UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2005 |
OR |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number: 1-13759
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland |
|
68-0329422 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
One Belvedere Place, Suite 300
|
|
94941 |
Mill Valley, California
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
|
(415) 389-7373
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all documents and reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes
þ No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of stock, as of the last practicable date.
|
|
Common Stock ($0.01 par value per share) |
24,825,475 as of November 3, 2005 |
REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
Residential real estate loans
|
|
$ |
16,341,180 |
|
|
$ |
22,208,417 |
|
Residential home equity lines of credit
|
|
|
215,137 |
|
|
|
296,348 |
|
Residential loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
664,801 |
|
|
|
561,658 |
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
56,102 |
|
|
|
54,479 |
|
Commercial loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
43,540 |
|
|
|
14,498 |
|
Securities portfolio
|
|
|
1,783,429 |
|
|
|
1,380,077 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
163,160 |
|
|
|
57,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Earning Assets
|
|
|
19,267,349 |
|
|
|
24,572,723 |
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
58,796 |
|
|
|
36,038 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
79,958 |
|
|
|
72,459 |
|
Interest rate agreements
|
|
|
25,422 |
|
|
|
16,144 |
|
Principal receivable
|
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
2,653 |
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
7,679 |
|
|
|
10,572 |
|
Deferred asset-backed security issuance costs
|
|
|
56,391 |
|
|
|
60,993 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
8,850 |
|
|
|
6,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
19,505,974 |
|
|
$ |
24,778,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood debt
|
|
$ |
161,739 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
Asset-backed securities issued
|
|
|
18,237,792 |
|
|
|
23,630,162 |
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
42,205 |
|
|
|
35,064 |
|
Interest rate agreements
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
1,124 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
30,482 |
|
|
|
28,095 |
|
Dividends payable
|
|
|
17,335 |
|
|
|
16,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
18,489,909 |
|
|
|
23,913,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
50,000,000 shares authorized; 24,764,404 and 24,153,576
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
808,107 |
|
|
|
773,222 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
117,043 |
|
|
|
105,357 |
|
Cumulative earnings
|
|
|
638,983 |
|
|
|
481,607 |
|
Cumulative distributions to stockholders
|
|
|
(548,316 |
) |
|
|
(496,272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
1,016,065 |
|
|
|
864,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
$ |
19,505,974 |
|
|
$ |
24,778,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
3
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
$ |
190,599 |
|
|
$ |
149,238 |
|
|
$ |
589,032 |
|
|
$ |
361,688 |
|
Residential home equity lines of credit
|
|
|
2,206 |
|
|
|
1,882 |
|
|
|
7,101 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
Residential loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
24,368 |
|
|
|
16,007 |
|
|
|
63,431 |
|
|
|
47,617 |
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
3,819 |
|
|
|
2,607 |
|
Commercial loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
Securities portfolio
|
|
|
22,926 |
|
|
|
12,932 |
|
|
|
60,356 |
|
|
|
32,992 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
2,374 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income before provision for credit losses
|
|
|
242,751 |
|
|
|
181,618 |
|
|
|
727,803 |
|
|
|
448,445 |
|
Reversal of (provision for) credit losses
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
(5,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
243,556 |
|
|
|
180,090 |
|
|
|
729,110 |
|
|
|
442,906 |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood debt
|
|
|
(3,845 |
) |
|
|
(2,312 |
) |
|
|
(8,398 |
) |
|
|
(7,373 |
) |
Asset-backed securities issued
|
|
|
(192,841 |
) |
|
|
(112,499 |
) |
|
|
(559,435 |
) |
|
|
(277,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
(196,686 |
) |
|
|
(114,811 |
) |
|
|
(567,833 |
) |
|
|
(284,747 |
) |
Net Interest Income
|
|
|
46,870 |
|
|
|
65,279 |
|
|
|
161,277 |
|
|
|
158,159 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(11,194 |
) |
|
|
(8,561 |
) |
|
|
(33,450 |
) |
|
|
(27,048 |
) |
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments
|
|
|
24,916 |
|
|
|
20,586 |
|
|
|
42,973 |
|
|
|
50,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
60,592 |
|
|
|
77,304 |
|
|
|
170,800 |
|
|
|
181,392 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(4,693 |
) |
|
|
(4,962 |
) |
|
|
(13,424 |
) |
|
|
(3,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
55,899 |
|
|
$ |
72,342 |
|
|
$ |
157,376 |
|
|
$ |
178,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
|
$ |
8.62 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
8.29 |
|
Regular dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
Special dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
24,712,536 |
|
|
|
21,952,606 |
|
|
|
24,554,475 |
|
|
|
20,674,396 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
25,314,315 |
|
|
|
22,728,369 |
|
|
|
25,159,619 |
|
|
|
21,486,208 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
4
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
55,899 |
|
|
$ |
72,342 |
|
|
$ |
157,376 |
|
|
$ |
178,221 |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities (AFS)
|
|
|
(16,200 |
) |
|
|
14,562 |
|
|
|
34,578 |
|
|
|
44,244 |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) included in net
income
|
|
|
(18,137 |
) |
|
|
(15,198 |
) |
|
|
(31,100 |
) |
|
|
(36,026 |
) |
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges
|
|
|
13,891 |
|
|
|
(13,772 |
) |
|
|
7,901 |
|
|
|
5,768 |
|
|
Reclassification of net realized cash flow hedge losses
(gains) to interest expense on asset-backed securities
issued
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(20,337 |
) |
|
|
(14,769 |
) |
|
|
11,686 |
|
|
|
14,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
$ |
35,562 |
|
|
$ |
57,573 |
|
|
$ |
169,062 |
|
|
$ |
192,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
5
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
Distributions to | |
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Income | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
Total | |
(Unaudited) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
24,153,576 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
773,222 |
|
|
$ |
105,357 |
|
|
$ |
481,607 |
|
|
$ |
(496,272 |
) |
|
$ |
864,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,376 |
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on assets AFS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
Net unrealized (loss) on interest rate agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,062 |
|
Issuance of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Offerings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment & Stock Purchase Plans
|
|
|
582,250 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
31,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,299 |
|
|
|
Employee Option & Stock Plans
|
|
|
19,969 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock & Stock DERs
|
|
|
8,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
Dividends declared:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,044 |
) |
|
|
(52,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005
|
|
|
24,764,404 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
808,107 |
|
|
$ |
117,043 |
|
|
$ |
638,983 |
|
|
$ |
(548,316 |
) |
|
$ |
1,016,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Cumulative | |
|
Distributions to | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Income | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
19,062,983 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
$ |
517,826 |
|
|
$ |
82,179 |
|
|
$ |
248,972 |
|
|
$ |
(295,840 |
) |
|
$ |
553,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,221 |
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on assets AFS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,218 |
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain on interest rate agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,494 |
|
Issuance of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Offerings
|
|
|
2,350,000 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
116,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,620 |
|
|
|
Dividend Reinvestment & Stock Purchase Plans
|
|
|
1,545,840 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
81,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,527 |
|
|
|
Employee Option & Stock Plans
|
|
|
278,895 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
Restricted Stock & Stock DERs
|
|
|
107,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,162 |
|
Dividends declared:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,341 |
) |
|
|
(53,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
23,345,696 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
727,144 |
|
|
$ |
96,452 |
|
|
$ |
427,193 |
|
|
$ |
(349,181 |
) |
|
$ |
901,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements
6
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
(In thousands) |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Unaudited) |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
157,376 |
|
|
$ |
178,221 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of premiums, discounts, and debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(61,045 |
) |
|
|
(63,570 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortization of non-financial assets
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
5,539 |
|
|
Non-cash stock compensation
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
7,163 |
|
|
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments
|
|
|
(42,973 |
) |
|
|
(50,281 |
) |
|
Principal payments on real estate loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
18,283 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Net sales of real estate loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
277,667 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
Purchases of real estate loans held-for-sale
|
|
|
(82,977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(7,499 |
) |
|
|
(22,254 |
) |
|
Principal receivable
|
|
|
1,124 |
|
|
|
12,434 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
(9,112 |
) |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(1,779 |
) |
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
11,991 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
2,387 |
|
|
|
11,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
274,201 |
|
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of real estate loans held-for-investment
|
|
|
(1,529,338 |
) |
|
|
(8,275,424 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate loans held-for-investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,811 |
|
|
Principal payments on real estate loans held-for-investment
|
|
|
7,230,178 |
|
|
|
2,483,075 |
|
|
Purchases of real estate securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(757,870 |
) |
|
|
(625,595 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
141,442 |
|
|
|
30,891 |
|
|
Principal payments on real estate securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
153,755 |
|
|
|
164,824 |
|
|
Net (increase) decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
(22,758 |
) |
|
|
(23,098 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
5,215,409 |
|
|
|
(6,132,516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings on Redwood debt
|
|
|
(41,542 |
) |
|
|
9,859 |
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of asset-backed securities
|
|
|
1,998,008 |
|
|
|
8,438,368 |
|
|
Deferred asset-backed security issuance costs
|
|
|
(11,259 |
) |
|
|
(26,229 |
) |
|
Repayments on asset-backed securities
|
|
|
(7,307,909 |
) |
|
|
(2,507,237 |
) |
|
Net (purchases) proceeds of interest rate agreements
|
|
|
(2,860 |
) |
|
|
686 |
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
32,758 |
|
|
|
202,197 |
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(50,892 |
) |
|
|
(50,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(5,383,696 |
) |
|
|
6,067,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
105,914 |
|
|
|
17,539 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
57,246 |
|
|
|
58,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
163,160 |
|
|
$ |
76,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
560,692 |
|
|
$ |
272,756 |
|
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
$ |
8,765 |
|
|
$ |
9,145 |
|
Non-cash financing activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared but not paid
|
|
$ |
17,335 |
|
|
$ |
15,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
7
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2005
(Unaudited)
Redwood Trust, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (Redwood),
invests in, credit-enhances, and securitizes residential and
commercial real estate loans and securities. Our primary
business is credit-enhancing high-quality jumbo residential real
estate loans nationwide. We also invest in securities that
represent interests in pools of diverse types of real estate
loans, including commercial real estate loans, home equity line
of credit loans (HELOCs), real estate collateralized debt
obligations (CDOs), and other real estate assets. We have
elected to have Redwood Trust, Inc. taxed as a Real Estate
Investment Trust (REIT).
Redwood acquires credit-enhancement securities (CES) from
residential real estate loan securitizations and, to a lesser
extent, from commercial real estate loan securitizations. Our
residential loan CES portfolio consists of non-rated, B-rated,
and BB-rated securities from residential real estate loan
securitizations. Our commercial loan CES are all non-rated,
first-loss commercial mortgagebacked (CMBS) securities.
|
|
|
Sequoia Residential Mortgage Loan Securitizations |
We acquire residential real estate loans from third party
originators for the Sequoia securitization program we sponsor.
We then sell these loans to Sequoia entities that finance their
purchases through the issuance of asset-backed securities (ABS).
Most Sequoia ABS are sold to third parties other than Redwood or
Acacia. Certain CES and portions of the interest-only securities
(IO securities) created by these securitizations are sold to
Redwood. Many of these CES (generally the BB-rated securities)
are subsequently sold by Redwood to the Acacia CDO
securitization program that Redwood sponsors (see below).
Redwood may also acquire other ABS issued by Sequoia entities
for re-sale to the Acacia CDO program. Redwoods on-going
investment in Sequoia securities is small relative to the size
of each Sequoia entity, and Redwoods maximum loss is
limited to its investment in these Sequoia securities (expect
for loan repurchase obligations that may arise in certain
limited situations).
We acquire various investment grade and non-investment grade
residential and commercial real estate securities from third
parties and Sequoia for re-sale to the Acacia CDO
securitizations we sponsor. We sell securities to Acacia
securitization entities that issue ABS. Redwood typically
acquires for its own portfolio the securities issued from Acacia
entities that bear the first-loss and second-loss credit risk of
the Acacia assets. Similar to the Sequoia transactions,
Redwoods on-going investment in these securities is small
relative to the size of each Acacia entity, and Redwoods
maximum loss is limited to its investments in these securities.
|
|
NOTE 2. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are
unaudited. The unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual
consolidated financial statements and, in our opinion, reflect
all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of our financial
position, results of operations, and cash flows. These
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be
read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial
statements included in the Redwoods Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. The
results for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005 are not necessarily indicative of the expected results
8
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
for the year ending December 31, 2005. Certain amounts for
prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the
September 30, 2005 presentation.
The September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Redwood and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Sequoia Mortgage
Funding Corporation, Acacia CDO 1, LTD through Acacia
CDO 8, LTD and RWT Holdings, Inc. (Holdings), and
Holdings wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Sequoia
Residential Funding, Inc. and Madrona LLC. For financial
reporting purposes, references to Sequoia mean Sequoia Mortgage
Funding Corporation and Sequoia Residential Funding, Inc.
References to Acacia mean all of the aforementioned Acacia CDO
entities. References to the Redwood REIT mean Redwood exclusive
of its taxable subsidiaries. The taxable subsidiaries of Redwood
are Holdings and Holdings wholly owned subsidiaries. All
significant inter-company balances and transactions have been
eliminated.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and
assumptions. These include fair value of certain assets, amount
and timing of credit losses, prepayment assumptions, and other
items that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the
reported amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the
reported period. Our estimates are inherently subjective in
nature and actual results could differ from those estimates.
|
|
|
Sequoia and Acacia Securitizations |
Redwood treats the securitizations it sponsors as financings
under the provisions of Financial Accounting Statement
No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
(FAS 140) as we have retained effective control over
these loans and securities. Control is maintained through our
active management of the assets in the securitization entity,
our retained asset transfer discretion, our ability to direct
certain servicing decisions, or a combination of the foregoing.
Accordingly, the underlying loans owned by the Sequoia entities
are shown on our Consolidated Balance Sheets under residential
real estate loans and the Sequoia ABS issued to third parties
are shown on our Consolidated Balance Sheets under ABS issued.
Assets owned by the Acacia entities are shown on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets either in our securities portfolio
(residential real estate backed securities rated BBB and above,
commercial real estate securities, CDO, and REIT corporate debt)
or our residential loan credit-enhancement securities (lower
rated residential real estate securities). ABS issued by the
Acacia entities are shown on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as
ABS issued. In our Consolidated Statements of Income, we record
interest income on the loans and securities and interest expense
on the ABS issued. Any Sequoia ABS (CES, investment grade, or
interest-only) acquired by Redwood or Acacia from Sequoia
entities and any Acacia ABS acquired by Redwood for its own
portfolio are eliminated in consolidation and thus are not shown
on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Earning assets (as consolidated for GAAP purposes) consist
primarily of residential and commercial real estate loans and
securities. Coupon interest is recognized as revenue when earned
according to the terms of the loans and securities and when, in
our opinion, it is collectible. Purchase discounts and premiums
related to earning assets are amortized into interest income
over their estimated lives, considering the actual and future
estimated prepayments of the earning assets using the interest
9
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
method (i.e., using an effective yield method). Gains or losses
on the sale of earning assets are based on the specific
identification method.
|
|
|
Residential and Commercial Real Estate Loans:
Held-for-Investment |
Real estate loans held-for-investment are carried at their
unpaid principal balances adjusted for net unamortized premiums
or discounts and net of any allowance for credit losses. The
majority of consolidated residential real estate loans are
classified as held-for-investment because the consolidated
securitization entities that own these assets have the ability
and intent to hold these loans to maturity. We may sell real
estate loans from time to time to third-parties other than the
securitization entities we sponsor.
Pursuant to Financial Accounting Statement No. 91,
Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with
Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Cost of Leases
(FAS 91), we use the interest method to determine an
effective yield and amortize the premium or discount on loans.
For loans acquired prior to July 1, 2004, we use coupon
interest rates as they change over time and anticipated
principal prepayments to determine an effective yield to
amortize the premium or discount. For loans acquired after
July 1, 2004, we use the initial coupon interest rate of
the loans (without regard to future changes in the underlying
indices) and anticipated prepayments to calculate an effective
yield to amortize the premium or discount.
Commercial real estate loans for which we have the ability and
intent to hold to maturity are classified as held-for-investment
and are carried at their unpaid balances adjusted for
unamortized premium discounts and net of any allowance for
credit losses.
|
|
|
Residential and Commercial Real Estate Loans:
Held-for-Sale |
Residential and commercial real estate loans that we are
marketing for sale are classified as real estate loans
held-for-sale. These are carried at the lower of cost or market
value on a loan-by-loan basis. Any market valuation adjustments
on these loans are recognized in net recognized gains and
valuation adjustments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
|
|
|
Residential and Commercial Loan Credit-Enhancement and
Securities Portfolio Securities: Available-for-Sale |
These securities are classified as available-for-sale
(AFS) and are carried at their estimated fair values.
Cumulative unrealized gains and losses are reported as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income in our
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity.
When recognizing revenue on AFS securities, we employ the
interest method to account for purchase premiums, discounts, and
fees associated with these securities. For securities rated AAA
or AA, we use the interest method as prescribed under
FAS 91, while for securities rated A or lower we use the
interest method as prescribed under the Emerging Issues Task
Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial
Assets (EITF 99-20). The use of these methods requires
us to project cash flows over the remaining life of each asset.
These projections include assumptions about interest rates,
prepayment rates, the timing and amount of credit losses, and
other factors. We review and make adjustments to our cash flow
projections on an ongoing basis and monitor these projections
based on input and analyses received from external sources,
internal models, and our own judgment and experience. There can
be no assurance that our assumptions used to estimate future
cash flows or the current periods yield for each asset
would not change in the near term.
10
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Redwood monitors its available-for-sale securities for
other-than-temporary impairment. We use the guidelines
prescribed under EITF 99-20, Financial Accounting Statement
No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and
Equity Securities (FAS 115), and Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 5(m), Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
(SAB 5(m)). Any other-than-temporary impairments are
reported under net recognized gains and losses and valuation
adjustments in our Consolidated Statements of Income.
For consolidated residential loans, HELOC loans, and commercial
real estate loans held-for-investment, we establish and maintain
credit reserves based on estimates of credit losses inherent in
these loan portfolios as of the balance sheet date. To calculate
the credit reserve, we assess inherent losses by determining
loss factors (defaults, the timing of defaults, and loss
severities upon defaults) that can be specifically applied to
each of the consolidated loans, loan pools, or individual loans.
We follow the guidelines of Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 102, Selected Loan Loss Allowance
Methodology and Documentation (SAB 102), and Financial
Accounting Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies
(FAS 5), in setting credit reserves for our residential
and commercial loans.
The following factors are considered and applied in such
determinations:
|
|
|
|
|
On-going analyses of the pool of loans including,
but not limited to, the age of loans, underwriting standards,
business climate, economic conditions, geographical
considerations, and other observable data |
|
|
|
Historical loss rates and past performance of similar loans |
|
|
|
Relevant environmental factors |
|
|
|
Relevant market research and publicly available third-party
reference loss rates |
|
|
|
Trends in delinquencies and charge-offs |
|
|
|
Effects of changes in credit concentrations |
|
|
|
Prepayment assumptions |
Once we determine applicable default amounts, the timing of the
defaults, and severities of losses upon the defaults, we
estimate expected losses for each pool of loans over its
expected life. We then estimate the timing of these losses and
the losses probable to occur over an effective loss confirmation
period. This period is defined as the range of time between the
probable occurrence of a credit loss (such as the initial
deterioration of the borrowers financial condition) and
the confirmation of that loss (the actual impairment or
charge-off of the loan). The losses expected to occur within the
effective loss confirmation period are the basis of our credit
reserves because we believe those losses exist as of the
reported date of the financial statements. We re-evaluate the
level of our credit reserves on at least a quarterly basis, and
we record provision, charge-offs, and recoveries monthly.
Additionally, if a loan becomes real estate owned (REO) or
is reclassified as held-for-sale, valuations specific to that
loan also include analyses of the underlying collateral.
The credit reserve for credit losses for the commercial real
estate loan portfolio includes detailed analyses of each loan
and the underlying property. The following factors are
considered and applied in such determinations:
|
|
|
|
|
On-going analyses of each individual loan including,
but not limited to, the age of loans, underwriting standards,
business climate, economic conditions, geographical
considerations, and other observable data |
11
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
On-going evaluations of fair values of collateral using current
appraisals and other valuations |
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow analyses |
|
|
|
Perfection of security interest |
|
|
|
Borrowers ability to meet obligations |
We follow the guidelines of Financial Accounting Statement
No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a
Loan (FAS 114), in determining impairment on commercial
real estate loans. We had no impaired commercial loans as of
September 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and highly liquid
investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Restricted cash includes principal and interest payments from
real estate loans and securities owned by consolidated
securitization entities that are collateral for or payable to
owners of ABS issued by those entities, cash pledged as
collateral on interest rate agreements, and cash held back from
borrowers until certain loan agreement requirements are met.
Corresponding liabilities for cash held back from borrowers are
included in accrued expenses and other liabilities on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Net deferred tax assets represent the net benefit of net
operating loss carry forwards, real estate asset basis
differences, and recognized tax gains on whole loan
securitizations that will be recognized under GAAP through the
financial statements in future periods.
|
|
|
Deferred Asset-Backed Securities Issuance Costs |
Deferred ABS issuance costs are costs associated with the
issuance of ABS from securitization entities we sponsor. These
costs typically include underwriting, rating agency, legal,
accounting, and other fees. Deferred ABS issuance costs are
reported on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as deferred charges
and are amortized as an adjustment to consolidated interest
expense using the interest method based on the actual and
estimated repayment schedules of the related ABS issued under
the principles prescribed in APB 21, Interest on
Receivables and Payables.
Other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets include REO,
fixed assets, prepaid interest, and other prepaid expenses. REO
is reported at the lower of cost or market value.
|
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable and Principal Receivable |
Accrued interest receivable and principal receivable represents
principal and interest that is due and payable to us.
12
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
We enter into interest rate agreements to help manage out
interest rate risks. See Note 5 for a detailed
discussion on interest rate agreements. We report our interest
rate agreements at fair value. Those with a positive value to us
are reported as an asset. Those with a negative value to us are
reported as a liability.
We take certain risks inherent in financial institutions,
including, but not limited to, credit risk, liquidity risk,
interest rate risk, prepayment risk, market value risk,
reinvestment risk, and capital risk. In addition, there are
several other risks and uncertainties specific to our business.
We seek to actively manage these risks and uncertainties while
also providing our stockholders with an appropriate rate of
return in light of these risks and uncertainties. There can be
no assurance that risks and uncertainties are adequately
provided for in our financial statements.
Redwood debt is short-term debt collateralized by loans and
securities held temporarily for future sale to securitization
entities. We carry this debt on our balance sheet at its unpaid
principal balance. Redwood currently does not have any long-term
debt; all debt matures within one year.
|
|
|
Asset-Backed Securities Issued |
The majority of our consolidated liabilities reported on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets represent ABS issued by
bankruptcy-remote securitization entities sponsored by Redwood.
These ABS issued are carried at their unpaid principal balances
net of any unamortized discount or premium. Our exposure to loss
from consolidated securitization entities (such as Sequoia and
Acacia) is limited (except, in some circumstances, for limited
loan repurchase obligations) to our net investment in securities
we have acquired from these entities. As required by the
governing documents related to each series of ABS, Sequoia and
Acacia assets are held in the custody of trustees. Trustees
collect principal and interest payments (less servicing and
related fees) from the assets and make corresponding principal
and interest payments to the issued ABS. ABS obligations are
payable solely from the assets of these entities and are
non-recourse to Redwood.
Accrued interest payable represents interest due and payable on
Redwood debt and ABS issued. It is generally paid within the
next month with the exception of interest due on Acacia ABS
which is settled quarterly instead of monthly.
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets include cash held back from borrowers, accrued
employee bonuses, executive deferred compensation, dividend
equivalent rights (DERs) payable, excise and income taxes, and
accrued legal, accounting, consultants and other miscellaneous
expenses.
13
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Dividends payable reflect the regular dividend of $0.70 per
share declared by our Board of Directors payable on
October 21, 2005 to stockholders of record as of
September 30, 2005.
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue
Code and the corresponding provisions of state law. In order to
qualify as a REIT, we must distribute at least 90% of our annual
REIT taxable income (this does not include taxable income
retained in our taxable subsidiaries) to stockholders within the
time frame set forth in the tax rules and we must meet certain
other requirements. If these requirements are met, we generally
will not be subject to Federal or state income taxation at the
corporate level with respect to the REIT taxable income we
distribute to our stockholders. We may retain up to 10% of our
REIT taxable income and pay corporate income taxes on this
retained income while continuing to maintain our REIT status.
The taxable income of Holdings and its subsidiaries is not
included in REIT taxable income, and is subject to state and
Federal income taxes at the applicable statutory rates. Deferred
income taxes, to the extent they exist, reflect estimated future
tax effects of temporary differences between the amounts of
taxes recorded for financial reporting purposes and amounts
actually payable currently as measured by tax laws and
regulations.
We have recorded a provision for income taxes in our
Consolidated Statements of Income based upon our estimated
liability for Federal and state income tax purposes. These tax
liabilities arise from estimated taxable earnings in taxable
subsidiaries and from the planned retention of a portion of our
estimated REIT taxable income. See Note 8 for
further discussion on income taxes.
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common shares and
potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential
common shares outstanding are calculated using the treasury
stock method, which assumes that all dilutive common stock
equivalents are exercised and the funds generated by the
exercises are used to buy back outstanding common stock at the
average market price of the common stock during the reporting
period.
Pursuant to EITF 03-6, Participating Securities and the
Two Class Method under FASB No. 128
(EITF 03-6), it was determined that there was no
allocation of income for our outstanding stock options, which
accrue dividend equivalent rights, as they were antidilutive
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005
and 2004. There were no other participating securities, as
defined by EITF 03-6 during these periods.
14
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides reconciliation of denominators of
the basic and diluted net income per share computations.
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Net Income Per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period
|
|
|
24,712,536 |
|
|
|
21,952,606 |
|
|
|
24,554,475 |
|
|
|
20,674,396 |
|
Net effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
601,779 |
|
|
|
775,763 |
|
|
|
605,144 |
|
|
|
811,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share
|
|
|
25,314,315 |
|
|
|
22,728,369 |
|
|
|
25,159,619 |
|
|
|
21,486,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
|
$ |
8.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
8.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, the
number of common shares that were anti-dilutive totaled 368,522
and 24,198, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004, the number of common shares
that were anti-dilutive totaled 167,622 and 20,238, respectively.
|
|
|
Other Comprehensive
Income |
Current period net unrealized gains and losses on residential
and commercial loan CES, securities portfolio
available-for-sale, and interest rate agreements classified as
cash flow hedges are reported as components of other
comprehensive income on our Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income.
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we had
one stock-based employee compensation plan and one employee
stock purchase plan. These plans are described more fully in
Note 10. In accordance with the guidance of
Financial Accounting Statement No. 148, Accounting for
Stock Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure,
an amendment for FASB Statement No. 123, (FAS 148)
we elected to prospectively apply the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based awards issued subsequent to
December 31, 2002.
We continue to account for all stock-based compensation awards
issued prior to December 31, 2002 under the recognition and
measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and related
interpretations. Under these provisions, when we granted
stock-based compensation awards we did not include any
stock-based employee compensation cost in net income, as all
awards granted under the plan had an exercise price equal to the
fair market value of
15
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Had Redwood
applied Financial Accounting Statement No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (FAS 123) to
options granted prior to 2003, net income and net income per
share would have been the pro-forma amounts indicated below:
|
|
|
Pro-Forma Net Income Under
FAS 123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
55,899 |
|
|
$ |
72,342 |
|
|
$ |
157,376 |
|
|
$ |
178,221 |
|
Add: Dividend equivalent right operating expenses under
APB 25
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
5,587 |
|
|
|
7,547 |
|
Add: Stock option operating (income) expenses under APB 25
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
1,021 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for awards granted prior to
January 1, 2003
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
57,711 |
|
|
$ |
74,252 |
|
|
$ |
162,194 |
|
|
$ |
185,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$ |
2.26 |
|
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
$ |
6.41 |
|
|
$ |
8.62 |
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
|
$ |
3.38 |
|
|
$ |
6.61 |
|
|
$ |
8.99 |
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
8.29 |
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
3.27 |
|
|
$ |
6.45 |
|
|
$ |
8.65 |
|
The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was used in determining
fair values of option grants accounted for under FAS 123.
The model requires the use of assumptions such as strike price,
expected life, risk free rate of return, and stock price
volatility. These options are generally granted over the course
of the calendar year. Some of the options granted during the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2004 had dividend equivalent rights,
and, accordingly, the assumed dividend yield was zero. Other
options granted during the first nine months of 2005 and 2004
had no DERs and the assumed dividend yield was 10%. See
Note 10 for a further discussion of options. The
following table describes the weighted average of assumptions
used for calculating the value of options granted in the three
months and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Weighted Average Assumptions used for Valuation of Options
under FAS 123 Granted during period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Stock Price Volatility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.00% |
|
|
|
26.41% |
|
|
|
22.00% |
|
Risk free rate of return (5 yr Treasury Rate)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45% |
|
|
|
4.07% |
|
|
|
3.30% |
|
Dividend Yield Assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
4.45% |
|
|
|
4.87% |
|
16
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
The EITF released EITF 03-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments (EITF 03-1). For investments that meet the
scope of this pronouncement, EITF 03-1 provides application
guidance to determine when an investment is considered impaired,
whether that impairment is other-than-temporary, and the
measurement of impairment. The guidance also includes accounting
considerations subsequent to the recognition of an
other-than-temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures
about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as
other-than-temporary impairments. In general,
EITF 03-1 states that if the fair value of an
applicable investment is lower than its book value, it is
considered impaired. This impairment is considered
other-than-temporary unless the investor has the ability and
intent to hold the investment for a reasonable period of time
sufficient for a forecasted recovery of the value of the asset.
Certain disclosure requirements of this pronouncement are
currently in effect and are presented in Note 3. The
recognition and measurement guidance of this pronouncement will
become effective at a later date to be determined. Accordingly,
we continue to evaluate other than temporary impairments as
prescribed under EITF 99-20, FAS 115, and
SAB 5(m).
In December 2004, a revised version of the original FAS 123
was issued. Financial Accounting Statement No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment (FAS 123R), supersedes
Accounting Principles Board No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees (APB 25). This Statement requires
that the cost resulting from all share-based payment
transactions be recognized in the financial statements. This
Statement establishes fair value as the measurement objective in
accounting for share-based payment arrangements and all
transactions with employees, except for equity instruments held
by employee stock ownership plans. Effective January 1,
2003 and in accordance with the transitional guidance of
FAS 148, we elected to prospectively apply the fair value
method of accounting for stock-based awards granted subsequent
to December 31, 2002. In accordance with the implementation
time frame established by the Securities and Exchange Commission
in April 2005, we plan to adopt FAS 123R as of
January 1, 2006. We are still in the process of evaluating
the impact of FAS 123R.
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, our
reported earning assets (owned by us or by consolidated
securitization entities) consisted of investments in
adjustable-rate, hybrid, and fixed-rate residential and
commercial real estate loans and securities and home equity
lines of credit. Hybrid loans have an initial fixed coupon rate
for three to ten years followed by periodic (usually annual or
semi-annual) adjustments. The original maturity of the majority
of our residential real estate loans and residential real estate
securities is usually twenty-five to thirty years. The original
maturity of our commercial real estate loans and commercial real
estate securities is generally up to ten years. The original
maturity of our home equity lines of credit is ten years. The
actual amount of principal outstanding is subject to change
based on the prepayments of the underlying loans.
For the three months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, the
average consolidated balance of earning assets was
$20.1 billion and $22.5 billion, respectively. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, the average
consolidated balance of earning assets was $22.2 billion
and $20.3 billion, respectively.
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans |
We acquire residential real estate loans from third party
originators for sale to securitization entities sponsored by us
under our Sequoia program. We sell these loans to Sequoia
securitization entities, which, in turn, issue ABS (that are
shown as liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets). The
17
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
following table presents the carrying value of consolidated real
estate loans as September 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004.
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Held-for- |
|
Held-for- | |
|
|
|
Held-for- | |
|
Held-for- | |
|
|
|
|
Sale |
|
Investment | |
|
Total | |
|
Sale | |
|
Investment | |
|
Total | |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current face
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,176,357 |
|
|
$ |
16,176,357 |
|
|
$ |
2,365 |
|
|
$ |
22,021,523 |
|
|
$ |
22,023,888 |
|
Unamortized Premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185,814 |
|
|
|
185,814 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
207,575 |
|
|
|
207,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,362,171 |
|
|
|
16,362,171 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
22,229,098 |
|
|
|
22,231,495 |
|
Lower of cost-or- market adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
Reserve for Credit Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,991 |
) |
|
|
(20,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,703 |
) |
|
|
(22,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,341,180 |
|
|
$ |
16,341,180 |
|
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
$ |
22,206,395 |
|
|
$ |
22,208,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-investment are primarily residential real estate
loans sold to securitization entities and are consolidated on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Loans acquired for future sale
to sponsored securitization entities are also classified as
held-for-investment. Loans held-for-sale are those we anticipate
selling to third parties other than Redwood-sponsored
securitization entities and are reported at the lower of cost or
market value.
Our goal is to sell all of the residential real estate loans we
acquire to securitization entities that finance their purchases
of loans from us through the issuance of ABS. During the period
we accumulate loans for securitization, we fund these loans with
equity and with short-term borrowings sourced through various
whole loan-financing facilities available to us.
We may exercise our right to call ABS issued by entities
sponsored by us and subsequently sell the loans to third
parties. If these transactions are not completed within a
reporting period, we reclassify held-for-investment loans to
held-for-sale loans once we determine which loans will be sold
to third parties. To the extent these transactions are completed
within a reporting period, the sale of loans is reported as a
sale of loans held-for-investment in our Statements of Cash
Flows.
18
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides detail of the activity of our
residential real estate loan held-for-sale and
held-for-investment portfolios for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Residential Real Estate Loans at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
19,383,193 |
|
|
$ |
19,915,575 |
|
|
$ |
22,208,417 |
|
|
$ |
16,239,160 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
332,049 |
|
|
|
2,898,165 |
|
|
|
1,591,238 |
|
|
|
7,923,314 |
|
Sales (other than to consolidated ABS trusts)
|
|
|
(263,079 |
) |
|
|
(112,811 |
) |
|
|
(266,457 |
) |
|
|
(112,811 |
) |
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(3,096,721 |
) |
|
|
(1,144,320 |
) |
|
|
(7,161,015 |
) |
|
|
(2,463,802 |
) |
Transfers to REO
|
|
|
(1,880 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net discount (premium) amortization
|
|
|
(13,479 |
) |
|
|
2,078 |
|
|
|
(29,452 |
) |
|
|
(23,430 |
) |
Reversal of (provision for) credit losses
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
(5,008 |
) |
Net recognized gains (losses) and valuation adjustments
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans at end of period
|
|
$ |
16,341,180 |
|
|
$ |
21,557,912 |
|
|
$ |
16,341,180 |
|
|
$ |
21,557,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below presents information regarding residential real
estate loans pledged under our borrowing agreements.
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Face | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Face | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Unpledged
|
|
$ |
16,680 |
|
|
$ |
16,760 |
|
|
$ |
3,618 |
|
|
$ |
3,288 |
|
Pledged for Redwood debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,707 |
|
|
|
190,207 |
|
Owned by securitization entities, financed through the issuance
of ABS
|
|
|
16,159,677 |
|
|
|
16,324,420 |
|
|
|
21,831,563 |
|
|
|
22,014,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value
|
|
$ |
16,176,357 |
|
|
$ |
16,341,180 |
|
|
$ |
22,023,888 |
|
|
$ |
22,208,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs) |
There were no HELOC purchases during the three months ended
September 30, 2005 and $0.1 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2005. We acquired
$335 million HELOCs during the nine months ended
September 30, 2004. Our goal is to sell the HELOCs we
accumulate to securitization entities that raise the proceeds
necessary through the issuance of ABS. As of September 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004, substantially all consolidated
HELOCs were owned by a securitization entity; the balance was
funded with equity. There were no sales during these periods to
19
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
unrelated third parties. These HELOCs are all indexed to the
prime rate. The table below represents the carrying value of
consolidated HELOCs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
Held-for- | |
|
Held-for- | |
|
|
Investment | |
|
Investment | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Current face
|
|
$ |
210,476 |
|
|
$ |
288,954 |
|
Unamortized premium
|
|
|
5,699 |
|
|
|
8,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
|
216,175 |
|
|
|
297,041 |
|
Reserve for credit losses
|
|
|
(1,038 |
) |
|
|
(693 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
$ |
215,137 |
|
|
$ |
296,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities |
The residential loan credit-enhancement securities shown on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets include non-rated, B-rated, and
BB-rated securities acquired from securitizations sponsored by
others. Our residential loan CES provided some level of
credit enhancement on $179 billion and $126 billion
high-quality residential real estate loans securitized by
entities not sponsored by us as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
Residential Loan CES Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
Available-for-Sale | |
|
Available-for-Sale | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Current face
|
|
$ |
1,052,813 |
|
|
$ |
933,772 |
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(89,429 |
) |
|
|
(108,141 |
) |
Portion of discount designated as credit protection
|
|
|
(382,862 |
) |
|
|
(342,706 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
|
580,522 |
|
|
|
482,925 |
|
Gross unrealized gains
|
|
|
91,949 |
|
|
|
84,390 |
|
Gross unrealized losses
|
|
|
(7,670 |
) |
|
|
(5,657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
$ |
664,801 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the concentrated credit risk associated with
residential loan CES, we are generally able to acquire these
securities at a discount to their face (principal) value. A
portion of this discount is designated as credit protection and
the remainder is accreted into income over the remaining life of
the security.
The amount of designated credit protection equals the amount of
credit losses within the underlying loan pool that we expect to
incur over the life of the loans. This estimate is determined
based upon various factors affecting these assets, including
economic conditions, characteristics of the underlying loans,
delinquency status, past performance of similar loans, and
external credit protection. We use a variety of internal and
external credit risk cash flow modeling and portfolio analytical
tools to assist in our assessments. Quarterly, we complete our
assessments on each individual underlying loan pool and
determine the appropriate level of credit protection required
for each security we own. The designated credit protection is
specific to each residential loan CES.
20
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the changes in our unamortized
discount and the portion of the discount designated as credit
protection for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Residential Loan CES Unamortized Discount and
Designated Credit Protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning balance of unamortized discount
|
|
$ |
96,488 |
|
|
$ |
121,808 |
|
|
$ |
108,141 |
|
|
$ |
123,329 |
|
Amortization of discount
|
|
|
(11,193 |
) |
|
|
(8,181 |
) |
|
|
(27,695 |
) |
|
|
(25,666 |
) |
Calls, sales, and other
|
|
|
(14,153 |
) |
|
|
(16,560 |
) |
|
|
(29,695 |
) |
|
|
(39,977 |
) |
Re-designation of credit protection to discount
|
|
|
19,242 |
|
|
|
5,733 |
|
|
|
44,015 |
|
|
|
34,163 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
6,567 |
|
|
|
(5,337 |
) |
|
|
17,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of unamortized discount
|
|
$ |
89,429 |
|
|
$ |
109,367 |
|
|
$ |
89,429 |
|
|
$ |
109,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance of designated credit protection
|
|
$ |
404,180 |
|
|
$ |
235,535 |
|
|
$ |
342,706 |
|
|
$ |
200,970 |
|
Realized credit losses
|
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
(3,303 |
) |
|
|
(2,343 |
) |
Calls, sales, and other
|
|
|
(33,420 |
) |
|
|
(3,830 |
) |
|
|
(44,768 |
) |
|
|
(10,430 |
) |
Re-designation of credit protection to discount
|
|
|
(19,242 |
) |
|
|
(5,733 |
) |
|
|
(44,015 |
) |
|
|
(34,163 |
) |
Acquisitions
|
|
|
32,846 |
|
|
|
73,487 |
|
|
|
132,242 |
|
|
|
144,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of designated credit protection
|
|
$ |
382,862 |
|
|
$ |
298,925 |
|
|
$ |
382,862 |
|
|
$ |
298,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yields recognized for GAAP for each security vary as a function
of credit results, prepayment rates, and, for our variable rate
securities, interest rates. If estimated future credit losses
exceed our prior expectations, credit losses occur more quickly
than expected, or prepayments occur more slowly than expected
(meaning the present value of projected cash flows is less than
previously expected), the yield over the remaining life of the
security may be adjusted downward. If estimated future credit
losses are less than our prior estimate, credit losses occur
later than expected, or prepayment rates are faster than
expected (meaning the present value of projected cash flows is
greater then previously expected), the yield over the remaining
life of the security may be adjusted upwards over time.
For three months ended September 30, 2005, we did not
recognize any other-than-temporary impairments
(EITF 99-20). For the nine months ended September 30,
2005, we recognized losses due to other-than-temporary
impairments of $0.1 million. For the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2004, we recognized losses due to
other-than-temporary impairments of $0.1 million and
$3.3 million, respectively. These recognized losses are
included in net recognized gains and valuation adjustments in
our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Gross unrealized gains and losses represent the difference
between the net amortized cost and the fair value of individual
securities. Gross unrealized losses represent a decline in
market value for securities not deemed impaired for GAAP. The
following table shows the gross unrealized losses, fair value,
and length of time that securities have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position of all consolidated residential
loan CES as of September 30, 2005. These unrealized
losses are not consid-
21
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
ered to be other-than-temporary impairments because these losses
are not due to adverse changes in credit or prepayment speeds
and we have the intent and ability to hold these securities for
a period sufficient for these securities to potentially recover
their values.
|
|
|
Residential Loan CES with Unrealized Losses as of
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months | |
|
12 Months or More | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
Value | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Value | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Value | |
|
(Losses) | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Residential loan credit- enhancement securities
|
|
$ |
132,941 |
|
|
$ |
(7,422 |
) |
|
$ |
2,978 |
|
|
$ |
(248 |
) |
|
$ |
135,919 |
|
|
$ |
(7,670 |
) |
The following table provides detail of the activity in our
residential CES portfolio for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Residential Loan CES Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Residential CES at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
706,195 |
|
|
$ |
442,239 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
$ |
378,727 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
57,481 |
|
|
|
82,918 |
|
|
|
213,139 |
|
|
|
195,553 |
|
Sales (other than to consolidated ABS trusts)
|
|
|
(98,775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126,068 |
) |
|
|
(22,416 |
) |
Principal repayments (including calls)
|
|
|
(18,403 |
) |
|
|
(44,822 |
) |
|
|
(62,735 |
) |
|
|
(126,459 |
) |
Discount amortization
|
|
|
11,193 |
|
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
27,695 |
|
|
|
25,666 |
|
Net unrealized balance sheet gains (losses)
|
|
|
(18,848 |
) |
|
|
(12,097 |
) |
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
(4,758 |
) |
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments
|
|
|
25,958 |
|
|
|
20,390 |
|
|
|
45,567 |
|
|
|
50,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Loan CES at end of period
|
|
$ |
664,801 |
|
|
$ |
496,809 |
|
|
$ |
664,801 |
|
|
$ |
496,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the $18 million and $63 million of principal pay
downs in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005, $5 million and $28 million, respectively,
represented calls of the securities in accordance with the
original issue provisions of individual securitization entities.
Of the $45 million and $126 million of principal pay
downs in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2004, $32 million and $80 million, respectively,
represented calls of securities.
22
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
We generally fund the first-loss and second-loss interests of
residential CES with equity capital. We generally sell the
third-loss interests (and some of the second-loss interests) of
the residential loan CES we acquire to securitization
entities (Acacia) that re-securitize these assets by issuing
ABS. Prior to sale to Acacia, we may fund some of the securities
acquired on a temporary basis with short-term borrowings through
various financing facilities available to us (see
Note 6). The table below presents information
regarding our residential CES pledged under borrowing agreements
and securitizations.
|
|
|
Residential Loan CES as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Unpledged
|
|
$ |
336,067 |
|
|
$ |
350,756 |
|
Pledged for Redwood debt
|
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
Owned by securitization entities, financed through issuance of
ABS
|
|
|
326,328 |
|
|
|
210,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying Value
|
|
$ |
664,801 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans |
Commercial real estate loans represent first or second lien
interests in multifamily, office, retail, and industrial
properties. Commercial real estate loans held-for-investment may
represent junior participations in first lien interests where we
provide credit enhancement to a senior interest.
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Held- |
|
Held-for- | |
|
|
|
Held- |
|
Held-for- | |
|
|
|
|
for-Sale |
|
Investment | |
|
Total | |
|
for-Sale |
|
Investment | |
|
Total | |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current face
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
66,348 |
|
|
$ |
66,348 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,598 |
|
|
$ |
65,598 |
|
Unamortized (discount) premium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,105 |
) |
|
|
(2,105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,478 |
) |
|
|
(2,478 |
) |
Portion of discount designated as credit protection
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,141 |
) |
|
|
(8,141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,141 |
) |
|
|
(8,141 |
) |
Lower of cost-or-market adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56,102 |
|
|
$ |
56,102 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides detail of the activity of our
commercial real estate loan portfolio for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Commercial real estate loans at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
41,794 |
|
|
$ |
33,546 |
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
$ |
22,419 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
14,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,951 |
|
|
|
17,066 |
|
Principal capitalized (payments)
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(8,878 |
) |
|
|
(3,307 |
) |
Net premium amortization
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
Reversal of provisions for credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales (other than to consolidated ABS trusts)
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,209 |
) |
|
|
(2,339 |
) |
Net recognized gains (losses) and valuation adjustments
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans at end of period
|
|
$ |
56,102 |
|
|
$ |
33,389 |
|
|
$ |
56,102 |
|
|
$ |
33,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our goal is to finance our commercial real estate loans with
equity or to sell them to securitization entities sponsored by
us. During the accumulation of these loans prior to sale to
Acacia, we may fund some of the loans with short-term borrowings
through various financing facilities available to us. The table
below presents information regarding our commercial real estate
loans pledged under borrowing agreements.
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Face | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Face | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Unpledged
|
|
$ |
15,591 |
|
|
$ |
7,192 |
|
|
$ |
40,868 |
|
|
$ |
32,119 |
|
Pledged for Redwood debt
|
|
|
14,401 |
|
|
|
14,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned by securitization entities, financed through issuance of
ABS
|
|
|
36,356 |
|
|
|
34,704 |
|
|
|
24,730 |
|
|
|
22,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying value
|
|
$ |
66,348 |
|
|
$ |
56,102 |
|
|
$ |
65,598 |
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The commercial loan CES shown on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets include non-rated securities acquired from
securitizations sponsored by others and a re-REMIC that is a
resecuritization of several first and second loss securities of
other CMBS. Our commercial loan CES provided some level of
credit enhancement on $21 billion and $6 billion
high-quality commercial real estate loans securitized by
entities not sponsored by us as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. In addition, the
underlying loans in the re-REMIC included in this portfolio
totaled $18 billion and $20 billion at
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
24
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Commercial Loan CES Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
Available-for-Sale | |
|
Available-for-Sale | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Current face
|
|
$ |
138,530 |
|
|
$ |
45,639 |
|
Unamortized premium
|
|
|
41,127 |
|
|
|
12,883 |
|
Portion of discount designated as credit protection
|
|
|
(138,530 |
) |
|
|
(45,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
|
41,127 |
|
|
|
12,883 |
|
Gross unrealized gains
|
|
|
3,264 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
Gross unrealized losses
|
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
$ |
43,540 |
|
|
$ |
14,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the concentrated credit risk associated with
commercial loan CES, we generally are able to acquire these
securities at a discount to their face (principal) value. A
portion of this discount is designated as credit protection and
the remainder is accreted into income or expense over the
remaining life of the security.
The amount of designated credit protection equals the amount of
credit losses within the underlying loan pool that we expect to
incur over the life of the loans. This estimate is determined
based upon various factors affecting these assets, including
economic conditions, characteristics of the underlying loans,
delinquency status, past performance of similar loans, and
external credit protection. We use a variety of internal and
external credit risk cash flow modeling and portfolio analytical
tools to assist in our assessments. Quarterly, we complete our
assessments on each individual underlying loan pool and
determine the appropriate level of credit protection required
for each security we own. The designated credit protection is
specific to each commercial loan CES.
The following table presents the changes in our unamortized
premium and the portion of the discount designated as credit
protection for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Commercial Loan CES Unamortized Discount and
Designated Credit Protection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning balance of unamortized (premium) discount
|
|
$ |
(24,847 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,084 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,883 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Amortization of premium (discount)
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Calls, sales, and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Re-designation of credit protection to discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(17,182 |
) |
|
|
(6,397 |
) |
|
|
(30,052 |
) |
|
|
(8,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of unamortized premium
|
|
$ |
(41,127 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,456 |
) |
|
$ |
(41,127 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance of designated credit protection
|
|
$ |
87,210 |
|
|
$ |
8,175 |
|
|
$ |
45,639 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Realized credit losses
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Calls, sales and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-designation of credit protection to discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
51,323 |
|
|
|
18,755 |
|
|
|
94,355 |
|
|
|
26,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance of designated credit protection
|
|
$ |
138,530 |
|
|
$ |
26,930 |
|
|
$ |
138,530 |
|
|
$ |
26,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Yields recognized for GAAP purposes for each security vary as a
function of credit results, prepayment rates, and (for our
variable rate securities) interest rates. If estimated future
credit losses exceed our prior expectations, credit losses occur
more quickly than expected, or prepayments occur more slowly
than expected, the yield over the remaining life of the security
may be adjusted downward. If estimated future credit losses are
less than our prior estimate, credit losses occur later than
expected, or prepayment rates are faster than expected, the
yield over the remaining life of the security may be adjusted
upwards over time.
For the three months ended September 30, 2005 and for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, we did not
recognize losses due to other-than-temporary impairment. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2005, we recognized losses
due to other-than-temporary impairments of $0.2 million.
Gross unrealized gains and losses represent the difference
between the net amortized cost and the fair value of individual
securities. Gross unrealized losses represent a decline in
market value for securities not deemed impaired for GAAP
purposes. The following table shows the gross unrealized losses,
fair value, and length of time that securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position of all consolidated
commercial loan CES as of September 30, 2005. These
unrealized losses are not considered to be other-than-temporary
impairments because these losses are not due to adverse changes
in credit or prepayment speeds and we have the intent and
ability to hold these securities for a period sufficient for
these securities to potentially recover their value.
|
|
|
Commercial Loan CES with Unrealized Losses as of
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months | |
|
12 Months or More |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
Value | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Value |
|
(Losses) |
|
Value | |
|
(Losses) | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Commercial Loan CES
|
|
$ |
3,407 |
|
|
$ |
(851 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,407 |
|
|
$ |
(851 |
) |
The following table provides detail of the activity in our
commercial loan CES portfolio for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Commercial Loan CES Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Commercial Loan CES at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
29,397 |
|
|
$ |
2,094 |
|
|
$ |
14,498 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
17,182 |
|
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
|
30,052 |
|
|
|
8,438 |
|
Sales (other than to consolidated ABS trusts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal repayments (including calls)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net discount (premium) amortization
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(1,657 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
Net unrealized balance sheet gains (losses)
|
|
|
(2,136 |
) |
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Loan CES at end of period
|
|
$ |
43,541 |
|
|
$ |
9,142 |
|
|
$ |
43,541 |
|
|
$ |
9,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We generally fund the commercial loan CES with equity
capital. There were no commercial loan CES pledged as
collateral at September 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004.
26
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Securities portfolio assets represent investment-grade security
interests in prime residential loans, sub-prime residential
loans, commercial real estate loans, second lien residential
loans, CDOs, and REIT corporate debt securities. Also
included in this portfolio are below investment-grade commercial
mortgage backed securities (except for non-rated securities
shown under commercial CES), securities backed by manufactured
housing loans, REIT corporate debt, and various real estate
interests in CDOs sponsored by others.
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio Carrying Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
Securities | |
|
Securities | |
|
|
Available-for-Sale | |
|
Available-for-Sale | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Current face
|
|
$ |
1,818,295 |
|
|
$ |
1,378,924 |
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(69,105 |
) |
|
|
(41,125 |
) |
Unamortized premium
|
|
|
4,310 |
|
|
|
5,548 |
|
Unamortized premium interest-only certificates
|
|
|
17,747 |
|
|
|
21,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost
|
|
|
1,771,247 |
|
|
|
1,365,029 |
|
Gross unrealized gains
|
|
|
21,127 |
|
|
|
20,159 |
|
Gross unrealized losses
|
|
|
(8,945 |
) |
|
|
(5,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value
|
|
$ |
1,783,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,380,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments (EITF 99-20) for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2005 totaled
$1.2 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Other-than-temporary impairments totaled $0.3 million and
$1.5 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004, respectively. These
other-than-temporary impairments are included as part of net
recognized gains and valuation adjustments in our Consolidated
Statements of Income.
Gross unrealized gains and losses represent the difference
between the net amortized cost and the fair value of individual
securities. Gross unrealized losses represent a temporary
decline in market values. The following table shows the gross
unrealized losses, fair value, and length of time that
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position of
all securities portfolio securities as of September 30,
2005. These unrealized losses are not considered to be
other-than-temporary impairments because these losses are not
due to adverse changes in credit or prepayment speeds, and we
have the intent and ability to hold these securities for a
period sufficient for these securities to potentially recover
their values.
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio with Unrealized Losses as of
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months | |
|
12 Months or More | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
Value | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Value | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Value | |
|
(Losses) | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Securities portfolio
|
|
$ |
477,696 |
|
|
$ |
(5,630 |
) |
|
$ |
118,064 |
|
|
$ |
(3,315 |
) |
|
$ |
595,760 |
|
|
$ |
(8,945 |
) |
27
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below provides detail of the activity in our
securities portfolio for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Securities Portfolio at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
1,648,838 |
|
|
$ |
1,093,374 |
|
|
$ |
1,380,077 |
|
|
$ |
844,714 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
190,160 |
|
|
|
144,753 |
|
|
|
514,679 |
|
|
|
421,604 |
|
Sales (other than to consolidated ABS trusts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,374 |
) |
|
|
(8,475 |
) |
Principal repayments
|
|
|
(41,618 |
) |
|
|
(18,489 |
) |
|
|
(91,020 |
) |
|
|
(38,365 |
) |
Net discount (premium) amortization
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
(1,293 |
) |
Net unrealized balance sheet gains (losses)
|
|
|
(13,569 |
) |
|
|
10,784 |
|
|
|
(3,081 |
) |
|
|
12,289 |
|
Net recognized gains (losses) and valuation adjustments
|
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(2,684 |
) |
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio at end of period
|
|
$ |
1,783,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,229,936 |
|
|
$ |
1,783,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,229,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents information on the types of
securities consolidated on our balance sheets as of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio Asset Types |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Commercial real estate
|
|
$ |
310,907 |
|
|
$ |
228,643 |
|
Residential prime
|
|
|
647,781 |
|
|
|
400,047 |
|
Residential sub prime
|
|
|
477,266 |
|
|
|
428,610 |
|
Residential second lien
|
|
|
118,409 |
|
|
|
131,197 |
|
Manufactured housing
|
|
|
14,695 |
|
|
|
14,016 |
|
REIT Corporate debt
|
|
|
63,381 |
|
|
|
64,479 |
|
Real estate CDOs
|
|
|
150,990 |
|
|
|
113,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities portfolio
|
|
$ |
1,783,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,380,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2005, non-investment grade securities
totaled $172 million, including commercial real estate
securities ($146 million), manufactured housing securities
($6 million), and real estate CDOs ($20 million). At
December 31, 2004, non-investment grade securities in this
portfolio totaled $87 million, including commercial real
estate securities ($70 million), REIT corporate debt
($8 million), manufactured housing securities
($6 million), and real estate CDOs ($3 million).
28
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The bulk of the securities we acquire are subsequently sold to
securitization entities (Acacia) that finance their purchases
through resecuritization (the issuance of ABS). While we are
accumulating securities prior to resecuritization, we may
finance some of these securities with short-term borrowings
through various financing facilities. The table below presents
information regarding our consolidated securities portfolio
securities pledged under borrowing agreements and
securitizations.
|
|
|
Securities Portfolio as Collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Unpledged
|
|
$ |
90,169 |
|
|
$ |
93,472 |
|
Pledged for Redwood debt
|
|
|
144,432 |
|
|
|
21,283 |
|
Owned by securitization entities, financed through the issuance
of ABS
|
|
|
1,548,828 |
|
|
|
1,265,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Carrying Value
|
|
$ |
1,783,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,380,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Recognized Gains and Valuation Adjustments |
Fluctuations in the market value of certain of our real estate
loan and security assets and interest rate agreements may also
affect our net income. The table below describes the various
components of our net recognized gains and valuation adjustments
reported in income during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Net Recognized Gains and Valuation Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Realized gains on calls:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan CES
|
|
$ |
2,704 |
|
|
$ |
20,472 |
|
|
$ |
14,643 |
|
|
$ |
47,534 |
|
|
Securities portfolio
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains (losses) on sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
Residential loan CES
|
|
|
23,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,979 |
|
|
|
6,242 |
|
|
Securities portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
Valuation adjustments impairment (EITF 99-20
and others):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan CES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(3,281 |
) |
|
Securities portfolio
|
|
|
(1,158 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(3,053 |
) |
|
|
(1,545 |
) |
|
Commercial loan CES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Lower-of-cost-or-market (LOCOM) valuation adjustments on
real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
Gains (losses) on interest rate agreements
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(567 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments
|
|
$ |
24,916 |
|
|
$ |
20,586 |
|
|
$ |
42,973 |
|
|
$ |
50,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 4. |
RESERVES FOR CREDIT LOSSES |
We establish and maintain credit reserves that we believe
represent probable credit losses in our consolidated residential
and commercial real estate loans held for investment as of the
date of the financial statements. The reserves for credit losses
are reflected as a component of residential and commercial real
estate loans on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following
table summarizes the activity in reserves for credit losses for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
Delinquencies in our consolidated residential real estate loan
portfolio were $23 million and $13 million,
respectively, as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004. Delinquencies include loans delinquent
more than 90 days, in bankruptcy, in foreclosure, and REO.
As a percentage of our residential real estate loan portfolio,
delinquencies remained at low levels relative to residential
real estate loans in the U.S. and stood at 0.14% and 0.06% of
our current loan balances as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively. Our residential loan
servicers advance payment on delinquent loans to the extent they
deem them recoverable. The following table summarizes the
activity in reserves for credit losses for our consolidated
residential real estate loans for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
22,396 |
|
|
$ |
20,080 |
|
|
$ |
22,703 |
|
|
$ |
16,336 |
|
(Reversal of) provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(1,315 |
) |
|
|
1,264 |
|
|
|
(1,502 |
) |
|
|
5,008 |
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
20,991 |
|
|
$ |
21,344 |
|
|
$ |
20,991 |
|
|
$ |
21,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delinquencies in our HELOC portfolio totaled $1.0 million,
or 0.48% of the outstanding balance as of September 30,
2005, and totaled $0.3 million, or 0.10% of the outstanding
balance as of December 31, 2004. The following table
summarizes the activity in reserves for credit losses for our
HELOCs for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
693 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
1,038 |
|
|
$ |
531 |
|
|
$ |
1,038 |
|
|
$ |
531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
We had no delinquent or impaired commercial real estate loans as
of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004. The
following table summarizes the activity in reserves for credit
losses for our commercial real estate loans for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
(Reversal of) credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(315 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5. |
INTEREST RATE AGREEMENTS |
We maintain an overall interest rate risk management strategy
that incorporates the use of derivative interest rate agreements
for a variety of reasons, including minimizing significant
fluctuations in earnings or market values on certain assets or
liabilities that may be caused by interest rate volatility.
Interest rate agreements we use as part of our interest rate
risk management strategy may include interest rate options,
swaps, options on swaps, futures contracts, options on futures
contracts, and options on forward purchases.
On the date an interest rate agreement is entered into, we
designate the interest rate agreement as (1) a hedge of the
fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of an
unrecognized firm commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a
hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash
flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or
liability (cash flow hedge), or (3) held for trading
(trading instrument). We currently have elected cash flow
hedging treatment for certain interest rate agreements and treat
other interest rate agreements as trading instruments.
In a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the change in the
fair value of the hedging derivative is recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income and is subsequently reclassified into
earnings when the hedging relationship is terminated. The
ineffective portion of the hedging derivative is recognized
immediately in earnings.
If we do not elect hedge accounting treatment (i.e., we
designate the interest rate agreement as a trading
instrument) changes in the market value of the interest
rate agreement and all associated income and expenses are
reported through earnings through net recognized gains and
valuation adjustments.
We report our interest rate agreements at fair value as
determined using third-party models and confirmed by Wall Street
dealers. As of September 30, 2005, the net fair value of
our interest rate agreements was $25.1 million. As of
December 31, 2004, the net fair value of interest rate
agreements was $15.0 million. Our total unrealized gain
included in accumulated other comprehensive income on interest
rate agreements was $18.2 million at September 30,
2005 and $10.0 million at December 31, 2004.
31
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table shows the aggregate fair value of our
interest rate agreements as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
Notional | |
|
Credit | |
|
Fair | |
|
Notional | |
|
Credit | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Exposure | |
|
Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Exposure | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Trading Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps purchased
|
|
$ |
1,529 |
|
|
$ |
116,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,861 |
|
|
$ |
105,400 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate caps sold
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest rate corridors purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,124,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1,340,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
57,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
23,389 |
|
|
|
6,898,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,536 |
|
|
|
11,081,719 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Rate Agreements
|
|
$ |
25,066 |
|
|
$ |
8,132,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,020 |
|
|
$ |
12,462,450 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We incur credit risk to the extent that the counterparties to
the interest rate agreements do not perform their obligations
under the interest rate agreements. If one of the counterparties
does not perform, we may not receive the cash to which we would
otherwise be entitled under the interest rate agreement. In
order to mitigate this risk, we only enter into interest rate
agreements that are either a) transacted on a national
exchange or b) transacted with counterparties that are
either i) designated by the U.S. Department of
Treasury as a primary government dealer, ii) affiliates of
primary government dealers, or iii) rated BBB or higher.
Furthermore, we generally enter into interest rate agreements
with several different counterparties in order to diversify our
credit risk exposure.
Certain of our interest rate agreements accounted for as cash
flow hedges may be terminated prior to the completion of the
forecasted transactions. In these cases, since the forecasted
transaction is still likely to occur, the net gain or loss on
the interest rate agreement remains in accumulated other
comprehensive income, and will be reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive income to our Consolidated Statements of
Income during the period the forecasted transaction occurs. Of
the $18.2 million in accumulated other comprehensive income
at September 30, 2005, $1.2 million was associated
with cash flow hedges that were terminated and $0.5 million
of this amount will be recognized as interest expense on our
Consolidated Statements of Income in the next twelve months. In
the case when the hedge is terminated and the forecasted
transaction is not expected to occur, we would immediately
recognize the gain or loss through our Consolidated Statements
of Income; there were no such instances in the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
To the extent our interest rate agreements accounted as cash
flow hedges are ineffective the net ineffective portion is
recorded as an interest expense. We use the dollar-offset method
to determine the amount of ineffectiveness recorded in the
Consolidated Statements of Income. We anticipate having
32
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
some ineffectiveness in our hedging program, as not all terms of
our hedges and not all terms of our hedged items match
perfectly. For both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005, the amount of ineffectiveness was
$0.1 million. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004, the amount of such ineffectiveness was
$0.3 million and $0.6 million of expense, respectively.
The following table depicts the interest income
(expense) and net recognized gains (losses) and valuation
adjustments activity for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004 for our interest rate
agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Realized net gains (losses) reclassified from other
comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
(109 |
) |
|
$ |
361 |
|
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
$ |
(287 |
) |
Realized net (losses) due to net ineffective portion of hedges
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(632 |
) |
Net cash receipt (payment) on Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
(2,981 |
) |
|
|
3,369 |
|
|
|
(12,910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
$ |
(2,889 |
) |
|
$ |
2,969 |
|
|
$ |
(13,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Recognized Gains (Losses) and Valuation
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized net gains (losses) on trading instruments
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
(567 |
) |
|
$ |
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will discontinue hedge accounting when (1) we determine
that the derivative is no longer expected to be effective in
offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the
designated hedged item; (2) the derivative expires or is
sold, terminated, or exercised; (3) the derivative is
de-designated as a fair value or cash flow hedge; or (4) it
is probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur by
the end of the originally specified time period.
Redwood debt is currently all short-term debt. We generally
enter into repurchase agreements, bank borrowings, and other
forms of collateralized short-term borrowings (short-term debt)
to finance assets under accumulation for future sale to
securitization entities. We also have $60 million
unsecuritized lines of credit available from two banks and have
a commercial paper facility (discussed below). The table below
summarizes Redwood debt by collateral type as of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
33
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Interest | |
|
Days Until | |
|
Amount | |
|
Interest | |
|
Days Until | |
|
|
Borrowed | |
|
Rate | |
|
Maturity | |
|
Borrowed | |
|
Rate | |
|
Maturity | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Residential real estate loan collateral
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
181,999 |
|
|
|
2.92 |
% |
|
|
126 |
|
Residential loan CES collateral
|
|
|
2,410 |
|
|
|
4.27 |
% |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loan collateral
|
|
|
14,247 |
|
|
|
5.32 |
% |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loan CES collateral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities portfolio collateral
|
|
|
145,082 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
% |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
21,282 |
|
|
|
4.05 |
% |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Redwood debt
|
|
$ |
161,739 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
75 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
|
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, the
average balance of Redwood debt was $298 million and
$264 million with a weighted-average interest cost of 5.16%
and 4.24%, respectively. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004, the average balance of Redwood debt was
$405 million and $464 million with a weighted average
cost of 2.29% and 2.12%, respectively. At September 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004, accrued interest payable on
Redwood debt was $0.1 million and $0.1 million,
respectively.
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
Redwood debt had the following remaining maturities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Within 30 days
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
31 to 90 days
|
|
|
161,739 |
|
|
|
115,841 |
|
Over 90 days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Redwood debt
|
|
$ |
161,739 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In March 2005, we formed Madrona Residential Funding, LLC
(Madrona), a special purpose entity and wholly owned
subsidiary of RWT Holdings. Madrona gives us the flexibility to
access the capital markets and issue short-term debt instruments
to finance the accumulation of loans prior to sale to sponsored
securitization entities. Madrona is designed to fund residential
loans accumulated for eventual sale to our Sequoia
securitization program by issuing A1+/ P1 rated commercial
paper. Madrona was established to accumulate up to
$1.5 billion of loans (although the current authorization
is for $300 million) and can warehouse each loan up to
270 days. There are specific eligibility requirements for
financing loans in this facility that are similar to our
existing financing facilities with several banks and large
investment banking firms. There is a credit reserve account for
approximately 70 basis points that will serve as
credit-enhancement to the commercial paper investors. In
addition, we issued $5.4 million of a BBB-rated Madrona ABS
to provide further credit support. This facility has a
three-year term. During the third quarter of 2005 Madrona issued
commercial paper which was purchased by Redwood. As of
September 30, 2005 there was no commercial paper issuance
outstanding.
We have uncommitted facilities available with several banks and
major investment banking firms for financing residential and
commercial real estate securities and loans. The table below
summarizes the outstanding balances as of September 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004 by collateral type.
34
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
|
of | |
|
|
|
|
Facilities | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Limit | |
|
Maturity | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Facilities by Collateral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
10/05-9/06 |
|
Real Estate Securities
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
161,739 |
|
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
3/06-8/06 |
|
Unsecured Line of Credit
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
10/05-8/06 |
|
Madrona Commercial Paper Facility
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
4/08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Facilities
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
161,739 |
|
|
$ |
2,520,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
|
of | |
|
|
|
|
Facilities | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Limit | |
|
Maturity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Facilities by Collateral
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
181,999 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,000 |
|
|
|
3/05-10/05 |
|
Real Estate Securities
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
21,282 |
|
|
|
410,000 |
|
|
|
3/05-8/05 |
|
Unsecured Line of Credit
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Madrona Commercial Paper Facility
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Facilities
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
|
$ |
2,010,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under these facilities generally bear interest based
on a specified margin over the one-month LIBOR interest rate. We
continue to be in compliance with all of our debt covenants for
all of our borrowing arrangements and credit facilities.
Covenants associated with our debt generally relate to our
tangible net worth, liquidity reserves, and leverage
requirements. We have not had, nor do we currently anticipate
having, any problems in meeting these covenants. It is our
intention to renew committed and uncommitted facilities as
needed, as well as pursue additional facilities and other types
of financing.
|
|
NOTE 7. |
ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES ISSUED |
Securitization entities sponsored by us issue ABS to raise the
funds to acquire assets from us and others. Each series of asset
ABS consists of various classes that pay interest at variable
and fixed rates. The bulk of the ABS is indexed to one-, three-
or six-month LIBOR. A lesser amount of the ABS are fixed for a
term and then will adjust to a LIBOR rate (hybrid ABS) or are
fixed for their entire term. Some of the ABS Interest-Only
(IO) securities issued have a fixed spread, while others
earn a coupon based on the spread between collateral owned by
and the ABS issued by a securitized entity. The maturity of each
class is directly affected by the rate of principal prepayments
on the assets of the issuing entity. Each series is also subject
to redemption (call) according to the specific terms of the
respective governing documents. As a result, the actual maturity
of any class of ABS is likely to occur earlier than its stated
maturity.
35
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of ABS issued by consolidated securitization
entities as of September 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004, along with other selected information, are summarized in
the table below.
|
|
|
Asset-Backed Securities Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Sequoia ABS issued certificates with principal value
|
|
|
$15,901,546 |
|
|
|
$21,681,229 |
|
Sequoia ABS issued interest-only certificates
|
|
|
163,332 |
|
|
|
210,385 |
|
Acacia ABS issued
|
|
|
2,138,200 |
|
|
|
1,691,592 |
|
Commercial ABS issued
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
9,523 |
|
Madrona ABS issued
|
|
|
5,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized premium on ABS
|
|
|
25,064 |
|
|
|
37,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated ABS issued
|
|
|
$18,237,792 |
|
|
|
$23,630,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of weighted average interest rates, by series
Sequoia
|
|
|
3.63% to 5.64% |
|
|
|
2.22% to 5.54% |
|
|
Stated Sequoia maturities
|
|
|
2007-2039 |
|
|
|
2007-2035 |
|
|
Number of Sequoia series
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Range of weighted average interest rates, by series
Acacia
|
|
|
4.03%-4.72% |
|
|
|
2.69%-3.35% |
|
|
Stated Acacia maturities
|
|
|
2018-2045 |
|
|
|
2018-2040 |
|
|
Number of Acacia series
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Weighted average interest rates Commercial
|
|
|
12.00% |
|
|
|
9.08% |
|
|
Stated commercial maturities
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2005 and 2009 |
|
|
Number of commercial series
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
The following table summarizes the accrued interest payable on
ABS issued as of September 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004.
|
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable on Asset-Backed Securities
Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Sequoia
|
|
$ |
28,207 |
|
|
$ |
28,879 |
|
Acacia
|
|
|
13,279 |
|
|
|
6,025 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued interest payable on ABS issued
|
|
$ |
41,529 |
|
|
$ |
34,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ABS issued by securitization entities sponsored by us are
collateralized by residential and commercial real estate loans
and securities. The ABS collateralized by residential real
estate loans (and some residential securities) are typically
securitized through entities with the brand name Sequoia.
Residential real estate loan collateral consists primarily of
adjustable-rate and hybrid, conventional, 25-or 30-year
residential real estate loans secured by first liens on one- to
four-family residential properties. HELOC collateral consists of
adjustable-rate first and second lien residential loans with a
ten-year revolving period and a maturity from origination of ten
years. The ABS issued that are collateralized by residential and
commercial real estate securities and commercial real estate
loans are typically issued
36
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
through entities with the brand name Acacia. Other ABS
collateralized by commercial loans are issued on an individual
basis. For financial reporting purposes the assets and
liabilities of these entities are consolidated on our balance
sheets.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005,
Sequoia entities issued $0.3 billion and $1.5 billion,
respectively, of Sequoia ABS to fund Sequoias acquisitions
of residential real estate loans from us. During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2004, Sequoia entities
issued $2.7 billion and $7.5 billion, respectively.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005,
Sequoia did not issue any ABS secured by interest-only
certificates that we had retained from prior Sequoia
securitizations. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004, Sequoia entities issued $0 and
$0.2 billion of ABS secured by interest-only securities we
had retained, respectively.
During both the three and nine months ended September 30,
2005 and 2004, Acacia entities issued $300 and $600 million
of Acacia ABS, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2005, we issued
$4.3 million of commercial ABS, and paid off commercial ABS
in full of $9.5 million. No commercial ABS issuances or
payoffs occurred during the three months ended
September 30, 2005 and during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2004.
The carrying value components of the collateral for ABS issued
and outstanding as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004 are summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
Collateral for Asset-Backed Securities Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Residential real estate loans
|
|
$ |
16,324,420 |
|
|
$ |
22,014,922 |
|
Residential home equity lines of credit
|
|
|
215,010 |
|
|
|
296,348 |
|
Residential loan CES
|
|
|
326,328 |
|
|
|
210,902 |
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
34,704 |
|
|
|
22,360 |
|
Securities portfolio securities
|
|
|
1,548,828 |
|
|
|
1,265,322 |
|
Real estate owned (REO)
|
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash owned by consolidated securitization entities
|
|
|
56,696 |
|
|
|
35,740 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
75,580 |
|
|
|
65,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total collateral for ABS issued
|
|
$ |
18,584,004 |
|
|
$ |
23,911,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a REIT, Redwood can deduct dividends paid from REIT taxable
income, and thus effectively reduce or eliminate corporate-level
income taxes. However, a REIT can retain up to 10% of its REIT
taxable income and still maintain its REIT status. We currently
plan to retain up to 10% of our 2005 REIT ordinary taxable
income and we will be subject to corporate level income taxes on
this retained income for the 2005 calendar tax year.
Our Federal tax provision for corporate income tax for the REIT
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 was
$0.9 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The
Federal provision was $1.2 million and $3.8 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004,
respectively. This Federal provision is estimated based on the
amount of anticipated REIT ordinary income to be permanently
retained for each year.
37
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Holdings, Redwoods taxable subsidiary, is subject to
corporate income taxes on its taxable income. Our current
Federal tax provision for corporate income tax for Holdings for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, was
$2.7 million and $3.7 million, respectively. Our
current Federal tax provision for corporate income tax for
Holdings for both the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004, was $4.8 million. Federal
NOLs were fully utilized during the year ended
December 31, 2004.
The Redwood and Holdings combined current unitary state
provision for corporate income taxes for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005 was $2.0 million and
$3.5 million, respectively. The Redwood and Holdings
current combined unitary state tax provision for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $2.9 million
and $3.7 million, respectively. Holdings state
NOLs were $10.7 million at September 30, 2005
and December 31, 2004. These state NOLs will expire between
2005 and 2012 if not utilized.
Holdings recorded a net deferred tax benefit for the three
months ended September 30, 2005 of $0.9 million and a
deferred tax provision of $2.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005. Deferred tax provisions are
attributable to securitization gain temporary differences
between GAAP and tax accounting treatments and the utilization
of prior period deferred tax assets. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2004, Holdings recognized
deferred tax benefits of $3.9 million and
$9.1 million, respectively.
As a result of current and deferred tax provisions, we
recognized a total net tax provision of $4.7 million and
$13.4 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005, respectively. We recognized a total net
tax provision of $5.0 million and $3.2 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2004,
respectively.
The following table summarizes the tax provisions for Redwood
REIT and Holdings for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current Tax Provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood REIT Federal
|
|
$ |
864 |
|
|
$ |
1,167 |
|
|
$ |
3,364 |
|
|
$ |
3,791 |
|
|
Holdings Federal
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
|
3,683 |
|
|
|
4,800 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
2,014 |
|
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
|
|
3,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current tax provision
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
8,894 |
|
|
|
10,531 |
|
|
|
12,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax provision/(benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood REIT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holdings
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
(3,932 |
) |
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
(9,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
(3,932 |
) |
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
(9,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income tax
|
|
$ |
4,693 |
|
|
$ |
4,962 |
|
|
$ |
13,424 |
|
|
$ |
3,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
Holdings had the following deferred tax asset and liability
balances.
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets/(Liabilities) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Net operating loss carry forward Federal
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net operating loss carry forward State
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
Real estate assets
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Gains from Sequoia securitizations
|
|
|
4,182 |
|
|
|
9,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
7,679 |
|
|
|
10,572 |
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefited deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
7,679 |
|
|
$ |
10,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
7,679 |
|
|
$ |
10,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the Internal Revenue Code, a dividend declared by a REIT
in October, November, or December of a calendar year and payable
to stockholders of record as of a specified date in such year
will be deemed to have been paid by the REIT and received by the
stockholders on the last day of that calendar year, provided the
dividend is actually paid before February 1st of the
following calendar year, and provided that the REIT has any
remaining undistributed REIT taxable income on the record date.
Therefore, the regular dividends declared in the fourth quarter
of 2004 that were paid in January 2005 are considered taxable
income to stockholders in 2004 (the year declared).
Similar to 2004, our 2005 dividend distributions declared before
December 31, 2005 and distributed on or before
January 31, 2006, are expected to be less than 85% of our
estimated 2005 REIT taxable income. This will result in a 4%
excise tax provision on the shortfall. Thus, for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2005, we provided for
excise tax of $0.3 million and $0.9 million,
respectively, which is reflected as a component of operating
expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Income. For the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2004, excise tax
totaled $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
accrued excise tax payable was $0.9 million and
$0.5 million, respectively, and was reflected as a
component of accrued expenses and other liabilities on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
NOTE 9. |
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
We estimate the fair value of our financial instruments using
available market information and other appropriate valuation
methodologies. These fair value estimates generally incorporate
discounted future cash flows at current market discount rates
for comparable investments. We validate our fair value estimates
on a quarterly basis by obtaining fair value estimates from
dealers who make a market in these financial instruments. We
believe the estimates we use reasonably reflect the values we
may be able to receive should we choose to sell them. Many
factors must be considered in order to estimate market values,
including, but not limited to interest rates, prepayment rates,
amount and timing of credit losses, supply and demand,
liquidity, and other market factors. Accordingly, our estimates
are inherently subjective in nature and involve uncertainty and
judgment to interpret relevant market and other data. Amounts
realized in actual sales may differ from the fair values
presented.
39
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents the carrying values and estimated
fair values of our financial instruments as of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Assets |
Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate loans: held-for-investment
|
|
$ |
16,341,180 |
|
|
$ |
16,266,463 |
|
|
$ |
22,206,395 |
|
|
$ |
22,395,296 |
|
|
Residential real estate loans: held-for-sale
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
$ |
2,022 |
|
|
HELOC: held-for-investment
|
|
$ |
215,137 |
|
|
$ |
216,791 |
|
|
$ |
296,348 |
|
|
$ |
297,623 |
|
|
Commercial real estate loans: held-for-investment
|
|
$ |
56,102 |
|
|
$ |
57,327 |
|
|
$ |
54,479 |
|
|
$ |
55,258 |
|
Real Estate Loan Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan credit-enhancement securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
available-for-sale
|
|
$ |
664,801 |
|
|
$ |
664,801 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
Commercial loan credit-enhancement securities, available-for-sale
|
|
$ |
43,540 |
|
|
$ |
43,540 |
|
|
$ |
14,498 |
|
|
$ |
14,498 |
|
|
Securities portfolio: available-for-sale
|
|
$ |
1,783,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,783,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,380,077 |
|
|
$ |
1,380,077 |
|
Interest Rate Agreements
|
|
$ |
25,066 |
|
|
$ |
25,066 |
|
|
$ |
15,020 |
|
|
$ |
15,020 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
163,160 |
|
|
$ |
163,160 |
|
|
$ |
57,246 |
|
|
$ |
57,246 |
|
Restricted Cash
|
|
$ |
58,796 |
|
|
$ |
58,796 |
|
|
$ |
36,038 |
|
|
$ |
36,038 |
|
|
Liabilities |
Redwood debt
|
|
$ |
161,739 |
|
|
$ |
161,739 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
|
$ |
203,281 |
|
ABS issued
|
|
$ |
18,237,792 |
|
|
$ |
18,233,496 |
|
|
$ |
23,630,162 |
|
|
$ |
23,701,977 |
|
Methodologies we use to estimate fair market values for various
asset types are described below.
|
|
|
|
|
Residential and HELOC loans fair values are determined by
available market quotes and discounted cash flow analyses and
are confirmed by third party/dealer pricing indications. |
|
|
|
Commercial loans fair values are determined by appraisals on
underlying collateral and discounted cash flow analyses. |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential credit enhancement portfolio and securities
portfolio fair values are determined by discounted cash flow
analyses and other valuation techniques using market pricing
assumptions confirmed by third party dealer pricing indications. |
40
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values on interest rate agreements are determined by third
party vendor modeling software and from valuations provided by
dealers active in the derivatives markets. |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes cash on hand and highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less. Fair values equal
carrying values. |
|
|
|
|
|
Includes interest earning cash balances in ABS entities for the
purpose of distribution to bondholders and reinvestment. Due to
the short-term nature of the restrictions, fair values equal
carrying values. |
|
|
|
|
|
All Redwood debt is adjustable and matures within one year; fair
values equal face values. |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities issued |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values are determined by discounted cash flow analyses and
other valuations techniques confirmed by third party dealer
pricing indications. |
|
|
NOTE 10. |
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
In March 2004, we amended the previously approved 2002 Redwood
Trust, Inc. Incentive Stock Plan (the Plan) for executive
officers, employees, and non-employee directors. This amendment
was approved by our stockholders in May 2004. The Plan
authorizes our Board of Directors (or a committee appointed by
our Board of Directors) to grant incentive stock options as
defined under Section 422 of the Code (ISOs), options not
so qualified (NQSOs), deferred stock, restricted stock,
performance shares, stock appreciation rights, limited stock
appreciation rights (awards), and dividend equivalent rights
(DERs) to eligible recipients other than non-employee directors.
ISOs and NQSOs awarded to employees have a maximum term of
ten-years and generally vest ratably over a four-year period.
NQSOs awarded to non-employee directors have a maximum term of
ten years and generally vest immediately or ratably over a
three- or four-year period. Non-employee directors are
automatically provided annual awards under the Plan. The Plan
has been designed to permit the Compensation Committee of our
Board of Directors to grant and certify awards that qualify as
performance-based and otherwise satisfy the requirements of
Section 162(m) of the Code; however, not all awards may so
qualify. As of September 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004, 453,053 and 614,608 shares of common stock,
respectively, were available for grant.
Of the total shares of common stock available for grant, no more
than 963,637 shares of common stock are cumulatively
available for grant as ISOs. As of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, 551,697 ISOs had been granted. The
exercise price for ISOs granted under the Plan may not be less
than the fair market value of shares of common stock at the time
the ISO is granted.
41
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Redwood has granted stock options that accrue and pay stock or
cash DERs. Stock DERs represent shares of stock that are
issuable when the holders exercise the underlying stock options,
the amount of which is based on prior dividends paid per share
on common stock and the market value of the stock on the various
dividend payable dates. All stock options with stock DERs issued
before January 1, 2003 are considered variable stock awards
under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25). As of September 30, 2005, 5,411 options
remained that are considered variable stock awards. For the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, we
recognized variable stock option income of $16,000 and $98,000,
respectively, on these stock options. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2004, we recognized variable
stock option expense of $0.2 million and $1.0 million,
respectively on these stock options. In addition, we expense the
stock DERs on these options. Options granted since
January 1, 2003 that provide for stock DERs are accounted
for under the provision of FAS 123 and are not considered
variable stock options. Cash DERs per applicable option are cash
payments made that are equal to the dividends paid in common
stock per share. For options granted prior to January 1,
2003 that provide for cash DERs, we expense the cash DERs
on these options. Stock options granted since January 1,
2003 that provide for cash DERs are accounted for when the
provisions of FAS 123; thus, there are no DER expenses
associated with these options as future DERs were included
in the valuation of the stock options at the grant date. These
expenses are included in operating expenses in our Consolidated
Statements of Income. Options with cash DERs are participating
securities under EITF 03-6 and were determined to be
antidilutive in all reported periods. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005, we accrued cash and stock
DER expenses of $2.0 million and $5.6 million,
respectively. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004, we accrued cash and stock DER expenses
of $2.0 million and $7.5 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there
were 389,787 and 387,404 unexercised options with stock DERs,
respectively. As of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, there were 1,155,715 and 1,176,010
unexercised options with cash DERs, respectively. As of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were
57,622 and 61,050 unexercised options with no DERs, respectively.
42
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the status of the Plan and changes during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 are
presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Stock Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,602,040 |
|
|
$ |
31.71 |
|
|
|
1,656,998 |
|
|
$ |
28.71 |
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
54.87 |
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
36.86 |
|
|
|
(128,473 |
) |
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
|
31.84 |
|
|
|
(6,370 |
) |
|
|
39.72 |
|
|
Stock dividend equivalent rights earned
|
|
|
5,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at end of period
|
|
|
1,603,124 |
|
|
$ |
31.59 |
|
|
|
1,528,947 |
|
|
$ |
29.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at period-end
|
|
|
1,197,548 |
|
|
$ |
27.40 |
|
|
|
1,064,329 |
|
|
$ |
25.90 |
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Stock Options Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,624,465 |
|
|
$ |
31.77 |
|
|
|
1,935,599 |
|
|
$ |
26.48 |
|
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
|
51.70 |
|
|
|
49,698 |
|
|
|
55.00 |
|
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(26,070 |
) |
|
|
21.33 |
|
|
|
(455,556 |
) |
|
|
17.00 |
|
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(13,853 |
) |
|
|
43.22 |
|
|
|
(16,054 |
) |
|
|
34.76 |
|
|
Stock dividend equivalent rights earned
|
|
|
14,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options at end of period
|
|
|
1,603,124 |
|
|
$ |
31.59 |
|
|
|
1,528,947 |
|
|
$ |
29.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at period-end
|
|
|
1,197,548 |
|
|
$ |
27.40 |
|
|
|
1,064,329 |
|
|
$ |
25.90 |
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period
|
|
$ |
51.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
43
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
Stock Options Exercise Prices As of
September 30,2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Range of | |
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
|
Exercise | |
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
Prices | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Exercise Price | |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
$ 0 to $10 |
|
|
|
49,180 |
|
|
|
7.98 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
18,635 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$10 to $20 |
|
|
|
355,846 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
12.74 |
|
|
|
355,846 |
|
|
|
12.74 |
|
|
$20 to $30 |
|
|
|
462,269 |
|
|
|
5.14 |
|
|
|
24.28 |
|
|
|
364,310 |
|
|
|
23.64 |
|
|
$30 to $40 |
|
|
|
267,060 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
37.47 |
|
|
|
259,427 |
|
|
|
37.50 |
|
|
$40 to $50 |
|
|
|
98,247 |
|
|
|
2.96 |
|
|
|
45.49 |
|
|
|
97,185 |
|
|
|
45.52 |
|
|
$50 to $60 |
|
|
|
369,721 |
|
|
|
8.40 |
|
|
|
55.08 |
|
|
|
101,344 |
|
|
|
53.98 |
|
|
$60 to $63 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
6.87 |
|
|
|
62.54 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
62.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 0 to $63 |
|
|
|
1,603,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,197,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, 3,299
and 5,912 shares, respectively, of restricted stock were
outstanding. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004, we did not grant any shares of
restricted stock to employees. No restrictions lapsed during the
three months ended September 30, 2005. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, restrictions on 1,750 of
these shares lapsed. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004, restrictions on 1,750 and 5,250 of
these shares lapsed, respectively. Restrictions on the remaining
shares of outstanding restricted stock lapse through
January 1, 2009.
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Restricted stock outstanding at the beginning of period
|
|
|
3,616 |
|
|
|
6,324 |
|
|
|
5,912 |
|
|
|
10,003 |
|
Restricted stock granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock for which restrictions lapsed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
|
|
(5,250 |
) |
Restricted stock forfeited
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(863 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Incentive Stock Plan allows for the granting of Deferred
Stock Units (DSUs). These are discussed below under Executive
Deferred Compensation Plan.
|
|
|
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan |
In May 2002, our Board of Directors approved the 2002 Redwood
Trust, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (EDCP). The
EDCP allows eligible employees and directors to defer portions
of current salary and certain other forms of compensation.
Redwood may match some deferrals up to certain levels.
Compensation deferred under the EDCP are assets of Redwood and
subject to the claims of the general creditors of Redwood. For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005,
deferrals of $0.1 million and $0.8 million,
respectively, were made under the EDCP. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2004, deferrals of
$0.2 million and $0.8 million were made, respectively.
The EDCP allows for the investment of deferrals in either an
interest crediting account or deferred stock units. The rate of
accrual in the interest crediting account is set forth in the
EDCP. For deferrals prior to July 1, 2004, the accrual rate
is based on a calculation of the marginal rate of return on our
portfolio of earning assets. This accrual rate will continue for
these deferred amounts through July 1, 2007 and then will
be based on references to publicly traded mutual funds or the
applicable federal rate (AFR). For deferrals after July 1,
2004, the accrual rate is based on references to publicly traded
mutual funds or the AFR. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005, accrued interest of $0.3 million
and $1.0 million was credited to participants under the
Plan, respectively. For the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004, accrued interest credited totaled
$0.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
Withdrawals of $0 and $0.2 million were made during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2005,
respectively. Withdrawals of $13,000 were made during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2004.
The following table provides detail on changes in
participants accounts in the EDCP for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Accounts Transfer in of participants payroll
deductions from the EDCP
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
786 |
|
|
$ |
833 |
|
Accrued interest earned in EDCP
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
Participant withdrawals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in participants equity
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
1,520 |
|
|
$ |
1,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
6,100 |
|
|
$ |
3,865 |
|
|
$ |
4,928 |
|
|
$ |
2,634 |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
6,448 |
|
|
$ |
4,232 |
|
|
$ |
6,448 |
|
|
$ |
4,232 |
|
45
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table provides detail on the financial position of
the EDCP at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Net Assets Available for EDCP Participant Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants payroll deductions receivable
|
|
$ |
3,877 |
|
|
$ |
3,286 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets available for participant benefits
|
|
$ |
6,448 |
|
|
$ |
4,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005,
10,000 and 44,564 Deferred Stock Units (DSUs), respectively,
were granted through deferrals under the Plan, which represented
a value of $0.5 million and $2.4 million at the time
of the grants, respectively. Forfeitures totaled
$0.1 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. There were no forfeitures during the
three months ended September 30, 2005. No such grants were
awarded or forfeitures occurred during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2004. The tables below provide
summaries of the balance and activities of the DSUs in the
EDCP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Value of DSUs at Grant
|
|
$ |
7,031 |
|
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
Participant forfeitures
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in Value at Period End since Grant
|
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of DSUs at Period End
|
|
$ |
6,554 |
|
|
$ |
5,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Stock Units Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Units | |
|
Value | |
|
Units | |
|
Value | |
(In thousands, except unit amounts) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
124,836 |
|
|
$ |
6,442 |
|
|
|
25,417 |
|
|
$ |
1,415 |
|
Transfer in of DSUs (value of grants)
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Valuation during Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(396 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
Participant forfeitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Number/ Value of DSUs
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
134,836 |
|
|
$ |
6,554 |
|
|
|
25,417 |
|
|
$ |
1,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
Deferred Stock Units Activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Units | |
|
Value | |
|
Units | |
|
Value | |
(In thousands, except unit amounts) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
92,161 |
|
|
$ |
5,722 |
|
|
|
25,417 |
|
|
$ |
1,292 |
|
Transfer in of DSUs (value of grants)
|
|
|
44,564 |
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Valuation during Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
Participant forfeitures
|
|
|
(1,889 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Change in Number/ Value of DSUs
|
|
|
42,675 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at End of Period
|
|
|
134,836 |
|
|
$ |
6,554 |
|
|
|
25,417 |
|
|
$ |
1,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
In May 2002, our stockholders approved the 2002 Redwood Trust,
Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP), effective July 1,
2002. The purpose of the ESPP is to give our employees an
opportunity to acquire an equity interest in Redwood through the
purchase of shares of common stock at a discount. The ESPP
allows eligible employees to have up to 15% of their annual
gross compensation (including base salary, bonus, and cash DERs,
and subject to certain other limitations) withheld to purchase
common stock at 85% of its market value. The maximum gross
compensation any participant can contribute to the ESPP in any
calendar quarter is $6,250. Market value as defined under the
ESPP is the lesser of the closing market price of the common
stock as of the start of an offering period in the ESPP or the
closing market price on the quarterly purchase date. The
offering period starts on January 1st of each calendar
year and consists of four quarterly purchase periods.
The ESPP allows a maximum of 100,000 shares of common stock
to be purchased. As of September 30, 2005,
22,083 shares have been purchased. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2005, employees acquired an
aggregate of 1,539 and 4,040 shares of common stock,
respectively, at an average purchase price of $41.32 and
$42.77 per share, respectively. For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2004, employees acquired an
aggregate of 1,243 and 3,644, shares, at an average price of
$43.53 and $43.36 per share, respectively. As of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there
remained a negligible amount of uninvested employee
contributions in the ESPP.
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Nine Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Transfer in of participants payroll deductions from the
ESPP
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Cost of common stock issued to participants under the terms of
the ESPP
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in participants equity
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our Board of Directors has approved the repurchase of a total of
7,455,000 shares of our common stock. A total of
6,455,000 shares were repurchased in 1998 and 1999. As of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there
remained 1,000,000 shares available under the authorization
for repurchase. Repurchased shares have been returned to the
status of authorized but unissued shares of common stock.
|
|
|
Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment
Plan |
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, we
issued 112,694 and 582,250 shares of common stock,
respectively, through our Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend
Reinvestment Plan for net proceeds of $5.7 million and
$31.3 million, respectively. For the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2004, we issued 601,750 and
1,545,840 shares for total proceeds of $33.7 million
and $81.5 million, respectively.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, we
did not undertake any secondary equity offerings. For the three
months ended September 30, 2004, we completed one secondary
equity offering and issued 1.2 million shares for net
proceeds of $65 million. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, we completed two secondary equity
offerings and issued 2.4 million shares for net proceeds of
$117 million.
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Certain assets are marked to market through accumulated other
comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets; these
adjustments affect our book value but not our net income. As of
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, we reported
net accumulated other comprehensive income of
$117.0 million and $105.4 million, respectively.
Changes in this account reflect increases or decreases in the
fair value of our earning assets or interest rate agreements
during the period, and also reflect changes due to calls of our
securities, write downs to fair value of a portion of our
securities, premium or discount amortization of our securities,
and amortization of realized gains or losses on our interest
rate agreements.
The following table provides reconciliation of accumulated other
comprehensive income as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Net unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loan CES
|
|
$ |
84,279 |
|
|
$ |
78,733 |
|
|
Commercial loan CES
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
Securities portfolio
|
|
|
12,182 |
|
|
|
15,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities
|
|
$ |
98,874 |
|
|
$ |
95,396 |
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate agreements accounted for as cash flow hedges
|
|
|
18,169 |
|
|
|
9,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
117,043 |
|
|
$ |
105,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 11. |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
As of September 30, 2005, we were obligated under
non-cancelable operating leases with expiration dates through
2013 for $6.2 million. The majority of the future lease
payments are related to the operating lease for our executive
offices to which we relocated in 2003 and signed a ten year
lease. Also included in the future lease commitments below are
future lease payments through May 2006 for our former executive
offices in Mill Valley that we vacated in 2003. Remaining
payments related to this lease are $0.1 million in 2005 and
$0.2 million in 2006. This office space is currently being
subleased through May 2006. The anticipated sublease payments
are not included in the table below.
|
|
|
Future Lease Commitments By Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
2005 (fourth quarter)
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
2006
|
|
|
996 |
|
2007
|
|
|
695 |
|
2008
|
|
|
702 |
|
2009
|
|
|
718 |
|
2010 and thereafter
|
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
6,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2005, there were no pending legal
proceedings to which we were a party or to which any of our
property was subject.
The table below shows our commitments to purchase loans and
securities as of September 30, 2005. The loan purchase
commitments represent derivative instruments under
FAS No. 149 amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(FAS No. 149). The fair value of these commitments
was negligible as of September 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
Residential real estate loans
|
|
$ |
1,076 |
|
Residential loan CES
|
|
|
|
|
Securities portfolio securities
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
4,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12. |
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS |
This Note provides information on activity during the fourth
quarter of 2005, through November 3, 2005.
49
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In the fourth quarter through November 3, we committed to sell
$77 million market value residential CES for anticipated GAAP
gains of $9 million and estimated taxable gains of $5 million.
These were all second-loss securities, primarily rated single-B.
During October 2005, residential CES with a principal value of
$7 million were called, generating estimated gains of $3 million
for GAAP purposes and $2 million for tax purposes.
In the fourth quarter through November 3, 2005, we committed to
acquire $7 million residential CES and $4 million commercial
CES. We also committed to buy $29 million residential real
estate securities, $16 million residential real estate loans,
$21 million commercial real estate securities, and
$4 million commercial real estate loans as inventory assets
for future securitization.
In October, prepayment rates for loans underlying our
residential CES and interest-only securities remained at or near
third quarter speeds.
To recycle and redeploy capital, during the fourth quarter we
exercised our option to call the Acacia 1 CDO transaction that
we sponsored in 2002. We plan to sell or re-securitize the
Acacia 1 collateral.
50
|
|
Item 2. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within
the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are not historical in
nature, including the words anticipated,
estimated, should, expect,
believe, intend, and similar
expressions, are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to
risks and uncertainties, including, among other things, those
described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004 under the caption Risk
Factors. Other risks, uncertainties, and factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected are detailed from time to time in reports filed by us
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including
Forms 10-K and 8-K.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events, or otherwise. In light of these
risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, the forward-looking
events mentioned, discussed in, or incorporated by reference
into this Form 10-Q might not occur. Accordingly, our
actual results may differ from our current expectations,
estimates, and projections.
Important factors that may impact our actual results include
changes in interest rates and market values; changes in
prepayment rates; general economic conditions, particularly as
they affect the price of earning assets and the credit status of
borrowers; the level of liquidity in the capital markets as it
affects our ability to finance our real estate asset portfolio;
and other factors not presently identified. This Form 10-Q
contains statistics and other data that in some cases have been
obtained from, or compiled from information made available by,
servicers and other third-party service providers.
SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK
Redwood Trust, Inc. is a financial institution located in Mill
Valley, California. We invest in, credit-enhance, and securitize
residential and commercial real estate loans and securities.
Our primary source of revenue is interest income from the real
estate securities we own. This interest income consists of the
monthly loan payments made by homeowners (and to a lesser
degree, commercial property owners) on the real estate loans
that underlie these securities. In addition, from time to time
we earn call income (a form of gain-on-sale income) from
residential credit-enhancement securities (CES) and realize
gains or losses from the sale of assets.
The residential real estate loan portfolio consolidated on
Redwoods balance sheet includes all of the residential
loans that we own temporarily prior to sale to a securitization
plus loans that are consolidated onto our balance sheet from ABS
securitization entities that have been sponsored by us.
Securitizations by sponsored entities are structured for
Redwoods Consolidated Balance Sheets as financings under
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and are not
accounted for as sales for GAAP reporting purposes
the underlying assets and liabilities are consolidated on
Redwoods balance sheets and associated income and expense
are consolidated in Redwoods income statements. The
consolidated residential real estate loan portfolio generally
consists of prime quality residential loans that
generally have high-quality characteristics such as relatively
low loan-to-value ratios and borrowers with relatively high
credit scores (in each case relative to U.S. residential
real estate loans as a whole). The majority of these loans are
jumbo loans that had loan balances at origination that exceeded
the loan limits imposed on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, so they
were not eligible at origination for purchase or
credit-enhancement by these government-sponsored enterprises.
Better than expected credit results on the loans we credit
enhance has been the primary driver of our continued strong
earnings results. Housing prices continue to increase, which
reduces our risk of
51
credit loss in the future for our existing assets. Our portfolio
of assets as a whole has the ability to generate attractive
earnings, cash flows, and dividends in the future, assuming real
estate credit losses do not increase materially. Delinquencies
on loans in our portfolio remain at historically low levels and
credit losses continue to be less than one basis point (0.01%)
of our credit-enhanced loans on an annual basis.
Recent changes in interest rates have resulted in a flatter
yield curve, causing faster prepayments for adjustable-rate
residential loans and a reduced supply of new adjustable-rate
loan originations (as homeowners are opting for hybrid-rate and
fixed-rate loans). In addition, new forms of adjustable-rate
mortgages (negative amortization, option ARMs, and
Moving Treasury Average ARMs) have increased their share of the
ARM market, and have increased prepayment rates on the ARM loans
we credit-enhance due to ARM-to-ARM refinancing and other
factors. These faster prepayment patterns affect both the
residential ARM loans securitized via the Sequoia program and
our portfolio of securities backed by ARM loans purchased from
other securitization entities not sponsored by us. Overall, we
believe we benefit over time from faster prepayment rates on our
net ARM loans and securities.
Faster prepayments for the residential ARM loans consolidated
from Sequoia entities have adversely affected our near-term
results of operations. Prepayment rates for these loans averaged
17% conditional prepayment rate (CPR) in 2004, 25% CPR in
the first quarter of 2005, 39% CPR in the second quarter of
2005, 51% CPR in the third quarter of 2005, and 49% CPR in
October 2005. Our net effective premium for GAAP purposes for
the $16 billion of loans consolidated on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets from Sequoia securitization entities (including
HELOCs) was $22 million at September 30, 2005. Our
effective net price for these Sequoia ARM loans for GAAP
purposes was 100.13% of principal value, and consists of
unamortized purchase premium ($191 million) and deferred
ABS issuance costs ($41 million) offset by premiums
received from the sale of ABS at a premium ($25 million),
premium received from the sale of interest-only ABS
($163 million), and credit reserves ($22 million).
Although our effective net premium for GAAP purposes for these
loans is low, changes in prepayment rates on these loans can
create volatility in our quarterly GAAP net income results
because GAAP treatment is not necessarily parallel for the
amortization of these largely offsetting premium and discount
balances. In addition to increasing premium amortization
expenses, the faster Sequoia ARM prepayment rates reduce our
overall investment in our older, more profitable Sequoia
transactions, thus lowering our overall earnings.
Our net effective discount on all consolidated residential and
commercial real estate loans and securities (ARM, fixed, and
hybrid) is $590 million, or $24 per share outstanding
at September 30, 2005. The net effective discount on
commercial real estate assets is $140 million ($6 per
share). The net effective discount on residential real estate
assets is $450 million ($18 per share outstanding at
September 30, 2005). The net effective commercial and
residential discount consists of purchase premiums
($255 million) and deferred ABS issuance costs
($56 million), less purchase discounts currently being
amortized into income ($161 million), purchase discounts
not currently being amortized into income because it is
designated as credit reserve ($552 million), premiums
received from the sale of ABS at a premium ($25 million),
and premiums received from the sale of interest-only ABS
($163 million). We will realize this $590 million net
discount as income over time to the extent it is not diminished
by credit losses. In addition to the cash net interest income we
earn, the realization of this discount as income over the next 5
to 7 years could (in the absence of an increase in credit
losses) result in attractive earnings and dividends for
stockholders. With faster prepayments we will realize this
income more quickly.
During the third quarter of 2005, we sold a portion of our
residential loan CES and we have completed the sale of
additional securities in the fourth quarter of 2005. These sales
were completed primarily as a means to increase our cash
balances now so we will be prepared to capitalize on future
investment opportunities, which we think may improve over the
next few years if real estate or capital markets come under
stress. As a result of these sales, we anticipate ending this
year with reduced credit risks, an even stronger balance sheet,
and significant levels of excess capital (uninvested cash).
52
Thus, our on-going earnings will likely be reduced (relative to
what they would have been otherwise) during the period this cash
remains uninvested.
Our commercial real estate and CDO businesses continue to
develop, diversifying our opportunities for growth as well as
diversifying our risks.
In our view, the long-term outlook for our business is good. We
believe our existing assets can generate attractive returns and
special dividends for stockholders over the next few years if
credit losses remain at current low levels. If the environment
becomes more difficult, we believe we are well prepared with a
strong balance sheet and cash to invest. We will maintain our
disciplined investment process, and we will continue to acquire
only those assets that we believe will generate attractive
long-term cash flows for the benefit of our stockholders.
Our GAAP earnings totaled $56 million ($2.21 per
share) for the third quarter of 2005, a decrease from the
$72 million ($3.18 per share) we earned for the third
quarter of 2004. Our earnings totaled $157 million
($6.26 per share) for the first nine months of 2005 and
$178 million ($8.29 per share) for the first nine
months of 2004. Our earnings are still at a level that we
consider attractive. Our GAAP return on equity was 22% for both
the third quarter and the first nine months of 2005.
Our results for the third quarter of 2005 were not as strong as
the extraordinary results we achieved during the third quarter
of 2004. Lower earnings resulted from a lower yield on our
portfolio of residential credit-enhancement securities (the
older, higher-yielding securities have prepaid, been called, or
sold), a reduction in net interest income from consolidated
residential loans and matched ABS issued due in part to
increased ARM prepayment rates, and high levels of uninvested
cash. These factors were partially offset by an increase in
income realized as the result of calls and sales.
Premium amortization expense on our consolidated residential
whole loans was $15.6 million greater during the third
quarter of 2005 than in the third quarter of 2004 as a result of
faster prepayments and a one-time cumulative adjustment of
$4.1 million to premium amortization expense which
effectively increased our reported earnings in the third quarter
of 2004.
For loans acquired prior to July 1, 2004, when amortizing
the purchase premiums under Financial Accounting Statement
No. 91 Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct
Cost of Leases (FAS 91), we use the interest method to
determine an effective yield and amortize the premium or
discount on loans assuming changes in interest rates. As a
result, during periods of rising short-term rates our effective
yields on these loans increase, and the amount of premium we
amortize in the period prior to the coupon rate readjustments is
generally lower than it will be in later periods for each pool
of loans. For loans acquired after July 1, 2004, we
determine an effective yield under FAS 91 using the initial
coupon interest rate of the loans (without regard to future
changes in the interest rates and underlying indices) as well as
anticipated prepayment rates. For these residential loans,
higher coupon interest rates will increase net realized yields
when the coupon readjusts. Periodic premium amortization
expenses will not be reduced as a result of coupon interest rate
increases. For these loans, as a result, premium amortization
expenses will be higher (relative to the older loans) in a
period of rising interest rates.
In the third quarter of 2004 we made a one-time adjustment of
$4.1 million to premium amortization expense as a result of
some technical errors discovered with respect to the application
of FAS 91. This adjustment was not deemed material. It did,
however, increase our earnings for that period, and in contrast
to comparisons with results for the third quarter of 2005.
Redwood has elected to be taxed as a REIT. As such, we are not
required to pay corporate income taxes on the REIT taxable
income that we distribute to stockholders as dividends. We are
required to distribute to stockholders as dividends at least 90%
of the REIT taxable income (our taxable income excluding income
earned in non-REIT taxable subsidiaries) that we earn. Through
September 30, 2005, we continued to satisfy our dividend
distribution requirements as a REIT. Our regular quarterly
dividend during the first three quarters of 2005 was
$0.70 per share.
53
Estimated total taxable income, estimated core taxable income,
and estimated REIT taxable income are not GAAP performance
measures but are important measures as they are the basis of our
required minimum dividend distributions to stockholders. A
reconciliation of these measures to the most comparable GAAP
measure appears in Table 18 below. Our GAAP income is
reduced by credit provision expenses provided for credit losses
while taxable income is reduced by credit losses only when they
are realized. Additionally, unrealized market price valuation
adjustments for GAAP purposes are generally not included in
taxable income, and certain compensation-related items are
treated differently for GAAP and tax purposes (both in terms of
timing and also total expenses over time). Most of the
securitizations we sponsor are treated as sales of assets for
tax purposes but are treated as a financing for GAAP purposes.
Securitizations we sponsor generally create a realized gain or
loss for tax purposes (generally a component of the taxable
income we earn in our taxable subsidiaries) but no such gain or
loss for GAAP purposes. Essentially, when we recognize gains on
securitizations that we sponsor, we accelerate for tax purposes
income that we will recognize for GAAP purposes over time in the
form of the net interest income from residential real estate
loans and associated ABS issued.
For the third quarter of 2005, we earned an estimated
$55 million ($2.23 per share) total taxable income
(pre-tax income as calculated for tax purposes), of which an
estimated $47 million ($1.91 per share) was real
estate investment trust (REIT) taxable income. For the
third quarter of 2004, we earned an estimated $59 million
($2.53 per share) of total taxable income, of which an estimated
$49 million ($2.10 per share) was REIT taxable income.
For the nine months ending September 30, 2005, we earned an
estimated $142 million ($5.78 per share) total taxable
income, of which an estimated $132 million ($5.34 per
share) was REIT taxable income. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2004, we earned an estimated
$182 million total taxable income ($8.45 per share),
of which $152 million ($7.05 per share) was REIT
taxable income.
Taxable income before calls, sales, and deductions for stock
options (estimated core taxable income) was $41 million
($1.66 per share) and $33 million ($1.41 per
share) for the three months ended September 30, 2005 and
2004, respectively. Estimated core taxable income was
$105 million ($4.27 per share) and $122 million
($5.73 per share) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
We currently project that the first three regular quarterly
dividends we declared in 2005 consisted of REIT taxable income
earned in 2004 ($37 million) plus a portion of REIT taxable
income earned in 2005 ($15 million). Based on our estimates
of REIT taxable income during the first nine months of 2005, we
entered the fourth quarter of 2005 with $107 million of
undistributed 2005 REIT taxable income ($4.31 per share
outstanding at September 30, 2005). Assuming we follow our
past practice with respect to declaring a special dividend (and
it is our current plan to do so), the amount of REIT taxable
income potentially available for a year-end 2005 special
dividend would equal:
|
|
|
(a) 90% of 2005 ordinary REIT income ($3.65 per share
outstanding as of September 30, 2005 that has been earned
plus any fourth quarter ordinary REIT taxable income), plus |
|
|
(b) 100% of capital gains REIT income ($0.66 per share
outstanding as of September 30, 2005 that has been earned
plus any fourth quarter capital gains REIT income), less |
|
|
(c) the fourth quarter 2005 regular dividend, less |
|
|
(d) 2 to 3 quarters of regular dividends deferred into
2006, and |
|
|
(e) as adjusted for any stock issuance during the fourth
quarter. |
Income from call and sales activity is long-term capital gain
income for tax purposes. Our tax-paying stockholders may benefit
to the degree they can take advantage of the lower tax rate on
our distributions of capital gains versus ordinary income. We
provide information annually on the tax characteristics of our
dividends and this information is also posted on our website at
www.redwoodtrust.com.
We currently face, and expect to continue to face, increased
competition, higher acquisition pricing, and a reduced supply of
high-quality residential credit-enhancement acquisition and loan
securitization opportunities. There are fewer high-quality fixed
rate, hybrid rate, and ARM securitizations as the
54
quantity of new originations of quality jumbo loans has
decreased and as banks and other financial institutions have
increased their purchases of residential real estate loans (and
continue to hold these loans unsecuritized). There is an
abundance of capital in and demand for assets from banks, hedge
funds, mortgage REITs, and other investors, resulting in higher
prices for the assets in which we invest. This has increased the
value of many of our existing portfolio assets and continues to
make the acquisition of attractive new high-quality assets more
challenging.
The existing market conditions of reduced high-quality supply,
increased competition, and high acquisition prices may continue,
although there are signs that the level of speculation in
housing and related capital markets may be easing. We have sold
assets to build a relatively large balance of uninvested cash as
we believe acquisition opportunities may improve over the next
two years. While we carry this excess cash, our overall risk
levels will be reduced, however absent major credit losses our
on-going earnings also will be reduced relative to what they
would have been otherwise. During the period we are seeking to
maintain excess cash levels for future opportunities, we will
likely significantly reduce our rate of new asset acquisitions.
After taking into consideration our internal risk-based capital
guidelines that suggest how much capital we need to support our
assets and operations, we had $250 million excess capital
(unutilized cash) at September 30, 2005. As we measure it
internally, our capital was 69% utilized at September 30,
2005. As we move forward, this amount will be reduced by
dividends and asset acquisitions and will be increased by cash
flows earned, asset pay downs, asset sales, and proceeds from
equity issuance.
We may continue to issue new equity in this environment, most
likely through our direct stock purchase and dividend
reinvestment plan. By issuing new shares, we can maintain our
desired level of excess cash while also taking advantage of the
attractive asset acquisition opportunities that still exist
today, maintaining a strong presence in our markets, and serving
our customers needs. If our share price were to drop to a
level below our reported book value (approximately $41 per
share at September 30, 2005), we would be less likely to
issue new shares unless there was a compelling reason to do so.
At a reasonable discount to this value, we would consider stock
repurchases while also being mindful of our desire to maintain
cash balances.
In this environment of reduced stock prices for mortgage REITs
and other specialty finance companies, it may make sense for us
to consider undertaking corporate transactions such as an
acquisition or equity investment, either to further the
development of our businesses or to gain cheap assets.
In general in the past, the real estate loans on which we have
taken first-loss credit risk have been high-quality loans
relative to U.S. real estate loans as a whole. In the
future, we may credit-enhance and/or securitize other credit
grades of residential loans (near-prime, Alt-A, sub-prime,
etc.), especially if prices for these assets dropped
significantly as a result of a stressed real estate credit and
capital markets liquidity environment. In such an environment,
we may also acquire distressed assets with high levels of
delinquencies and credit losses if we believe we can evaluate
and invest in these assets to the benefit of our stockholders.
In addition, we may invest in distressed commercial real estate
and CDO assets.
In general, our hurdle rate for new acquisitions is 14% internal
rate of return, We will not buy an asset unless we believe there
is a high likelihood that the asset will produce cash flows that
discount back to a 14% cash-on-cash return per-overhead and
pre-tax (making what we believe to be relatively conservative
assumptions about credit losses, prepayments, etc.). If we can
achieve this minimum hurdle rate for all of our assets and we
are fully invested, we estimate we can earn a 10% to 11% return
on equity on average over time and generate sufficient cash to
support our regular dividend rate.
55
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
Acquisitions, Securitizations, Sales, and Calls |
During the third quarter of 2005, we acquired $332 million
adjustable-rate and hybrid residential real estate loans for our
residential conduits Sequoia securitization program, loan
sales to Sequoia entities totaled $327 million, and Sequoia
entities created and issued $327 million ABS. For the first
nine months of 2005, residential real estate loan acquisitions
totaled $1.6 billion, sales to Sequoia entities totaled
$1.5 billion, and Sequoia entities issued $1.5 billion
ABS. All these securitizations are sales for legal and tax
purposes but are treated as financings under GAAP. Accordingly,
in our GAAP financial statements, we consolidate the assets and
liabilities of the Sequoia entities and record interest income
on the loans sold to securitization entities and interest
expense on ABS issued by securitization entities. At
September 30, 2005, our loans held for future sale to
Sequoia were $17 million; these loans are classified as
held-for-investment for GAAP purposes as Sequoia has the intent
to hold them to maturity.
During the third quarter of 2005, we acquired $57 million
residential loan CES. During the first nine months of 2005,
we acquired $213 million residential loan CES. The
loans underlying the CES we acquired during the third quarter of
2005 were generally consistent with our usual high-quality
standards. The average FICO score was 735 and the average
loan-to-value (LTV) was 69%. The geographic distribution was 49%
in California, with Florida, Virginia, New Jersey, Illinois, and
New York together representing a total of 20% of the total (and
no other state representing more than 2% of the loans). The
property types for these loans were 89% primary residence, 9%
second homes, and 2% investment properties. These loans had an
average loan balance of $445,000. Increasingly, we are
credit-enhancing loans that have balances that are lower than
the jumbo loan balance limit imposed on Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac these lower-balance loans were 17% of the loans
we credit-enhanced in the third quarter. Loans with balances
over $1 million represented 5% of the dollar balance. Loan
types credit-enhanced in the third quarter included 27% hybrid,
46% fixed, and 27% adjustable-rate. A total of 19% of newly
credit-enhanced loans were interest-only, negative amortization,
or similar type loans where a fully amortizing loan payment is
not required. We consider these types of loans to be prime loans
when there is a significant down payment made and the borrower
is strong and not over-leveraged.
We acquired $14 million commercial real estate loans during
the third quarter of 2005 and $21 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2005. We had no sales of
commercial real estate loans during the third quarter of 2005.
We sold $11 million during the first nine months of 2005.
We did not acquire or sell commercial real estate loans during
the three months ended September 30, 2004. We acquired
$17 million commercial real estate loans during the nine
months ended September 30, 2004 and sold $2 million
during this period.
During the third quarter of 2005, we acquired $17 million
commercial loan CES, and during the first nine months of
2005 we acquired $30 million commercial loan CES. No
commercial loan CES were sold during these periods.
We acquired $190 million of other residential and
commercial real estate securities during the third quarter of
2005 for our Acacia CDO securitization program. During the first
nine months of 2005, we acquired $515 million of these
securities for our Acacia CDO securitization program. We sold
$244 million of securities to Acacia entities during the
third quarter of 2005; total securities sales to Acacia entities
for the first nine months of 2005 were $516 million. We
finished the third quarter with securities of $268 million
held for future sale to future Acacias. Acacia entities issued
$300 million CDO ABS during the third quarter of 2005, and
$600 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. All of the assets and liabilities of
Acacia entities are consolidated onto our Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
In the third quarter of 2005, we had calls of our residential
CES of $5 million principal value for GAAP gains of
$3 million and taxable gains of $2 million. For the
first nine months of 2005, we had $28 million principal
value of calls, generating GAAP call income gains of
$15 million and taxable income gains of $11 million.
The principal value of residential CES currently callable at
September 30,
56
2005 was $7 million. A substantial portion of our GAAP and
taxable income in 2003 and 2004 came from gains from calls and
gains from sales of residential CES. Returns from these sources
are highly variable and not predictable. As we started 2005 with
a smaller amount of securities that are callable, we expect call
income in 2005 to be at significantly lower levels than achieved
in the past two years.
Occasionally, we sell loans and securities from our portfolio.
Sales generate one-time gains (or losses), which add to
(subtract from) reported GAAP earnings, taxable earnings, and
perhaps our total future required dividend payments. Asset sales
and calls may adversely impact our future earnings, as the lost
ongoing income from these high-yield securities is often higher
than the yield generated by new assets we may acquire. In the
third quarter of 2005, we sold $362 million market value
residential real estate and residential and commercial
securities and loans, generating GAAP gains of $23 million
and taxable gains of $15 million. During the first nine
months, sales of securities and loans of $419 million
market value generated GAAP gains of $32 million and
taxable gains of $21 million. We have continued to sell
assets during the fourth quarter of 2005.
Net income decreased to $56 million in the third quarter of
2005 compared to $72 million in the third quarter of 2004.
This decrease was primarily the result of a decline in net
interest income. Higher premium amortization expense on our
residential real estate loans (due to faster prepayments) and
lower yields on our residential loan CES portfolio on newer
assets (relative to the older assets that were called or sold),
less efficient capital utilization (we operated with more
uninvested cash in 2005 than in 2004), and an increase operating
expenses (as we continue to scale up, professionalize, and
diversify our operations). Earnings in the third quarter of 2004
were positively affected by a one-time adjustment to premium
amortization expense of $4.1 million. For similar reasons
(and including a one-time tax benefit of $5.2 million
recorded for GAAP purposes in the second quarter of 2004),
earnings in the first nine months of 2005 decreased to
$157 million from the $178 million earned during the
first nine months of 2004.
Taxable net income totaled $55 million in the third quarter
of 2005 and $142 million for the first nine months of 2005.
These were both decreases from the $59 million earned in
the third quarter of 2004 and $182 million earned in the
first nine months of 2004. The decrease was caused primarily by
a drop in taxable gains from calls and asset sales, fewer IO
securities owned (we have not been acquiring the IO securities
created by the securitization entities sponsored by us, and the
older IO securities we own are paying down), and higher
operating expenses. As discussed more fully below, operating
expenses increased primarily as a result of additional staff and
systems, and increased accounting, consultant, and other costs
relating to the enhancement of our internal controls.
We provide for income taxes for GAAP purposes based on our
estimates of our taxable income, the amount of taxable income we
currently plan to permanently retain, and the amount of taxable
income we estimate to be earned at our taxable subsidiaries. In
the first nine months of 2004, we benefited from Federal and
state net operating loss carry forwards and did not have any
current tax provisions for income generated at our taxable REIT
subsidiaries. During 2005, by contrast, our tax provision under
GAAP benefited only slightly from some remaining state net
operating losses. In addition, in the first nine months of 2004,
we recognized a one-time deferred tax asset, thus recognizing
the future value of remaining net operating losses at that time.
In addition, in prior years, we generated taxable gains-on-sales
from our securitization activities at the taxable subsidiaries.
Gains on these activities were much lower in 2005 due to
decreased volumes and a significant decrease in the gains
generated by each securitization. Since these securitizations
were treated as financings under GAAP, deferred tax assets were
created. A portion of these deferred tax assets was expensed in
the 2005 periods.
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
243,556 |
|
|
$ |
180,090 |
|
|
$ |
729,110 |
|
|
$ |
442,906 |
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
(196,686 |
) |
|
|
(114,811 |
) |
|
|
(567,833 |
) |
|
|
(284,747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
46,870 |
|
|
|
65,279 |
|
|
|
161,277 |
|
|
|
158,159 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(11,194 |
) |
|
|
(8,561 |
) |
|
|
(33,450 |
) |
|
|
(27,048 |
) |
Net recognized gains and valuation adjustments
|
|
|
24,916 |
|
|
|
20,586 |
|
|
|
42,973 |
|
|
|
50,281 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(4,693 |
) |
|
|
(4,962 |
) |
|
|
(13,424 |
) |
|
|
(3,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
55,899 |
|
|
$ |
72,342 |
|
|
$ |
157,376 |
|
|
$ |
178,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Common Shares
|
|
|
25,314,315 |
|
|
|
22,728,369 |
|
|
|
25,159,619 |
|
|
|
21,486,208 |
|
Net income per share
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
8.29 |
|
Total interest income consists of interest earned on
consolidated earning assets, plus income from amortization of
discount for assets acquired at prices below principal value,
less expenses for amortization of premium for assets acquired at
prices above principal value, less credit provision expenses.
|
|
|
Table 2 Interest Income and
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
245,735 |
|
|
$ |
171,804 |
|
|
$ |
731,361 |
|
|
$ |
446,827 |
|
Discount amortization
|
|
|
12,714 |
|
|
|
9,012 |
|
|
|
30,425 |
|
|
|
26,925 |
|
Premium amortization
|
|
|
(15,698 |
) |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
(33,983 |
) |
|
|
(25,307 |
) |
Reversal of (provision for) credit losses
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
(5,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
243,556 |
|
|
$ |
180,090 |
|
|
$ |
729,110 |
|
|
$ |
442,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earning assets
|
|
$ |
20,085,393 |
|
|
$ |
22,460,500 |
|
|
$ |
22,230,168 |
|
|
$ |
20,308,547 |
|
Yield as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
4.89 |
% |
|
|
3.07 |
% |
|
|
4.38 |
% |
|
|
2.94 |
% |
Discount amortization
|
|
|
0.25 |
% |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
|
|
0.18 |
% |
Premium amortization
|
|
|
(0.31 |
)% |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
(0.20 |
)% |
|
|
(0.17 |
)% |
Reversal of (provision for) credit losses
|
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
(0.03 |
)% |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
(0.04 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield on earning assets
|
|
|
4.85 |
% |
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared
to the same period in 2004, interest income increased primarily
due to an overall increase in yield caused by an increase in
short-term interest rates. A majority of the assets are
adjustable-rate residential real estate loans, and yields on
these assets increase as short-term interest rates rise as has
occurred over the past twelve months. Total consolidated earning
assets balance decreased during the third quarter of 2005 as
compared to the third quarter of 2005 primarily as a result of
decreased sponsorship of securitizations of residential real
estate loans over the past twelve months from the nine months
ended September 30, 2004. For the
58
nine months ended September 30, 2005, the increase in
interest income was due to both higher interest rates and a
larger average balance of earning assets.
The table below presents the contribution to interest income and
yield from each of our portfolios. Further discussions of
changes in yields and balances are presented below by portfolio.
|
|
|
Table 3 Interest Income and
Yield by Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005 | |
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Interest | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Interest | |
|
Average | |
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
Income | |
|
Income | |
|
Balance | |
|
Yield | |
|
Income | |
|
Income | |
|
Balance | |
|
Yield | |
thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Residential real estate loans, net of provision for credit losses
|
|
$ |
191,914 |
|
|
|
78.80 |
% |
|
$ |
17,373,023 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
$ |
147,974 |
|
|
|
82.16 |
% |
|
$ |
20,484,287 |
|
|
|
2.89 |
% |
HELOCs, net of provision for credit losses
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
% |
|
|
224,884 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
% |
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
323,100 |
|
|
|
2.00 |
% |
Residential loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
24,368 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
585,663 |
|
|
|
16.64 |
% |
|
|
16,007 |
|
|
|
8.89 |
% |
|
|
368,887 |
|
|
|
17.36 |
% |
Commercial loans, net of provision for credit losses
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
47,703 |
|
|
|
10.14 |
% |
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
0.58 |
% |
|
|
33,461 |
|
|
|
12.40 |
% |
Commercial loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
32,192 |
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
7,372 |
|
|
|
18.80 |
% |
Securities portfolio
|
|
|
22,926 |
|
|
|
9.41 |
% |
|
|
1,687,506 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
|
|
12,932 |
|
|
|
7.18 |
% |
|
|
1,141,456 |
|
|
|
4.53 |
% |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
% |
|
|
134,422 |
|
|
|
2.95 |
% |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
101,937 |
|
|
|
0.69 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$ |
243,556 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
20,085,393 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
% |
|
$ |
180,090 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
22,460,500 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 | |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Interest | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Interest | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Income | |
|
Income | |
|
Balance | |
|
Yield | |
|
Income | |
|
Income | |
|
Balance | |
|
Yield | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Residential real estate loans, net of provision for credit losses
|
|
$ |
590,534 |
|
|
|
80.99 |
% |
|
$ |
19,673,866 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
356,680 |
|
|
|
80.53 |
% |
|
$ |
18,724,707 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
% |
HELOCs, net of provision for credit losses
|
|
|
6,721 |
|
|
|
0.92 |
% |
|
|
255,626 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
% |
|
|
149,686 |
|
|
|
1.92 |
% |
Residential loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
63,431 |
|
|
|
8.70 |
% |
|
|
543,516 |
|
|
|
15.56 |
% |
|
|
47,617 |
|
|
|
10.75 |
% |
|
|
324,563 |
|
|
|
19.56 |
% |
Commercial loans, net of provision for credit losses
|
|
|
4,004 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
% |
|
|
49,635 |
|
|
|
10.76 |
% |
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
27,324 |
|
|
|
12.72 |
% |
Commercial loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
25,558 |
|
|
|
8.82 |
% |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
|
17.37 |
% |
Securities portfolio
|
|
|
60,356 |
|
|
|
8.28 |
% |
|
|
1,553,993 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
|
32,992 |
|
|
|
7.45 |
% |
|
|
994,139 |
|
|
|
4.42 |
% |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,374 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
127,974 |
|
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
84,739 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$ |
729,110 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
22,230,168 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
% |
|
$ |
442,906 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
% |
|
$ |
20,308,547 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
The table below details our interest income by portfolio as a
result of changes in consolidated asset balances
(volume) and yield (rate) for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.
Table
4 Volume and Rate Changes for
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Interest Income | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Change in Interest Income | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 Versus | |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
2005 Versus September 30, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
Change | |
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
Change | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Residential real estate loans, net of provisions for credit
losses
|
|
$ |
(22,475 |
) |
|
$ |
66,415 |
|
|
$ |
43,940 |
|
|
$ |
18,080 |
|
|
$ |
215,774 |
|
|
$ |
233,854 |
|
HELOCs, net provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(492 |
) |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
3,043 |
|
|
|
4,567 |
|
Residential loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
9,406 |
|
|
|
(1,045 |
) |
|
|
8,361 |
|
|
|
32,123 |
|
|
|
(16,309 |
) |
|
|
15,814 |
|
Commercial loans, net of provision for credit losses
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
(732 |
) |
|
|
1,397 |
|
Commercial loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
(1,640 |
) |
|
|
1,248 |
|
Securities portfolio
|
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
|
9,994 |
|
|
|
18,580 |
|
|
|
8,784 |
|
|
|
27,364 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
(5,713 |
) |
|
$ |
69,179 |
|
|
$ |
63,466 |
|
|
$ |
75,535 |
|
|
$ |
210,669 |
|
|
$ |
286,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume change is the change in average portfolio balance
between periods multiplied by the rate earned in the earlier
period. Rate change is the change in rate between periods
multiplied by the average portfolio balance in the prior period.
Interest income changes that result from changes in both rate
and volume were allocated to the rate change amounts shown in
the table.
A discussion of the changes in total income, average balances,
and yields for each of our portfolios is provided below.
|
|
|
Table 5 Consolidated
Residential Real Estate Loans Interest Income and
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
204,078 |
|
|
$ |
147,160 |
|
|
$ |
618,484 |
|
|
$ |
385,118 |
|
Net (premium) discount amortization
|
|
|
(13,479 |
) |
|
|
2,078 |
|
|
|
(29,452 |
) |
|
|
(23,430 |
) |
Reversal of (provision for) credit losses
|
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
(5,008 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
191,914 |
|
|
$ |
147,974 |
|
|
$ |
590,534 |
|
|
$ |
356,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average consolidated residential real estate loans
|
|
$ |
17,373,023 |
|
|
$ |
20,484,287 |
|
|
$ |
19,673,866 |
|
|
$ |
18,724,707 |
|
Yields as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
4.70 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
|
|
4.19 |
% |
|
|
2.74 |
% |
Net (premium) discount amortization
|
|
|
(0.31 |
)% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
(0.20 |
)% |
|
|
(0.16 |
)% |
Reversal of (provision for) credit losses
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
(0.02 |
)% |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
(0.04 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
2.89 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
2.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
During 2005, as compared to 2004, interest income on residential
real estate loans increased primarily as a result of higher
yields. Yields on these residential real estate loans are
increasing as short-term interest rates are rising as most of
these loans have coupon rates that adjust monthly or every six
months based on one -or six-month LIBOR interest rate. Higher
average balances contributed to the increase in interest income
during the nine months of 2005 as compared to the first nine
months of 2004; however, average balances had a dampening effect
in the third quarter of 2005 as compared to a year earlier as
the level of new loans added to this consolidated portfolio was
less than the level of prepayments over the last twelve months.
Premium amortization expense (as a percentage of average loan
balances) during 2005 increased from the same periods in 2004.
Amortization expense results from the application of
FAS 91. In applying the interest method under FAS 91,
we make certain elections to determine an effective yield to
amortize the premium. For loans acquired prior to July 1,
2004, in our effective yield calculations we use coupon interest
rates as they change over time as well as anticipated principal
prepayments (actual and projected). Thus, rising rates will
cause an increase in effective yield for these adjustable rate
residential loans, as the coupon rate is rising or will reset at
a higher rate in the near term. For this lag before the reset,
the amount of premium expense is generally lower in order to
increase the current effective yield to current market levels
yield (all other factors being equal). For loans acquired after
July 1, 2004, we determine an effective yield under
FAS 91 using the initial coupon interest rate of the loans
(without regard to future changes in the interest rates and
underlying indices) as well as anticipated prepayment rates. For
these residential loans, higher coupon interest rates will
increase net realized yields when the coupon actually
re-adjusts. Periodic premium amortization expenses will not be
reduced in the short-term in anticipation of coupon interest
rate increases. As a result, these loans premium amortization
expenses will be higher (relative to the older loans) in a
period of rising interest rates. As of September 30, 2005,
loans acquired before July 1, 2004 had a principal value of
$11.68 billion and an amortized cost basis of
$11.82 billion. Loans acquired after July 1, 2004 had
a principal value of $4.50 billion and an amortized cost
basis of $4.54 billion.
|
|
|
Table 6 Residential
HELOC Interest Income and Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
3,165 |
|
|
$ |
2,954 |
|
|
$ |
9,489 |
|
|
$ |
4,007 |
|
Net premium amortization
|
|
|
(959 |
) |
|
|
(1,072 |
) |
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
(531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
|
$ |
1,618 |
|
|
$ |
6,721 |
|
|
$ |
2,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of HELOCs
|
|
$ |
224,884 |
|
|
$ |
323,100 |
|
|
$ |
255,626 |
|
|
$ |
149,686 |
|
Yields as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5.64 |
% |
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
4.96 |
% |
|
|
3.57 |
% |
Net premium amortization
|
|
|
(1.71 |
)% |
|
|
(1.33 |
)% |
|
|
(1.25 |
)% |
|
|
(1.18 |
)% |
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(0.91 |
)% |
|
|
(0.33 |
)% |
|
|
(0.20 |
)% |
|
|
(0.47 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
3.02 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our return on the HELOC-backed securities we acquired from
securitization of HELOCs we sponsored may be materially reduced
if prepayment rates (net of draws) on these loans are faster
than we originally anticipated. Cumulative prepayments through
September 30, 2005 were at a CPR of 28%, which was slightly
faster than we originally anticipated.
62
|
|
|
Table 7 Residential
Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities Interest
Income and Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
13,175 |
|
|
$ |
7,826 |
|
|
$ |
35,736 |
|
|
$ |
21,951 |
|
Net discount amortization
|
|
|
11,193 |
|
|
|
8,181 |
|
|
|
27,695 |
|
|
|
25,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
24,368 |
|
|
$ |
16,007 |
|
|
$ |
63,431 |
|
|
$ |
47,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average residential loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
$ |
585,663 |
|
|
$ |
368,887 |
|
|
$ |
543,516 |
|
|
$ |
324,563 |
|
Yield as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
9.00 |
% |
|
|
8.49 |
% |
|
|
8.77 |
% |
|
|
9.02 |
% |
Net discount amortization
|
|
|
7.64 |
% |
|
|
8.87 |
% |
|
|
6.79 |
% |
|
|
10.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
16.64 |
% |
|
|
17.36 |
% |
|
|
15.56 |
% |
|
|
19.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized from residential loan CES during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005
increased as compared to the same periods in 2004, primarily due
to growth in our portfolio over the past year, partially offset
by the lower yield on the residential CES portfolio which
decreased during the 2005 periods as compared to the 2004
periods. This is the result of the more seasoned, higher
yielding assets (higher yielding as a result of several years of
strong credit performance and favorable prepayments) being
called or sold within the last year. In addition, any newer CES
generally have lower yields because we do not expect the same
strong credit performance or favorable prepayment patterns to
repeat themselves.
The yields we currently recognize on recently acquired CES (both
residential and commercial) may be less than the yields we will
actually realize over the lives of these CES. To determine
yields on CES, we make assumptions regarding loan losses and
prepayments. Since the market generally has a wide range for
these assumptions (and not a specific estimate), we apply
assumptions within a range that generally result in yields on
these assets in early periods of ownership that are lower than
what we might realize over the life of the assets. Specifically,
the initial yield we book on certain CES may be lower than the
market mid-range expectation of performance (and below our
hurdle rate of 14%). We review the actual performance of each
CES and the markets and our renewed range of expectations
every quarter. We adjust the yield of the assets as a result of
the appropriate and supportable changes in assumptions. In
addition, if credit performance is better than the original
range of expectations, and/or prepayment behavior is favorable
relative to initial estimates, the yields on these CES over the
remaining lives may be significantly higher then we recorded in
the first several quarters of ownership. In many cases, the
yield we recognize in any period may prove to be too high or too
low, as the actual yield we realize over the life of each of the
CES will be dependent upon the actual receipt (both timing and
amounts) of cash. Cumulatively, the cash we receive over the
life of an asset will be accounted for as either a return of our
initial investment or as income. The timing of the recognition
of income is based on our estimates and assumptions of future
amounts and timing of credit losses and prepayments and may be
inexact.
The determination of the yield is a function of the assumptions
used to project the cash flows on each security. One assumption
is the estimated credit losses. The amount of credit losses we
assume for each security is the amount of designated credit
reserve we have for that asset. If our expectations change, we
will change the amount of credit losses anticipated and this
will impact the effective yield over the remaining life. Our
designation of the level of credit reserve is based on many
factors, including the credit rating agencies
determination of required credit-enhancement levels. As our
securities season and loan pools have specific default and loss
experience, our assumptions will change. While we use the
markets range of expectations, our designated credit
reserve and projected timing of losses are subjective in nature.
63
In the third quarter of 2005 and also thus far in the fourth
quarter of 2005, we have been selling many of our single B-rated
residential loan CES. The restructuring of our balance sheet in
this way reflects our belief that now is a good time to reduce
overall risk levels and raise cash for future investment
opportunities. By retaining most our first-loss (non-rated) CES,
we are retaining most of the upside potential within our
residential portfolios should credit losses continue to be low.
These sales are generating gains that will be distributed to our
stockholders. We generally are not reinvesting cash at this
time. As a result we will likely have a smaller portfolio of
residential CES and higher cash balances until our investment
strategy changes.
We believe the risk/reward ratio offered by our recent CES
acquisitions is attractive for stockholders. Nevertheless, we
believe these new securities are unlikely to generate over their
lives the level of interest and call income generated by our
older portfolio assets unless the market environment going
forward proves to be as attractive (i.e., very fast prepayments
and very low credit losses) as over the last several years. We
expect that our rate of new asset acquisitions will slow.
|
|
|
Table 8 Commercial Real
Estate Loans Interest Income and Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
1,278 |
|
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
$ |
4,017 |
|
|
$ |
2,959 |
|
Net premium amortization
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
Reversal of credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
$ |
1,038 |
|
|
$ |
4,004 |
|
|
$ |
2,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average earning assets
|
|
$ |
47,703 |
|
|
$ |
33,461 |
|
|
$ |
49,635 |
|
|
$ |
27,324 |
|
Yield as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
10.72 |
% |
|
|
13.93 |
% |
|
|
10.79 |
% |
|
|
14.44 |
% |
Net premium amortization
|
|
|
(0.58 |
)% |
|
|
(1.53 |
)% |
|
|
(0.53 |
)% |
|
|
(1.72 |
)% |
Reversal of credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
10.14 |
% |
|
|
12.40 |
% |
|
|
10.76 |
% |
|
|
12.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The interest income earned on our commercial real estate loan
portfolio increased in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 from the same periods in 2004 primarily
due to the growth in our commercial loan portfolio. This
increase was partially offset by lower yield assumptions for
newer commercial loans. During the first nine months of 2005, we
reversed a portion of the credit reserve based on our positive
assessment of one loan in the portfolio and reclassified the
loan from held-for-investment to held-for-sale in anticipation
of a sale, which occurred in the second quarter of 2005.
64
|
|
|
Table 9 Commercial
Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities Interest Income and
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
1,355 |
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
3,347 |
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
Net (premium) discount amortization
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(1,657 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
453 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
$ |
1,690 |
|
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average residential loan credit-enhancement securities
|
|
$ |
32,192 |
|
|
$ |
7,372 |
|
|
$ |
25,558 |
|
|
$ |
3,389 |
|
Yield as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
16.84 |
% |
|
|
15.53 |
% |
|
|
17.46 |
% |
|
|
16.65 |
% |
Net discount (premium) amortization
|
|
|
(11.21 |
)% |
|
|
3.27 |
% |
|
|
(8.64 |
)% |
|
|
0.72 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
18.80 |
% |
|
|
8.82 |
% |
|
|
17.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized from commercial loan CES during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005
increased as compared to the same periods in 2004 primarily due
to the growth in this portfolio.
As discussed above, the yields we recognize on recently acquired
CES (both residential and commercial) may be less than the
yields we will actually realize over the lives of these assets.
For commercial loan CES, prepayment assumptions generally
have less of an impact on the yield because as commercial loans
underlying CMBS generally have contractual provisions that make
prepayments less likely than residential loans. The timing of
the recognition of income is based on our estimates and
assumption of future amounts and timing of credit losses and
prepayments.
|
|
|
Table 10 Consolidated
Securities Portfolio Interest Income and
Yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
21,697 |
|
|
$ |
12,235 |
|
|
$ |
57,918 |
|
|
$ |
31,951 |
|
Discount amortization
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
2,730 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
Premium amortization
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$ |
22,926 |
|
|
$ |
12,932 |
|
|
$ |
60,356 |
|
|
$ |
32,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average securities portfolio balance
|
|
$ |
1,687,506 |
|
|
$ |
1,141,456 |
|
|
$ |
1,553,993 |
|
|
$ |
994,139 |
|
Yield as a result of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
5.14 |
% |
|
|
4.29 |
% |
|
|
4.98 |
% |
|
|
4.28 |
% |
Discount amortization
|
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
|
0.29 |
% |
|
|
0.23 |
% |
|
|
0.17 |
% |
Premium amortization
|
|
|
(0.01 |
)% |
|
|
(0.05 |
)% |
|
|
(0.03 |
)% |
|
|
(0.03 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
5.43 |
% |
|
|
4.53 |
% |
|
|
5.18 |
% |
|
|
4.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income increased from the 2004 periods to the
2005 periods for the securities portfolio as the total size of
the portfolio grew and as yields increased over these periods as
the coupon rates on adjustable-rate loan securities (which
comprise over half of the portfolio) adjusted upward with the
increase in short-term interest rates over the past year.
Interest income includes cash interest payments we receive on
the securities in this portfolio, including the net interest
earned on IO securities and less certain underlying due
diligence expenses associated with the purchase of certain
securities.
65
Consolidated interest expense consists of interest payments on
Redwood debt and ABS issued, plus the amortization of deferred
ABS issuance costs and expenses related to certain interest rate
agreements less the amortization of ABS premiums. These ABS
premiums are created when interest-only and other ABS are issued
at prices greater than principal value.
Total consolidated interest expense increased in 2005 from 2004
due to higher cost of funds as a result of an increase in
short-term interest rates and a larger balance of consolidated
ABS issued. Furthermore, interest expense associated with
interest-only and Sequoia ABS issued at a premium were not
reduced this quarter in an amount commensurate with the increase
in prepayments on the underlying Sequoia loans due to timing
differences on the nature of the ABS outstanding.
|
|
|
Table 11 Total Interest
Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest expense on Redwood debt
|
|
$ |
3,845 |
|
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
8,398 |
|
|
$ |
7,373 |
|
Interest expense on ABS
|
|
|
192,841 |
|
|
|
112,499 |
|
|
|
559,435 |
|
|
|
277,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
$ |
196,686 |
|
|
$ |
114,811 |
|
|
$ |
567,833 |
|
|
$ |
284,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Redwood debt balance
|
|
$ |
297,788 |
|
|
$ |
404,589 |
|
|
$ |
264,024 |
|
|
$ |
463,700 |
|
Average ABS issued balance
|
|
|
19,542,413 |
|
|
|
21,606,164 |
|
|
|
21,630,747 |
|
|
|
19,426,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average total obligations
|
|
$ |
19,840,201 |
|
|
$ |
22,010,753 |
|
|
$ |
21,894,771 |
|
|
$ |
19,890,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of funds of Redwood debt
|
|
|
5.16 |
% |
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
2.12 |
% |
Cost of funds of ABS issued
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
2.08 |
% |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
Cost of funds of total obligations
|
|
|
3.97 |
% |
|
|
2.09 |
% |
|
|
3.46 |
% |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
For purposes of calculating the weighted average borrowing costs
of ABS issued, we include the amortization of the deferred ABS
issuance costs with interest expense. We include the average
deferred ABS issuance costs in the average balances below.
|
|
|
Table 12 Average Balances of
Asset-Backed Securities Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Sequoia
|
|
$ |
17,453,727 |
|
|
$ |
20,278,819 |
|
|
$ |
19,727,546 |
|
|
$ |
18,356,063 |
|
Acacia
|
|
|
2,142,869 |
|
|
|
1,377,574 |
|
|
|
1,956,423 |
|
|
|
1,115,171 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
5,416 |
|
|
|
7,086 |
|
|
|
5,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of ABS issued
|
|
$ |
19,600,827 |
|
|
$ |
21,661,809 |
|
|
$ |
21,691,055 |
|
|
$ |
19,476,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average deferred ABS issuance costs
|
|
|
(58,414 |
) |
|
|
(55,645 |
) |
|
|
(60,308 |
) |
|
|
(49,849 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of ABS issued, net
|
|
$ |
19,542,413 |
|
|
$ |
21,606,164 |
|
|
$ |
21,630,747 |
|
|
$ |
19,426,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
The table below details interest expense on debt and
consolidated ABS issued as a result of changes in consolidated
balances (volume) and cost of funds
(rate) for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 as compared to the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2004.
|
|
|
Table
13 Volume and Rate Changes for
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Interest Expense | |
|
Change in Interest Expense | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 Versus | |
|
September 30, 2005 Versus | |
|
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
September 30, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
Change | |
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
Change | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest expense on Redwood debt
|
|
$ |
(610 |
) |
|
$ |
2,143 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
(3,175 |
) |
|
$ |
4,200 |
|
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
Interest expense on ABS
|
|
|
(10,746 |
) |
|
|
91,088 |
|
|
|
80,342 |
|
|
|
31,467 |
|
|
|
250,594 |
|
|
|
282,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
$ |
(11,356 |
) |
|
$ |
93,231 |
|
|
$ |
81,875 |
|
|
$ |
28,292 |
|
|
$ |
254,794 |
|
|
$ |
283,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume change is the change in average balance of obligations
between periods multiplied by the rate paid in the earlier
period. Rate change is the change in rate between periods
multiplied by the average outstanding obligations in the current
period. Interest expense changes that resulted from changes in
both rate and volume were allocated to the rate change amounts
shown in the table.
Details of the change in cost of funds of debt and cost of funds
on ABS issued are provided below.
|
|
|
Table
14 Cost of Funds of Redwood
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest expense on Redwood debt
|
|
$ |
3,845 |
|
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
8,398 |
|
|
$ |
7,373 |
|
Average Redwood debt balance
|
|
$ |
297,788 |
|
|
$ |
404,589 |
|
|
$ |
264,024 |
|
|
$ |
463,700 |
|
Cost of funds of Redwood debt
|
|
|
5.16 |
% |
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
4.24 |
% |
|
|
2.12 |
% |
The increase in the cost of funds of Redwood debt is the result
of higher short-term interest rates and reflects the nature of
the collateral. Generally, the cost of funds is lower on
residential whole loans than on other asset-backed securities.
Thus, as the mix of assets used as collateral changes, the
average cost of funds may change, even during a period with no
change in short-term interest rates.
67
|
|
|
Table
15 Cost of Funds of Asset-Backed
Securities Issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ABS interest expense
|
|
$ |
191,035 |
|
|
$ |
108,237 |
|
|
$ |
556,202 |
|
|
$ |
256,115 |
|
ABS issuance expense amortization
|
|
|
5,162 |
|
|
|
4,197 |
|
|
|
15,821 |
|
|
|
12,045 |
|
Net ABS interest rate agreement (income) expense
|
|
|
(623 |
) |
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
(2,968 |
) |
|
|
13,841 |
|
Net ABS issuance premium amortization
|
|
|
(2,733 |
) |
|
|
(2,823 |
) |
|
|
(9,620 |
) |
|
|
(4,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ABS interest expense
|
|
$ |
192,841 |
|
|
$ |
112,499 |
|
|
$ |
559,435 |
|
|
$ |
277,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of ABS
|
|
$ |
19,542,413 |
|
|
$ |
21,606,164 |
|
|
$ |
21,630,747 |
|
|
$ |
19,426,816 |
|
ABS interest expense
|
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
2.00 |
% |
|
|
3.43 |
% |
|
|
1.76 |
% |
ABS issuance expense amortization
|
|
|
0.11 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.08 |
% |
Net ABS interest rate agreement (income) expense
|
|
|
(0.01 |
)% |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
(0.02 |
)% |
|
|
0.09 |
% |
Net ABS issuance premium amortization
|
|
|
(0.06 |
)% |
|
|
(0.05 |
)% |
|
|
(0.06 |
)% |
|
|
(0.03 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of funds of ABS
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
2.08 |
% |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
1.90 |
% |
The coupon payments on the ABS issued are primarily indexed to
one-, three-, and six-month LIBOR. Over the past year,
short-term interest rates have risen and, thus, so has our cost
of funds of ABS.
Operating expenses during the third quarter and first nine
months of 2005 increased from the same periods in 2004. Total
operating expenses before excise tax and variable stock option
expense (VSOE) or income (VSOI) increased by 36% over
the last year (from the third quarter of 2004 to the third
quarter of 2005). Expenses increased due to investments in
systems and infrastructure, increases in the scale of our
operations, and increased accounting, consulting fees, and
internal control costs. Generally, the scale of our business
over the last years has increased more rapidly than our
operating expenses; to some extent, operating costs continue to
increase as a lagged effect of prior growth.
Our operating efficiency ratio remains under 25% but was higher
in 2005 than in 2004 due to continued growth in systems and
infrastructure at a time when we are selling assets. Management
excludes excise tax and VSOE/ VSOI in determining the efficiency
ratio. By excluding these items, management believes that we are
providing a performance measure comparable to measures commonly
used by other companies in our industry because these two types
of excluded expenses do not reflect ongoing costs of day-to-day
operations of our company. Stock option grant expenses under
FAS 123, however, are an on-going expense and are included
in operating expense before excise tax and VSOE/ VSOI.
VSOE/ VSOI is a non-cash expense or income item that varies as a
function of Redwoods stock price. If our stock price
increases during a quarter and the stock price is above the
strike price certain variable options, we record a
GAAP expense in that period equal to the increase in the stock
price times the number of in-the-money variable
options that remain outstanding. If our stock price decreases
during a quarter, we record income in that period equal to the
decrease in the stock price times
68
the number of in-the-money variable options that
remain outstanding. With the adoption of FAS 123R,
Financial Accounting Statement No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, effective January 1, 2006 we will no longer
have VSOE/ VSOI.
Excise tax is a function of the timing of dividend
distributions. In the prior two years, Redwood delayed
distributing dividends on a portion of its REIT taxable income;
as a result, under the REIT tax rules, Redwood paid excise
taxes. Excise tax is included in operating expenses on our
Consolidated Statements of Income. The reconciliation of GAAP
operating expense to operating expense before excise tax and
VSOE/ VSOI is provided in the table below.
|
|
|
Table
16 Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total operating expenses
|
|
$ |
11,194 |
|
|
$ |
8,561 |
|
|
$ |
33,450 |
|
|
$ |
27,048 |
|
Less: Excise tax
|
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
(791 |
) |
Less: Variable stock option income (VSOI) (expense) VSOE
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses before excise tax and VSOE/ VSOI
|
|
$ |
10,925 |
|
|
$ |
8,047 |
|
|
$ |
32,648 |
|
|
$ |
25,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of total operating expense before excise tax and
VSOE/ VSOI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed compensation expense
|
|
$ |
2,802 |
|
|
$ |
1,959 |
|
|
$ |
8,203 |
|
|
$ |
6,031 |
|
Other operating expense
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
2,512 |
|
|
|
10,367 |
|
|
|
6,028 |
|
Incentive stock (income) expense
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
Variable compensation expense
|
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
|
3,443 |
|
|
|
13,407 |
|
|
|
12,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses before excise tax and VSOE/ VSOI
|
|
$ |
10,925 |
|
|
$ |
8,047 |
|
|
$ |
32,648 |
|
|
$ |
25,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (NII)
|
|
$ |
46,870 |
|
|
$ |
65,279 |
|
|
$ |
161,277 |
|
|
$ |
158,159 |
|
Adjusted efficiency ratio (Operating expense before excise tax
and VSOE/ VSOI)/net interest income
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Fixed compensation expenses include employee salaries and
related employee benefits. Other operating expenses include
office costs, systems, legal and accounting fees, and other
business expenses. We expect to continue to make significant
investments in expanding our staff and developing our business
processes and information technologies in order to meet the
operating needs we will face as we grow in the long-term. As a
result, we expect these fixed expenses will continue to increase
even during periods of time when our asset balances are
decreasing.
Incentive stock (income) expense represents the cost of equity
compensation as determined under FAS 123 for options and
option equity awards granted to employees and directors after
December 31, 2002. Beginning January 1, 2006, with the
adoption of FAS 123R, all remaining unvested incentive
awards and all future awards will be accounted for under this
principle. Beginning January 1, 2006, there will no longer
be future DER expenses as all remaining stock awards will be
accounted for under FAS 123R (and the value of additional
DERs on an award is already included in the value at the time of
grant and which is expensed over the requisite service period of
the award).
Variable compensation includes employee bonuses (which are based
on individual employee performance and the adjusted return on
equity earned by Redwood) and DER expenses on certain options
still outstanding and granted prior to December 31, 2002.
The primary drivers of this expense
69
are the profitability (return on equity) of the company, taxable
income at the REIT (which determines total dividend distribution
requirements), the number of employees, and the number of
incentive stock awards outstanding that receive DER payments
that are expensed (options granted prior to January 1,
2003).
|
|
|
Net Recognized Gains (Losses) and Valuation
Adjustments |
For the three months ended September 30, 2005, our net
recognized gains and losses and valuation adjustments totaled
positive $24.9 million as compared to positive
$20.6 million for the same period in 2004. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, our net recognized gains
and losses and valuation adjustments totaled positive
$43.0 million as compared to positive $50.3 million
for the same period in 2004.
The difference in net gains and valuation adjustments during
2005 periods compared to the 2004 periods are primarily the
result of lower gains on calls and sales during these various
periods. For the three months ended September 30, 2005,
gains on sales and calls totaled $26.0 million as compared
to the $21.0 million recognized during the three months
ended September 30, 2004. For the first nine months of
2005, total gain on sales and calls were $46.8 million as
compared to the $55.2 million realized during the first
nine months of 2004. We expect gains from calls to continue,
although at an unpredictable and significantly slower rate. We
will likely continue to sell assets from time to time; sales can
generate gains or losses.
Under accounting rules (FAS 115, EITF 99-20, and
SAB 5(m)), we determine if there is other-than-temporary
impairment as defined by GAAP for our residential and commercial
credit-enhancement and securities portfolios. To do so, we
review the projected discounted cash flows on our assets based
on credit, prepayment, and other assumptions compared to those
cash flows in prior period projections. Assets with reduced
discounted projected cash flows are written down if the current
market value for that asset is below our current basis. It is
difficult to predict the timing or magnitude of these
other-than-temporary impairments; amounts could be substantial.
We recognized other-than-temporary impairments of
$1.2 million for the three months ended September 30,
2005 and $3.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. Other-than-temporary impairments
totaled $0.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2004 and $4.8 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2004.
Estimated Taxable Income and Common Stock Dividends
Estimated total taxable income is the pre-tax income we earn
calculated using calculation methods appropriate for tax
purposes. Taxable income calculations differ significantly from
GAAP. Estimated total taxable income is not a GAAP performance
measure, but it is an important measure as it is the basis of
our dividend distributions to stockholders. Estimated REIT
taxable income is that portion of our taxable income that is
subject to REIT tax rules. We must distribute at least 90% of
this income as dividends to stockholders over time. As a REIT we
are not subject to corporate income taxes on the REIT taxable
income we distribute. The remainder of our estimated total
taxable income (the non-REIT taxable income) is income we earn
in taxable subsidiaries. We pay income tax on this income and we
generally retain the after-tax income at the subsidiary level.
Estimated core taxable income is not a GAAP financial measure.
Estimated core taxable income is the taxable income, including
taxable income at the REIT and our taxable subsidiaries, before
gains and losses on asset sales and calls and certain other
expenses such as deductions for stock option exercises.
Estimated core taxable income is a important measure in trying
to understand our ability to sustain dividend distributions to
stockholders. Taxable income measures are reconciled to GAAP net
income in Tables 17 and 18 below.
Taxable income per share is measured as the estimated pretax
taxable income earned in a calendar quarter divided by the
number of shares outstanding at the end of the quarter. Annual
taxable income per share is the sum of the quarterly taxable
income per share for each of the four quarters of
70
the fiscal year. Taxable income per share for the first nine
months of a year is the sum of the first three quarters
taxable income per share.
Estimated total taxable income was $55 million in the third
quarter of 2005 ($2.23 per share), a decrease from the
$59 million ($2.53 per share) during the third quarter of
2004. This decrease was primarily due to lower gains due to
sales and calls of assets. A decrease in gains on calls and
sales of assets also contributed to the decrease in estimated
total taxable income during the first nine months of 2005
($142 million, or $5.78 per share) as compared to the first
nine months of 2004 ($182 million, or $8.45 per share).
The table below reconciles the differences between GAAP net
income and estimated total taxable income and estimated core
taxable income.
|
|
|
Table
17 Differences Between GAAP Net
Income and Estimated Total Taxable Income and Estimated Core
Taxable Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, | |
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(Except per share data, |
|
Total | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
Per Share | |
in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
GAAP Net Income
|
|
$ |
55,899 |
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
72,342 |
|
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
$ |
157,373 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
178,221 |
|
|
$ |
8.29 |
|
GAAP/Tax differences (net)*
|
|
|
(743 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total taxable income (pre-tax)
|
|
$ |
55,156 |
|
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
$ |
59,173 |
|
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
$ |
142,439 |
|
|
$ |
5.78 |
|
|
$ |
182,065 |
|
|
$ |
8.45 |
|
Stock option exercise deductions
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
3,564 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
12,927 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
Gains on calls
|
|
|
(2,087 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(15,445 |
) |
|
|
(0.66 |
) |
|
|
(10,619 |
) |
|
|
(0.43 |
) |
|
|
(36,945 |
) |
|
|
(1.70 |
) |
Gains on sales
|
|
|
(15,017 |
) |
|
|
(0.61 |
) |
|
|
(11,476 |
) |
|
|
(0.49 |
) |
|
|
(30,056 |
) |
|
|
(1.22 |
) |
|
|
(35,651 |
) |
|
|
(1.67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable income before stock option exercises, calls, and sales
(core taxable income)
|
|
$ |
40,996 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
32,997 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
105,328 |
|
|
$ |
4.27 |
|
|
$ |
122,396 |
|
|
$ |
5.73 |
|
|
|
* |
See Table 18 for a detailed presentation of the GAAP/Tax
differences. |
The gains during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 were $17.1 million and
$40.7 million, respectively, and were mostly from calls and
sales of securities. The gains during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2004 were $26.9 million and
$72.6 million, respectively, and were mostly from calls and
securitization gains. Income from call and sales activity is
long-term capital gain income for tax purposes. Our tax-paying
stockholders may benefit to the degree they can take advantage
of the lower tax rate on our distributions of capital gains
versus ordinary income. We provide information annually on the
tax characteristics of our dividends and this information is
also posted on our website at www.redwoodtrust.com.
Estimated core taxable income was $1.66 per share in the third
quarter of 2005, an increase from $1.44 per share we earned in
the second quarter of 2005, and an increase from $1.41 per share
we earned in the third quarter of 2004. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, core taxable income was
$4.27 per share and $5.73 per share, respectively. Estimated
core taxable income decreased for the first nine months of 2005
as compared to the first nine months of 2004 due primarily to a
decrease in the balance of IO securities we own. This decrease
in IO securities income has been partially offset by increased
income on residential loan CES as a result of increased
acquisitions of these assets over the last year. However, as a
result of significant sales of CES in the third quarter of 2005
(which generated sales income), future taxable income is likely
to be lower than in previous quarters, until we reinvest the
returned capital. In addition, we have higher operating expenses.
71
The differences between GAAP and tax accounting for credit
losses could be significant in any one period, although the
cumulative income recognized will be the same. Generally, in the
early years of owning a security, our tax yield will be higher
than our GAAP yield as our GAAP yield assumes future loan losses
that are not included in our tax assumptions. When the projected
losses occur, the taxable income will be reduced while our GAAP
income will be unaffected (as the loss was already assumed to
occur). If the losses are less than estimated under GAAP, then
the GAAP yield on the asset may increase, even to a level above
the tax yield (which may not have changed).
In the 2005 periods, there were significantly less taxable
expenses due to exercising stock options than we recognized in
the 2004 periods.
The table below reconciles the differences between GAAP net
income and estimated total taxable income and estimated REIT
taxable income.
|
|
|
Table
18 Differences Between GAAP Net
Income and Estimated Total Taxable Income and Estimated REIT
Taxable Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(All dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
GAAP Net Income
|
|
$ |
55,899 |
|
|
$ |
72,342 |
|
|
$ |
157,376 |
|
|
$ |
178,221 |
|
Interest income and expense differences
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
(23,527 |
) |
|
|
(23,606 |
) |
|
|
(19,469 |
) |
Reversal of (provision for) credit losses GAAP
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
5,539 |
|
Tax deductions for realized credit losses
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(1,737 |
) |
|
|
(637 |
) |
Long-term compensation differences
|
|
|
2,892 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
6,999 |
|
|
|
5,734 |
|
Stock option exercise deduction differences
|
|
|
(2,944 |
) |
|
|
(745 |
) |
|
|
(3,564 |
) |
|
|
(12,927 |
) |
Depreciation of fixed asset differences
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
(549 |
) |
Other operating expense differences
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
Sales of asset differences
|
|
|
(8,041 |
) |
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
(11,484 |
) |
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
Call income from residential CES differences
|
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
(3,961 |
) |
|
|
(2,523 |
) |
|
|
(8,017 |
) |
Tax gain on securitizations
|
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
11,153 |
|
|
|
2,974 |
|
|
|
21,456 |
|
Tax gain on intercompany sales and transfers
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
5,801 |
|
|
|
7,503 |
|
GAAP market valuation write downs (EITF 99-20)
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
3,259 |
|
|
|
4,826 |
|
Interest rate agreement differences
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Provision for excise tax GAAP
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
Provision for income tax differences
|
|
|
5,013 |
|
|
|
2,834 |
|
|
|
8,182 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total taxable income (pre-tax)
|
|
$ |
55,156 |
|
|
$ |
59,173 |
|
|
$ |
142,439 |
|
|
$ |
182,065 |
|
Earnings from taxable subsidiaries
|
|
|
(8,038 |
) |
|
|
(10,143 |
) |
|
|
(10,923 |
) |
|
|
(30,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REIT taxable income (pre-tax)
|
|
$ |
47,118 |
|
|
$ |
49,030 |
|
|
$ |
131,516 |
|
|
$ |
151,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP income per share based on average diluted shares during
period
|
|
$ |
2.21 |
|
|
$ |
3.18 |
|
|
$ |
6.26 |
|
|
$ |
8.29 |
|
Total taxable income per share based on shares outstanding at
period end
|
|
$ |
2.23 |
|
|
$ |
2.53 |
|
|
$ |
5.78 |
|
|
$ |
8.45 |
|
REIT taxable income per share based on shares outstanding at
period end
|
|
$ |
1.91 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
$ |
5.34 |
|
|
$ |
7.05 |
|
Taxable income at our subsidiaries was lower in the 2005 periods
than in the corresponding 2004 periods. This was due to
decreased securitization activity and decreases in the gains per
securitization transaction. Income in the third quarter of 2005
at the subsidiary levels was higher than in the previous two
quarters due to an adjustment of income that was generated at
Holdings but previously reported at
72
the REIT level ($2.3 million) and due to an adjustment of
$3.6 million related to a smaller deduction of 2004 state
income taxes paid by Holdings. Redwood REIT and Holdings filed a
unitary state tax return for 2004 and a majority of the related
deduction for state taxes was reflected at the REIT in the third
quarter of 2005.
We currently project that the first three regular quarterly
dividends we declared in 2005 ($52 million) consisted of
REIT taxable income earned in 2004 and a portion of REIT taxable
income earned in 2005. Based on our estimates of REIT taxable
income during the first nine months of 2005, we entered the
fourth quarter of 2005 with $107 million of undistributed
REIT taxable income, assuming we permanently retain 10% of our
ordinary REIT taxable income. We expect to pay this balance as
dividends to our stockholders during the remainder of 2005 and
2006.
We permanently retained approximately 10% of the ordinary REIT
taxable income we earned during 2004, and we declared the
distribution of the remainder as dividends by September 2005. We
also retained 100% of the taxable income that we earned at our
taxable REIT subsidiaries in 2004 (after taxes). We accrued
income tax expense on the portion of the REIT taxable income
that we permanently retained. By retaining a portion of our
income, we seek to build equity per share, and thus potential
earnings and dividends per share, over time. We anticipate
following a similar pattern of distribution in 2005 and are
accruing income tax expense accordingly.
Our current provision for corporate income taxes is based on a
combined Federal and state corporate tax rate of 41% on the
amount of anticipated REIT ordinary income to be retained for
the year. Our estimates of taxable income are subject to change
due to changes in interest rates, prepayments, credit losses,
and other market factors as well as changes in applicable income
tax laws and regulations. One potential future tax law change
that we are aware of (which is described in IRS Announcement
2004-75) could, for example, cause our taxable income and
associated dividend distributions to decrease in future periods
as it may allow for changes in the assumptions used to determine
current period income on IO securities. However, we do not
expect this potential future tax law change will have a material
impact on either our taxable income or our dividend rate, given
our existing portfolio.
We generally attempt to avoid acquiring assets or structuring
financings or sales at the REIT level that would be likely to
generate distributions of Unrelated Business Taxable Income
(UBTI) or excess inclusion income to our stockholders, or that
would cause prohibited transaction taxes on the REIT; there can
be no assurance that we will be successful in doing so.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY, AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Each of our product lines and portfolios is a component of our
single business of investing in, credit-enhancing, and
securitizing residential and commercial real estate loans and
securities. Our consolidated earning assets, as presented for
GAAP purposes, consist of six portfolios: residential real
estate loans, HELOCs, residential loan CES, commercial real
estate loans, commercial loan CES, and securities
portfolio. A discussion of the activities in each of these
portfolios appears below.
|
|
|
Impact of Hurricanes in the Third Quarter of 2005 |
During the third quarter of 2005, hurricanes Katrina and Rita
hit the Gulf Coast States including parts of Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Texas. We own both residential and commercial
securities that have loans in the affected areas. In most cases
our securities represent the first loss risk on a pool of loans
and thus we have some increased potential for losses as a result
of these hurricanes. In the following paragraphs we provide
information estimating the amount of losses that may result from
these hurricanes. These reflect our current estimates based on
the best available information. Along with other financial
institutions with loans in these areas, we need additional time
to evaluate individual loans, and borrowers, to assess the
condition of underlying collateral, and to determine potential
insurance proceeds and other available recovery sources. We have
begun this process and provide the following estimates based on
information obtained to date and assumptions made with the
available data. As additional data is obtained, our estimates
will be revised. We do not intend to publish any updated
73
estimates until we file our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
However, while the figures below represent our best estimate as
of September 30, 2005, there can be no assurance that
actual losses will fall within these ranges as there are many
factors yet to be determined such as insurance
claims, the state of the local economy, and the strength or
weakness of the housing market in the affected areas.
Of the residential loans we credit-enhance through our Sequoia
program, ($16 billion), there are 321 loans totaling
$71 million dollars in the Katrina affected areas. Of
these, 83 loans totaling $21 million were in the New
Orleans market. We estimate our taxable losses will be between
$1 million and $3 million on these loans. This
estimate is based on assumptions regarding which loans in each
pool may be damaged, estimated losses, severities, potential
insurance proceeds, and borrowers general ability to
repay. (Our largest exposure of loans in this area in any one
pool is 1% of the remaining outstanding loans in that pool. All
of the Sequoia transactions we have sponsored have at least one
loan in the affected areas.) We anticipate losses will be
realized beginning in 2006 through 2007. We factored in these
assumptions when we reviewed the adequacy of our credit reserves
on these loans as of September 30, 2005.
Of the residential loans we credit-enhance that were securitized
by others ($179 billion), there were 1,684 loans totaling
$264 million in the affected areas. Using similar
assumptions as we did on the Sequoia loans, we estimate taxable
losses ranging from $1 million to $8 million. In the
transactions from which we have acquired the first loss piece,
there are no pools in which we are estimating losses sufficient
to erode the entire first loss piece.
Of the HELOCs we own through our Sequoia program
($215 million), there are 34 loans totaling
$1.5 million in the Katrina-affected areas. We estimate our
taxable losses may be up to $1.5 million for these HELOCs.
Through our commercial loan CES, we credit-enhance
$39 billion commercial loans. In the areas affected by
hurricanes Katrina and Rita, we have first-loss exposure to 29
loans totaling $139 million. Based on our initial
assessment of the most severely affected commercial properties,
we estimate $2 to $5 million of taxable losses. We
currently do not believe that any pools losses will be
sufficient to fully erode any of the first loss pieces we own.
|
|
|
Residential Real Estate Loans |
We acquired $332 million high-quality residential real
estate loans for future sale to securitization entities (or as
whole loans) during the third quarter of 2005. We acquired
$1.6 billion loans in the first nine months of 2005. Most
of these loans were subsequently sold to ABS securitization
entities that we consolidate for reporting purposes. Almost all
of our loan purchases were one- and six-month LIBOR loans; we
also acquired $171 million of hybrid loans. We continue to
expand our relationships with originators from whom we acquire
loans. However, our acquisition volumes declined in recent
quarters. If the yield curve flattens further, the housing
market weakens, competition to acquire loans increases further,
and competing products (including negative amortization, MTA
moving treasury average (MTA), ARMs, or other related products)
continue to gain shares of the jumbo ARM market, we would expect
our volume of adjustable-rate residential loan acquisitions to
continue to decline.
The consolidated balance of residential real estate loans at
September 30, 2005 of $16.3 billion was lower than the
consolidated balance at December 31, 2004 of
$22.2 billion. (Loans and related debt underlying
residential credit-enhancement securities acquired from
securitizations not sponsored from us do not appear on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.) Prepayments on loans consolidated
for GAAP were greater than our net acquisitions of new loans
during the first nine months of 2005. This was the result of
both an increase in prepayment speeds and a decrease in the
volume of acquisitions and sponsored securitizations. Prepayment
speeds increased in adjustable rate mortgages as a result of a
flattening of the yield curve (an increase in short-term
interest rates relative to long-term interest rates). This
change in the yield curve also served to reduce the new
production of adjustable-rate loans indexed to LIBOR. In
addition, we face increased competition to purchase these loans.
74
At September 30, 2005, Redwood owned $17 million
residential real estate loans accumulated for sale to future
securitizations or as whole loans. None of these loans were
pledged to support Redwood debt. ABS securitization entities
consolidated on Redwoods balance sheet owned
$16.3 billion of residential real estate loans as of
September 30, 2005.
There were approximately 49,000 loans in this consolidated
residential real estate loan portfolio at September 30,
2005, and the average loan balance was $333,000. Loans with a
balance over $1 million made up 14% of the dollar balance
of loans. Over 99% of consolidated residential loans at
September 30, 2005 had adjustable-rate coupons that adjust
every month or every six months to the one- or six-month LIBOR
rate. Loans on homes located in California were 22% of the
dollar balance of this portfolio, split approximately evenly
between northern and southern California. States that each
represent 4% to 12% of our consolidated portfolio include
Florida, Georgia, New York, New Jersey, Texas, Arizona, and
Illinois. Primary residences represented 88% of the dollar
balance of the loans, second homes represented 10%, and investor
properties represented 2%.
Loans on our Consolidated Balance Sheets are generally
high-quality loans, with credit scores, loan-to-value ratios,
and other loan characteristics consistent with a high quality
loan. As of September 30, 2005, substantially all of the
loans in this portfolio were interest-only loans; that is, the
homeowner is able to make interest payments only rather than
paying both principal and interest for a prescribed number of
years. None of the loans in this portfolio have the potential
for negative amortization; that is, the homeowner cannot opt to
make a payment that is less than the full interest accrual rate
on the loan. The ability of the homeowner to make an
interest-only payment that is less than the amount that would
fully amortize the loan may cause additional risks especially as
interest rates rise (since these are generally adjustable-rate
loans). To date, the credit performance of the interest-only
residential loans that Redwood has credit-enhanced in this
portfolio has been better than our original expectations.
The credit qualities of these loans, personal income growth, a
strong housing market, and rising housing prices have helped to
contain delinquencies and losses. Recently, however, short-term
interest rates have risen. If this trend continues, required
monthly payments made by homeowners with adjustable-rate real
estate loans will increase further and possibly by a material
amount. This would potentially cause some credit issues as
almost all of the loans in our consolidated residential real
estate loan portfolio are adjustable-rate. Rising interest rates
(or a soft economy) could also have an impact on housing prices,
which in turn could adversely affect credit performance of these
loans.
Charge-offs (credit losses) recorded in this portfolio totaled
$0.1 million during the quarter ended September 30,
2005 and a $0.2 million for the first nine months of 2005,
and credit losses remained at an annualized rate of less than
1 basis point (0.01%) during these periods. There were no
charge-offs during these periods in 2004. Serious delinquencies
increased from $13.3 million at December 31, 2004 to
$23.0 million at September 30, 2005. Serious
delinquencies include loans delinquent more than 90 days,
in bankruptcy, in foreclosure, and real estate owned. As a
percentage of this loan portfolio, serious delinquencies
remained at low levels relative to the U.S. residential
real estate loans as a whole, and were 0.14% of our current loan
balances in this portfolio at September 30, 2005, an
increase from 0.06% at December 31, 2004.
The reserve for credit losses on residential real estate loans
is included as a component of residential real estate loans on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The residential real estate
loan credit reserve balance of $21 million was 0.13% of the
current balance of this portfolio at September 30, 2005,
compared to 0.10% at December 31, 2004.
Management reviews the levels of credit reserves every quarter
and adjusts the reserve through a credit provision. The credit
reserve balance and provision for credit losses are based on
several factors that include delinquencies, performance of the
loans, loan balances, and the rate at which the portfolio
increases or decreases, and any other special circumstances such
as hurricane damage. The decrease in the credit provision
expense in 2005 relative to 2004 is due to a net decline in the
outstanding loan balance and continued strong credit
performance. While delinquencies have increased over the past
75
nine months, the overall level of delinquencies remains low by
industry standards, and our estimate of credit losses on our
existing loans that are not in hurricane-affected areas
continues to trend downward.
At September 30, 2005, we owned IO securities that benefit
to some degree from the spread between the assets and the
liabilities of the issuing securitization entities for
$10.8 billion of these consolidated loans. These assets and
liabilities are closely matched economically and to the degree
there is a mismatch we attempt to reduce this mismatch through
the use of interest rate agreements. For the remainder of the
consolidated securitized residential loans ($5.4 billion),
we do not own the security that benefits from the
asset/liability spread. Thus, spread changes between the yield
of these consolidated loans and the cost of the associated
consolidated liabilities do not affect our economic profits or
cash flow (although our reported income could show significant
volatility in the short term due to differences in the timing of
amortization of premiums and discount between assets and
liabilities).
|
|
|
Residential Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs) |
In the second quarter of 2004, we acquired $335 million
high-quality HELOCs and sponsored the securitization of these
loans. We have recently initiated flow purchase agreements with
originators and acquired $125,000 HELOCs in the second quarter
of 2005. We currently intend to continue acquiring HELOCs when
we believe we can acquire HELOCs at a price that is less than
the net sales proceeds we would expect to earn from sponsoring a
securitization of HELOCs or selling the HELOCs as whole loans.
Generally, in the second half of 2004 and the first nine months
of 2005, the price that banks were willing to pay for HELOCs for
their own portfolios exceeded the price that we were willing to
pay based on our estimate of the proceeds available from
securitization of the HELOCs.
The current balance of HELOC loans consolidated on our balance
sheet at September 30, 2005 was $215 million. This
HELOC portfolio consists of adjustable-rate first and second
lien residential loans with a 10-year revolving period and a
maturity from origination of ten years. During the revolving
period, borrowers have the option of drawing funds up to the
available credit limit. As a result, the balance of each HELOC,
and the total balance of this portfolio, may increase if
borrowers increase their draws. The coupon rate on the HELOCs
adjusts as a function of the Prime short-term interest rate. The
HELOC portfolio is generally high quality and characterized by
relatively high FICO credit scores (average of 725) and
relatively low combined loan-to-value ratios (average of 75%).
The borrowers in this HELOC portfolio are similar in many ways
to the borrowers for the other residential loans in the
securitizations we have sponsored.
As of September 30, 2005, our GAAP credit reserve for
consolidated HELOCs was $1.0 million, or 0.49% of the
outstanding balance of this portfolio. At December 31,
2004, the reserve was $0.7 million, or 0.24% of the
outstanding balance. Serious delinquencies in our HELOC
portfolio totaled $1.0 million, or 0.48% of the outstanding
balance as of September 30, 2005, an increase from the
delinquencies of $0.3 million, or 0.10% as of
December 31, 2004. However, overall delinquencies to date
are still below our original expectations for these loans. There
were no realized credit losses from the HELOC portfolio during
the first nine months of 2005.
In general, due to the second lien status of most of these
HELOCs, we expect delinquencies for these HELOCs to be somewhat
higher than we experience with our other managed real estate
loans. We believe the loss frequency of these HELOCs may be
approximately similar to the other residential loans of the same
vintage that we manage, but we expect the loss severity (credit
loss from a default, as a percentage of the loan balance) of
HELOCs to be significantly higher. Due to the higher loss
severity, we expect cumulative credit losses over time on these
HELOCs could be materially higher than on our other managed
residential loans. We have factored this higher loss expectation
into our acquisition pricing and securitization calculations. As
a result, for the securities we acquired and hold at Redwood
from this HELOC securitization, we believe we can earn an
attractive yield even if the underlying HELOCs produce
significantly higher losses than our other managed residential
loans.
Prepayments affect the returns we earn from owning HELOC assets.
Slower prepayments are better for us. On average, prepayment
rates for these loans have been faster than we expected
76
(cumulatively, a CPR of 28% through September 30, 2005).
Our assessment of the risks associated with a potential
acceleration of HELOC prepayments has been a factor in our not
acquiring HELOCs since the second quarter of 2004.
|
|
|
Residential Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities (acquired
from securitizations sponsored by others) |
Residential loan CES are the securities issued by an ABS
securitization entity that bear the bulk of the initial credit
risk of the underlying pool of residential loans that was
securitized. The CES that bear the concentrated credit risk
typically have below investment-grade credit ratings. By bearing
the first-loss, second-loss, and
third-loss credit risk, these securities
credit-enhance the other securities issued by the ABS entity,
allowing those credit-enhanced securities to earn high ratings
from credit-rating agencies, thus allowing them to be sold to a
wide variety of capital markets investors. The CES bear the
initial losses that come from the underlying loan pool, but
losses are limited as the maximum loss for the owner of CES is
limited to the investment made in purchasing the CES.
We acquire residential loan CES at a price that is
typically significantly less than the principal value of the
security (typically 10% to 35% of principal value for a
first-loss security). The security typically pays interest at a
rate of 3% to 9% of principal value. Our economic return on
these securities is dependent primarily on the amount and timing
of credit losses that reduce the principal value of these
residential CES. Secondarily, our investment returns from owning
these assets depend on the prepayment rate of the underlying
loans a faster prepayment rate over time is
beneficial.
During the third quarter of 2005, we acquired residential
loan CES with a principal value of $94 million and a
market value of $57 million. Thus far in 2005, we have
acquired $345 million principal value and $213 million
market value of these CES. Although increased competition has
generally resulted in higher prices for these assets than in
prior years, we are still able to acquire securities at prices
and with characteristics that meet our high quality standards
and that we anticipate will more likely than not meet our hurdle
rate of 14% annual return (net discounted present value of
projected cash flows, before overhead) over time. Given our
initial range of credit loss and prepayment rate assumptions,
initial yields for GAAP purposes for some newly acquired assets
can be less than our hurdle rate.
During the three months ended September 30, 2005, we sold
residential loan CES with a principal value of
$125 million and a market value of $99 million,
respectively, to third-parties other than Acacia; during the
first nine months of 2005, we sold residential loan CES
with principal value of $160 million and market value of
$126 million, respectively, to third parties other than
Acacia. Occasionally, we sell securities from this portfolio for
portfolio management reasons or to recycle capital. We have
continued to sell residential CES in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Residential loan securities become callable as they season,
usually when the current balance of the underlying loans
declines to under 10% of the original securitized loan balance.
Calls are usually beneficial for us, as we receive a payment for
the full principal value of an asset that, in general, we
acquired at a discount to the principal value. Calls typically
diminish future reported earnings per share, however, it is
usually our highest yielding assets that get called. During the
third quarter of 2005, residential loan CES with a
principal value of $5 million were called. Calls totaled
$28 million principal value in the first nine months of
2005. We expect to realize calls in the fourth quarter of 2005
from the $7 million principal value of residential CES we
owned as of September 30, 2005 that were callable and from
other CES that will become callable during 2005 (given current
prepayment rates, we estimate that approximately $1 million
additional principal value of our existing residential CES could
become callable by the year-end 2005). We do not have an
accurate way to determine when or if these securities will be
called. However, we believe call activity and call profits are
likely to decline significantly during 2005 and in future years
relative to the prior two years as the amount of CES potentially
callable has declined significantly.
77
As a net result of our acquisition, sale, and call activity, the
loans underlying these reported residential CES increased from
$126 billion at December 31, 2004 to $179 billion
at September 30, 2005. (Total residential loans
credit-enhanced, including Sequoia loans, were $149 billion
at December 31, 2004 and $195 billion at
September 30, 2005.)
There were approximately 527,000 loans totaling
$179 billion underlying our residential credit-enhancement
securities at September 30, 2005, and the average loan
balance was $340,000. Loans with a balance over $1 million
made up 6% of the dollar balance of loans. Loans on homes
located in California were 44% of these loan balances, split
approximately evenly between northern and southern California.
Other states, each of which represents 3% to 11% of these loans,
include Florida, New York, New Jersey, Virginia, Texas, and
Colorado. Primary residences represented 92% of these loan
balances, second homes represented 6%, and investor properties
represented 2%. Fixed rate loans totaled 43% of the loans,
hybrids totaled 32%, and adjustable rate mortgages totaled 25%.
Included in the adjustable rate loans are loans that allow for
negative amortization (18% of the total loans). Loans that had
an interest-only payment component totaled 25% of the portfolio.
|
|
|
Table 19 Residential
Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
First loss position, principal value
|
|
$ |
433,557 |
|
|
$ |
352,752 |
|
Second loss position, principal value
|
|
|
231,837 |
|
|
|
276,720 |
|
Third loss position, principal value
|
|
|
387,419 |
|
|
|
304,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal value
|
|
$ |
1,052,813 |
|
|
$ |
933,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First loss position, amortized cost
|
|
$ |
101,215 |
|
|
$ |
68,675 |
|
Second loss position, amortized cost
|
|
|
152,870 |
|
|
|
171,220 |
|
Third loss position, amortized cost
|
|
|
326,437 |
|
|
|
243,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortized cost
|
|
$ |
580,522 |
|
|
$ |
482,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First loss position, carrying value
|
|
$ |
152,470 |
|
|
$ |
110,933 |
|
Second loss position, carrying value
|
|
|
171,398 |
|
|
|
195,536 |
|
Third loss position, carrying value
|
|
|
340,933 |
|
|
|
255,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying value
|
|
$ |
664,801 |
|
|
$ |
561,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We mark residential loan CES to market value on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets (but not generally through our
income statement unless we determine there is
other-than-temporary impairment). At September 30, 2005,
our reported ownership of residential CES acquired from
securitizations sponsored by others totaled $665 million.
This was an increase from the $562 million market value we
reported on December 31, 2004. Our acquisitions plus net
positive market value adjustments exceeded calls, sales, and
principal pay downs for the first nine months of 2005.
At September 30, 2005, our adjusted cost basis of
residential loan CES was $581 million. At
September 30, 2005, the $84 million difference between
our adjusted cost basis and our balance sheet carrying value
represented net unrealized market value gains for residential
loan CES (acquired from others). Net unrealized market
value gains increased during the first nine months of 2005 by
$6 million.
The difference between the principal value ($1.1 billion)
and adjusted cost basis ($581 million) of these residential
loan CES at September 30, 2005 was $472 million,
of which $383 million was designated as internal credit
protection (reflecting our estimate of likely credit losses
on the underlying loans over the life of these securities),
while the remaining $89 million represented a purchase
discount we will accrue into income over time. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, we re-designated
$44 million of designated credit protection to unamortized
discount to be accreted into
78
income over time (due to strong credit performance and
cumulative prepayments on the underlying loans).
Faster prepayments for the loans underlying recently acquired
residential CES have not led to significantly higher yields for
GAAP purposes in the near-term as most of the purchase discount
balances have been designated as internal credit protection.
Since we assume much of this purchase discount will be required
to cover expected credit losses, we do not amortize this
purchase discount designated as internal credit protection into
income even if prepayment rates are faster than originally
anticipated. If credit performance is better than excellent in
the years ahead, as part of our estimate of expected future cash
flows, we may re-designate the internal credit reserve as
discount and then amortize it into reported income. If
cumulative prepayment rates have been rapid, the yields we
recognize for GAAP from these securities after any such
re-designation is likely to be higher.
External credit protection serves to protect us from credit
losses on a specific asset basis and represents the principal
value of interests owned by others that are junior to specific
interests owned by us. At September 30, 2005, we had
$135 million of external credit-enhancement and
$383 million of internally designated credit protection for
this portfolio. The combined balance of external and internally
designated credit protection represented 29 basis points
(0.29%) of the $179 billion of loans underlying our
credit-enhancement portfolio. The amount of credit protection
and the related risks are specific to each credit-enhancement
interest.
There were $1.7 million credit losses for the underlying
loans during the third quarter of 2005 and $3.7 million
credit losses during the first nine months of 2005. The
annualized rate of credit loss was less than 1 basis point
(0.01%) of underlying loans. Losses borne by external
credit-enhancement for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 totaled $0.2 million and
$0.4 million, respectively. Losses by us (against our
designated credit reserves) totaled $1.5 million during the
third quarter of 2005, and $3.3 million during the first
nine months of 2005.
There were $0.7 million of credit losses for the underlying
loans during the third quarter of 2004 and $2.6 of million
credit losses during the first nine months of 2004. The
annualized rate of credit loss was less than 1 basis point
(0.01%) of underlying loans. Losses borne by external
credit-enhancement for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004 totaled $0.2 million and
$0.3 million, respectively. Losses incurred by us (against
our designated credit reserves) totaled $0.5 million during
the third quarter of 2004, and $2.3 million during the
first nine months of 2004.
Delinquencies (over 90 days, foreclosure, bankruptcy, and
REO) in the underlying portfolio of residential loans that we
credit-enhance through owning these CES were $260 million
at September 30, 2005, an increase from $150 million
at December 31, 2004. Delinquencies as a percentage of the
residential loans we credit-enhance increased to 0.15% at
September 30, 2005 from 0.12% at December 31, 2004.
The level of delinquencies on these loans is below national
levels.
For the three months ended September 30, 2005, we did not
recognize losses due to other-than-temporary impairment on our
residential loan CES. We recognized $55,000 of
other-than-temporary impairments for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005. Impairments for the third quarter of
2004 totaled $0.1 million and totaled $3.3 million for
the first nine months of 2004. These losses are included in net
recognized gains and valuation adjustments in our Consolidated
Statements of Income.
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Loans |
We have been investing in commercial real estate loans since
1998. Our commercial real estate loan portfolio increased during
the first nine months of 2005 to $56 million at
September 30, 2005 from $54 million at
December 31, 2004 due to the acquisition of
$21 million of loans, offset by sales, principal pay-downs,
and amortization. We plan to continue to make additional
investments in commercial real estate loans, including mezzanine
loans, subordinated (junior or second lien) loans, and B-Notes
(B-Notes represent a structured commercial real estate loan that
retains a higher portion of the credit risk and generates a
higher yield than the initial loan.)
79
Factors particular to each of our other commercial loans (e.g.,
lease activity, market rents, and local economic conditions)
could cause credit concerns for our commercial loan portfolio in
the future. If this occurs, we may need to provide for future
losses on our commercial loans held-for-investment. We
continually monitor and determine the level of appropriate
reserves for our commercial loans. No additional reserves were
required during the third quarter of 2005. Commercial real
estate loans, fair values, and credit reserve requirements are
determined by ongoing evaluations of underlying collateral using
current appraisals, discounted cash flow analyses, and other
valuation methodologies.
|
|
|
Commercial Loan Credit-Enhancement Securities |
We acquire unrated interests in CMBS and fund them with equity.
We define these non-rated CMBS as commercial loan CES. At
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the amount
of underlying commercial loans that we credit enhanced through
our ownership of commercial loan credit enhancement securities
was $39 billion and $26 billion, respectively.
At September 30, 2005, we credit enhanced $21 billion
of commercial real estate loans through ownership of first-loss
CMBS, an increase from the $6 billion in commercial real
estate loans credit enhanced at December 31, 2004.
Delinquencies were $13 million, or 0.06% of the loan
balances at September 30, 2005; there were no delinquencies
on these loans at December 31, 2004. We incurred no credit
losses on these underlying loans for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Our
internally-designated credit reserve on these loans was
$121 million and $27 million at September 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
The average loan size on the approximately 1,400 loans we credit
enhanced at September 30, 2005 was $15 million. These
loans were located in California (17%), New York (14%), Texas
(8%), Virginia (4%), Florida (3%), and in other states across
the U.S. The underlying collateral for these loans consisted of
office buildings (40%), retail (32%), multi-family apartments
(11%), hotels (6%), and the remaining 11% a mix of self storage,
industrial and other property types. The weighted-average LTV on
these loans was 69% and the weighted average debt-service
coverage was 1.67X as of September 30, 2005.
At September 30, 2005, we credit-enhanced $18 billion
of commercial real estate loans through our interests in a CMBS
re-REMIC, a decrease from the $20 billion credit enhanced
at December 31, 2004. Delinquencies on these loans at were
$220 million, or 1.20% of the loan balances at
September 30, 2005. Delinquencies on these loans were
$363 million, or 1.80% of the loan balances at
December 31, 2004. External credit protection on these
loans was $1.6 billion at both September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004. Internally-designated credit reserves
were $17 million and $19 million at September 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2005, total credit losses
on these underlying loans were $1 million and
$66 million, respectively, of which $1 million and
$65 million were borne by credit enhancement securities not
owned by us, respectively. Credit losses realized against our
designated credit reserves on our commercial loan CES were
$3,000 and $1.5 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005, respectively.
The average loan size for the approximate 4,500 loans we credit
enhanced at September 30, 2005 was $4 million. These
loans were located in California (17%), New York (11%), Texas
(8%), Florida (6%), Virginia (3%), and in other states across
the U.S. The underlying collateral for these loans consisted of
multi-family apartments (31%), retail (30%), office buildings
(13%), hotels (7%), industrial (6%), and other property types.
The weighted average LTV on these loans was 73% and the weighted
average debt-service coverage was 1.47X as of September 30,
2005.
Securities Portfolio
We continue to acquire diverse residential real estate loan
securities, commercial real estate loan securities, debt
interests in real estate-oriented CDOs, in each case primarily
rated AA, A, and BBB. Also included in this portfolio are
non-investment grade interests in commercial real estate
securities (excluding commercial loan CES), manufactured housing
securities, corporate bonds issued by REITs,
80
and equity in CDOs sponsored by others. We have sold most
of our securities in this consolidated portfolio (as reported
for GAAP purposes) to Acacia bankruptcy-remote securitization
entities. Acacia issues CDO ABS to fund its acquisition of these
assets. We consolidate these Acacias assets as
securities portfolio and any BB-rated residential
loan CES are consolidated with our Residential Loan
CES, and we reflect Acacias issuance of CDO ABS as
ABS obligations on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The increase in the securities portfolio during this quarter was
the result of additional acquisitions of securities for sale to
Acacia. Our consolidated securities portfolio totaled
$1.8 billion carrying value on September 30, 2005, of
which $1.5 billion had been sold to Acacia ABS
securitization entities as of that date. At December 31,
2004, we had $1.4 billion carrying value of these
securities, of which $1.3 billion had been sold to Acacia
entities as of that date.
We continue to acquire non-investment grade CMBS that are rated
BB and B. These assets will be sold to Acacia entities. The
balance of these CMBS assets increased to $146 million at
September 30, 2005 from $70 million at
December 31, 2004.
We reported other-than-temporary impairments (EITF 99-20
and FA5115) in the consolidated securities portfolio of
$1.2 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2005 and $3.1 million for the first nine
months of 2005. We had other-than-temporary impairments during
the third quarter or first nine months of 2004 of
$0.3 million and $1.5 million, respectively.
The tables below present the types of securities we own as
reported in this securities portfolio by their credit ratings as
of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Table 20 Consolidated
Securities Portfolio Underlying Collateral
Characteristics at September 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2005 |
|
Total | |
|
AAA | |
|
AA | |
|
A | |
|
BBB | |
|
BB | |
|
B | |
|
Unrated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Residential Prime real estate loans
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Sub-prime real estate loans
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Second Lien real estate loans
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufactured Housing Loans
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
REIT Corporate Debt
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate CDOs
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities Portfolio
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
592 |
|
|
$ |
501 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating: | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
Total | |
|
AAA | |
|
AA | |
|
A | |
|
BBB | |
|
BB | |
|
B | |
|
Unrated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Residential Prime real estate loans
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Sub-prime real estate loans
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Second Lien real estate loans
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufactured Housing Loans
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
REIT Corporate Debt
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate CDOs
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities Portfolio
|
|
$ |
1,381 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
We typically use debt to fund the accumulation of assets prior
to sale to sponsored ABS securitization entities (Sequoia and
Acacia entities). These accumulated assets are pledged to secure
the associated debt. These borrowings have maturities of less
than one year and interest rates that generally change monthly
based upon a margin over the one-month LIBOR interest rate. Our
debt levels vary based on the timing of our asset accumulation
and securitization activities. During the first nine months of
2005, as measured daily, our maximum debt level was
$552 million, our minimum debt level was $94 million,
and our average debt level was $264 million.
In March 2005, we formed Madrona Residential Funding, LLC
(Madrona), a special purpose entity and wholly owned
subsidiary of RWT Holdings. Madrona gives us the flexibility to
access the capital markets and issue short-term debt instruments
to finance the accumulation of loans prior to sale to sponsored
securitization entities. Madrona is designed to fund residential
loans accumulated for eventual sale to our Sequoia
securitization program by issuing A1+/ P1 rated commercial
paper. Madrona was established to accumulate up to
$1.5 billion of loans (although the current authorization
is for $300 million) and can warehouse each loan up to
270 days. There are specific eligibility requirements for
financing loans in this facility that are similar to our
existing financing facilities with several banks and large
investment banking firms. There is a credit reserve account for
approximately 70 basis points that will serve as
credit-enhancement to the commercial paper investors. In
addition, we issued $5.4 million of a BBB-rated Madrona ABS
to provide further credit support to the holders of commercial
paper. This facility has a three-year term. During the third
quarter of 2005, Madrona issued commercial paper which was
purchased by Redwood. As of September 30, 2005, there was
no commercial paper issuance outstanding.
Overall, we believe we maintain a close match between the
interest rate characteristics of Redwood debt and the pledged
assets. For most of our debt-funded assets (assets acquired for
future sale to sponsored securitization entities or to other
financial institutions as whole loans), the floating rate nature
of our debt closely matches the adjustable-rate interest income
earning characteristics of the accumulated assets. Not all of
the accumulated assets we acquire are adjustable-rate. We also
acquire fixed rate and hybrid rate securities for
re-securitization through our Acacia CDO program, and we may
acquire hybrid rate residential real estate loans in the future
for our Sequoia securitization program. We typically use
interest rate agreements to hedge associated interest rate
mismatches when the assets we accumulate for future
securitizations do not match the interest rate characteristics
of our debt.
82
|
|
|
Asset-Backed Securities Issued |
Redwood consolidates on its balance sheets the asset-backed
securities that are obligations of those securitization entities
that are sponsored by Redwood. These ABS issued are not
obligations of Redwood.
Sequoia had $16.1 billion asset-backed securities
outstanding on September 30, 2005 compared to
$21.9 billion on December 31, 2004. Pay downs of
existing ABS issued by Sequoia exceeded new issuance and
resulted in the decline in overall balance of Sequoia ABS thus
far this year.
Acacia entities issue ABS of a type known as CDOs to fund their
acquisitions of real estate securities from Redwood. Acacia CDO
issuance outstanding was $2.1 billion on September 30,
2005 and $1.7 billion on December 31, 2004. We issued
$0.6 billion of Acacia ABS in the first nine months of
2005. For the three months ended September 30, 2005, there
were $34.3 million of Acacia ABS pay downs. Pay downs
totaled $87.4 million during the first nine months of 2005.
There were no significant pay downs of Acacia ABS during the
first nine months of 2004.
Our reported stockholders equity increased by 18% during
the first nine months of 2005, from $864 million at
December 31, 2004 to $1.0 billion at
September 30, 2005 as a result of $157 million
earnings, $31 million stock issuance, $1 million
proceeds from stock option exercises, $3 million non-cash
equity adjustments, and a $12 million net increase in the
market values of assets that are marked-to-market through our
Consolidated Balance Sheets, offset by $52 million
dividends declared.
We may seek to issue additional shares even during a period when
we are maintaining uninvested cash balances. This would allow us
to accommodate additional portfolio growth while also using cash
balances to reduce overall risk (and insure funding for future
opportunities). As always, we will issue equity only when we
believe such issuance would enhance long-term earnings and
dividends per share, compared to what they would have been
otherwise.
Certain assets are marked-to-market through accumulated other
comprehensive income; these adjustments affect our book value
but not our net income. As of September 30, 2005, we
reported a net accumulated other comprehensive income of
$117 million and at December 31, 2004 we reported net
accumulated other comprehensive income of $105 million.
Changes in this account reflect increases in the fair value of
our earning assets (positive $35 million) and interest rate
agreements (positive $8 million), and also reflect changes
due to calls, sales, and other-than-temporary impairments of a
portion of our securities ($31 million). Our reported book
value at September 30, 2005 was $41 per share.
CASH REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCES OF CASH
We use cash to fund our operating and securitization activities,
invest in earning assets, service and repay Redwood debt, fund
working capital, and fund our dividend distributions.
One primary source of cash is principal and interest payments
received on a monthly basis from our real estate loans and
securities. This includes payments received from those ABS that
we acquired from ABS securitizations we sponsor. Other sources
of cash include proceeds from sales of assets to securitizations
entities, proceeds from sales of other assets, borrowings, and
issuance of common stock.
We currently use borrowings solely to finance the accumulation
of assets for future sale to securitization entities. Sources of
borrowings include repurchase agreements, bank borrowings, and
other forms of collateralized short-term borrowings, and
non-secured lines of credit. We also issue collateralized
commercial paper. Our borrowings are typically repaid using
proceeds received from the sale of assets to securitization
entities. For residential loans, our typical inventory holding
period is one to twelve weeks. For securities held for sale to
Acacia CDO securitization entities, our typical holding period
is one to six months.
83
In addition to the cash flows discussed above, our Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows also includes cash flows generated and
used by the ABS securitization entities that are consolidated on
our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash flows generated within
these entities are not available to Redwood, except to the
degree that a portion of these cash flows may be due to Redwood
as an owner of one or more of the ABS certificates issued by the
entity. Cash flow obligations of and uses of cash
by these ABS entities are not part of Redwoods
operations and are not obligations of Redwood, although a
decrease in net cash flow (or an increase in credit losses)
generated by an ABS entity could defer or reduce (or potentially
eliminate) interest and/or principal payments otherwise due to
Redwood as an owner of certain more risky ABS issued by the
entities.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET COMMITMENTS
At September 30, 2005, in the ordinary course of business,
we had commitments to purchase $4 million of real estate
loans and securities that settled in October 2005. These
purchase commitments represent derivative instruments under
FAS No. 149. The value of these commitments was
negligible as of September 30, 2005.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The table below presents our contractual obligations and
commitments as of September 30, 2005, as well as the
consolidated obligations of the securitization entities that we
sponsored and are consolidated on our balance sheets. The
operating leases are commitments that are expensed based on the
terms of the related contracts.
|
|
|
Table 21 Contractual
Obligations and Commitments as of September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due or Commitment Expiration by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
1 to | |
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
5 Years | |
|
After 5 Years | |
(In thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Redwood obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redwood debt
|
|
$ |
161,739 |
|
|
$ |
161,739 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
6,187 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
2,183 |
|
Purchase commitments securities
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
3,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase commitments whole loans
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Redwood obligations and commitments
|
|
$ |
173,033 |
|
|
$ |
168,009 |
|
|
$ |
2,841 |
|
|
$ |
2,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of securitization entities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated asset-backed securities
|
|
$ |
18,237,792 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,237,792 |
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
41,529 |
|
|
|
41,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations of securitization entities
|
|
$ |
18,279,321 |
|
|
$ |
41,529 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,237,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated obligations and commitments
|
|
$ |
18,452,354 |
|
|
$ |
209,538 |
|
|
$ |
2,841 |
|
|
$ |
18,239,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
All consolidated ABS issued are collateralized by associated
assets and, although the stated maturity is as shown, the ABS
obligations will pay down as the principal of the associated
real estate loans or securities pay down. |
84
PERMANENT ASSET PORTFOLIO
Managements approach to investments, risks, and returns
focuses on managing a portfolio of assets that is funded with
equity. In our opinion these assets are able to generate
high-quality, long-term cash flows that meet or exceed our
hurdle rate without using any financial leverage. We refer to
these assets as permanent assets. Management
believes that the following discussion of Redwoods
permanent asset portfolio (a presentation of our assets that
differs from GAAP) is helpful for further understanding our
business.
Our permanent assets are characterized below along with an
explanation of how these assets and any associated liabilities
are presented in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
Residential CES and IO securities acquired from Sequoia
entities: These securities are represented on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets as the difference between
residential loans ($16.3 billion) plus HELOCs
($215 million) sold to securitization entities and ABS
issued ($16.1 billion) by the securitization entities. The
total estimated fair value of these Sequoia CES and IO
securities is estimated at $113 million at
September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
Residential loan B-rated and non-rated CES acquired from
ABS securitizations sponsored by others: These securities
appear on our balance sheets at estimated market value
($297 million as of September 30, 2005) within our
residential CES portfolio. This estimate does not include
B-rated residential CES that have been sold to Acacia. |
|
|
|
Investments in Acacia entities: These investments in
Acacia entities are represented on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets as the difference between securities ($1.9 billion)
acquired from third parties and securities acquired from Sequoia
entities ($0.3 billion, which do not appear explicitly on
our balance sheets) and sold to Acacia entities and ABS issued
($2.1 billion) by Acacia entities. The securities within
Acacia and consolidated on our balance sheets generally have
credit ratings of AAA through B. Our equity investments in
Acacia entities had a total estimated fair value of
$113 million at September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
Interests in commercial real estate loans: These
interests in commercial real estate loans are represented on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets as the difference between commercial
loans ($15 million) consolidated on our balance sheets and
commercial loan ABS issued ($4 million). Interests in
commercial loans have an estimated fair value at
September 30, 2005 of $11 million. |
|
|
|
Commercial loan CES: These commercial loan CES
are reported at estimated market value on our Consolidated
Balance Sheets. At September 30, 2005, commercial
loan CES had an estimated market value of $44 million. |
|
|
|
Other securities. These securities include CDO equity
acquired from securitizations sponsored by others, residential
IO securities purchased from securitizations sponsored by
others, and certain commercial real estate securities. These are
reported on our balance sheets at estimated market value within
the securities portfolio. At September 30, 2005, these
other securities had a total estimated market value of
$10 million. |
We also earn net interest income from our inventory assets,
which are not part of our permanent asset portfolio. These are
assets acquired by us for future sale (typically within one to
four months) to securitization entities sponsored by us or to
another financial institution. We fund our inventory asset with
equity and with Redwood debt. Our inventory is characterized
below.
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loans: These inventory assets include
residential loans ($17 million at September 30, 2005)
and HELOCs ($0.1 million) temporarily funded with equity
($17 million) or Redwood debt ($0). These generally stay in
inventory less than two months prior to the sale to a Sequoia
entity or a financial institution. These are reported as part of
our residential real estate loans or home equity lines of credit
on our consolidated balance sheets. |
85
|
|
|
|
|
Residential and commercial real estate securities: These
inventory assets include diverse securities ($268 million)
generally with credit ratings of AAA through B that were
acquired for future sale to Acacia. We fund these assets with
equity ($106 million) and Redwood debt ($162 million).
These are reported as part of our residential CES portfolio and
our securities portfolio on our consolidated balance sheets. |
MARKET RISKS
We seek to manage the risks inherent in our business
including credit risk, liquidity risk, interest rate risk,
prepayment risk, market value risk, reinvestment risk, and
capital risk in a prudent manner designed to insure
Redwoods longevity. At the same time, we endeavor, to the
best of our ability, to provide our stockholders with both a
steady regular dividend and an attractive long-term return. In
general, we seek to assume risks that can be quantified from
historical experience, to actively manage such risks, to earn
sufficient compensation to justify the taking of such risks, and
to maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we do take.
We believe our quantitative risk has not materially changed from
our disclosures under Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004.
Our core business is assuming the credit risk of real estate
loans. We are highly leveraged in an economic sense due to the
structured leverage within the securities we own, as the amount
of residential and commercial real estate loans on which we take
first-loss risk is high relative to our equity
capital base. However, we do not use debt to fund these assets
and our maximum credit loss from these assets (excluding loans
and securities held temporarily as inventory for securitization)
is limited and is less than our equity capital base. The
majority of our credit risk comes from high-quality residential
real estate loans. This includes residential real estate loans
consolidated from ABS securitizations from which we have
acquired a credit-sensitive ABS security, and loans we
effectively guarantee or insure through
the acquisitions of residential loan CES from
securitizations sponsored by others. We are also exposed to
credit risks in our commercial real estate loan portfolio, the
first-loss commercial real estate securities we own,
our other residential and commercial real estate securities, and
with counter-parties with whom we do business.
We assume credit risk with respect to residential real estate
loans primarily through the ownership of residential
loan CES and similarly structured securities acquired from
securitizations sponsored by others and from Sequoia
securitizations sponsored by us. These securities have below
investment-grade credit ratings due to their high degree of
credit risk with respect to the residential real estate loans
within the securitization entities that issued these securities.
Credit losses from any of the loans in the securitized loan
pools reduce the principal value of and economic returns from
residential loan CES. We assume credit risk with respect to
commercial real estate loan premiums through the ownership of
commercial loan CES acquired from securitizations sponsored
by others.
Credit losses on residential real estate loans can occur for
many reasons, including: poor origination practices; fraud;
faulty appraisals; documentation errors; poor underwriting;
legal errors; poor servicing practices; weak economic
conditions; decline in the value of homes; special hazards;
earthquakes and other natural events; over-leveraging of the
borrower; changes in legal protections for lenders; reduction in
personal incomes; job loss; and personal events such as divorce
or health problems. In addition, if the U.S. economy or the
housing market weakens, our credit losses could be increased
beyond levels that we have anticipated. The interest rate is
adjustable for the bulk of the loans securitized by
securitization trusts sponsored by us and for a portion of the
loans underlying residential CES we have acquired from
securitizations sponsored by others. Accordingly, when
short-term interest rates rise, required monthly payments from
homeowners will rise under the terms of these adjustable-rate
mortgages, and this may increase borrowers delinquencies
and defaults. In addition, a portion of the loans we
credit-enhance are interest-only and negative amortization
loans, which may have special credit risks. If we incur
increased credit losses, our taxable income would be reduced,
our GAAP
86
earnings might be reduced, and our cash flows, asset market
values, access to short-term borrowings (typically used to
acquire assets for sale to securitization entities), and our
ability to securitize assets might be harmed. The amount of
capital and cash reserves that we hold to help us manage credit
and other risks may prove to be insufficient to protect us from
earnings volatility, dividend cuts, liquidity issues, and
solvency issues.
Credit losses could also reduce our ability to sponsor new
securitizations of residential loans. We generally expect to
increase our portfolio of residential CES and our credit
exposure to the residential real estate loan pools that underlie
these securities.
Credit losses on commercial real estate loans can occur due to a
multitude of reasons, including: poor origination practices;
fraud; faulty appraisals; documentation errors; poor
underwriting; legal errors; poor servicing practices; weak
economic conditions; decline in the value of the property;
special hazards; earthquakes and other natural events;
over-leveraging of the property; changes in legal protections
for lenders; reduction in market rents and occupancies and poor
property management practices. In addition, if the
U.S. economy weakens, our credit losses could be increased
beyond levels that we have anticipated. The large majority of
the commercial loans we credit-enhance are fixed-rate loans with
required amortization. A small number of loans are interest-only
loans for the entire term or a portion thereof, which may have
special credit risks. If we incur credit losses, our taxable
income would be reduced, our GAAP earnings might be reduced, and
our cash flows, asset market values, access to short-term
borrowings (typically used to acquire assets for sale to
securitization entities), and our ability to securitize assets
might be harmed. The amount of capital and cash reserves that we
hold to help us manage credit and other risks may prove to be
insufficient to protect us from earnings volatility, dividend
cuts, liquidity issues, and solvency issues.
Loan cash flows from each commercial mortgage loan pool and
their corresponding distribution to each of our CMBS may be
affected by numerous assumptions and variables including:
|
|
|
(i) changes in our estimate of the timing and/or amount of
credit losses on the commercial mortgage loans (credit risk),
which are a function of: |
|
|
|
|
|
the percentage of mortgage loans that experience a default
either during the mortgage term or at maturity (referred to in
the industry as a default percentage); |
|
|
|
the recovery period represented by the time that elapses between
the default of a commercial mortgage loan and the subsequent
foreclosure and liquidation of the corresponding real estate (a
period of time referred to in the industry as a lag); |
|
|
|
the amount of mortgage loan principal lost as a result of the
deficiency in the liquidation proceeds resulting from
foreclosure and sale of the underlying collateral property
(referred to in the industry as a loss severity); and |
|
|
|
other costs related to credit including trust expenses and
disposition costs related to the loans; |
|
|
|
(ii) changes in cash flows related to principal losses and
interest shortfalls, as well as our estimate of the timing and
amount of potential recoveries of such shortfalls, based on our
overall expected loss estimate for our CMBS, the fair value of
which is determined using a loss adjusted yield to maturity; |
|
|
(iii) the amount and timing of principal and interest
advances made by the servicers for distribution to the
CMBS; and |
|
|
(iv) the expected performance of the properties during the
resolution period. |
In addition to residential loan CES and commercial CES, the
Acacia entities we also sponsor own investment-grade and other
securities (typically rated AAA through B, and in a second-loss
position or better, or otherwise effectively more senior in the
credit structure as compared to a residential loan CES or
commercial loan CES or equivalent held by us) issued by
residential securitization entities that are
87
sponsored by others. Generally, we do not control or influence
the underwriting, servicing, management, or loss mitigation
efforts with respect to these assets. Some of the securities
Acacia owns are backed by sub-prime residential loans that have
substantially higher risk characteristics than prime-quality
loans. These lower-quality residential loans can be expected to
have higher rates of delinquency and loss, and losses to Acacia
(and thus Redwood interest in) could occur. Most of
Acacias securities are reported as part of our
consolidated securities portfolio on our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Acacia has also acquired investment-grade BB-rated, and
B-rated residential loan securities from the Sequoia
securitization entities we have sponsored. The probability of
incurring a credit loss on these securities is less than the
probability of loss from first-loss residential loan CES
and commercial loan CES, as cumulative credit losses within
a pool of securitized loans would have to exceed the principal
value of the subordinated CES (and exhaust any other credit
protections) before losses would be allocated to the Acacia
securities. If the pools of residential and commercial loans
underlying these securities were to experience poor credit
results, however, these Acacia securities could have their
credit ratings down-graded, could suffer losses in market value,
or could experience principal losses. If any of these events
occurs, it would likely reduce our returns from the Acacia CDO
equity securities we have acquired and may reduce our ability to
sponsor Acacia transactions in the future.
Redwoods debt was $162 million at September 30,
2005. This debt was secured by mostly investment grade
securities accumulated as inventory for sale to Acacia
securitization entities. We also have unsecured lines of credit
available that was not drawn upon as of September 30, 2005.
Covenants associated with a portion of our short-term debt
generally relate to our tangible net worth, liquidity reserves,
and leverage requirements. We have not had, nor do we currently
anticipate having, any problems in meeting these covenants.
However, many factors, including ones external to us, may affect
our ability to meet these covenants and may affect our liquidity
in the future.
Our ability to sponsor securitizations depends upon being able
to access the short-term debt markets to fund assets acquired as
inventory prior to sale to sponsored ABS securitization
entities. If short-term debt was not available in the future, we
would likely need to cease our securitization sponsorship
activities, and a potentially attractive source of new assets
for our permanent assets portfolio and a source of gain-on-sale
profits (for tax and cash) for our taxable subsidiaries would be
lost during that time. Assets consolidated onto our balance
sheet from ABS entities would generally not be affected by a
lack of liquidity in the debt markets (or changes in the asset
market values) since these assets are already sold to and
financed to maturity by the ABS entity. If sales to ABS entities
became an unavailable or unattractive exit strategy due to
issues within securitization markets, and if we cannot extend
our short-term financing arrangements, assets held as inventory
for future securitization and financed with debt would have to
be sold, most likely at a loss under those circumstances.
Proceeds from any such sales may not be sufficient to repay debt
balances.
At this time, we see no material negative trends that we believe
would affect our access to sufficient short-term borrowings or
would affect the valuation of the assets we use to secure these
borrowings. We plan to continue to utilize short-term borrowings
to accumulate real estate loans and securities as inventory
prior to sale to ABS entities.
We own ABS certificates issued from ABS securitization entities
(such as Sequoia and Acacia) that were sponsored by us. Payments
of principal and interest by these entities to the holders of
ABS issued by these entities are not the legal obligation of
Redwood. We could lose the entire investment we have made in the
securities we acquire from these entities, but we will not be
required to provide liquidity in the event of a default of one
of these entities on the entities asset-backed securities
obligations.
In some cases, as the seller of assets to these entities prior
to securitization, we have the obligation under representation
and warranty provisions to repurchase assets from the entities
in limited circumstances such as fraud. We have obtained,
however, similar representations and warranties from the
companies from whom we acquired loans. As a result, our
liquidity risk from representations and
88
warranties should be minimal as long as our counter-parties meet
their obligations. We believe our sponsorship of these entities,
and our ownership of interests in these entities, is unlikely to
be a source of potential liquidity risk for us.
At September 30, 2005, we had $164 million
unrestricted cash and unpledged liquid assets (101% of our
short-term debt balances) available to meet potential liquidity
needs. Increases or decreases in this ratio at different balance
sheet dates primarily are the result of the timing of sale of
assets to securitization entities. While we anticipate
maintaining a strong liquidity position, our ratio of liquid
assets to short-term debt will fluctuate as we continue to fund
our real estate loans and other securities with short-term
borrowings prior to securitization. At this time, we see no
indications or materially negative trends that we believe would
be likely to cause us a liquidity shortage.
Net liquidity at September 30, 2005 was $334 million.
Net liquidity is the amount of unrestricted cash we would have
had on hand if we had sold all the loans and securities we are
accumulating for future sale at their estimated market value
($332 million on September 30, 2005) and used the
proceeds to pay off Redwoods debt ($162 million on
September 30, 2005). Net liquidity is available for cash
needs such as dividend distributions, acquiring new permanent
assets, and supporting our securitization efforts.
Under our internal risk-adjusted capital guidelines,
$250 million of this net liquidity at September 30,
2005 was excess liquidity available to support growth in our
business. The remainder of the net liquidity balance was
required under our risk-adjusted capital guidelines to support
our current and projected sales inventory and other operating
needs and liquidity risks (such as the risk of requiring cash to
post as margin for interest rate agreements if interest rates
move adversely for these agreements).
Our strategy is to maintain an asset/liability posture on a
consolidated basis that is effectively match-funded so that the
achievement of our long-term goals is unlikely to be affected by
changes in interest rates. This includes assets owned and the
ABS issued by consolidated securitization entities, to the
extent that any mismatches within the entities could affect our
cash flows. We use interest-rate agreements so that the interest
rate characteristics of the ABS issued by consolidated
securitization entities, as adjusted for outstanding interest
rate agreements, closely matches the interest rate
characteristics of the assets owned by those entities.
At September 30, 2005, we consolidated $18.0 billion
adjustable-rate ABS collateralized by adjustable-rate assets and
$0.2 billion fixed/hybrid rate ABS collateralized by
consolidated fixed/hybrid rate assets. For interest rate
matching purposes, these assets and liabilities are closely
matched. We owned the IO security, CDO equity, or similar
security that economically benefits from the spread between the
assets and the liabilities of the issuing securitization entity
on a portion ($13.3 billion) of these consolidated
entities. These assets and liabilities are closely matched
economically and to the degree there is a mismatch we attempt to
reduce this mismatch through the use of interest rate
agreements. For the remainder of the consolidated ABS entities
($5.4 billion), we do not own the security that benefits
from the asset/liability spread. Thus, spread changes between
the yield of these assets and the cost of these liabilities do
not affect our economic profits or cash flow (although timing
differences for those assets and liabilities may cause GAAP
earnings volatility). Thus, we do not utilize interest rate
agreements with respect to interest rate mismatches that may
exist between these assets and liabilities on these other
consolidated ABS entities.
The remainder of our consolidated assets at September 30,
2005 ($9 million six-month adjustable-rate assets,
$53 million short-term fixed rate assets, $806 million
hybrid and fixed-rate assets, and $148 million non-earning
assets) were effectively funded for interest rate matching
purposes with equity.
89
The table below summarizes the matching of our reported assets,
as adjusted for our interest rate agreements and other hedging
instruments. There was no significant change in our position
since the beginning of the year. Even if our assets and
liabilities are effectively matched in an economic sense,
volatility in reported earnings on a quarter-to-quarter basis
could result from changes in interest rates.
|
|
|
Table 22 Asset/ Liability
Matching at September 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
One-Month | |
|
Six-Month | |
|
Fixed/ | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
|
Liabilities | |
|
|
Asset | |
|
LIBOR | |
|
LIBOR | |
|
Hybrid | |
|
Bearing | |
|
|
|
and | |
Asset Type |
|
Amount | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Equity | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (unrestricted)
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
One-Month LIBOR
|
|
|
5,649 |
|
|
|
5,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,649 |
|
Six-Month LIBOR
|
|
|
11,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
11,965 |
|
Other ARM
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
Fixed/ Hybrid< 1yr*
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Fixed/ Hybrid> 1yr
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
1,157 |
|
Non-Earning Assets
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
19,506 |
|
|
$ |
6,018 |
|
|
$ |
11,956 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
|
$ |
19,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Projected principal receipts on fixed-rate and hybrid rate
assets over the next twelve months. |
|
|
|
Asset/ Liability Matching at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non | |
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
One-Month | |
|
Six-Month | |
|
Fixed/ | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
|
Liabilities | |
|
|
Asset | |
|
LIBOR | |
|
LIBOR | |
|
Hybrid | |
|
Bearing | |
|
|
|
and | |
Asset Type |
|
Amount | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Liabilities | |
|
Equity | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (unrestricted)
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
One-Month LIBOR
|
|
|
6,314 |
|
|
|
6,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,314 |
|
Six-Month LIBOR
|
|
|
16,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16,974 |
|
Other ARM
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Fixed/ Hybrid< 1yr*
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Fixed/ Hybrid> 1yr
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
Non-Earning Assets
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
24,778 |
|
|
$ |
6,656 |
|
|
$ |
16,959 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
864 |
|
|
$ |
24,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Projected principal receipts on fixed-rate and hybrid rate
assets over the next twelve months. |
We seek to maintain an asset/liability posture that benefits
from investments in prepayment-sensitive assets while limiting
the risk of adverse prepayment fluctuations to an amount that,
in most circumstances, can be absorbed by our capital base while
still allowing us to make regular dividend payments.
We believe there is a relatively low likelihood of prepayment
risk events occurring within our securitization inventory
assets, as we typically sell these loans within a few months of
acquiring them. However, changes in prepayment forecasts by
market participants could affect the market prices for ABS
(especially IO securities) sold by these securitization
entities, and thus could affect the gain on sale for economic
and tax purposes (not for GAAP purposes) that we seek to earn
from sponsoring these securitizations.
90
There are prepayment risks in the assets and associated
liabilities consolidated on our balance sheets. In general,
discount securities (such as CES) benefit from faster prepayment
rates on the underlying real estate loans and premium securities
(such as IO securities) benefit from slower prepayments on the
underlying loans. Our largest current potential exposure to
increases in prepayment rates is from short-term residential ARM
loans. However, as of September 30, 2005, our premium
balances on IO securities backed by ARM loans are less than our
discount balances on residential CES backed by ARM loans. As a
result, we believe that as of September 30, 2005, we are
slightly biased in favor of faster prepayment speeds with
respect to the long-term economic effect of ARM prepayments.
However, in the short-term, for GAAP, changes in ARM prepayment
rates could cause GAAP earnings volatility.
ARM prepayment rates are driven by many factors, one of which is
the steepness of the yield curve. As the yield curve flattens
(short-term interest rates rise relative to longer-term interest
rates), ARM prepayments typically increase. Prepayment rates on
the ARMs underlying the Redwood-sponsored Sequoia
securitizations increased from near 25% to over 45% over the
last year as the yield curve flattened.
Through our ownership of discount residential loan CES
backed by fixed rate and hybrid residential loans, we generally
benefit from faster prepayments on fixed and hybrid loans.
Prepayment rates for these loans typically accelerate as medium
and long-term interest rates decline.
Prepayments can also affect our credit results and risks. Credit
risks for the CES we own are reduced each time a loan prepays.
All other factors being equal, faster prepayment rates should
reduce our credit risks on our existing portfolio.
Prepayments affect GAAP earnings in the near-term primarily
through the timing of the amortization of purchase premium and
discount. Amortization income from discount assets may not
necessarily offset amortization expense from premium assets, and
vice-versa. Variations in current and projected prepayment rates
for individual assets and changes in short-term interest rates
(as they affect projected coupons on adjustable rate mortgages
and thus change effective yield calculations on certain loans)
may cause net premium amortization expense or net discount
amortization income to vary substantially from quarter to
quarter. In addition, the timing of premium expense on assets
may not always match the timing of the premium taken to income
on liabilities even when the underlying assets are the same
(i.e., the prepayments are identical).
|
|
|
Reinvestment Risk and Competition |
Reinvestment risk is the risk that the assets we acquire in the
future (to maintain our asset size and effective capital
utilization as we reinvest principal payments received from our
current assets) will not be as attractive as the assets we own
today. This is one of the most potent risks we face.
Although many of our securities do not currently receive
principal payments as the underlying loan pools pay down (they
are temporarily locked out), the eventual receipt of principal
payments is accelerated by faster prepayments. In addition,
residential CES typically become callable when the current
balance of the underlying loans pays down to 10% of the original
balance. Faster prepayments generally lead to quicker principal
repayments and call income that will need to be reinvested.
Most of our existing assets have an expected remaining average
life of three to ten years. As a result, our short-term results
(one to three years) will likely be determined primarily by our
current portfolio of assets. Our longer-term results (and our
ability to maintain regular dividend payments in the long term)
will be determined primarily by assets we have yet to acquire or
create and actions we have yet to take.
During 2004 and the first nine months of 2005, we experienced
increased competition (especially from banks, but also from Wall
Street conduits, REITs, hedge funds, and other financial
institutions) to acquire assets at the same time that
originations of new assets were declining. We expect this
increased level of competition to continue. The result is
generally lower expected yields for new
91
investment assets and lower expected securitization profit
margins for sales of inventory to sponsored securitizations. As
a result, we expect that our reported GAAP earnings per share
and our special dividends per share are more likely than not to
decline over the next few years from recent levels as our
current assets are paid down and replaced with new assets with a
lower yield potential.
At September 30, 2005, we reported on a consolidated basis
$2.5 billion assets that were marked-to-market through our
balance sheet (i.e., available for sale securities) but not
through our income statement. Of these assets, 59% had
adjustable-rate coupons, 18% had hybrid coupon rates, and the
remaining 23% had fixed coupon rates. Many of these assets are
credit-sensitive. Market value fluctuations of these assets can
affect the balance of our stockholders equity base. Market
value fluctuations for our securities can affect not only our
earnings and book value, but also our liquidity, especially to
the extent these assets may be funded with short-term borrowings
prior to securitization.
Most of our consolidated real estate assets are loans accounted
for as held-for-investment and reported at cost. Although these
loans have generally been sold to Sequoia entities at
securitization and, thus, changes in the market value of the
loans do not have an impact on our liquidity in the long-term,
changes in market value during the accumulation period (while
these loans are funded with debt) may have a short-term effect
on our liquidity.
We use interest rate agreements to manage certain interest rate
risks. Our interest rate agreements are reported at market
value, with any periodic changes reported through either our
income statement or in our balance sheet. Adverse changes in the
market values of our interest rate agreements (which would
generally be caused by falling interest rates) may require us to
devote additional amounts of cash to margin calls.
Virtually all of our consolidated assets and liabilities are
financial in nature. As a result, changes in interest rates, and
other factors drive our performance far more than does
inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily
correlate with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates.
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP
and, as a REIT; our dividends must equal at least 90% of our net
REIT taxable income as calculated for tax purposes. In each
case, our activities and balance sheet are measured with
reference to historical cost or fair market value without
considering inflation.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of certain assets and liabilities at the date
of the consolidated financial statements and the reported
amounts of certain revenues and expenses during the reported
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
critical accounting policies and how changes in estimates might
affect our financial results and statements are discussed below.
Management discusses the ongoing development and selection of
these critical accounting policies with the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors.
When recognizing revenue on consolidated earning assets, we
employ the interest method and determine an effective yield to
account for purchase premiums, discounts, and other net
capitalized fees or costs associated with purchasing and
financing real estate loans and securities. For consolidated
real estate loans, the interest method is applied as prescribed
under FAS 91. For loans acquired prior to July 1,
2004, the interest method or effective yield is determined using
interest rates as they change over time and future anticipated
principal prepayments. For loans acquired subsequent to that
date, the
92
initial interest rate of the loans and future anticipated
principal prepayments are used in determining the effective
yield. For our consolidated securities, the interest method to
determine an effective yield is applied as prescribed under
FAS 91 or EITF 99-20 using anticipated principal
prepayments. The use of these methods requires us to project
cash flows over the remaining life of each asset. These
projections include assumptions about interest rates, prepayment
rates, timing and amount of credit losses, when certain tests
will be met that may allow for changes in payments made under
the structure of securities, estimates regarding the likelihood
and timing of calls of securities at par, and other factors. We
review our cash flow projections on an ongoing basis and monitor
these projections based on input and analyses received from
external sources, internal models, and our own judgment and
experience. We constantly review our assumptions and make
adjustments to the cash flows as deemed necessary. There can be
no assurance that our assumptions used to generate future cash
flows, or the current periods yield for each asset, will
prove to be accurate.
Our consolidated residential loan CES have
below-investment-grade credit ratings and represent subordinated
interests in pools of high-quality jumbo residential real estate
loans. As a result of the relatively high credit risks of these
investments, we are able to purchase CES at a discount to
principal (par) value. A portion of the purchase discount
is subsequently accreted as interest income under the interest
method while the remaining portion of the purchase discount is
considered as a form of credit protection. The amount of credit
protection is based upon our assessment of various factors
affecting our assets, including economic conditions,
characteristics of the underlying loans, delinquency status,
past performance of similar loans, and external credit
protection. We use a variety of internal and external credit
risk analyses, cash flow modeling, and portfolio analytical
tools to assist us in our assessments.
Under the interest method, decreases in our credit loss
assumptions embedded in our cash flow forecasts could result in
increasing yields being recognized from residential
loan CES. In addition, faster-than-anticipated prepayment
rates would also tend to increase realized yields over the
remaining life of an asset. In contrast, increases in our credit
loss assumptions and/or slower than anticipated prepayment rates
could result in lower yields being recognized under the interest
method and may represent an other-than-temporary impairment
under GAAP, in which case the asset may be written down to its
fair value through our Consolidated Statements of Income.
Redwood applies APB 21 and APB 12 in determining its
periodic amortization for the premium on its debt, including the
issuance of IO securities and deferred bond issuance cost
(DBIC). We arrive at a periodic interest cost that represents a
level effective rate on the sum of the face amount of the ABS
issued and (plus or minus) the unamortized premium or discount
at the beginning of each period. The difference between the
periodic interest cost so calculated and the nominal interest on
the outstanding amount of the ABS issued is the amount of
periodic amortization. Prepayment assumptions used in modeling
the underlying assets to determine accretion or amortization of
discount or premium are used in developing the liability cash
flows that are used to determine ABS issued premium amortization
and DBIC expenses.
|
|
|
Establishing Valuations and Accounting for Changes in
Valuations |
We estimate fair value of assets and interest rate agreements
using available market information and other appropriate
valuation methodologies. We believe estimates we use reflect
market values we may be able to receive should we choose to sell
assets. Our estimates are inherently subjective in nature and
involve matters of uncertainty and judgment in interpreting
relevant market and other data. Many factors are necessary to
estimate market values, including, but not limited to, interest
rates, prepayment rates, amount and timing of credit losses,
supply and demand, liquidity, and other market factors. We apply
these factors to each of our assets, as appropriate, in order to
determine market values. Residential real estate loans
held-for-sale are generally valued on a pool basis while
commercial real estate loans held-for-sale and securities
available-for-sale are valued on a loan-specific basis.
93
In addition to our valuation processes, we are active acquirers
and occasional sellers of assets on our consolidated balance
sheets. Thus, we believe that we have the ability to understand
and determine changes in assumptions that are taking place in
the marketplace and make appropriate changes in our assumptions
for valuing assets. In addition, we use third party sources to
validate our valuation estimates.
Valuation adjustments to real estate loans held-for-sale are
reported as net recognized losses and valuation adjustments on
our Consolidated Statements of Income in the applicable period
of the adjustment. Adjustments to the fair value of securities
available-for-sale are reported through our Consolidated Balance
Sheets as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income
in stockholders equity within the cumulative unrealized
gains and losses classified as accumulated other comprehensive
income. The exception to this treatment of securities
available-for-sale is when a specific impairment is identified
or a decrease in fair value results from a decline in estimated
cash flows that is considered other-than-temporary. In such
cases, the resulting decrease in fair value is recorded in net
recognized gains (losses) and valuation adjustments on our
Consolidated Statements of Income in the applicable period of
the adjustment.
We review our fair value calculations on an ongoing basis. We
monitor the critical performance factors for each loan and
security. Our expectations of future performance are shaped by
input and analyses received from external sources, internal
models, and our own judgment and experience. We review our
existing assumptions relative to our and the markets
expectations of future events and make adjustments to the
assumptions that may change our market values. Changes in
perceptions regarding future events can have a material impact
on the value of our assets. Should such changes or other factors
result in significant changes in the market values, our net
income and book value could be adversely affected.
There are certain other valuation estimates we make that have an
impact on current period income and expense. One such area is
the valuation of certain equity grants. For equity awards
granted prior to January 1, 2003, we use the principles
provided by APB 25, Interest on Receivables and
Payables. For all subsequent awards, the provision under
FAS 123 apply. Furthermore, FAS 123R will become the
appropriate principle effective January 1, 2006.
For consolidated residential and commercial real estate loans
held-for-investment, we establish and maintain credit reserves
that we believe represent probable credit losses that will
result from inherent losses existing in our consolidated
residential and commercial real estate loans held for investment
as of the date of the financial statements. The reserves for
credit losses are adjusted by taking provisions for credit
losses recorded as a reduction in interest income on residential
and commercial real estate loans on our Consolidated Statements
of Income. The reserves consist of estimates of specific loan
impairment and estimates of collective losses on pools of loans
with similar characteristics.
To calculate the credit reserve for credit losses for
residential real estate loans and HELOCs, we determine inherent
losses by applying loss factors (default, the timing of
defaults, and the loss severity upon default) that can be
specifically applied to each pool of loans. The following
factors are considered and applied in such determination:
|
|
|
|
|
On-going analysis of the pool of loans including,
but not limited to, the age of the loans, underwriting
standards, business climate, economic conditions, geographic
considerations, and other observable data |
|
|
|
Historical loss rates and past performance of similar loans |
|
|
|
Relevant environmental factors |
|
|
|
Relevant market research and publicly available third-party
reference loss rates |
|
|
|
Trends in delinquencies and charge-offs |
94
|
|
|
|
|
Effects in changes in credit concentrations |
|
|
|
Prepayment assumptions |
Once we determine the applicable default rate, the timing of
defaults, and the severity of loss upon the default, we estimate
the expected losses of each pool of loans over their expected
lives. We then estimate the timing of these losses and the
losses probable to occur over an effective loss confirmation
period. This period is defined as the range of time between the
probable occurrence of a credit loss (such as the initial
deterioration of the borrowers financial condition) and
the confirmation of that loss (the actual charge-off of the
loan). The losses expected to occur within the effective loss
confirmation period are the basis of our credit reserves because
we believe those losses exist as of the reported date of the
financial statements. We re-evaluate the level of our credit
reserves on at least a quarterly basis and record provision,
charge-offs, and recoveries monthly. The credit reserve for
credit losses for the commercial real estate loans includes a
detailed analysis of each loan and underlying property. The
following factors are considered and applied in such
determination.
|
|
|
|
|
On-going analysis of each individual loan including,
but not limited to, the age of the loans, underwriting
standards, business climate, economic conditions, geographic
considerations, and other observable data; |
|
|
|
On-going evaluation of fair values of collateral using current
appraisals and other valuations |
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow analysis |
|
|
|
Perfection of security interest |
|
|
|
Borrowers ability to meet obligations |
If residential loan becomes REO or a commercial loan becomes
impaired, or loans are reclassified as held-for-sale, specific
valuations are primarily based on analyses of the underlying
collateral.
|
|
|
Accounting for Derivative Instruments (Interest Rate
Agreements) |
We use derivative instruments to manage certain risks such as
market value risk and interest rate risk. Currently, the
majority of our interest rate agreements are used to match the
duration of liabilities to assets. The derivative instruments we
employ include, but are not limited to, interest rate swaps,
interest rate options, options on swaps, futures contracts,
options on futures contracts, options on forward purchases, and
other similar derivatives. We collectively refer to these
derivative instruments as interest rate agreements.
On the date an interest rate agreement is entered into, we
designate each interest rate agreement under GAAP as (1) a
hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or of
an unrecognized firm commitment (fair value hedge), (2) a
hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash
flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or
liability (cash flow hedge), or (3) held for trading
(trading instrument).
We currently elect to account for the bulk of our interest rate
agreements as cash flow hedges; the remainder are accounted for
as trading instruments. We record these derivatives at their
estimated fair market values, and record changes in their fair
values in accumulated other comprehensive income on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets. These amounts are reclassified to
our Consolidated Statements of Income over the effective hedge
period as the hedged item affects earnings. Any ineffective
portions of these cash flow hedges are included in our
Consolidated Statements of Income, and any changes in the market
value on our hedges designated as trading instruments.
We may discontinue GAAP hedge accounting prospectively when we
determine that (1) the derivative is no longer effective in
offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged
item; (2) it is no longer probable that the forecasted
transaction will occur; (3) a hedged firm commitment no
longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or
(4) designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is
no longer appropriate. A discontinued hedge may result in
recognition of certain gains or losses
95
immediately through our Consolidated Statements of Income, or
such gains or losses may be accreted from accumulated other
comprehensive income into earnings over the original hedging
period.
|
|
Item 3. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK |
Discussions about our quantitative and qualitative disclosures
about market risk are included in our Managements
Discussion and Analysis included herein.
|
|
Item 4. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as that term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of
September 30, 2005, which is the end of the period covered
by this 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
There has been no change in Redwoods internal control over
financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation
required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15 that occurred during the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, Redwoods internal
control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 2. |
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Maximum Number of | |
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as | |
|
Shares Available for | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Part of Publicly | |
|
Purchase Under | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price Paid | |
|
Announced | |
|
Publicly Announced | |
Period |
|
Purchased | |
|
per Share | |
|
Programs | |
|
Programs | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
July 1 July 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1 August 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1 September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
No shares were purchased for the three months ended
September 30, 2005. The Company announced stock repurchase
plans on various dates from September 1997 through November 1999
for the total repurchase of 7,455,000 shares. None of these
plans have expiration dates on repurchases. Shares totaling
1,000,000 are currently available for repurchase under those
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 11.1 |
|
|
Computation of Earnings per Share for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2005 (filed herewith) |
|
|
Exhibit 31.1 |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith) |
|
|
Exhibit 31.2 |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith) |
|
|
Exhibit 32.1 |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished
herewith) |
|
|
Exhibit 32.2 |
|
|
Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished
herewith) |
96
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REDWOOD TRUST, INC. |
|
Dated: November 3, 2005 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Douglas B. Hansen
------------------------------
Douglas B. Hansen
President
(authorized officer of registrant) |
|
Dated: November 3, 2005 |
|
By: |
|
/s/ Harold F. Zagunis
------------------------------
Harold F. Zagunis
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Controller, Treasurer, and Secretary
(principal financial and accounting officer) |
97