
3,865 |
|
|
$ |
6,100 |
|
|
$ |
3,865 |
|
The following table provides detail on the financial position of the EDCP at June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Available for EDCP Participant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Cash
Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants payroll deductions receivable |
|
$ |
3,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,286 |
|
Accrued interest receivable |
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets available for participant benefits |
|
$ |
6,100 |
|
|
$ |
4,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSUs
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, 21,773 and 34,564 DSUs, respectively, were
granted through deferrals under the Plan as part of employees bonuses, and grants to directors,
which represented a value of $1.1 million and $1.9 million at the time of grant, respectively. No
such grants were awarded during the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Stock Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Value of DSUs at Grant |
|
$ |
6,523 |
|
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
Participant forfeitures |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in Value at Period End since Grant |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value at Period End |
|
$ |
6,442 |
|
|
$ |
5,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Deferred Stock Units Activity |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(in thousands, except unit amounts) |
|
Units |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Value |
|
Transfer in of DSUs (value of grants) |
|
|
21,773 |
|
|
$ |
1,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Change in Valuation during Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
Participant forfeitures |
|
|
(1,889 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Number/Value of DSUs |
|
|
19,884 |
|
|
$ |
1,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
|
104,952 |
|
|
$ |
5,371 |
|
|
|
25,417 |
|
|
$ |
1,580 |
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
|
124,836 |
|
|
$ |
6,442 |
|
|
|
25,417 |
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
Deferred Stock Units Activity |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(in thousands, except unit amounts) |
|
Units |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Units |
|
|
Value |
|
Transfer in of DSUs (value of grants) |
|
|
34,564 |
|
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Change in Valuation during Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,037 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
Participant forfeitures |
|
|
(1,889 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Number/Value of DSUs |
|
|
32,675 |
|
|
$ |
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at Beginning of Period |
|
|
92,161 |
|
|
$ |
5,722 |
|
|
|
25,417 |
|
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
Balance at End of Period |
|
|
124,836 |
|
|
$ |
6,442 |
|
|
|
25,417 |
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In May 2002, our stockholders approved the 2002 Redwood Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP), effective July 1, 2002. The purpose of the ESPP is to give our employees an opportunity to
acquire an equity interest in Redwood through the purchase of shares of common stock at a discount.
The ESPP allows eligible employees to have up to 15% of their annual gross compensation (including
base salary, bonus, and cash DERs, and subject to certain other limitations) withheld to purchase
common stock at 85% of its market value. The maximum gross compensation any participant can
contribute to the ESPP in any calendar quarter is $6,250. Market value as defined under the ESPP
is the lesser of the closing market price of the common stock as of the start of an offering period
in the ESPP or the closing market price on the quarterly purchase date. The offering period starts
on January 1st of each calendar year and consists of four quarterly purchase periods.
The ESPP allows a maximum of 100,000 shares of common stock to be purchased. As of June 30, 2005,
20,544 shares have been purchased. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, employees
acquired an aggregate of 1,207 and 2,501 shares of common stock, respectively, at an average
purchase price of $43.84 and $43.67 per share, respectively. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2004, employees acquired an aggregate of 1,220 and 2,401, shares, at an average price of
$43.32 and $43.27 per share, respectively. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there
remained a negligible amount of uninvested employee contributions in the ESPP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Transfer in of participants payroll deductions
from the ESPP |
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of common stock
issued to participants under
the terms of the ESPP |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in participants equity |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Repurchases
Our Board of Directors has approved the repurchase of a total of 7,455,000 shares of our common
stock. A total of 6,455,000 shares were repurchased in 1998 and 1999. As of June 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, there remained 1,000,000 shares available under the authorization for
repurchase. Repurchased shares have been returned to the status of authorized but unissued shares
of common stock.
Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we issued 124,801 and 469,556 shares of common
stock, respectively, through our Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan for net
proceeds of $6.3 million and $25.6 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June
30, 2004 we issued 500,397 and 944,135 shares for total proceeds of
$23.7 million and $47.8 million,
respectively.
36
Equity Offerings
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we did not undertake any equity offerings. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 we completed one offering and issued 1.2 million
shares for net proceeds of $52 million.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Certain assets are marked to market through accumulated other comprehensive income; these
adjustments affect our book value but not our net income. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004, we reported net accumulated other comprehensive income of $137.4 million and $105.4 million,
respectively. Changes in this account reflect increases or decreases in the fair value of our
earning assets or interest rate agreements during the period, and also reflect changes due to calls
of our securities, write downs to fair value of a portion of our securities, premium or discount
amortization of our securities, and amortization of realized gains or losses on our interest rate
agreements.
The following table provides reconciliation of accumulated other comprehensive income as of June
30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale
securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan CES |
|
$ |
103,126 |
|
|
$ |
78,733 |
|
Securities portfolio |
|
|
30,084 |
|
|
|
16,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
133,210 |
|
|
$ |
95,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on interest
rate agreements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate agreements accounted for
as cash flow hedges |
|
|
4,170 |
|
|
|
9,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive
income |
|
$ |
137,380 |
|
|
$ |
105,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
As of June 30, 2005, we were obligated under non-cancelable operating leases with expiration dates
through 2013 for $6.5 million. The majority of the future lease payments are related to the
initial ten-year operating lease for our executive offices to which we relocated in 2003. Also
included in the future lease commitments below are future lease payments through May 2006 for our
former executive offices in Mill Valley that we vacated in 2003. Remaining payments related to
this lease are $0.3 million in 2005 and $0.2 million in 2006. This office space is currently being
subleased through May 2006. The anticipated sublease payments are not included in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
Future Lease Commitments By Year |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
2005 (second half) |
|
$ |
714 |
|
2006 |
|
|
947 |
|
2007 |
|
|
674 |
|
2008 |
|
|
702 |
|
2009 |
|
|
718 |
|
2010 and thereafter |
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
6,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2005, there were no pending legal proceedings to which we were a party or to which
any of our property was subject.
The table below shows our commitments to purchase loans and securities as of June 30, 2005. The
loan purchase commitments represent derivative instruments under FAS No. 149. The fair value of
these commitments was negligible as of June 30, 2005.
37
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to Purchase |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Residential real estate loans |
|
$ |
7,731 |
|
Residential loan CES |
|
|
|
|
Securities portfolio securities |
|
|
17,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
25,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
This section provides information on Redwoods and consolidated subsidiaries activity during the
third quarter of 2005, through August 4, 2005.
In July 2005, securitization entities sponsored by us issued $300 million ABS through Acacia CDO 8. Various residential and commercial real estate loans and securities are collateral for these ABS issued.
In July
2005, residential loan CES with a principal value of $3 million were
called. We will recognize market value gains on these calls of $2
million for GAAP purposes and $1 million for tax purposes in the third quarter of 2005. We also committed to sell $21 million of residential real estate securities for GAAP gains of $7 million and estimate taxable gains of $7 million.
During the
third quarter of 2005 (through August 4, 2005), we committed to
purchase $194 million residential real estate loans, $27 million
residential loan credit-enhancement securities, and $62 million
of securities portfolio securities, of which $17 million were
non-investment grade commercial real estate loan securities.
During the
third quarter of 2005 (through August 4, 2005), we committed to sell
$77 million of residential real estate loans for a GAAP and tax gain of $0.1 million. As of June, 30, 2005, we owned $60 million of these loans (and reclassified them from held-for-investment to held-for-sale) and $17 million of the loans we had committed to purchase with a settlement date in the third quarter of 2005.
Average
prepayment rates (CPR) for loans underlying our residential CES were
slower in July than in the second quarter of 2005. For our securitized residential real estate loans, CPRs were 49% in July, an
increase from the 39% CPR these loans averaged in the second quarter of 2005.
38
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the safe harbor provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not historical in nature, including
the words anticipated, estimated, should, expect, believe, intend, and similar
expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, those described in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 under the caption Risk Factors.
Other risks, uncertainties, and factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those projected are detailed from time to time in reports filed by us with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), including Forms 10-K and 8-K.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as
a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties,
and assumptions, the forward-looking events mentioned, discussed in, or incorporated by reference
into this Form 10-Q might not occur. Accordingly, our actual results may differ from our current
expectations, estimates, and projections.
Important factors that may impact our actual results include changes in interest rates and market
values; changes in prepayment rates; general economic conditions, particularly as they affect the
price of earning assets and the credit status of borrowers; the level of liquidity in the capital
markets as it affects our ability to finance our real estate asset portfolio; and other factors not
presently identified. This Form 10-Q contains statistics and other data that in some cases have
been obtained from, or compiled from information made available by, servicers and other third-party
service providers.
SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK
Summary
Redwood Trust, Inc. is a financial institution located in Mill Valley, California. We invest in,
credit-enhance, and securitize residential and commercial real estate loans and securities.
Our primary source of revenue is interest income from the real estate securities we own. This
interest income consists of the monthly loan payments made by homeowners (and to a lesser degree,
commercial property owners) on the real estate loans that underlie these securities. In addition,
from time to time we earn call income (a form of gain-on-sale income) from residential
credit-enhancement securities (CES) and may realize other gains from the sale of assets.
Our consolidated residential real estate loan portfolio includes all of the residential loans that
we own temporarily prior to sale to a securitization plus loans that are consolidated onto our
balance sheet from ABS securitization entities that have been sponsored by us. Securitizations by
our sponsored entities are structured as financings under GAAP and are not accounted for as sales
for GAAP reporting purposes the underlying assets and liabilities are consolidated on Redwoods
income statements and balance sheets. Our consolidated residential real estate loan portfolio
consists of prime quality residential loans that generally have high-quality characteristics such
as relatively low loan-to-value ratios and borrowers with relatively high credit scores (in each
case relative to U.S. residential real estate loans as a whole). The majority of these loans are
jumbo loans that had loan balances at origination that exceeded the loan limits imposed on Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac, so they were not eligible at origination for purchase or credit-enhancement by
these government-sponsored enterprises.
Better than expected credit results on the loans we credit enhance is the primary driver of our
continued strong earnings results. Housing prices continue to increase, which reduces our risk of
credit loss in the future for our existing assets. Our portfolio of assets as a whole has the
ability to generate attractive earnings, cash flows, and dividends in the future, assuming real
estate credit losses do not increase materially. Delinquencies on loans in our portfolio remain at
historically low levels and credit losses continue to be less than one basis point (0.01%) of our
credit-enhanced loans on an annual basis.
Recent changes in interest rates have resulted in a flatter yield curve, causing faster prepayments
for adjustable-rate residential loans and a reduced supply of new adjustable-rate loan originations
(as homeowners are opting for hybrid-rate and fixed-rate loans). In addition, new forms of
adjustable-rate mortgages (negative amortization, option ARMs and Moving Treasury Average ARMs)
have increased their share of the ARM market, and have increased prepayment rates on the ARM loans
we credit-
39
enhance due to ARM-to-ARM refinancing and other factors. These faster prepayment patterns affect
both the residential ARM loans securitized via the Sequoia program and our portfolio of
securities backed by ARM loans purchased from other securitization
entities not sponsored by us. Overall, we benefit from faster
prepayment rates on our net ARM loans and securities.
Faster
prepayments for the residential ARM loans for which we have sponsored
the securitization through our Sequoia
securitization program adversely affected our near-term results of operations. Prepayment rates
for these loans averaged 17% CPR in 2004, 25% CPR in the first quarter of 2005, 39% CPR in the
second quarter of 2005, and 49% CPR in July 2005. Our net effective premium for GAAP purposes for
the $20 billion of loans consolidated on our Consolidated Balance Sheets from Sequoia
securitization entities (including HELOCs) was $15 million at June 30, 2005. Our effective net
price for these loans for GAAP purposes was 100.08% of principal
value, and consists of unamortized
purchase premium ($210 million) and deferred ABS issuance costs ($45 million) offset by premiums
received from the sale of ABS at a premium ($31 million), premium received from the sale of
interest-only ABS ($186 million), and credit reserves ($23 million). Although our effective net
premium for GAAP purposes for these loans is low, changes in prepayment rates on these loans can
create volatility in our quarterly GAAP net income results because GAAP treatment is not
necessarily parallel for the amortization of these largely offsetting premium and discount
balances.
Our net effective discount on all residential loans and securities (ARM, fixed, and hybrid) has
several asset and liability components. The total net effective
discount is $484 million ($20 per
share outstanding at June 30, 2005) and consists of purchase
premiums ($316 million), and deferred ABS
issuance costs ($58 million), less purchase discounts on
securities ($214 million), premiums
received from the sale of ABS at a premium ($31 million), premiums received from the sale of
interest-only ABS ($186 million), and credit reserves on loans and securities ($427 million). We
will realize this $484 million net discount as income over time, to the extent it is not diminished by credit
losses. With faster prepayments we will realize this discount more
quickly. Separately, we also have $93
million ($4 per share) of net effective discount on our commercial
real estate loans and securities.
The asset and liability components listed above have different GAAP accounting treatments. These
differences in GAAP accounting affect the timing of recognition of
income and expense. While overall we believe that we will benefit
from faster prepayments over time, our quarter-to-quarter GAAP results
could be volatile as a result of GAAP timing differences and other
factors.
We saw a small amount of this potential volatility in the second quarter. In some cases this
volatility might reflect real long-term economic changes of trends. Alternatively, quarterly
earnings volatility might reflect timing differences that will likely reverse over the longer term.
GAAP Earnings
Our GAAP earnings totaled $41 million ($1.62 per share) for the second quarter of 2005, a decrease from
the $55 million ($2.58 per share) we earned for the second quarter of 2004. Our earnings, totaled
$101 million ($4.04 per share) for the first half of 2005 and $106 million ($5.08 per share) for
the first half of 2004.
Our results through the second quarter of 2005 are not as strong as the extraordinary results we
achieved during the first half of 2004. Reasons for this include a decrease in gains achieved due
to sales and calls of assets, a lower yield on our portfolio of residential credit-enhancement
securities (the older, higher-yielding securities have prepaid, been called, or sold), a temporary
reduction in net interest income from residential loans and matched ABS issuance as ARM prepayments
have increased (caused by differences in the timing of premium amortization for consolidated assets
and liabilities), and our cautious approach to investing capital in this environment (maintaining a
relatively high level of uninvested cash in 2005). Our earnings are still at a level that we
consider attractive our GAAP return on equity was 17% in the second quarter of 2005 and 22% in the
first half of 2005.
40
Taxable Income
Redwood has elected to be taxed as a REIT. As such, we are not required to pay corporate income
taxes on the REIT taxable income that we distribute to stockholders as dividends. We are required
to distribute to stockholders as dividends at least 90% of the REIT taxable income (our taxable
income excluding income earned in non-REIT taxable subsidiaries) that we earn. Through June 30,
2005, we continued to satisfy our dividend distribution requirements as a REIT. Our regular
dividend during both the first quarter and second quarter of 2005 was $0.70 per share.
Taxable income is the pre-tax income we earn calculated using methods appropriate for tax purposes.
Taxable income often may differ significantly from GAAP income; a reconciliation of the two is provided
later in this Form 10-Q.
For the second quarter of 2005, we earned an estimated $41 million ($1.66 per share) total taxable
income (pre-tax income as calculated for tax purposes), of which an estimated $39 million ($1.59
per share) was real estate investment trust (REIT) taxable income.
For the first half of 2005, we earned an estimated $87 million ($3.55 per share) total taxable
income (pre-tax income as calculated for tax purposes), of which an estimated $84 million ($3.43
per share) was real estate investment trust (REIT) taxable income.
Taxable income before stock option exercise deductions and gains on sale and call income was $1.47
per share in the second quarter of 2005, an increase from the $1.25 per share we earned in the
first quarter of 2005 and a decrease from the $2.19 per share we earned in the second quarter of
2004, as calculated on a similar basis. Taxable income before stock option exercise deductions and
gains on sale and call income was $2.72 per share for the first half of 2005 and $4.16 per share
for the first half of 2004.
We currently project that the first two regular quarterly dividends we declared in 2005 ($34
million) and a portion of the third quarter of 2005 regular dividend will consist of REIT taxable
income earned in 2004. Based on our estimates of REIT taxable income during the first half of 2005,
and assuming we permanently retain 10% of our ordinary REIT taxable income, we entered the third
quarter of 2005 with $81 million of undistributed REIT taxable income ($3.27 per share outstanding)
which we expect to pay as dividends to our stockholders during the remainder of 2005 and 2006.
Outlook
Business
conditions are challenging in ways described below, but overall continue to be favorable. We
continue to acquire new high-quality residential assets at a
reasonably attractive price and at a reasonable pace. Our
commercial real estate and CDO businesses continue to develop, diversifying our opportunities for
growth as well as diversifying our risks.
Over the last few years, improvements in our return on equity, earnings, and dividends have also
been driven in part by increased capital efficiencies that we have realized through selling or
re-securitizing assets (recycling capital). In achieving these capital efficiencies, in some cases
we have increased our potential earnings volatility with respect to credit risk and prepayment
risk. In other cases, we have reduced certain risks while recycling
capital. We continue to seek new capital
recycling opportunities within our portfolio.
After taking into consideration our internal risk-based capital guidelines that suggest how much
capital we need to support our assets, we had $148 million excess capital (unutilized cash) at June
30, 2005. This was similar to the level of excess capital we had at the beginning of the quarter
($143 million at March 31, 2005). At our current relatively low rate of capital absorption (new
acquisitions less sales, calls, and asset pay downs), we believe this
excess capital is sufficient to
support our operations for some time. This level of excess capital is generally greater than we
believe is optimal. However, during certain investment environments (like the one we have
currently) we are likely to have more excess capital and our
short-term earnings may be lower than they would have been otherwise.
We currently face, and expect to continue to face, increased competition, higher acquisition
pricing, and a reduced supply of high-quality loan acquisition opportunities. There are fewer
high-quality fixed rate, hybrid rate, and ARM securitizations as the quantity of new originations
of quality jumbo loans has decreased and as banks and other financial institutions increase their
purchases of residential real estate loans and hold these assets unsecuritized. There is an
abundance of capital in and demand for assets from banks, hedge funds, mortgage REITs, and other
investors, resulting in higher prices for the assets in which we
invest. This has increased the value of many of
our existing portfolio assets and continues to make the acquisition of new high-quality assets more
challenging.
41
We currently anticipate that existing market conditions of reduced high-quality supply, increased
competition, and high acquisition prices will likely continue for some time. As our current
portfolio of assets pays down, we will continue to acquire new assets when our quality standards
are met (real estate loans on which we take first-loss credit risk should be high-quality loans
relative to U.S. real estate loans as a whole should have a high
likelihood (in our opinion) of achieving and our hurdle rate of 14%
cash internal rate of return pre-tax and pre-overhead). We
believe we can source new assets with attractive return potential, but not in the same volumes as
we did in prior years. We believe that our rate of equity capital
absorption will be at a much slower
pace than in the past few years. In some quarters, like the second quarter of 2005, we may have
little net change in capital utilization. If we decide to sell a significant amount of assets
excess capital levels may increase. Furthermore, we do not expect that new
asset acquisitions will generate the yields over their lives that will equal the yields we have
reported in
the last few years from assets we acquired in earlier periods.
Overall, in the long term, we believe we will continue to be a leader in our market as a result of
our operating efficiencies, our intense and specialized business focus, and the relationships we
have developed with our business partners. Although we believe it is unlikely we will be able to
sustain our earnings, return on equity, and special dividends per share at the extraordinary levels
achieved during 2003 and 2004, we believe over the next few years we will continue to generate
earnings, cash flows, and returns on equity that are reasonably attractive when viewed on an
absolute basis (rather than relative to the past). We expect to maintain our regular dividend
payments. We continue to believe that a reasonable assumption for the range of return on equity we
could most likely earn on average over the long term (absent
significant deterioration in the
credit environment) is 11% to 18%. We earned a 17% return on equity on a GAAP basis during the
second quarter of 2005.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Acquisitions and Securitizations
During the second quarter of 2005, we acquired $365 million adjustable-rate residential real estate
loans for our Sequoia securitization program. We sold $369 million residential real estate loans
to Sequoia 2005-3 ABS during the quarter, and this entity created and sold $369 million ABS. For
the first half of 2005, our residential real estate loan acquisition totaled $1.3 billion, sales to
Sequoia entities totaled $1.1 billion, and Sequoia entities
issued $1.1 billion ABS. All these
securitizations are sales for legal and tax purposes but are treated as financings under
GAAP. Accordingly, in our Consolidated Statements of Income, we consolidate and record interest
income on the loans sold to securitization entities and interest expense on ABS issued by
securitization entities. At June 30, 2005, our loans held for future sale to Sequoia were $239
million; these loans are classified as held-for-investment for GAAP purposes as Sequoia has the
intent to hold them to maturity. At June 30, 2005, we also held
$60 million of loans we intend to sell as whole loans;
these loans were classified as held-for-sale loans.
During the second quarter of 2005, we acquired $88 million residential loan CES. During the first
half of 2005, we acquired $156 million residential loan CES. The
loans underlying the CES we acquired
during the second quarter of 2005 were consistent with our
high-quality standards. The average FICO score was 732 and the average loan-to-value (LTV) was 67%. The geographic
distribution was 50% in California with Florida, Texas, Virginia and
New York together representing a
total of 14% of the total (and no other state representing more than
2% of the loans). The property
types on these loans were 91% primary residence, 6% second homes, and 3% investment properties.
These loans had an average loan balance of $267,000. Increasingly, we
are credit-enhancing loans that have balances that are lower than the
jumbo loan balance limit imposed on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
these lower-balance loans were 34% of the loans we credit-enhanced in
the second quarter. Loans with balances over $1 million
represented 6%. Loan types included 44% hybrid, 36% fixed, and 20%
adjustable-rate. Most of the adjustable rate
loans (17% of total loans) allowed for negative amortization. A total
of 48% of newly credit-enhanced loans were interest-only, negative
amortization, or similar type loans where a fully amortizing loan
payment is not required.
We did not
acquire commercial loans in the second quarter of 2005. We acquired $7 million of
commercial loans in the first half of 2005. We sold $11 million
seasoned commercial loans in the second quarter of 2005.
We acquired $156 million of other residential and commercial real estate securities during the
second quarter of 2005 for our Acacia CDO securitization program. Thus far in 2005, Redwood
acquired $314 million of these securities for our Acacia CDO securitization program. We sold $22
million of securities to Acacia entities during the second quarter of 2005; total securities sales
to Acacia entities for the first six months of 2005 were
$272 million. We finished the second quarter
with securities of $328 million held for future sale to future Acacias. Acacia entities did not issue
ABS during the three months ended June 30, 2005.
42
Acacia issued $300 million ABS during the six months ended June 30, 2005. All of the assets and
liabilities of Acacia entities were included on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Included
in the securities portfolio were non-rated first-loss CMBS, that we fund with
equity. We did not purchase any of these securities during the second
quarter of 2005. We purchased
$13 million in the first half of 2005.
Net Income
Although net interest income has been increasing over the past several quarters, overall net GAAP
earnings decreased to $41 million in the second quarter of 2005 compared to $55 million in the
second quarter of 2004. This decrease was primarily the result of a decline in realized gains from
calls and sales of assets, less efficient capital utilization (we operated with more uninvested
cash in 2005 than in 2004), increases in net provisions for income taxes (as our GAAP provision for
income taxes was reduced by NOLs in 2004), a one time tax benefit of $5.2 million recorded for GAAP
in 2004, and an increase operating expenses (as we scale up our operations for future growth). For
similar reasons, earnings in the first half of 2005 decreased to $101 million from $106 million
during the first half of 2004. During the first half of 2005, credit performance remained strong.
Taxable net income totaled $41 million in the second quarter of 2005 and $87 million for the first
half of 2005. These were both decreases from the $72 million earned in the second quarter of 2004
and $123 million earned in the first half of 2004. The decrease was caused primarily by a drop in
taxable gains from calls and asset sales, fewer IO securities owned (we have not been acquiring the IO
securities created by the securitization entities sponsored by us, and the older IO securities we
own are paying down), and higher operating expenses.
In the second quarter of 2005, we had calls of our residential CES of $9 million principal value
for GAAP gains of $4 million and taxable gains of $3 million. For the first half of 2005, GAAP
call income gains totaled $12 million and taxable income gains were $9 million. The principal
value of residential CES currently callable at June 30, 2005 was $4 million. A substantial portion
of our GAAP and taxable income in 2003 and 2004 came from gains from calls and gains from sales of
residential CES. Returns from these sources are highly variable and not predictable.
As we started 2005 with a smaller amount of securities that are callable, we expect call income in
2005 to decline significantly from levels achieved in these prior years.
Occasionally,
we sell loans and securities from our portfolio. Sales generate one-time gains (or
losses), which add to (subtract from) reported GAAP earnings, taxable earnings, and perhaps our
total future required dividend payments. Asset sales and calls may adversely impact our
future earnings, as the lost ongoing income from these high-yield securities is often higher than
the yield generated by new assets we may acquire. In the second
quarter of 2005, we sold a residential real
estate security and two commercial real estate loans, generating GAAP gains of $0.2 million
and taxable gains of $0.2 million. During the first six months sales of loans and securities
generated GAAP gains of $8 million and taxable gains of $10 million. We have continued to sell
assets during the third quarter of 2005.
We provide for income taxes for GAAP purposes based on our estimates of our taxable income, the amount of
taxable income we currently plan to permanently retain, and the amount of taxable income we earned
at our taxable subsidiaries. In the first half of 2004, we had the benefit of Federal and state
net operating loss carry forwards and did not have any current tax provisions for income generated
at our taxable REIT subsidiaries. During 2005, by contrast, our GAAP provision for tax benefited
only slightly from some remaining state net operating losses. In addition, in the first half of
2004, we recognized a one-time deferred tax asset, thus recognizing
the future value of remaining net operating losses.
In 2004,
we generated significant taxable gains-on-sales due to securitizations
activities at the taxable subsidiaries. Since these securitizations were treated as financings
under GAAP, a deferred tax asset was created. A portion of these deferred tax assets was expensed
in the 2005 periods. Additional taxable gains on securitizations in 2005 have been minimal (due in
part to a lower volume of securitization as well as a decrease in the profitability margin of each
securitization in 2005).
43
Table 1
Net Income
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
248,388 |
|
|
$ |
137,979 |
|
|
$ |
485,554 |
|
|
$ |
262,816 |
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
(195,180 |
) |
|
|
(90,359 |
) |
|
|
(371,147 |
) |
|
|
(169,936 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
53,208 |
|
|
|
47,620 |
|
|
|
114,407 |
|
|
|
92,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
(11,284 |
) |
|
|
(8,461 |
) |
|
|
(22,256 |
) |
|
|
(18,487 |
) |
Net recognized gains and
valuation adjustments |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
12,258 |
|
|
|
18,057 |
|
|
|
29,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(4,054 |
) |
|
|
3,671 |
|
|
|
(8,731 |
) |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
40,915 |
|
|
$ |
55,088 |
|
|
$ |
101,477 |
|
|
$ |
105,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Common Shares |
|
|
25,196,286 |
|
|
|
21,325,075 |
|
|
|
25,109,390 |
|
|
|
20,855,647 |
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
2.58 |
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
Interest Income
Total interest income consists of interest earned on consolidated earning assets, plus income from
amortization of discount for assets acquired at prices below principal value, less expenses for
amortization of premium for assets acquired at prices above principal value, less credit provision
expenses.
Table 2
Interest Income and Yield
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
248,669 |
|
|
$ |
144,865 |
|
|
$ |
485,626 |
|
|
$ |
275,023 |
|
Discount amortization |
|
|
8,156 |
|
|
|
9,077 |
|
|
|
17,357 |
|
|
|
17,961 |
|
Premium amortization |
|
|
(9,964 |
) |
|
|
(14,463 |
) |
|
|
(17,931 |
) |
|
|
(26,157 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
|
(1,500 |
) |
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
(4,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
248,388 |
|
|
$ |
137,979 |
|
|
$ |
485,554 |
|
|
$ |
262,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earning assets |
|
$ |
22,606,036 |
|
|
$ |
20,283,156 |
|
|
$ |
23,320,331 |
|
|
$ |
19,220,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield as a result of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
Discount amortization |
|
|
0.14 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
Premium amortization |
|
|
(0.17 |
%) |
|
|
(0.29 |
%) |
|
|
(0.15 |
%) |
|
|
(0.27 |
%) |
Credit provision expense |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
(0.03 |
%) |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
(0.04 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield on earning assets |
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
|
2.72 |
% |
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
2.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods in 2004, interest
income increased primarily due to the growth in average consolidated earning assets and an overall
increase in yield caused by an increase in short-term interest rates. Total consolidated earning
assets grew primarily as a result of increased sponsorship of securitizations of residential real
estate loans over the past twelve months. A majority of the assets are adjustable-rate residential
real estate loans, and yields on these assets increased in line with rise of short-term interest
rates over the past twelve months.
44
The table below presents the contribution to interest income and yield from each of our portfolios.
Table 3
Interest Income and Yield by Portfolio
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Yield |
|
Residential real estate
loans, net of provision
for credit losses |
|
$ |
203,743 |
|
|
|
82.03 |
% |
|
$ |
20,054,970 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
% |
|
$ |
109,880 |
|
|
|
79.64 |
% |
|
$ |
18,754,200 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
% |
HELOCs, net of provision
for credit losses |
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
% |
|
|
257,515 |
|
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
% |
|
|
124,053 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan
credit-enhancement
securities |
|
|
19,439 |
|
|
|
7.83 |
% |
|
|
550,460 |
|
|
|
14.13 |
% |
|
|
16,077 |
|
|
|
11.65 |
% |
|
|
317,235 |
|
|
|
20.27 |
% |
Commercial loans, net of
provision for credit
losses |
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
45,214 |
|
|
|
10.68 |
% |
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
26,129 |
|
|
|
13.29 |
% |
Securities portfolio |
|
|
20,727 |
|
|
|
8.34 |
% |
|
|
1,573,170 |
|
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
|
10,545 |
|
|
|
7.64 |
% |
|
|
980,089 |
|
|
|
4.30 |
% |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
124,707 |
|
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
81,450 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
248,388 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
22,606,036 |
|
|
|
4.40 |
% |
|
$ |
137,979 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
20,283,156 |
|
|
|
2.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Yield |
|
Residential real estate
loans, net of provision
for credit losses |
|
$ |
398,620 |
|
|
|
82.10 |
% |
|
$ |
20,843,356 |
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
$ |
208,706 |
|
|
|
79.41 |
% |
|
$ |
17,835,248 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
% |
HELOCs, net of provision
for credit losses |
|
|
5,025 |
|
|
|
1.03 |
% |
|
|
271,252 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
% |
|
|
62,026 |
|
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan
credit-enhancement
securities |
|
|
39,063 |
|
|
|
8.05 |
% |
|
|
522,093 |
|
|
|
14.96 |
% |
|
|
31,610 |
|
|
|
12.03 |
% |
|
|
302,157 |
|
|
|
20.92 |
% |
Commercial loans, net of
provision for credit
losses |
|
|
2,795 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
50,617 |
|
|
|
11.04 |
% |
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
% |
|
|
24,222 |
|
|
|
12.96 |
% |
Securities portfolio |
|
|
38,667 |
|
|
|
7.96 |
% |
|
|
1,508,316 |
|
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
20,156 |
|
|
|
7.67 |
% |
|
|
921,047 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
% |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
124,697 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
76,046 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
485,554 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
23,320,331 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
$ |
262,816 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
19,220,746 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
The table below details how our interest income changed by portfolio as a result of changes in
consolidated asset balances (volume) and yield (rate) for the three and six months ended June
30, 2005 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Table 4
Volume and Rate Changes for Interest Income
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Interest Income |
|
|
Change in Interest Income |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 Versus June 30, 2004 |
|
|
June 30, 2005 Versus June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total Change |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total Change |
|
Residential real estate
loans, net of provisions
for credit losses |
|
$ |
7,621 |
|
|
$ |
86,242 |
|
|
$ |
93,863 |
|
|
$ |
35,201 |
|
|
$ |
154,713 |
|
|
$ |
189,914 |
|
HELOCs, net provision
for credit losses |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
1,808 |
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
4,489 |
|
Residential loan
credit-enhancement
securities |
|
|
11,819 |
|
|
|
(8,457 |
) |
|
|
3,362 |
|
|
|
23,008 |
|
|
|
(15,555 |
) |
|
|
7,453 |
|
Commercial loans, net of
provision for credit
losses |
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
(484 |
) |
|
|
1,226 |
|
Securities portfolio |
|
|
6,381 |
|
|
|
3,801 |
|
|
|
10,182 |
|
|
|
12,852 |
|
|
|
5,659 |
|
|
|
18,511 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
992 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
27,071 |
|
|
$ |
83,338 |
|
|
$ |
110,409 |
|
|
$ |
74,732 |
|
|
$ |
148,006 |
|
|
$ |
222,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume change is the change in average portfolio balance between periods multiplied by the rate
earned in the earlier period. Rate change is the change in rate between periods multiplied by the
average portfolio balance in the prior period. Interest income changes that result from changes in
both rate and volume were allocated to the rate change amounts shown in the table.
A discussion of the changes in total income, average balances, and yields for each of our
portfolios is provided below.
Table
5
Consolidated Residential Real Estate Loans Interest Income and
Yield
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
211,186 |
|
|
$ |
125,105 |
|
|
$ |
414,406 |
|
|
$ |
237,958 |
|
Net premium
amortization expense |
|
|
(8,937 |
) |
|
|
(13,992 |
) |
|
|
(15,973 |
) |
|
|
(25,508 |
) |
Reversal of (provision
for) credit losses |
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
(3,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
203,743 |
|
|
$ |
109,880 |
|
|
$ |
398,620 |
|
|
$ |
208,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average consolidated
residential real estate
loans |
|
$ |
20,054,970 |
|
|
$ |
18,754,200 |
|
|
$ |
20,843,356 |
|
|
$ |
17,835,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields as a result of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
4.21 |
% |
|
|
2.67 |
% |
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
2.67 |
% |
Net premium
amortization expense |
|
|
(0.18 |
%) |
|
|
(0.30 |
%) |
|
|
(0.15 |
%) |
|
|
(0.29 |
%) |
Credit provision expense |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
(0.03 |
%) |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
(0.04 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield |
|
|
4.06 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2005, and compared to a year earlier, interest income on residential real estate loans
increased as a result of higher average balances and higher yields. Yields on these residential
real estate loans have
46
started to
trend upward as short-term interest rates are rising. Most of these loans have coupon
rates that adjust monthly or every six months based on one-or six-month LIBOR interest rate.
Premium amortization expense (as a percentage of average loan balances) during 2005 decreased from
the same periods in 2004. Amortization expense results from the application of FAS 91. In
applying the interest method under FAS 91, we make certain elections to determine an effective
yield to amortize the premium. For loans acquired prior to July 1, 2004, in our effective yield
calculations we use coupon interest rates as they change over time as
well as anticipated principal
prepayments (actual and projected). Thus, rising rates will cause an increase
in effective yield for these adjustable rate residential loans, both because the coupon is rising
and also because premium amortization expense is likely to be reduced
in order to increase the current effective yield to current market
levels yield (all other factors being equal). For loans acquired after
July 1, 2004, we determine an effective yield under FAS 91 using the initial coupon interest rate
of the loans (without regard to future changes in the interest rates
and underlying indices) as well as anticipated
prepayment rates. For these residential loans, higher coupon interest rates will increase net
realized yields. Periodic premium amortization expenses, however, will not be reduced as a result
of coupon interest rate increases. For these loans, as a result, premium amortization expenses
will be higher (relative to the older loans) in a period of rising interest rates. As of June 30,
2005, loans acquired before July 1, 2004 had a principal value of $14.00 billion and an amortized
cost basis of $14.16 billion. Loans acquired after July 1, 2004 had a principal value of $5.14
billion and an amortized cost basis of $5.18 billion.
Table 6
Residential HELOC Interest Income and Yield
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
3,255 |
|
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
|
$ |
6,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,053 |
|
Net premium amortization
expense |
|
|
(821 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(1,429 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
Reversal of (provision for)
credit losses |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
2,467 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
$ |
5,025 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of HELOCs |
|
$ |
257,515 |
|
|
$ |
124,053 |
|
|
$ |
271,252 |
|
|
$ |
62,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields as a result of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
5.06 |
% |
|
|
3.40 |
% |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
|
|
3.40 |
% |
Net premium amortization
expense |
|
|
(1.28 |
%) |
|
|
(0.81 |
%) |
|
|
(1.05 |
%) |
|
|
(0.81 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net provision for credit losses |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
(0.86 |
%) |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
(0.86 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield |
|
|
3.83 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
3.70 |
% |
|
|
1.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our return on the HELOC-backed securities we acquired from securitization of HELOCs we sponsored
can be materially reduced if prepayment rates (net of draws) on these loans are faster than we
originally anticipated. Cumulative prepayments through June 30, 2005 were faster than we
originally anticipated.
47
Table 7
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities Interest Income and Yield
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
11,664 |
|
|
$ |
7,230 |
|
|
$ |
22,561 |
|
|
$ |
14,125 |
|
Net discount
amortization income |
|
|
7,775 |
|
|
|
8,847 |
|
|
|
16,502 |
|
|
|
17,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
19,439 |
|
|
$ |
16,077 |
|
|
$ |
39,063 |
|
|
$ |
31,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average residential
loan
credit-enhancement
securities |
|
$ |
550,460 |
|
|
$ |
317,235 |
|
|
$ |
522,093 |
|
|
$ |
302,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield as a result of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
8.48 |
% |
|
|
9.11 |
% |
|
|
8.64 |
% |
|
|
9.35 |
% |
Net discount
amortization income |
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
11.16 |
% |
|
|
6.32 |
% |
|
|
11.57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield |
|
|
14.13 |
% |
|
|
20.27 |
% |
|
|
14.96 |
% |
|
|
20.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized from residential loan CES during the three and six months ended June 30,
2005 increased as compared to the same periods in 2004, primarily due to growth in our portfolio
over the past year, partially offset by the lower yield we recognize on the newer assets relative
to the more seasoned assets that have shown improving credit performance.
Yields on the residential CES portfolio decreased during the 2005 periods as compared to the 2004
periods. This is the result of the more seasoned, higher yielding assets (higher yielding as a
result of several years of strong credit performance and favorable prepayments) being called within
the last year and being replaced with newer CES that have lower yield assumptions. We believe the
risk/reward ratio offered by our recent CES acquisitions is attractive for stockholders.
Nevertheless, we believe these new securities are unlikely to generate over their lives the level
of interest and call income generated by our older portfolio assets unless the market environment
going forward proves to be as attractive (i.e., very fast prepayments and very low credit losses)
as the environment has been over the last several years.
Table 8
Commercial Real Estate Loans Interest Income and Yield
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
2,737 |
|
|
$ |
1,793 |
|
Net premium
amortization expense |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(224 |
) |
Reversal of
(provision for)
credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
1,208 |
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
|
$ |
2,795 |
|
|
$ |
1,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earning assets |
|
$ |
45,214 |
|
|
$ |
26,129 |
|
|
$ |
50,617 |
|
|
$ |
24,222 |
|
Yield as a result of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
11.56 |
% |
|
|
14.85 |
% |
|
|
10.81 |
% |
|
|
14.81 |
% |
Net premium
amortization expense |
|
|
(0.88 |
%) |
|
|
(1.56 |
%) |
|
|
(0.50 |
%) |
|
|
(1.85 |
%) |
Reversal of provision
for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield |
|
|
10.68 |
% |
|
|
13.29 |
% |
|
|
11.04 |
% |
|
|
12.96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest income earned on our commercial real estate loan portfolio increased in the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005 from the same periods in 2004 primarily due to the growth in our
commercial
48
loan portfolio. This increase was partially offset by lower yield assumptions for newer commercial
loans. During the first half of 2005, we reversed a portion of the credit reserve based on our
positive assessment of one loan in the portfolio and reclassified the loan from held-for-investment
to held-for-sale in anticipation of a sale of a loan.
Table 9
Consolidated Securities Portfolio Interest Income and Yield
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
20,454 |
|
|
$ |
10,433 |
|
|
$ |
38,213 |
|
|
$ |
19,854 |
|
Discount amortization |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
Premium amortization |
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
$ |
20,727 |
|
|
$ |
10,545 |
|
|
$ |
38,667 |
|
|
$ |
20,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average securities
portfolio balance |
|
$ |
1,573,170 |
|
|
$ |
980,089 |
|
|
$ |
1,508,316 |
|
|
$ |
921,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield as a result of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
5.20 |
% |
|
|
4.26 |
% |
|
|
5.07 |
% |
|
|
4.31 |
% |
Discount amortization |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
Premium amortization |
|
|
(0.03 |
%) |
|
|
(0.04 |
%) |
|
|
(0.05 |
%) |
|
|
(0.03 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield |
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
4.38 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income increased from the 2004 periods to the 2005 periods for the securities
portfolio as the total size of the portfolio grew. Yields for the total reported securities
portfolio increased over these periods as the coupon rates on adjustable-rate loan securities
adjusted upward with the increase in short-term interest rates over the past year.
Interest Expense
Consolidated interest expense consists of interest payments on Redwood debt and ABS issued, plus
the amortization of deferred ABS issuance costs and certain expenses related to interest rate
agreements less the amortization of ABS premiums. These ABS premiums are created when
interest-only and other ABS are issued at prices greater than principal value.
Total interest expense (as reported for GAAP purposes on a consolidated basis) increased in 2005
from 2004 due to higher cost of funds as a result of an increase in short-term interest rates and a
larger balance of consolidated ABS issued. Furthermore, interest expenses associated with
interest-only and premium Sequoia ABS issued were not reduced this quarter in an amount
commensurate with the increase in prepayments on the underlying Sequoia loans due to timing
differences on the nature of the ABS interests sold (i.e., amortization of the ABS premium issued
and commensurate reduction of interest expense on some
of the IO securities sold have not yet accelerated concurrent with the increase in prepayment
speeds on the underlying loan collateral).
49
Table 10
Total Interest Expense
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest expense on
Redwood debt |
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
|
$ |
2,490 |
|
|
$ |
4,553 |
|
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
Interest expense on ABS |
|
|
193,355 |
|
|
|
87,869 |
|
|
|
366,594 |
|
|
|
164,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
195,180 |
|
|
$ |
90,359 |
|
|
$ |
371,147 |
|
|
$ |
169,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Redwood debt
balance |
|
$ |
216,639 |
|
|
$ |
539,231 |
|
|
$ |
246,863 |
|
|
$ |
493,581 |
|
Average ABS issued balance |
|
|
22,067,276 |
|
|
|
19,350,833 |
|
|
|
22,692,221 |
|
|
|
18,325,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total obligations |
|
$ |
22,283,915 |
|
|
$ |
19,890,064 |
|
|
$ |
22,939,084 |
|
|
$ |
18,818,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of funds of Redwood
debt |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
Cost of funds of ABS issued |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
Cost of funds of total
obligations |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
3.24 |
% |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
For purposes of calculating the weighted average borrowing costs of ABS issued, we include the
amortization of the deferred ABS issuance costs with interest expense. We include the average
deferred ABS issuance costs in the average balances below.
Table
11
Average Balances of
Asset-Backed Securities
Issued
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Sequoia |
|
$ |
20,168,278 |
|
|
$ |
18,277,112 |
|
|
$ |
20,883,299 |
|
|
$ |
17,379,506 |
|
Acacia |
|
|
1,955,641 |
|
|
|
1,117,542 |
|
|
|
1,861,655 |
|
|
|
987,141 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
5,404 |
|
|
|
5,431 |
|
|
|
8,537 |
|
|
|
5,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of ABS issued |
|
$ |
22,129,323 |
|
|
$ |
19,400,085 |
|
|
$ |
22,753,491 |
|
|
$ |
18,372,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average deferred ABS
issuance costs |
|
|
(62,047 |
) |
|
|
(49,252 |
) |
|
|
(61,270 |
) |
|
|
(46,917 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of ABS
issued, net |
|
$ |
22,067,276 |
|
|
$ |
19,350,833 |
|
|
$ |
22,692,221 |
|
|
$ |
18,325,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below details how our interest expense changed our debt and consolidated ABS issued as a
result of changes in consolidated balances (volume) and cost of funds (rate) for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
50
Table 12
Volume and Rate Changes for Interest Expense
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Interest Expense |
|
|
Change in Interest Expense |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 Versus |
|
|
June 30, 2005 Versus |
|
|
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total Change |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Total Change |
|
Interest expense on Redwood debt |
|
$ |
(1,490 |
) |
|
$ |
825 |
|
|
$ |
(665 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,530 |
) |
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
$ |
(508 |
) |
Interest expense on ABS |
|
|
12,335 |
|
|
|
93,151 |
|
|
|
105,486 |
|
|
|
39,291 |
|
|
|
162,428 |
|
|
|
201,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
10,845 |
|
|
$ |
93,976 |
|
|
$ |
104,821 |
|
|
$ |
36,761 |
|
|
$ |
164,450 |
|
|
$ |
201,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume change is the change in average balance of obligations between periods multiplied by the
rate paid in the earlier period. Rate change is the change in rate between periods multiplied by
the average outstanding obligations in the current period. Interest expense changes that resulted
from changes in both rate and volume were allocated to the rate change amounts shown in the table.
Details of the change in cost of our debt and cost of funds on our ABS issued are provided
below.
Table 13
Cost of Funds of Redwood Debt
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Interest expense on Redwood debt |
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
|
$ |
2,490 |
|
|
$ |
4,553 |
|
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
Average Redwood debt balance |
|
$ |
216,639 |
|
|
$ |
539,231 |
|
|
$ |
246,863 |
|
|
$ |
493,581 |
|
Cost of funds of Redwood debt |
|
|
3.37 |
% |
|
|
1.85 |
% |
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
|
2.05 |
% |
51
Table 14
Cost of Funds of Asset-Backed Securities Issued
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
ABS interest expense |
|
$ |
191,985 |
|
|
$ |
78,809 |
|
|
$ |
365,167 |
|
|
$ |
147,879 |
|
ABS issuance expense amortization |
|
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
4,305 |
|
|
|
10,659 |
|
|
|
7,848 |
|
Net ABS interest rate agreement expense (income) |
|
|
(875 |
) |
|
|
5,988 |
|
|
|
(2,345 |
) |
|
|
10,953 |
|
Net ABS issuance premium amortization (income) on ABS issue |
|
|
(3,140 |
) |
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
(6,887 |
) |
|
|
(1,805 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ABS interest expense |
|
$ |
193,355 |
|
|
$ |
87,869 |
|
|
$ |
366,594 |
|
|
$ |
164,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of ABS |
|
$ |
22,067,276 |
|
|
$ |
19,350,833 |
|
|
$ |
22,692,221 |
|
|
$ |
18,325,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ABS interest expense |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
1.63 |
% |
|
|
3.22 |
% |
|
|
1.61 |
% |
ABS issuance expense amortization |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
Net ABS interest rate agreement expense (income) |
|
|
(0.02 |
%) |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
(0.02 |
%) |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
Net ABS issuance premium amortization (income) on ABS issue |
|
|
(0.06 |
%) |
|
|
(0.02 |
%) |
|
|
(0.06 |
%) |
|
|
(0.02 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of funds of ABS |
|
|
3.50 |
% |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
3.23 |
% |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
The coupon payments on the ABS issued are primarily indexed to one-, three-, and six- month LIBOR.
Over the past year, short-term interest rate has risen and, thus, so has our cost of funds of ABS.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses during the second quarter and first half of 2005 increased from the same periods
in 2004. Total operating expenses before excise tax and variable stock option expense (VSOE) or
income (VSOI) increased by 23% over the last year (from the second quarter of 2004 to the second
quarter of 2005). Expenses increased due to investments in systems and infrastructure, increases
in the scale of our operations, and increased accounting, legal, consulting fees, and internal
control costs. Generally, the scale of our business over the last year has increased as rapidly as our operating
expenses, and our efficiency ratio has remained relatively constant between 19% and 21% in the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. The efficiency ratio is total operating expenses
before excise tax and variable stock option expense (VSOE) or income (VSOI) as a percentage of net
interest income (NII).
Management excludes excise tax and VSOE/VSOI in determining the efficiency ratio. By excluding
these items, management believes that we are providing a performance measure comparable to measures
commonly used by other companies in our industry because these two types of excluded expenses do
not reflect ongoing costs of day-to-day operations of our company.
Stock option grant expenses (under FAS 123) are an on-going expense and are included in operating expense before excise tax and VSOE/VSOI.
VSOE/VSOI are a non-cash expense or income item that varies as a function of Redwoods stock price.
If our stock price increases during a quarter and the stock price is
above the strike price certain variable
options, we record a GAAP expense in that period equal to the increase in the stock price times the
number of in-the-money variable options that remain outstanding. If our stock price decreases
during a quarter, we record income in that period equal to the decrease in the stock price times
the number of in-the-money variable options that remain outstanding. Excise tax is a function of the timing
of dividend distributions. In the prior two years, Redwood delayed distributing dividends on a
portion of its REIT taxable income; as a result, under the REIT tax rules, Redwood paid excise
taxes. Excise tax is included in operating expenses on
52
our Consolidated Statements of Income. The reconciliation of GAAP operating expense to operating
expense before excise tax and VSOE is provided in the table below.
Table 15
Operating Expenses
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
11,284 |
|
|
$ |
8,461 |
|
|
$ |
22,256 |
|
|
$ |
18,487 |
|
Less: Excise tax |
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
(490 |
) |
Less: Variable stock option
income (VSOI) (expense) (VSOE) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses before
excise tax and VSOE/VSOI |
|
$ |
10,974 |
|
|
$ |
8,892 |
|
|
$ |
21,723 |
|
|
$ |
17,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of total operating
expense before excise tax and
VSOE/VSOI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed compensation expense |
|
$ |
2,623 |
|
|
$ |
1,842 |
|
|
$ |
5,401 |
|
|
$ |
4,073 |
|
Other operating expense |
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
6,501 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
Fair value of stock option expense |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
856 |
|
Variable compensation expense |
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
9,103 |
|
|
|
8,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses before
excise tax and VSOE/VSOI |
|
$ |
10,974 |
|
|
$ |
8,892 |
|
|
$ |
21,723 |
|
|
$ |
17,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (NII) |
|
$ |
53,208 |
|
|
$ |
47,620 |
|
|
$ |
114,407 |
|
|
$ |
92,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted efficiency ratio
(Operating expense before excise
tax and VSOE/VSOI)(NII) |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
Fixed compensation expenses include employee salaries and related employee benefits. Other
operating expenses include office costs, systems, legal and accounting fees, and other business
expenses. Both of these increased in 2005 from year earlier periods due to increases in staff
related to the increased scale of the operations of our business. We expect to continue to make
significant investments in expanding our staff and developing our business processes and
information technologies. As a result, we expect that our operating expenses will continue to
increase.
Fair value of stock option expense represents the cost of equity compensation as determined under
FAS 123 for options and option equity awards granted to employees and directors after December 31,
2002. Variable compensation includes employee bonuses (which are based on individual employee
performance and the adjusted return on equity earned by Redwood) and dividend equivalent right
expenses on certain options still outstanding and granted prior to December 31, 2002.
The primary drivers of this expense are the profitability (return on equity) of the company,
dividend payments, the number of employees, and the number of stock options outstanding that
receive DER payments that are expensed for GAAP purposes.
53
Net Recognized Gains (Losses) and Valuation Adjustments
For the three months ended June 30, 2005, our net recognized gains and losses and valuation
adjustments totaled positive $3.0 million as compared to positive $12.3 million for the same period
in 2004.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, our net recognized gains and losses and valuation
adjustments totaled positive $18.1 million as compared to positive $29.7 million for the same
period in 2004.
We recognized lower net gains and valuation adjustments during the three and six months ended June
30, 2005 periods than in the 2004 periods, primarily as a result of lower gains on calls and sales.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, gains on sales and calls totaled $4.9 million
and $20.8 million, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, total gain on
sales and calls were $16.2 million and $34.3 million, respectively. We expect gains from calls to
continue, although at an unpredictable and slower rate for the next few years. We will likely
continue to sell assets from time to time; sales can generate gains or losses.
Under accounting rules (FAS 115, EITF 99-20, and SAB 5(m)), we determine quarterly if there is any
other-than-temporary impairment as defined by GAAP for our residential credit-enhancement and
securities portfolios. To do so, we review the projected discounted cash flows on our assets based
on credit, prepayment, and other assumptions compared to those cash flows in prior period
projections. Assets with reduced discounted projected cash flows are written down in value if the
current market value for that asset is below our current basis. It is difficult to predict the
timing or magnitude of these other-than-temporary impairments; the quarterly amounts could be
substantial. We recognized other-than-temporary impairments of $1.7 million and $2.1 million for
the three and six months ending June 30, 2005, respectively. Other-than-temporary impairments
totaled $3.8 million and $4.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Taxable Income, Provisions for Income Taxes, and Common Dividends
Estimated total taxable income and estimated REIT taxable income are not GAAP performance measures
but are important measures as they are the basis of our required minimum dividend distributions to
stockholders. A reconciliation of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measure appears below.
Our taxable income differs from our GAAP income. For example, our GAAP income is reduced by credit
provision expenses accrued in anticipation of credit losses while taxable income is reduced by
credit losses only when they are realized. Additionally, unrealized market price valuation
adjustments for GAAP purposes are generally not included in taxable income, and certain
compensation-related items are treated differently for GAAP and tax purposes (both in terms of
timing and also total expenses over time). Most of the securitizations we sponsor are treated as
sales of assets for tax purposes but are treated as a financing for GAAP purposes. Securitizations
we sponsor generally create a realized gain or loss for tax purposes (a component of the taxable
income we earn in our taxable subsidiaries) but no such gain or loss for GAAP purposes.
Essentially, when we recognize gains on securitizations that we sponsor, we are accelerating for
tax purposes income that we will recognize for GAAP purposes over time in the form of the net
interest income from residential real estate loans and associated ABS issued. We discuss taxable
income as it determines the amount of our dividend requirements and the amount we may be able to
permanently retain.
Estimated REIT taxable income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 was less than our
estimated REIT taxable income we earned during these periods in 2004, both in total and in per
share amounts. Gains due to calls and sales were at lower levels for the 2005 periods than in the
2004 periods. Since the first half of 2004 we have not been acquiring any of the IO securities we
create from Sequoia. The balance of the IO securities we own has decreased since that time. This
decrease in IO securities income has been partially offset by increased income on residential CES
as a result of increase in acquisitions of these assets.
Taxable income before calls, sales, and deductions for stock options exercised was $1.47 per share
in the second quarter of 2005, an increase from the $1.25 per share we earned on a similar basis in
the first quarter of 2005 but a decrease from the $2.19 per share we earned in the second quarter
of 2004. Taxable net interest income decreased in the 2005 periods from the 2004 periods due
primarily to a decrease in the balance of IO securities we own.
REIT operating expenses as measured for tax purposes before stock option exercise deductions
increased year over year due to our increasing the capacity of our business operations as we grow.
54
The following table shows the components of our estimated taxable income and the amounts related to
calls, sales, stock option exercise deductions, and income at our taxable subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 16 |
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
Taxable Income |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
(all dollars in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
Per share |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Per share |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Per share |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Per share |
|
REIT net interest income |
|
$ |
44,313 |
|
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
52,460 |
|
|
$ |
2.44 |
|
|
$ |
84,595 |
|
|
$ |
3.44 |
|
|
$ |
98,047 |
|
|
$ |
4.74 |
|
REIT operating expenses
excluding stock option
expense |
|
|
(8,115 |
) |
|
|
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
(5,423 |
) |
|
|
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
(15,956 |
) |
|
|
(0.65 |
) |
|
|
(11,955 |
) |
|
|
(0.58 |
) |
REIT State tax deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable income before
stock option exercises,
calls, and sales |
|
|
36,198 |
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
47,037 |
|
|
|
2.19 |
|
|
|
66,939 |
|
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
86,092 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
|
REIT stock option exercise
deductions |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(620 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(12,182 |
) |
|
|
(0.62 |
) |
REIT gains on calls |
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
12,081 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
8,532 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
21,501 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
REIT gains on sales |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
9,547 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
7,423 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable income |
|
|
39,237 |
|
|
|
1.59 |
|
|
|
60,344 |
|
|
|
2.81 |
|
|
|
84,398 |
|
|
|
3.43 |
|
|
|
102,834 |
|
|
|
4.96 |
|
Pre-tax income at taxable
subsidiaries |
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
11,721 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
20,057 |
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
Total taxable income (pre-tax) |
|
$ |
40,952 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
72,065 |
|
|
$ |
3.35 |
|
|
$ |
87,284 |
|
|
$ |
3.55 |
|
|
$ |
122,891 |
|
|
$ |
5.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable income per share is measured as the estimated pretax taxable income earned in a calendar
quarter dividend by the number of shares outstanding at the end of that quarter. Annual taxable
income per share is the sum of the four quarterly taxable earnings per share calculations. Taxable
income per share for the first six months of a year is the sum of the first two quarters taxable
income per share.
We currently project that the first two regular quarterly dividends we declared in 2005 ($34
million) and a portion of the third quarter of 2005 regular dividend will consist of REIT taxable
income earned in 2004. Based on our estimates of REIT taxable income during the first quarter of
2005, we entered the third quarter of 2005 with $81 million of undistributed REIT taxable income
which we expect to pay as dividends to our stockholders during the remainder of 2005 and 2006,
assuming we permanently retain 10% of our ordinary REIT taxable income.
Income from call and sales activity is long-term capital gain income for tax purposes. Our
tax-paying stockholders may benefit to the degree they can take advantage of the lower tax rate on
our distributions of capital gains versus ordinary income. We provide information annually on the
tax characteristics of our dividends and this information is also posted on our website at
www.redwoodtrust.com.
The table below reconciles the differences between GAAP and taxable income.
55
Table 17
Differences Between GAAP Net Income and Estimated Total Taxable and Estimated REIT Taxable Income
(all dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
GAAP Net Income |
|
$ |
40,915 |
|
|
$ |
55,088 |
|
|
$ |
101,477 |
|
|
$ |
105,879 |
|
Interest income and expense differences |
|
|
(4,868 |
) |
|
|
5,208 |
|
|
|
(24,959 |
) |
|
|
4,058 |
|
Provision for credit losses GAAP |
|
|
(1,527 |
) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
4,011 |
|
Tax deductions for realized credit losses |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
|
(510 |
) |
Long-term compensation differences |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
4,107 |
|
|
|
5,332 |
|
Stock option exercise deduction differences |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(620 |
) |
|
|
(12,182 |
) |
Depreciation of fixed asset differences |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Other operating expense differences |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Sales of asset differences |
|
|
(2,476 |
) |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
(3,443 |
) |
|
|
(1,102 |
) |
Call income from residential CES differences |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(2,157 |
) |
|
|
(2,204 |
) |
|
|
(4,056 |
) |
Tax gain on securitizations |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
10,303 |
|
|
|
3,366 |
|
|
|
10,303 |
|
Tax gain on intercompany sales and transfers |
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
5,631 |
|
|
|
7,475 |
|
GAAP market valuation write downs (EITF 99-20) |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
4,404 |
|
Interest rate agreement differences |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
Provision for excise tax GAAP |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
Provision for income tax differences |
|
|
3,035 |
|
|
|
(3,672 |
) |
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total taxable income (pre-tax) |
|
$ |
40,952 |
|
|
$ |
72,065 |
|
|
$ |
87,283 |
|
|
$ |
122,892 |
|
Earnings from taxable subsidiaries |
|
|
(1,715 |
) |
|
|
(11,721 |
) |
|
|
(2,885 |
) |
|
|
(20,058 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable income (pre-tax) |
|
$ |
39,237 |
|
|
$ |
60,344 |
|
|
$ |
84,398 |
|
|
$ |
102,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP Income per share based on average diluted shares during period |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
$ |
2.58 |
|
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
$ |
5.08 |
|
Total taxable income per share based on shares outstanding at period end |
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
3.35 |
|
|
$ |
3.55 |
|
|
$ |
5.92 |
|
REIT taxable income per share based on shares outstanding at period end |
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
|
$ |
4.96 |
|
REIT taxable income before stock option exercises, calls, and sales |
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
|
$ |
4.16 |
|
56
We permanently retained approximately 10% of the ordinary REIT taxable income we earned during
2004, and we will declare the distribution of the remainder as dividends by September 2005. We also
retained 100% of the taxable income that we earned at our taxable REIT subsidiaries in 2004 (after
taxes). We accrued income tax expense on the portion of the REIT taxable income that we
permanently retained. By retaining a portion of our income, we seek to build equity per share, and
thus potential earnings and dividends per share, over time. We anticipate following a similar
pattern of distribution in 2005 and are accruing income tax expense accordingly. Our current
provision for corporate income taxes for Redwood is estimated based on a combined Federal and state
corporate tax rate of 41% on the amount of anticipated REIT ordinary income to be retained for the
year.
Our estimates of taxable income are subject to change due to changes in interest rates prepayments,
credit losses, and other market factors as well as changes in applicable income tax laws and
regulations. One potential future tax law change that we are aware of (which is described in IRS
Announcement 2004-75) could, for example, cause our taxable income and associated dividend
distributions to decrease in future periods as it may allow for changes in the assumptions used to
determine current period income on IO securities. However, we do not expect this potential future
tax law change will have a material impact on either our taxable income or our dividend rate, given
our existing portfolio.
We generally attempt to avoid acquiring assets or structuring financings or sales at the REIT level
that would be likely to generate distributions of UBTI or excess inclusion income to our
stockholders, or that would cause prohibited transaction taxes on the REIT; there can be no
assurance that we will be successful in doing so.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Each of our product lines and portfolios is a component of our single business of investing in,
credit-enhancing, and securitizing residential and commercial real estate loans and securities.
Our consolidated earning assets, as presented for GAAP purposes, consist of five portfolios:
residential real estate loans, HELOCs, residential CES, commercial real estate loans, and
securities portfolio. A discussion of the activities in each of these portfolios appears below.
Residential Real Estate Loans
We acquired $0.4 billion high-quality residential real estate loans for future sale to
securitization entities (or as whole loans) during the second quarter of 2005. We acquired $1.2 billion loans in the first
half of 2005. Most of these loans were subsequently sold to ABS securitization entities that we
consolidate for reporting purposes. All of our loan purchases were one- and six-month LIBOR loans.
We continue to expand our relationships with originators from whom we acquire loans. However,
acquisition volumes declined in recent quarters. If the yield curve flattens further, the housing
market weakens, competition to acquire loans further increases, and competing products including
negative amortization, MTA (moving treasury average) ARMs, or other related products continue to
gain shares of the jumbo ARM market, we would expect our volume of adjustable-rate residential loan
acquisitions to continue to decline.
The consolidated balance of residential real estate loans at June 30, 2005 of $19.4 billion was
lower than the consolidated balance at December 31, 2004 of $22.2 billion. (Loans underlying residential credit-enhancement securities acquired from securitizations not sponsored from us do not appear on our consolidated GAAP balance sheet). Prepayments on
loans consolidated for GAAP were greater than our net acquisitions of new loans during the first half of 2005. This was
the result of both an increase in prepayment speeds and a decrease in the volume of acquisitions
and sponsored securitizations. Prepayment speeds increased in the adjustable rate mortgages as a
result of a flattening of the yield curve (an increase in short-term interest rates relative to
long-term interest rates). This change in the yield curve also served to reduce the new production
of adjustable-rate loans indexed to LIBOR. In addition, we face increased competition to purchase
these loans.
At June 30, 2005, Redwood owned $239 million of residential real estate loans accumulated for
sale to future securitizations or as whole loans. These loans were pledged to support $205 million associated Redwood debt.
ABS securitization entities consolidated on Redwoods balance sheet owned $19.1 billion residential
real estate loans as of June 30, 2005.
There were approximately 56,000 loans in this consolidated residential real estate loan portfolio at
June 30, 2005, and the average loan balance was $339,000. Loans with a balance over $1 million
made up 13% of the dollar balance of loans. Over 99% of consolidated residential loans at June 30,
2005 had adjustable-rate coupons that adjust every month or each six months to the one- or
six-month LIBOR rate (a short-term interest rate). Loans on homes located in California were 24%
of the dollar balance of this portfolio, split approximately evenly between northern and southern
California. States that each
57
represent 4% to 11% of our consolidated portfolio include Florida, Georgia, New York, New Jersey,
Texas, Arizona, and Colorado. Primary residences represented 88% of the dollar balance of the loans, second homes
represented 10%, and investor properties represented 2%.
Loans in this portfolio are generally high-quality loans, with credit scores, loan-to-value ratios,
and other loan characteristics consistent with high quality. As of June 30, 2005, substantially
all of the loans in this portfolio were interest-only loans; that is, the homeowner is able to make
interest payments only rather than paying both principal and interest for a prescribed number of
years. None of the loans in this portfolio have the potential for negative amortization; that is,
the homeowner cannot opt to make a payment that is less than the full interest accrual rate on the
loan. The ability of the homeowner to make an interest-only payment that is less than the amount
that would fully amortize the loan may cause additional risks especially as interest rates rise
(since these are generally adjustable-rate loans). To date, the credit performance of the
interest-only residential loans that Redwood has credit-enhanced in this portfolio has been better
than our original expectations.
The credit qualities of these loans, personal income growth, a strong housing market, and rising
housing prices have helped to contain delinquencies and losses. Recently, however, short-term
interest rates have started to rise. If this trend continues, required monthly payments made by
homeowners with adjustable-rate real estate loans will increase by a material amount, thus
potentially causing some credit issues. Almost all of the loans in our consolidated residential
real estate loan portfolio are adjustable-rate. Rising interest rates (or a soft economy) could
also have an impact on housing prices, which in turn could adversely affect our credit losses.
Charge-offs (credit losses) net of recoveries recorded in this portfolio totaled a positive $0.1
million (a net recovery) during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and a negative $0.1 million for the
first half of 2005, and credit losses remained at an annualized rate of less than 1 basis point
(0.01%) during these periods. There were no charge-offs during these periods in 2004. Serious
delinquencies increased from $13.3 million at December 31, 2004 to $16.5 million at June 30, 2005.
Serious delinquencies include loans delinquent more than 90 days, in bankruptcy, in foreclosure,
and real estate owned. As a percentage of this loan portfolio, serious delinquencies remained at
low levels relative to the U.S. residential real estate loans as a whole, and were 0.09% of our
current loan balances in this portfolio at June 30, 2005, an increase from the 0.06% at December
31, 2004.
The reserve for credit losses on residential real estate loans is included as a component of
residential real estate loans on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The residential real estate loan credit
reserve balance of $22 million was 0.12% of the current balance of this portfolio at June 30, 2005.
It was 0.10% at December 31, 2004.
Management reviews the levels of credit reserves every quarter and adjusts the reserve through a
credit provision. The credit reserve balance and provision for credit losses are based on several factors
that include delinquencies, performance of the loans, loan balances, and the rate at which the
portfolio increases. The decrease in the credit provision expense in 2005 relative to 2004 is due to a net decline in the outstanding loan balance and continued strong credit performance.
While delinquencies have increased over the past six months, the overall level of delinquencies
remains low by industry standards and our estimate of credit losses on our existing loans continues
to trend downward.
At June 30, 2005, we owned the IO security that
benefits from the spread between the assets and the liabilities of the issuing securitization
entity for $15.2 billion of these consolidated loans. These assets and liabilities
are closely matched economically and to the degree there is a mismatch we attempt to reduce this
mismatch through the use of interest rate agreements. For the remainder of the consolidated securitized residential loans ($5.6 billion), we do not own the security that benefits from the asset/liability spread.
Thus, spread changes between the yield of these assets and the cost of these liabilities do not
affect Redwoods economic profits or cash flow (although our reported income could be affected with significant volatility in the short term).
Residential Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs)
In the second quarter of 2004, we acquired $335 million high-quality HELOCs and sponsored their
securitization. We have recently initiated flow purchase agreements with originators
and acquired $0.1 million of HELOCs in the second quarter of 2005. We currently intend to continue
acquiring HELOCs when we believe we can acquire HELOCs at a price that is less than the net sales
proceeds we would expect to earn from sponsoring a securitization of HELOCs or selling the HELOCs as whole loans.
Generally, in the second half of 2004 and the first half of 2005, the price that banks were willing
to pay for HELOCs for their own portfolios exceeded the price that we were willing to pay based on our estimate of the proceeds
available from securitization of the HELOCs.
58
The current balance of HELOC loans at June 30, 2005 was $247 million. This HELOC portfolio
consists of adjustable-rate first and second lien residential loans with a 10-year revolving period
and a maturity from origination of 10 years. During the revolving period, borrowers have the
option of drawing funds up to the available credit limit. As a result, the balance of each HELOC,
and the total balance of this portfolio, may increase if borrowers increase their draws. The coupon
rate on the HELOCs adjusts as a function of the Prime short-term interest rate. The HELOC portfolio
is generally high quality and characterized by relatively high FICO credit scores (average of 725)
and relatively low combined loan-to-value ratios (average of 75%). The borrowers in this HELOC
portfolio are similar in many ways to the borrowers for the other residential loans in the
securitizations we have sponsored.
As of June 30, 2005, our GAAP credit reserve for consolidated HELOCs was $0.6 million, or 0.23% of
the outstanding balance of this portfolio. At December 31, 2004, the reserve was $0.7 million, or
0.24% of the outstanding balance. Serious delinquencies in our HELOC portfolio totaled $0.4
million, or 0.15% of the outstanding balance as of June 30, 2005, an increase from the
delinquencies of $0.3 million, or 0.10% as of December 31, 2004. However, overall delinquencies
are currently still below our original expectations for these loans. There were no realized credit
losses from the HELOC portfolio during the first half of 2005.
In general, due to the second lien status of most of these HELOCs, we expect delinquencies for
these HELOCs to be somewhat higher than we experience with our other managed real estate loans. We
believe the loss frequency of these HELOCs may be approximately similar to the other residential
loans of the same vintage that we manage, but we expect the loss severity (credit loss from a
default, as a percentage of the loan balance) of HELOCs to be significantly higher. Due to the
higher loss severity, we expect cumulative credit losses over time on these HELOCs could be
materially higher than on our other managed residential loans. We have factored this higher loss
expectation into our acquisition pricing and securitization calculations. As a result, for the
securities we acquired and hold at Redwood from this securitization, we believe we can earn an
attractive yield even if the underlying HELOCs produce significantly higher losses than our other
managed residential loans.
Prepayment rates affect the returns we earn from owning HELOC assets. Slower prepayments are better for us. On average, prepayment
rates for these loans have been faster than we expected. Our assessment of the risks associated with a potential acceleration of HELOC prepayments is the primary reason we have not
acquired bulk pools of HELOCs since the second quarter of 2004.
Residential Credit-Enhancement Securities (acquired from securitizations sponsored by others)
Residential CES are the securities issued by an ABS securitization entity that bear the bulk of the
initial credit risk of the underlying pool of loans that was securitized. The CES that bear the
concentrated credit risk typically have below investment-grade credit ratings. By bearing the
first-loss, second-loss, and third-loss credit risk, these securities credit-enhance the
other securities issued by the ABS entity, allowing those credit-enhanced securities to earn high
ratings from credit-rating agencies, thus allowing them to be sold to a wide variety of capital
markets investors. The credit-enhancement securities (CES) bear the initial losses that come from the underlying loan pool, but losses are limited as the maximum
loss for the owner of CES is limited to the investment made in purchasing the CES.
We acquire residential CES at a price that is typically significantly less than the principal value
of the security (typically 10% to 35% of principal value for a first-loss security). The security
typically pays interest at a rate of 3% to 9% of principal value. Our economic return on these
securities is dependant primarily on the amount and timing of credit losses that reduce the
principal value of these residential CES. Secondarily, our investment
returns from owning these assets depend on the prepayment rate of the underlying loans, a faster prepayment rate over time is beneficial.
During the second quarter of 2005, we acquired residential loan CES with a principal value of $146
million and a carrying value of $88 million. Thus far in 2005, we have acquired $251 million
principal value and $156 million carrying value of these CES. This level of acquisition is similar
to our quarterly levels over the past several years. Although increased competition has generally
resulted in higher prices for these assets than in prior years, we are still able to acquire
securities at prices and with characteristics that meet our high quality standards and that we
anticipate will more likely than not meet over time our hurdle rate of 14% annual returns (net discounted present
value of projected cash flows, before overhead). Given our initial credit loss and prepayment rate
assumptions, initial yields for GAAP purposes for some newly acquired assets can be less than 14%.
In the second quarter of 2005, we did not sell residential loan CES. During the first half of
2005, we sold residential loan CES with a principal value of $35 million to third-parties other
than Acacia. Occasionally, we sell securities from this portfolio for portfolio management reasons
or to recycle capital. These sales may reduce the amount of new equity we need to issue to support or
growing operations. We have sold residential CES in the third quarter of 2005 and we anticipate
further sales of these assets during the remainder of 2005.
Residential loan securities become callable as they season, usually when the current balance of the
underlying loans declines to under 10% of the original securitized loan balance. Calls are usually
59
beneficial for us, as we receive a payment for the full principal value of an
asset that, in general, we acquired at a discount to the principal value. Calls typically diminish
future reported earnings per share, however, as it is usually our highest yielding assets that get called.
During the second quarter of 2005, residential loan CES with a principal value of $9 million were
called. Calls totaled $23 million principal value in the first half of 2005. We expect to
realize calls in the second half of 2005 from the $4 million principal value of residential CES we
owned as of June 30, 2005 that were callable and from other CES that will become callable during
2005. Given current prepayment rates, we estimate that approximately $14 million additional
principal value of our existing residential CES could become callable by the year-end 2005. We do
not have an accurate way to determine when or if these securities will be called. However, we
believe call activity and call profits are likely to decline significantly during 2005 relative to
the prior two years as the amount of CES potentially callable has declined.
As a net result of our acquisition, sale, and call activity, the managed loans underlying these
reported residential CES increased from $126 billion at December 31, 2004 to $164 billion at June
30, 2005. (Total managed residential loans, including Sequoia loans, were $183 billion at December
31, 2004 and $183 billion at June 30, 2005.)
There were approximately 403,000 loans underlying these residential credit-enhancement securities
at June 30, 2005, and the average loan balance was $407,000. Loans with a balance over $1 million
made up 6% of the dollar balance of loans. Loans on homes located in California were 44% of these
loan balances, split approximately evenly between northern and southern California. Other states, each of
which represents 3% to 11% of these loans, include Florida, Georgia, New York, New Jersey,
Virginia, Texas, and Colorado. Primary residences represented 92% of these loan balances, second homes
represented 5%, and investor properties represented 3%. Fixed rate loans totaled 45% of the loans,
hybrids totaled 30%, and adjustable rate mortgages totaled 25%. Included in the adjustable rate
loans (18% of the total loans) are loans that allow for negative amortization. Loans that had an
interest-only payment component totaled 23% of the portfolio and included some adjustable rate and
hybrid loans.
Table 18
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities
(all dollars in thousands, except number of underlying loans)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
First loss position, principal value |
|
$ |
425,080 |
|
|
$ |
352,752 |
|
Second loss position, principal value |
|
|
306,145 |
|
|
|
276,720 |
|
Third loss position, principal value |
|
|
372,512 |
|
|
|
304,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal value |
|
$ |
1,103,737 |
|
|
$ |
933,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First loss position, amortized cost |
|
$ |
95,122 |
|
|
$ |
68,675 |
|
Second loss position, amortized cost |
|
|
196,495 |
|
|
|
171,220 |
|
Third loss position, amortized cost |
|
|
311,452 |
|
|
|
243,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortized cost |
|
$ |
603,069 |
|
|
$ |
482,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First loss position, carrying value |
|
$ |
150,621 |
|
|
$ |
110,933 |
|
Second loss position, carrying value |
|
|
228,737 |
|
|
|
195,536 |
|
Third loss position, carrying value |
|
|
326,837 |
|
|
|
255,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying value |
|
$ |
706,195 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We mark residential CES to market value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (but not generally
through our income statement unless we determine there is other-than-temporary impairment under
GAAP). At June 30, 2005, we reported ownership of residential CES acquired from securitizations
sponsored by others with a market value totaling $706 million. This was an increase from the $562
million market value we reported on December 31, 2004. Our acquisitions plus net positive market
value adjustments exceeded calls, sales, and principal pay downs for the first half of 2005.
At June 30, 2005, our adjusted cost basis of reported residential CES was $603 million. At June
30, 2005, the $103 million difference between our adjusted cost basis and our balance sheet
carrying value represented net unrealized market value gains for residential CES (acquiring from others). Net
unrealized market value gains increased during the first half of 2005 by $24 million.
60
The difference between the principal value ($1.1 billion) and adjusted cost basis ($603 million) of
these residential loan CES at June 30, 2005 was $501 million, of which $404 million was designated
as internal credit protection (reflecting our estimate of likely credit losses on the underlying
loans over the life of these securities) while the remaining $96 million represents a purchase
discount we will accrue into income over time. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we
re-designated $25 million of designated credit protection to unamortized discount to be accrued
into income over time (due to strong credit performance and rapid cumulative prepayments on the
underlying loans).
Faster prepayments for the loans underlying recently acquired residential CES have not led to significantly higher yields for GAAP purposes in the near-term as most of the purchase discount balances have been designated as internal credit protection. Since we assume much of this purchase discount will be required to cover credit losses, we do not amortize this purchase discount into income even if prepayment rates are faster than originally anticipated. If credit performance is excellent in the years ahead, we may re-designate the internal credit reserve as discount and amortize it into reported income. If cumulative prepayment rates have been rapid, the yields we recognize for GAAP from these securities after any such re-designation will be higher.
At June 30, 2005, we had $142 million external credit-enhancement and $404 million internally
designated credit protection for this portfolio. External credit protection serves to protect us
from credit losses on a specific asset basis and represents the principal value of interests owned
by others that are junior to specific interests owned by us. The combined balance of external and
internally designated credit protection represented 33 basis points (0.33%) of the $164 billion of
loans underlying our credit-enhancement portfolio. The amount of credit protection and the related
risks are specific to each credit-enhancement interest.
There were $0.6 million credit losses for the underlying loans during the second quarter of 2005
and $2.0 million credit losses during the first half of 2005. Losses borne by external
credit-enhancement for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 totaled $0.2 million. The
annualized rate of credit loss was less than 1 basis point (0.01%) of underlying loans.
Delinquencies (over 90 days, foreclosure, bankruptcy, and real estate owned (REO)) in the
underlying portfolio of residential loans that we credit-enhance through owning these CES were $229
million at June 30, 2005, an increase from $150 million at December 31, 2004. Delinquencies as a
percentage of the residential loans we credit-enhance increased to 0.14% at June 30, 2005 from
0.12% at December 31, 2004.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, we recognized losses due to other-than-temporary
impairment under GAAP of $21,000 and $55,000, respectively. Impairments for the second quarter of
2004 totaled $2.6 million and totaled $3.2 million for the first half of 2004. These losses are
included in net recognized gains and valuation adjustments in our Consolidated Statements of
Income.
Commercial Real Estate Loans
We have been investing in commercial real estate loans since 1998. Our commercial real estate loan
portfolio decreased during the first quarter of 2005 to $42 million at June 30, 2005 from $54
million at December 31, 2004 due to sales, principal pay-downs, and amortization. We plan to make
additional investments in commercial real estate loans, including mezzanine loans, subordinated
(junior or second lien) loans, and B-Notes. (B-Notes represent a structured commercial real estate
loan that retains a higher portion of the credit risk and generates a higher yield than the
initial loan.)
Factors particular to each of our other commercial loans (e.g., lease activity, market rents, and
local economic conditions) could cause credit concerns for our commercial loan portfolio in the
future. If this occurs, we may need to provide for future losses on our commercial loans
held-for-investment. We continually monitor and determine the level of appropriate reserves for our
commercial loans. No additional reserves were required during the second quarter of 2005.
Commercial real estate loans, fair values, and credit reserve requirements are determined by
ongoing evaluations of underlying collateral using current appraisals, other valuations, discounted
cash flow analyses, and other methodologies.
Securities Portfolio
We continue to acquire diverse residential real estate loan securities, commercial real estate loan
securities, equity and debt interests in real estate-oriented CDOs, and corporate bonds issued by
REITs, in each case primarily rated AA, A, BBB, BB, and B. Also included in this portfolio are
commercial real estate CES and non-investment grade interests (equity) in CDOs sponsored by others. We have sold most of our securities portfolio (as reported for GAAP purposes) to Acacia bankruptcy-remote securitization entities. Acacia issues CDO ABS to fund its
acquisition of these assets. We consolidate these Acacias
assets as securities portfolio, and we reflect Acacias issuance of
CDO ABS as ABS obligations on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The increase in the securities portfolio during this quarter was the result of additional
acquisitions of securities for sale to Acacia. Our consolidated securities portfolio totaled $1.7
billion carrying value on June 30, 2005, of which $1.4 billion had been sold to Acacia ABS
securitization entities as of that date. At December 31, 2004, we had $1.4 billion carrying value of these securities, of which $1.3 billion
had been sold to Acacia entities as of that date.
61
We continue to increase the amount of non-investment grade CMBS we acquire. The balance of these
increased to $140 million at June 30, 2005 from $84 million at December 31, 2004. CMBS that are
rated BB and B are subsequently sold to Acacia entities. The first-loss CMBS CES retained at
Redwood had a market value of $23 million at June 30, 2005.
We retain the unrated CMBS and fund them with equity. These non-rated CMBS we define as commercial
CES. The amount of underlying commercial loans that we credit-enhanced through our ownership in
these non-rated CMBS was $12 billion at June 30, 2005, an increase from the $5 billion at December
31, 2004. There were no delinquencies at June 30, 2005, as compared to delinquencies at the
beginning of the year of 1.42% of loans outstanding. We incurred no credit losses in the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005.
In addition to the commercial CES, we also own a $6 million first loss interest in a
re-securitization (re-REMIC) of seasoned CMBS first-loss, second loss, and other CMBS securities.
Some loans underlying the securities that were included in this CMBS re-REMIC have defaulted;
however, since we anticipated these losses at the time of purchase of our re-REMIC asset, we had
appropriately reserved for these credit losses.
We reported other-than-temporary impairments in this portfolio of $0.1 million during the three
months ended June 30, 2005 and $0.1 million for the first six months of 2005. We had no
other-than-temporary impairments during the second quarter or first half of 2004.
The tables below present the types of securities we own as reported in this securities portfolio by
their credit rating as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
Table 19
Consolidated Securities Portfolio Characteristics at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2005 |
|
Total |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB |
|
|
B |
|
|
Unrated |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
299 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
Residential Prime |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Sub-prime |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Second Lien |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufactured Housing |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate REIT Debt |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate CDOs |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities Portfolio |
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
405 |
|
|
$ |
588 |
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
Total |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
AA |
|
|
A |
|
|
BBB |
|
|
BB |
|
|
B |
|
|
Unrated |
|
Commercial real estate |
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
Residential Prime |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Sub-prime |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Second Lien |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufactured Housing |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate REIT Debt |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate CDOs |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities Portfolio |
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Redwoods Debt
We typically use debt to fund the accumulation of assets prior to sale to sponsored ABS
securitization entities (Sequoia and Acacia entities). These accumulated assets are pledged to
secure the associated debt. Our debt levels vary from quarter to quarter based on the timing of
our asset accumulation and securitization activities. During the first half of 2005, as measured daily, our maximum debt level
was $552 million, our minimum debt level was $94 million, and our average debt level was $247
million. These
62
borrowings have maturities of less than one year and interest rates that generally
change monthly based upon a margin over the one-month LIBOR interest rate.
Overall, we believe we maintain a close match between the interest rate characteristics of Redwood
debt and the associated assets. For most of our debt-funded assets (assets acquired for future
sale to sponsored securitization entities or to other financial institutions as whole loans), the floating rate nature of our debt closely matches
the adjustable-rate interest income earning characteristics of the accumulated assets. Not all of
the accumulated assets we acquire are adjustable-rate. We also acquire fixed rate and hybrid
rate securities for re-securitization via our Acacia CDO program, and we may acquire
hybrid rate residential real estate loans in the future for our Sequoia
securitization program. We typically use interest rate agreements to hedge associated interest
rate mismatches when the assets we accumulate for future securitizations that do not match the
interest rate characteristics of our debt.
In March 2005, we formed Madrona Residential Funding, LLC (Madrona), a special purpose entity and
wholly owned subsidiary of RWT Holdings. Madrona gives us the flexibility to access the capital
markets and issue short-term debt instruments to finance the accumulation of loans prior to sale to
sponsored securitization entities. Madrona is designed to fund residential loans accumulated for
eventual sale to our Sequoia securitization program by issuing A1+/P1 rated commercial paper.
Madrona is authorized to accumulate up to $1.5 billion of loans at any time and can warehouse each
loan up to 270 days. There are specific eligibility requirements for financing loans in this
facility that are similar to our existing financing facilities with several bank and large
investment banking firms. There will be a credit reserve account for approximately 70 basis points
that will serve as credit-enhancement to the commercial paper investors. This facility has a
three-year term. There has been no activity in Madrona through June 30, 2005; we anticipate
issuing our first series of commercial paper later this year.
Asset-Backed Securities Issued
Redwood consolidates on its balance sheets the asset-backed securities that are obligations of
those securitization entities that are sponsored by Redwood. These ABS issued are not obligations
of Redwood.
Sequoia
had $18.9 billion asset-backed securities outstanding on June 30, 2005 compared to $21.9
billion on December 31, 2004. Pay downs of existing ABS issued by Sequoia exceeded new issuance
and resulted in the decline in overall balance of Sequoia ABS over this period. However, the
outstanding balances in 2005 were higher than in the same periods as 2004, due to the high level of
securitization activity in 2004.
Acacia entities issue ABS of a type known as CDOs to fund their acquisition of real estate
securities from Redwood. Acacia CDO issuance outstanding was $1.9 billion on June 30, 2005 and
$1.7 billion on December 31, 2004. We issued $0.3 billion of Acacia ABS in the first half of 2005.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, there were
$28.3 million and $53.1 million of Acacia ABS pay downs, respectively. There were no significant pay downs of Acacia ABS during the first half of 2004.
Stockholders Equity
Our reported stockholders equity increased by 15% in the last six months, from $864 million at December 31, 2004 to $992
million at June 30, 2005 as a result of $102 million earnings, $26 million stock issuance, $1
million proceeds from stock option exercises, $2 million non-cash equity adjustments, and a $32
million net increase in the market values of assets that are marked-to-market through our
Consolidated Balance Sheets, offset by $35 million dividends declared.
Depending on our investment portfolio and securitization activity growth, asset sales, and capital
recycling opportunities, we may seek to raise additional equity capital. We issue equity shares
when we believe that opportunities to expand our portfolios are attractive and we believe such
issuance would enhance long-term earnings and dividends per share, compared to what they would be
otherwise. In general, we usually seek to maintain a level of excess equity capital sufficient to
fund three to nine months of anticipated growth.
Certain assets are marked-to-market through accumulated other comprehensive income; these
adjustments affect our book value but not our net income. As of June 30, 2005, we reported a net
accumulated other comprehensive income of $137 million and at December 31, 2004 we reported net
accumulated other comprehensive income of $105 million. Changes in this account reflect increases
in the fair value of our earning assets ($51 million) and interest rate agreements (negative $6
million), and also reflect changes due to calls, sales, and write downs to fair value of a portion of our
securities ($13 million).
63
CASH REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCES OF CASH
We use cash to fund our operating and securitization activities, invest in earning assets, service
and repay Redwood debt, fund working capital, and fund our dividend distributions.
One primary source of cash is principal and interest payments received on a monthly basis from our
real estate portfolio assets. This includes payments received from those ABS that Redwood acquired
from Redwood-sponsored ABS securitizations. Additionally, Redwood uses as sources of cash proceeds
from sales of assets to securitizations entities, proceeds from sales of other assets, Redwood
debt, retained earnings, and issuance of common stock.
Redwood currently uses borrowings solely to finance the accumulation of assets for future sale to
securitization entities. Sources of borrowings for Redwood include repurchase agreements, bank
borrowings, and other forms of collateralized short-term borrowings. We currently intend to also
utilize a collateralized commercial paper facility during 2005. These borrowings are typically
repaid using proceeds received from the sale of assets to securitization entities. For residential
loans, our typical inventory holding period is one to twelve weeks. For securities held for sale
to Acacia CDO securitization entities, our typical holding period is one to six months.
In addition to the cash flows discussed above, our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows also
includes cash flows generated and used by the ABS securitization entities that are consolidated on
to our reported balance sheets. Cash flows generated within these entities are not available to
Redwood, except to the degree that a portion of these cash flows may be due to Redwood as an owner
of one or more of the ABS certificates issued by the entity. Cash flow obligations of and uses
of cash by these ABS entities are not part of Redwoods operations and are not obligations of
Redwood, although a decrease in net cash flow (or an increase in credit losses) generated by an ABS
entity could defer or reduce (or potentially eliminate) interest and/or principal payments
otherwise due to Redwood as an owner of certain more risky ABS issued by the entity.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS
At June 30, 2005, in the ordinary course of business, we had commitments to purchase $26 million of
real estate loans and securities that settled in July 2005. These purchase commitments represent
derivative instruments under FAS No. 149. The value of these commitments was negligible as of June
30, 2005.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The table below presents our contractual obligations and commitments as of June 30, 2005, as well
as the consolidated obligations of the securitization entities that we sponsored and are
consolidated on out balance sheets. The operating leases are commitments that are expensed based on
the terms of the related contracts.
64
Table 20
Contractual Obligations and Commitments as of June 30, 2005
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due or Commitment Expiration By Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1 to 5 |
|
|
After 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
Redwood obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood debt |
|
$ |
452,829 |
|
|
$ |
452,829 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
Purchase commitments securities |
|
|
17,914 |
|
|
|
17,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
commitments whole loans |
|
|
7,731 |
|
|
|
7,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Redwood obligations and commitments |
|
$ |
486,443 |
|
|
$ |
481,249 |
|
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
|
$ |
2,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of securitization entities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated asset-backed securities |
|
$ |
20,814,551 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,814,551 |
|
Accrued interest payable |
|
|
41,290 |
|
|
|
41,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations of securitization entities |
|
$ |
20,855,841 |
|
|
$ |
41,290 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,814,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated obligations and commitments |
|
$ |
21,342,284 |
|
|
$ |
522,539 |
|
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
|
$ |
20,816,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: All consolidated ABS issued are collateralized by associated assets and, although the
stated maturity is as shown, the ABS obligations will pay down as the principal of the associated
real estate loans or securities pay down.
PERMANENT ASSET PORTFOLIO
Managements approach to investments, risk, and returns focuses on managing a portfolio of assets
that are funded with equity. In our opinion these assets are able to generate high-quality,
long-term cash flows without any financial leverage. We refer to these assets as permanent
assets. Management believes that the following discussion of Redwoods permanent asset portfolio (a presentation of our assets that differs from GAAP)
is helpful for a better understanding of our economic risks and rewards.
The bulk of Redwoods economic risk and reward is derived from our permanent assets. Some of these
permanent assets are included for GAAP purposes in our reported residential CES and securities portfolio (i.e., commercial
CES). Others may not be specifically identifiable on our Consolidated Balance Sheets (due to
financing treatment of our sponsored securitizations) and include the residential CES and IO
securities we create through our Sequoia program and the CDO equity we create through our Acacia
program.
Our permanent assets are characterized below along with an explanation of how these assets and any
associated liabilities are presented in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
CES and IO securities acquired from Sequoia entities: These do not appear explicitly on
our balance sheets but they are represented on our balance sheets as the difference between
residential loans ($19.1 billion) plus HELOCs ($247 million) securitized and consolidated on
our balance sheets and ABS issued ($18.9 million) by the securitization
entities. The market value of these permanent assets is estimated at
$129 million at June
30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Residential CES rated B or non-rated acquired from ABS securitizations sponsored by
others and held as permanent assets: These securities appear on our balance sheets at market value (estimated at $348
million as of June 30, 2005) within our residential CES portfolio. This amount does not include B-rated residential CES that have been sold to Acacia. |
|
|
|
|
Interests in commercial real estate loans: Some of these do not appear explicitly on
our balance sheets but they are represented on our balance sheets as the difference
between commercial loans ($15 million) consolidated on our balance sheets
and ABS issued ($4 million). Commercial loan permanent assets have an estimated market value at
June 30, 2005 of $11 million. |
65
|
|
|
Investments in the equity of the Acacia securitizations we sponsor: These assets do not appear explicitly on
our balance sheets but they are represented on our balance sheets as the difference between
securities ($1.7 billion) securitized and consolidated on our balance sheets as well as
securities acquired from Sequoia entities ($0.3 billion, which do not appear explicitly on our balance
sheets) and ABS issued ($1.9 billion) by these securitization entities. The
securities within Acacia and consolidated on our balance sheets generally have credit
ratings of AAA through B. Our permanent assets that are investments in these Acacia entities had an estimated market value of
$94 million at June 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Commercial loan CES and re-REMIC securities: These permanent assets are reported at market value
on our balance sheets within our securities portfolio. At June 30, 2005, commercial loan
CES had an estimated market value of $23 million and commercial re-REMIC securities had an estimated
market value of $6 million. |
|
|
|
|
Other securities such as CDO equity acquired from securitizations sponsored
by others, residential IO securities purchased from securitizations
sponsored by others, and certain investment-grade commercial
real estate securities held as permanent investment: These are reported on our balance sheets at market value within the securities
portfolio. At June 30, 2005, these permanent assets other
securities had an estimated market value of $10 million. |
We also earn net interest income from our inventory assets, which are not part of our
permanent asset portfolio. These are assets acquired by us for future sale (typically within four
months although it could be longer) to a securitization entity or to another financial institution. We fund our inventory with equity and with short-term debt. Our inventory is characterized below.
|
|
|
Our inventory residential loans ($300 million) and HELOCs ($0.1 million) funded with equity
or Redwood debt ($205 million). These generally stay in inventory less than three months
prior to the sale to a Sequoia entity or a financial institution. |
|
|
|
|
Diverse residential and commercial real estate securities ($361 million), generally with
credit ratings of AAA through B that were acquired on a temporary basis as inventory for
future sale to ABS securitization entities (Acacia). We fund these assets with equity and
Redwood debt ($248 million). These are reported as part of our
residential CES portfolio and our securities portfolio on our
balance sheets. |
MARKET RISKS
We seek to manage the risks inherent in our business including credit risk, liquidity risk,
interest rate risk, prepayment risk, market value risk, reinvestment risk, and capital risk in a
prudent manner designed to insure Redwoods longevity. At the same time, we endeavor, to the best
of our ability, to provide our stockholders with both a steady regular dividend and an attractive
long-term return. In general, we seek to assume risks that can be quantified from historical
experience, to actively manage such risks, to earn sufficient compensation to justify the taking of
such risks, and to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we do take. We believe our
quantitative risk has not materially changed from our disclosures under Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
Credit Risk
Assuming the credit risk of real estate loans is our primary business. We assume credit risk with
respect to residential real estate loans primarily through the ownership of residential CES and
similarly structured securities acquired from securitizations sponsored by others and from Sequoia
securitizations sponsored by us. These securities have below investment-grade credit ratings due to
their high degree of credit risk with respect to the residential real estate loans within the
securitization entities that issued these securities. Credit losses from any of the loans in the
securitized loan pools reduce the principal value of and economic returns from residential CES.
We are highly leveraged in an economic sense due to the structured leverage within the securities
we own, as the amount of residential and commercial real estate loans on which we take first-loss
risk is high relative to our equity capital base. However, our maximum credit loss from these
assets (excluding loans and securities held temporarily as inventory for securitization) is limited
and is less than our equity capital base. The majority of our credit risk comes from high-quality
residential real estate loans. This includes residential real estate loans consolidated from ABS
securitizations from which we have acquired a credit-sensitive ABS security, and loans we
effectively guarantee or insure through the acquisitions of residential loan CES from
securitizations sponsored by others. We are also exposed to credit risks in our
66
commercial real estate loan portfolio, the first-loss commercial real estate securities we own,
our other residential and commercial real estate securities, and with counter-parties with whom we
do business.
Credit losses on residential real estate loans can occur for many reasons, including: poor
origination practices; fraud; faulty appraisals; documentation errors; poor underwriting; legal
errors; poor servicing practices; weak economic conditions; decline in the value of homes; special
hazards; earthquakes and other natural events; over-leveraging of the borrower; changes in legal
protections for lenders; reduction in personal incomes; job loss; and personal events such as
divorce or health problems. In addition, if the U.S. economy or the housing market weakens, our
credit losses could be increased beyond levels that we have anticipated. The interest rate is
adjustable for the bulk of the loans securitized by securitization trusts sponsored by us and for a
portion of the loans underlying residential CES we have acquired from securitizations sponsored by
others. Accordingly, when short-term interest rates rise, required monthly payments from homeowners
will rise under the terms of these adjustable-rate mortgages, and this may increase borrowers
delinquencies and defaults. In addition, a portion of the loans we credit-enhance are interest-only
and negative amortization loans, which may have special credit risks. If we incur increased credit
losses, our taxable income would be reduced, our GAAP earnings might be reduced, and our cash
flows, asset market values, access to short-term borrowings (typically used to acquire assets for
sale to securitization entities), and our ability to securitize assets might be harmed. The amount
of capital and cash reserves that we hold to help us manage credit and other risks may prove to be
insufficient to protect us from earnings volatility, dividend cuts, liquidity issues, and solvency
issues.
Credit losses could also reduce our ability to sponsor new securitizations of residential loans. We
generally expect to increase our portfolio of residential CES and our credit exposure to the
residential real estate loan pools that underlie these securities.
In addition to residential CES, the Acacia entities we sponsor own investment-grade and other
securities (typically rated AAA through B, and in a second-loss position or better, or otherwise
effectively more senior in the credit structure as compared to a residential CES or equivalent held
by us) issued by residential securitization entities that are sponsored by others. Generally, we do
not control or influence the underwriting, servicing, management, or loss mitigation efforts with
respect to these assets. Some of the securities Acacia owns are backed by sub-prime loans that
have substantially higher risk characteristics than prime-quality loans. These lower-quality loans
can be expected to have higher rates of delinquency and loss, and losses to Acacia (and thus
Redwood) could occur. Most of Acacias securities are reported as part of our consolidated
securities portfolio on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Acacia has also acquired investment-grade
BB-rated, and B-rated residential loan securities from the Sequoia securitization entities we have
sponsored. The probability of incurring a credit loss on these securities is less than the
probability of loss from first-loss residential CES, as cumulative credit losses within a pool of
securitized loans would have to exceed the principal value of the subordinated CES (and exhaust any
other credit protections) before losses would be allocated to the Acacia securities. If the pools
of residential loans underlying these securities were to experience poor credit results, however,
these Acacia securities could have their credit ratings down-graded, could suffer losses in market
value, or could experience principal losses. If any of these events occurs, it would likely reduce
our returns from the Acacia CDO equity securities we have acquired and may reduce our ability to
sponsor Acacia transactions in the future.
Liquidity Risk
Redwoods debt was $453 million at June 30, 2005. This debt was secured by loans accumulated as
inventory for future sale to Sequoia (or as whole loans to another financial institution) and securities and loans accumulated as inventory for sale to Acacia bankruptcy-remote ABS securitization entities. The
assets securing this debt were high-quality residential real estate loans and (mostly investment
grade) real estate loan securities.
Covenants associated with a portion of our short-term debt generally relate to our tangible net
worth, liquidity reserves, and leverage requirements. We have not had, nor do we currently
anticipate having, any problems in meeting these covenants. However, many factors, including ones
external to us, may affect our ability to meet these covenants and may affect our liquidity in the
future.
Our ability to sponsor securitizations depends upon being able to access the short-term debt
markets to fund assets acquired as inventory prior to sale to sponsored ABS securitization
entities. If short-term debt was not available in the future, we would likely need to cease our
securitization sponsorship activities, and a potentially attractive source of new assets for our
permanent assets portfolio and a source of gain-on-sale profits (for tax and cash) for our taxable
subsidiaries would be lost during that time. Assets consolidated onto our balance sheet from ABS
entities would generally not be affected by a lack of liquidity in the debt markets (or changes in
asset market values) since these assets are already sold to and
67
financed to maturity by the ABS entity. If sales to ABS entities became an unavailable or
unattractive exit strategy due to issues within securitization markets, and if we cannot extend our
short-term financing arrangements, assets held as inventory for future securitization and financed
with debt would have to be sold, most likely at a loss. Proceeds from any such sales may not be
sufficient to repay debt balances.
At this time, we see no material negative trends that we believe would affect our access to
sufficient short-term borrowings or would affect the valuation of the assets we use to secure these
borrowings. We plan to continue to utilize short-term borrowings to accumulate real estate loans
and securities as inventory prior to sale to ABS entities.
We own ABS certificates issued from ABS securitization entities (such as Sequoia and Acacia) that
were sponsored by us. Payments of principal and interest by these entities to the holders of ABS
issued by these entities are not the legal obligation of Redwood. We could lose the entire
investment we have made in the securities we acquire from these entities, but we will not be
required to provide liquidity in the event of a default of one of these entities on the entities
asset-backed securities obligations.
As the seller of assets to these entities prior to securitization, in some cases we have the
obligation under representation and warranty provisions to repurchase assets from the entities in
limited circumstances such as fraud. We have obtained, however, similar representations and
warranties from the companies from whom we acquired loans. As a result, our liquidity risk from
representations and warranties should be minimal as long as our counter-parties meet their
obligations. We believe our sponsorship of these entities, and our ownership of interests in these
entities, is unlikely to be a source of potential liquidity risk for us.
At June 30, 2005, we had $263 million unrestricted cash and unpledged liquid assets available to
meet potential liquidity needs. Thus, total available liquidity equaled 58% of our short-term debt
balances. Increases or decreases in this ratio at different balance sheet dates primarily are the
result of the timing of sale of assets to securitization entities. While we anticipate maintaining
a strong liquidity position, our ratio of liquid assets to short-term debt will fluctuate from
quarter to quarter as we continue to fund our residential real estate loans and other securities
with short-term borrowings prior to securitization. At this time, we see no indications or
materially negative trends that we believe would be likely to cause us a liquidity shortage.
Net liquidity at June 30, 2005 was $268 million. Net liquidity is the amount of unrestricted cash
we would have had on hand if we had sold all the loans and securities we are accumulating for
future sale at their estimated market value ($649 million on June 30, 2005) and used the
proceeds to pay off Redwoods debt ($453 million on June 30, 2005). Net liquidity is available for
cash needs such as dividend distributions, acquiring new permanent assets, and supporting our
securitization efforts.
Under our internal risk-adjusted capital guidelines, $148 million of this net liquidity at June 30,
2005 was excess liquidity available to support growth in our business. The remainder of the net
liquidity balance was required under our risk-adjusted capital guidelines to support our current
and projected sales inventory and other operating needs and liquidity risks (such as the
risk of requiring cash to post as margin for interest rate agreements if interest rates move
adversely for these agreements).
Interest Rate Risk
Our strategy is to maintain an asset/liability posture on a consolidated basis (including assets
owned by and the ABS issued by consolidated securitization entities, to the extent that any
mismatches within the entities could affect our cash flows) that is effectively match-funded so
that the achievement of our long-term goals is unlikely to be affected by changes in interest
rates. In general, the interest rate characteristics of the ABS issued by consolidated
securitization entities, as adjusted for outstanding interest rate agreements, closely matches the
interest rate characteristics of the assets owned by those entities.
At June 30, 2005, we consolidated $21.0 billion adjustable-rate ABS collateralized by
adjustable-rate assets and $0.2 billion fixed/hybrid rate ABS collateralized by consolidated
fixed/hybrid rate assets. For interest rate matching purposes, these assets and liabilities are
closely matched. At June 30, 2005, we owned the IO security, CDO equity, or similar security that
economically benefits from the spread between the assets and the liabilities of the issuing
securitization entity on a portion of these consolidated entities. These assets and liabilities
are closely matched economically and to the degree there is a mismatch we attempt to reduce this
mismatch through the use of interest rate agreements. For the remainder of the consolidated ABS
entities, we do not own the security that benefits from the asset/liability spread. Thus, spread
changes between the yield of these assets and the cost of these liabilities do not affect Redwoods
economic profits or cash flow (although timing differences for those assets and liabilities may cause GAAP earnings volatility). As a result, we do not utilize interest rate agreements with respect to
68
interest rate mismatches that may exist between these assets and liabilities on these other
consolidated ABS entities.
The remainder of our consolidated assets at June 30, 2005 ($12 million six-month adjustable-rate
assets, $52 million short-term fixed rate assets, $797 million hybrid and fixed-rate assets,
and $87 million non-earning assets) were effectively funded for interest rate matching purposes
with equity. The table below summarizes the matching of our reported assets, as adjusted for our interest
rate agreements and other hedging instruments. There was no significant change in our position
since the beginning of the year.
Even if our assets and liabilities are effectively matched in an economic sense, volatility in
reported earnings on a quarter-to-quarter basis could result from changes in interest rates.
Table 21
Asset / Liability Matching at June 30, 2005
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- |
|
|
Six- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
|
|
Month |
|
|
Fixed/ |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Asset |
|
Asset |
|
|
LIBOR |
|
|
LIBOR |
|
|
Hybrid |
|
|
Bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
And |
|
Type |
|
Amount |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Equity |
|
Cash (unrestricted) |
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
One-Month LIBOR |
|
|
6,185 |
|
|
|
6,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,185 |
|
Six-Month LIBOR |
|
|
14,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14,567 |
|
Other ARM |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
Fixed / Hybrid < 1yr* |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Fixed / Hybrid > 1yr |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
Non-Earning Assets |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
22,346 |
|
|
$ |
6,494 |
|
|
$ |
14,555 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
991 |
|
|
$ |
22,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Projected principal receipts on fixed-rate and hybrid rate assets over the next twelve months. |
69
At December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One- |
|
|
Six- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month |
|
|
Month |
|
|
Fixed/ |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Asset |
|
Asset |
|
|
LIBOR |
|
|
LIBOR |
|
|
Hybrid |
|
|
Bearing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
And |
|
Type |
|
Amount |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Equity |
|
Cash (unrestricted) |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
One-Month LIBOR |
|
|
6,314 |
|
|
|
6,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,314 |
|
Six-Month LIBOR |
|
|
16,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16,974 |
|
Other ARM |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Fixed / Hybrid < 1yr* |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Fixed / Hybrid > 1yr |
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
Non-Earning Assets |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
24,778 |
|
|
$ |
6,656 |
|
|
$ |
16,959 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
864 |
|
|
$ |
24,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Projected principal receipts on fixed-rate and hybrid rate assets over the next twelve months. |
Prepayment Risk
We seek to maintain an asset/liability posture that benefits from investments in
prepayment-sensitive assets while limiting the risk of adverse prepayment fluctuations to an amount
that, in most circumstances, can be absorbed by our capital base while still allowing us to make
regular dividend payments.
We believe there is a relatively low likelihood of prepayment risk events occurring within our
securitization inventory assets, as we typically sell these loans within a few months of acquiring
them. However, changes in prepayment forecasts by market participants could affect the market
prices for ABS (especially IO securities) sold by these securitization entities, and
thus could affect the gain on sale (for economic and tax purposes (not for GAAP purposes) that we
seek to earn from sponsoring these securitizations.
With respect to other consolidated assets, there could be prepayment risks that arise due to the
interaction of these assets and associated liabilities. In general, discount securities (such as
CES) benefit from faster prepayment rates on the underlying real estate loans and premium
securities (such as IO securities) benefit from slower prepayments on the underlying loans. Our
largest current potential exposure to changes in prepayment rates is from short-term residential
ARM loans. However, as of June 30, 2005, our premium balances on IO securities backed by ARM loans are less
than our discount balances on residential CES backed by ARM loans. As a result, we believe that as of June
30, 2005, we are slightly biased in favor of faster prepayment speeds with respect to the long-term
economic effect of ARM prepayments. However, in the short-term, for GAAP, changes in ARM prepayment rates
could cause reported earnings volatility.
ARM prepayment rates are driven by many factors, one of which is the steepness of the yield curve.
As the yield curve flattens (short-term interest rates rise relative to longer-term interest
rates), ARM prepayments typically increase. Prepayment rates on the ARMs underlying the
Redwood-sponsored Sequoia securitizations increased from near 25% to over 40% over the last year as
the yield curve flattened.
Through our ownership of discount residential CES backed by fixed rate and hybrid residential
loans, we generally benefit from faster prepayments on fixed and hybrid loans. Prepayment rates
for these loans typically accelerate as medium and long-term interest rates decline.
Prepayments can also affect our credit results and risks. Credit risks for the CES we own are
reduced each time a loan prepays. All other factors being equal, faster prepayment rates should
reduce our credit risks on our existing portfolio.
Prepayments affect GAAP earnings in the near-term primarily through amortization of purchase
premium and discount. Amortization income from discount assets may not necessarily offset
amortization expenses from premium assets, and vice-versa. Variations in current and projected
prepayment rates for
70
individual assets and changes in short-term interest rates (as they affect projected coupons on
adjustable rate mortgages and thus change effective yield calculations) may cause net premium
amortization expense or net discount amortization income to vary substantially from quarter to
quarter.
Reinvestment Risk and Competition
Reinvestment risk is the risk that the assets we acquire in the future (to maintain our asset size
as we reinvest principal payments received from our current assets) will not be as attractive as
the assets we own today. This is one of the most potent risks we face.
Although many of our securities do not currently receive principal payments as the underlying loan
pools pay down (they are temporarily locked out), the eventual receipt of principal payments is
accelerated by faster prepayments. In addition, residential CES typically become callable when the
current balance of the underlying loans pays down to 10% of the original balance. Faster
prepayments generally lead to more rapid principal repayments and calls that will need to be
reinvested.
Most of our existing assets have an expected average life of three to ten years. As a result, our
short-term results (one to three years) will likely be determined primarily by our current
portfolio of assets. Our longer-term results (and our ability to maintain regular dividend
payments in the long term) will be determined primarily by assets we have yet to buy and actions we
have yet to take.
During 2004 and the first half of 2005, we experienced increased competition (especially from
banks, but also from Wall Street conduits, REITs, hedge funds, and other financial institutions) to
acquire assets at the same time that originations of new assets are declining. We expect this
increased level of competition to continue. The result is lower expected yields for new investment
assets and lower expected securitization profit margins for sales of inventory to sponsored
securitizations. As a result, we expect that our reported GAAP earnings per share and our special
dividends per share are more likely than not to decline over the next few years from recent levels
as our current permanent asset portfolio pays down and are replaced with new assets with a lower
yield potential.
Market Value Risk
At June 30, 2005, we reported on a consolidated basis $2.4 billion of assets that were
marked-to-market through our balance sheet (i.e., available for sale securities) but not through
our income statement. Of these assets, 59% had adjustable-rate coupons, 19% had hybrid coupon
rates, and the remaining 22% had fixed coupon rates. Many of these assets are credit-sensitive.
Market value fluctuations of these assets can affect the balance of our stockholders equity base.
Market value fluctuations for our securities can affect not only our earnings and book value, but
also our liquidity, especially to the extent these assets may be funded with short-term borrowings
prior to securitization.
Most of our consolidated real estate assets are loans accounted for as held-for-investment and
reported at cost. Although these loans have generally been sold to Sequoia entities at
securitization and, thus, changes in the market value of the loans do not have an impact on our
liquidity in the long-term, changes in market value during the accumulation period (while these
loans are funded with debt) may have a short-term effect on our liquidity.
We use interest rate agreements to manage certain interest rate risks. Our interest rate
agreements are reported at market value, with any periodic changes reported through either our
income statement or in our balance sheet. Adverse changes in the market values of our interest
rate agreements (which would generally be caused by falling interest rates) may require us to
devote additional amounts of cash to margin calls.
Inflation Risk
Virtually all of our consolidated assets and liabilities are financial in nature. As a result,
interest rates, changes in interest rates, and other factors drive our performance far more than
does inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate with inflation rates or
changes in inflation rates.
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP and, as a REIT; our dividends must
equal at least 90% of our net REIT taxable income as calculated for tax purposes. In each case, our
activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost or fair market value
without considering inflation.
71
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during
the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The critical accounting
policies and how changes in estimates might affect our financial results and statements are
discussed below. Management discusses the ongoing development and selection of these critical
accounting policies with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
Revenue Recognition and Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
When recognizing revenue on consolidated earning assets, we employ the interest method and
determine an effective yield to account for purchase premiums, discounts, and other net capitalized
fees or costs associated with purchasing and financing real estate loans and securities. For
consolidated real estate loans, the interest method is applied as prescribed under FAS 91. For
loans acquired prior to July 1, 2004, the interest method or effective yield is determined using
interest rates as they change over time and future anticipated principal prepayments. For loans
acquired subsequent to that date, the initial interest rate of the loans and future anticipated
principal prepayments are used in determining the effective yield. For our consolidated
securities, the interest method to determine an effective yield is applied as prescribed under FAS
91 or EITF 99-20 using anticipated principal prepayments. The use of these methods requires us to
project cash flows over the remaining life of each asset. These projections include assumptions
about interest rates, prepayment rates, timing and amount of credit losses, when certain tests will
be met that may allow for changes in payments made under the structure of securities, estimates
regarding the likelihood and timing of calls of securities at par, and other factors. We review
our cash flow projections on an ongoing basis and monitor these projections based on input and
analyses received from external sources, internal models, and our own judgment and experience. We
constantly review our assumptions and make adjustments to the cash flows as deemed necessary.
There can be no assurance that our assumptions used to generate future cash flows, or the current
periods yield for each asset, will prove to be accurate.
Our consolidated residential loan CES have below-investment-grade credit ratings and represent
subordinated interests in pools of high-quality jumbo residential real estate loans. As a result
of the relatively high credit risks of these investments, we are able to purchase CES at a discount
to principal (par) value. A portion of the purchase discount is subsequently accreted as interest
income under the interest method while the remaining portion of the purchase discount is considered
as a form of credit protection. The amount of credit protection is based upon our assessment of
various factors affecting our assets, including economic conditions, characteristics of the
underlying loans, delinquency status, past performance of similar loans, and external credit
protection. We use a variety of internal and external credit risk analyses, cash flow modeling,
and portfolio analytical tools to assist us in our assessments.
Under the interest method, decreases in our credit loss assumptions embedded in our cash flow
forecasts could result in increasing yields being recognized from residential loan CES. In
addition, faster-than-anticipated prepayment rates would also tend to increase realized yields over
the remaining life of an asset. In contrast, increases in our credit loss assumptions and/or
slower than anticipated prepayment rates could result in lower yields being recognized under the
interest method and may represent a other-than-temporary impairment under GAAP, in which case the
asset may be written down to its fair value through our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Redwood applies APB 21 and APB 12 in determining its periodic amortization for the premium on its
debt, including the issuance of IO securities and deferred bond issuance cost (DBIC). We arrive at
a periodic interest cost that represents a level effective rate on the sum of the face amount of
the ABS issued and (plus or minus) the unamortized premium or discount at the beginning of each
period. The difference between the periodic interest cost so calculated and the nominal interest
on the outstanding amount of the ABS issued is the amount of periodic amortization. Prepayment
assumptions used in modeling the underlying assets to determine accretion or amortization of
discount or premium for FAS 91 are used in developing the cash flows that are used to determine ABS
issued premium amortization and DBIC expenses.
Establishing Valuations and Accounting for Changes in Valuations
We estimate fair value of assets and interest rate agreements using available market information
and other appropriate valuation methodologies. We believe estimates we use reflect market values
we may be able to receive should we choose to sell assets. Our estimates are inherently subjective
in nature and
72
involve matters of uncertainty and judgment in interpreting relevant market and other
data. Many factors are necessary to estimate market values, including, but not limited to,
interest rates, prepayment rates, amount and timing of credit losses, supply and demand, liquidity,
and other market factors. We apply these factors to each of our assets, as appropriate, in order
to determine market values. Residential real estate loans held-for-sale are generally valued on a
pool basis while commercial real estate loans held-for-sale and securities available-for-sale are
valued on a loan-specific basis.
In addition to our valuation processes, we are active acquirers and occasional sellers of assets on
our consolidated balance sheets. Thus, we believe that we have the ability to understand and
determine changes in assumptions that are taking place in the marketplace and make appropriate
changes in our assumptions for valuing assets. In addition, we use third party sources to validate
our valuation estimates.
Valuation adjustments to real estate loans held-for-sale are reported as net recognized losses and
valuation adjustments on our Consolidated Statements of Income in the applicable period of the
adjustment. Adjustments to the fair value of securities available-for-sale are reported through
our Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in
stockholders equity within the cumulative unrealized gains and losses classified as accumulated
other comprehensive income. The exception to this treatment of securities available-for-sale is
when a specific impairment is identified or a decrease in fair value results from a decline in
estimated cash flows that is considered other-than-temporary. In such cases, the resulting
decrease in fair value is recorded in net recognized gains (losses) and valuation adjustments on
our Consolidated Statements of Income in the applicable period of the adjustment.
We review our fair value calculations on an ongoing basis. We monitor the critical performance
factors for each loan and security. Our expectations of future performance are shaped by input and
analyses received from external sources, internal models, and our own judgment and experience. We
review our existing assumptions relative to our and the markets expectations of future events and
make adjustments to the assumptions that may change our market values. Changes in perceptions
regarding future events can have a material impact on the value of our assets. Should such changes
or other factors result in significant changes in the market values, our net income and book value
could be adversely affected.
There are certain other valuation estimates we make that have an impact on current period income
and expense. One such area is the valuation of certain equity grants. There are several different
accounting principles presenting appropriate treatment. FAS 123R will become the appropriate
principle effective January 1, 2006. We do not believe this application will have a material
impact on our future expense calculations for outstanding options.
Credit Reserves
For consolidated residential and commercial real estate loans held-for-investment, we establish and
maintain credit reserves that we believe represent probable credit losses that will result from
inherent losses existing in our consolidated residential and commercial real estate loans held for
investment as of the date of the financial statements. The reserves for credit losses are adjusted
by taking provisions for credit losses recorded as a reduction in interest income on residential
and commercial real estate loans on our Consolidated Statements of Income. The reserves consist of
estimates of specific loan impairment and estimates of collective losses on pools of loans with
similar characteristics.
To calculate the credit reserve for credit losses for residential real estate loans and HELOCs, we
determine inherent losses by applying loss factors (default, the timing of defaults, and the loss
severity upon default) that can be specifically applied to each pool of loans. The following
factors are considered and applied in such determination:
|
|
|
On-going analysis of the pool of loans including, but not limited to, the age of the
loans, underwriting standards, business climate, economic conditions, geographic
considerations, and other observable data; |
|
|
|
|
Historical loss rates and past performance of similar loans; |
|
|
|
|
Relevant environmental factors; |
|
|
|
|
Relevant market research and publicly available third-party reference loss rates; |
|
|
|
|
Trends in delinquencies and charge-offs; |
|
|
|
|
Effects in changes in credit concentrations; and |
|
|
|
|
Prepayment assumptions. |
Once we determine the applicable default rate, the timing of defaults, and the severity of loss
upon the default, we estimate the expected losses of each pool of loans over their expected lives.
We then
73
estimate the timing of these losses and the losses probable to occur over an effective loss
confirmation period. This period is defined as the range of time between the probable occurrence
of a credit loss (such as the initial deterioration of the borrowers financial condition) and the
confirmation of that loss (the actual charge-off of the loan). The losses expected to occur within
the effective loss confirmation period are the basis of our credit reserves because we believe
those losses exist as of the reported date of the financial statements. We re-evaluate the level
of our credit reserves on at least a quarterly basis and record provision, charge-offs, and
recoveries monthly.
The credit reserve for credit losses for the commercial real estate loans includes a detailed
analysis of each loan and underlying property. The following factors are considered and applied in
such determination.
|
|
|
On-going analysis of each individual loan |
|
|
|
|
On-going evaluation of fair values of collateral using current appraisals and other valuations |
|
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow analysis |
|
|
|
|
Perfection of security interest |
|
|
|
|
Borrowers ability to meet obligations |
If residential loan becomes REO or a commercial loan becomes impaired, or loans are reclassified as
held-for-sale, specific valuations are primarily based on analyses of the underlying collateral.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments (Interest Rate Agreements)
We use derivative instruments to manage certain risks such as market value risk and interest rate
risk. Currently, the majority of our interest rate agreements are used to match the duration of
liabilities to assets. The derivative instruments we employ include, but are not limited to,
interest rate swaps, interest rate options, options on swaps, futures contracts, options on futures
contracts, options on forward purchases, and other similar derivatives. We collectively refer to
these derivative instruments as interest rate agreements.
On the date an interest rate agreement is entered into, we designate each interest rate agreement
under GAAP as (1) a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an
unrecognized firm commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the
variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash
flow hedge), or (3) held for trading (trading instrument).
We currently elect to account for the bulk of our interest rate agreements as cash flow hedges; the
remainders are accounted for as trading instruments. We record these derivatives at their
estimated fair market value, and record changes in their fair value in accumulated other
comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts are reclassified to our
Consolidated Statements of Income over the effective hedge period as the hedged item affects
earnings. Any ineffective portions of these cash flow hedges are included in our Consolidated
Statements of Income and any changes in the market value on our hedges designated as trading
instruments.
We may discontinue GAAP hedge accounting prospectively when we determine that (1) the derivative is
no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item; (2) it
is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur; (3) a hedged firm commitment no
longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or (4) designating the derivative as a hedging
instrument is no longer appropriate.
The discontinued hedge accounting may result in recognition of certain gains or losses immediately
through out Consolidated Statements of Income, or such gains or losses may be accreted from
accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings over the original hedging period.
Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Discussions about our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included in
our Managements Discussion and Analysis included herein.
Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the
effectiveness of the design
74
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as that term
is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that
evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of
June 30, 2005, which is the end of the period covered by this 10-Q, our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
There has been no change in Redwoods internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rule 13a-15 that occurred
during the quarter ended June 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, Redwoods internal control over financial reporting.
75
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Of Shares Available |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
For Purchase Under |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Announced Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
|
|
April 1 - April 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 - May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1 - June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
No shares were purchased for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The Company
announced stock repurchase plans on various dates from September 1997 through November 1999
for the total repurchase of 7,455,000 shares. None of these plans have expiration dates on
repurchases. Shares totaling 1,000,000 are currently available for repurchase under those
plans.
Item 4. Submission Of Matters To a Vote Of Security Holders
The
2005 annual meeting of shareholders of Redwood Trust, Inc. was held on May 5, 2005. The election of directors was the sole matter voted on at that annual meeting. Results of
the election were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes |
Nominee |
|
For |
|
|
Withheld |
|
|
|
|
Douglas B. Hansen |
|
|
19,764,155 |
|
|
|
145,660 |
|
Greg H. Kubicek |
|
|
19,681,592 |
|
|
|
228,222 |
|
Charles J. Toeniskoetter |
|
|
19,745,712 |
|
|
|
164,103 |
|
The following Directors term of office continues after the meeting:
Richard D. Baum
George E. Bull
Mariann Byerwalter
David L. Tyler
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit 11.1
|
|
Computation of Earnings per Share for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005 (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith) |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith) |
|
|
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith) |
76
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
|
|
Dated: August 4, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Douglas B. Hansen
|
|
|
|
Douglas B. Hansen |
|
|
|
President
(authorized officer of registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 4, 2005 |
By: |
/s/ Harold F. Zagunis
|
|
|
|
Harold F. Zagunis |
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Controller, Treasurer, and Secretary
(principal financial and
accounting officer) |
|
|
77